You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #32: Try to answer your questions [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Zaphod 36 Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Try to answer your questions
1) why couldn't the crash site have been made by a 757-sized drone?

There was no airplane parts on the crash site. If the plane came from southeast, then normally there must be some airplane parts(especially the tail)in the field to the Rollock direction. If there was airplane parts they would publicize the photos, because this photos are very good stuff for the officially version.
There is also no accumulation of earth in this direction.
The witnesses in Boswell saw the plane at 2000 feet. Stacey Tayler and Fritz talked about 6000 feet descending. I think UA 93 was heading to Johnstown in his final minutes after the shoot down and 180-Return(Fritz also mentioned). It was descending from 6000 to 2000 feet, overflewing the indian lake area and just gliding.

2) how could a missile from the white plane mimic the crash site? Where did the airplane parts come from? Were they pre-planted?
There was no airplane parts, just scrap from Rollock nearby(scrap-recycling company). They digged the crater before and planted the scrap(and other things) inside. They digged the furrows too.
On an airphoto shortly after the "crash" you can see a blue container near the crater. Why was there a blue container when there was no building site(coal mine) on this location? I guess there was a building site shortly before 09/11...

3) why was the crash site faked in the first place?
It was the officially crash site and a red herring one and all.
The real crash of flight 93 was at another coal mine. It was planned to do both things simultaneously. But this project was disturbed by the interceptor. So the missile hit the crater 3 minutes too late.

4) What exactly was the C-130 operating by remote control, since it wasn't around for much of flight 93?

A remote pilot, two sensor operators, support staff, along with a ground control station carried by a C-130 transport plane, are required to operate a Predator. A group of SWARM planes will be managed by a single person using equipment as commonplace as a PDA.

Stanley Hilton mentioned the crashing planes was remoted by cyclops system. Probably the C-130 was operating with cyclops.
Flight 93 departed with all hostages of the four hijacked planes with destination to Afghanistan. But the final destination of the plotters are a coal mine nearby. They took control of the plane with Home Run("Flight Path Change Request") and remoted Flight 93 with cyclops to the coal mine.
The official path of Flight 93 was a red herring and done with another aircraft(UA91?)

5) You don't think there was any plane-swap operation for flight 93?
I think, UA93 and UA175 landed in Johnstown(around 09:30) on the way to Cleveland. A third plane (Buffets plane or UA91?) continued the official Flight Path.
This plane landed in Johnstown(Buffets plane landed in Johnstown!) and was swapped by the remoted UA93 from Johnstown.
I found also this:
Shortly before it went down, another call was made to the Westmoreland County 911 center from a Mount Pleasant Township resident who said he could see a large plane flying low and banking from side to side.

Why is the banking plane seen near Mount Pleasant, north of Johnstown? Was it seen shortly after the departure in Johnstown in north direction? In which direction the planes starting at Johnstown airport?

"John Hugya, an administrative assistant to U.S. Rep John Murtha, said *he has been told that the plane initially flew over Cambria County Airport in Johnstown.* There was no communication from the plane, and the plane was not responding to Cleveland Center, which is how they knew it was one of the hijacked planes."
This is quotet from your last posts. The overflew of Johnstown is in contradiction to the official version. Maybe the plane was not overflew Johnstown, it landed there.

6) Is there any evidence for all four 9/11 planes being at Johnstown airport? If so, what is it? I have never seen it.

No, but it is strange enough that Bergen Record wrote about the evacuation of Johnstown at 09:20. After this evacuation there was no independent people, who can witness the landing of the hijacked plane.
The day before there was a drill named "Amalgam Virgo"? What do you think about that?

