spooked911
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 25. I have tried -- using Flight Sim |
| -The improbability of piloting UA175 |
spooked911 |
Nov-27-11 05:26 PM |
#0 |
 -
"Why"? |
zappaman |
Nov-27-11 06:04 PM |
#1 |
| -
I don't know. |
Larry L. Burks |
Nov-27-11 06:33 PM |
#2 |
 -
Thanks Larry! |
zappaman |
Nov-27-11 07:45 PM |
#3 |
 -
Someone has GOT to look into the abject failure of the chemtrails program |
jberryhill |
Nov-28-11 12:17 AM |
#6 |
| -
Larry, how is your energy machine coming along? |
jberryhill |
Nov-27-11 09:49 PM |
#5 |
| -
I don't believe the OP was saying there were planes (nt) |
T S Justly |
Nov-29-11 01:39 PM |
#20 |
| -
Ah, spooked, enjoying the holiday weekend? |
jberryhill |
Nov-27-11 09:44 PM |
#4 |
| -
Texas sharpshooter fallacy coming through! |
KDLarsen |
Nov-28-11 02:01 AM |
#7 |
| -
"correct for crosswind" |
spooked911 |
Nov-28-11 06:56 AM |
#8 |
| -
if it wasn't planned, then in what sense would it be "precise"? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Nov-28-11 07:37 AM |
#9 |
| -
"precise" in the sense of the visible execution and end result |
spooked911 |
Nov-28-11 12:01 PM |
#10 |
| -
say whaa? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Nov-28-11 06:32 PM |
#16 |
| -
you're hopeless |
spooked911 |
Nov-28-11 07:51 PM |
#17 |
| -
if you had better arguments, you'd get better results |
OnTheOtherHand |
Nov-29-11 11:57 AM |
#19 |
| -
I may not have taken account of every rebuttal, but certainly I pointed out the power-dive rebuttal |
spooked911 |
Dec-02-11 09:47 AM |
#28 |
| -
wake up |
OnTheOtherHand |
Dec-02-11 11:27 AM |
#31 |
| -
are you a lawyer in real life? |
spooked911 |
Dec-03-11 06:53 PM |
#33 |
| -
I think you should stop impugning me and spend more time on your posts |
OnTheOtherHand |
Dec-03-11 07:44 PM |
#34 |
| -
funny, coming from someone who endlessly impugns me |
spooked911 |
Dec-04-11 08:53 AM |
#36 |
| -
I try very hard to be patient |
OnTheOtherHand |
Dec-04-11 09:31 AM |
#38 |
| -
On your general points, I understand your sentiments, and thanks for the anecdote. |
spooked911 |
Dec-05-11 01:25 PM |
#43 |
| -
that is clear, but not at all convincing |
OnTheOtherHand |
Dec-06-11 08:01 AM |
#44 |
| -
do you think the "regulatory limit" of Vmo is arbitrary or for a reason? |
spooked911 |
Dec-06-11 12:28 PM |
#45 |
| -
so a bullshit Socratic number is the best thing you've got? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Dec-06-11 01:14 PM |
#47 |
| -
I've answered plenty of your questions... jeesh |
spooked911 |
Dec-07-11 07:24 PM |
#54 |
| -
spooked, I could not make it more clear |
OnTheOtherHand |
Dec-08-11 06:35 AM |
#57 |
| -
Since Vne = "never exceed speed" why are you so concerned by Vmo? |
hack89 |
Dec-07-11 04:06 PM |
#49 |
| -
The Vne of a 767 is .86 mach = 560 knots at 1000 feet. |
hack89 |
Dec-07-11 04:12 PM |
#51 |
| -
I think your first link is as I've pasted below |
OnTheOtherHand |
Dec-07-11 05:32 PM |
#52 |
| -
But you agree that Vne is the speed you need to concern yourself with? nt |
hack89 |
Dec-07-11 06:21 PM |
#53 |
| -
let me put it this way |
OnTheOtherHand |
Dec-08-11 06:51 AM |
#58 |
| -
it's not at all clear that Vne = 0.86 mach at 1000 feet |
spooked911 |
Dec-07-11 07:42 PM |
#55 |
| -
Then find a different calculation that gives a different result. |
hack89 |
Dec-07-11 09:29 PM |