7) what happened to flight 93 after it was hit by a missile? I have a hard time believing the whole plane blew up over the lake-- the lake is not that big.
It made a return after it was on the run unsuccessfully. It was gliding and descending to the abandoned, prepared coal mine out of the way in this area. It nosedived in this coal mine.
They borrowed the CVR, maybe some DNA or mostly of the plane. Or the whole plane was buried in the coal mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Proof that official UA 93 story is a hoax John Doe II  Apr-15-05 01:57 PM   #0 
  - Wow  RBHam   Apr-16-05 02:32 AM   #1 
  - Conclusion?  paulthompson   Apr-17-05 01:17 PM   #2 
  - I have to respectfully disagree  John Doe II   Apr-17-05 01:29 PM   #3 
  - I updated my above message  paulthompson   Apr-17-05 01:37 PM   #4 
     - The article also deals with U-turn  John Doe II   Apr-17-05 01:46 PM   #5 
        - I'm sorry...  paulthompson   Apr-17-05 02:39 PM   #6 
           - Two planes  John Doe II   Apr-17-05 03:16 PM   #8 
              - reply  paulthompson   Apr-18-05 01:38 PM   #11 
                 - Answer to your questions  John Doe II   Apr-19-05 03:40 PM   #16 
                    - Precising the position of the plane from northwest  John Doe II   Apr-29-05 03:22 PM   #24 
                       - Precision  John Doe II   May-11-05 02:54 PM   #26 
                          - In view of these posts  Andre II   Oct-24-06 02:40 PM   #49 
  - The maneuver  Zaphod 36   Apr-17-05 02:40 PM   #7 
  - Hi Zaphod  paulthompson   Apr-18-05 02:01 PM   #12 
     - From New Baltimore to Lowery  Zaphod 36   Apr-18-05 04:58 PM   #14 
        - A fireball going up several HUNDRED FEET into the air from the crash???  spooked911   Apr-24-05 09:09 AM   #21 
        - Fire  John Doe II   Apr-24-05 11:44 AM   #23 
        - Interesting idea. But how on earth was the crash scene simulated?  spooked911   Apr-24-05 09:13 AM   #22 
  - How  MrSammo1   Apr-20-05 12:36 AM   #17 
  - "To me", "I think", "It seems"  medienanalyse   Apr-18-05 05:10 AM   #9 
  - reply  paulthompson   Apr-18-05 01:18 PM   #10 
     - U- turns and muddy waters  medienanalyse   Apr-19-05 05:34 AM   #15 
     - At this point I think Paul's scenario is the most likely, but ...  philb   May-21-05 10:36 PM   #41 
  - My 2 cents  woody b   Apr-18-05 03:18 PM   #13 
  - My 2 dollars (raising the stake)  woody b   Apr-20-05 03:33 PM   #18 
     - Sorry, I overlooked your answer!  John Doe II   Apr-23-05 02:14 PM   #19 
  - Clearly the official story of 9/11 is wrong in many respects--  spooked911   Apr-24-05 09:02 AM   #20 
  - Inside job  John Doe II   May-03-05 05:24 AM   #25 
  - I am trying to work out these flight 93 scenarios again. I think this is  spooked911   May-20-05 02:13 PM   #27 
  - The scenario  Zaphod 36   May-20-05 06:28 PM   #28 
     - Zaphod 36  demodewd   May-20-05 07:02 PM   #29 
     - Thanks for your wonderful answers, BUT I do have a few questions  spooked911   May-20-05 10:41 PM   #30 
        - Try to answer your questions  Zaphod 36   May-21-05 07:53 AM   #32 
           - According to Longman, there was a front landing gear found near the crash  spooked911   May-21-05 12:21 PM   #33 
              - My suspicion  Zaphod 36   May-21-05 02:04 PM   #34 
                 - whaddaya think?  demodewd   May-21-05 04:52 PM   #35 
                 - The hijacking  Zaphod 36   May-21-05 06:27 PM   #36 
                    - Wow, I'm really impressed with the level which you have this figured out!  spooked911   May-21-05 06:58 PM   #37 
                    - other details  demodewd   May-21-05 07:12 PM   #38 
                       - Planes to Afghanistan  Zaphod 36   May-22-05 05:09 AM   #42 
                       - It makes sense to me that the hijackers thought they would hijack planes  spooked911   May-22-05 10:54 AM   #44 
                       - Is this gassing what Ed Felt was referring to?  spooked911   May-22-05 10:55 AM   #45 
                 - About "home run"  spooked911   May-21-05 07:13 PM   #39 
                    - Home Run and Cyclops  Zaphod 36   May-22-05 05:30 AM   #43 
  - Moreover, how does this story fit in with the flight 93 story?  spooked911   May-20-05 11:11 PM   #31 
  - I just noticed something very interesting in Todd Beamer's call  spooked911   May-21-05 10:26 PM   #40 
  - And ......  John Doe II   Jun-22-05 06:29 AM   #46 
  - Another reason  Andre II   Dec-19-05 04:31 PM   #47 
  - In view of  Andre II   Apr-07-06 03:03 AM   #48 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC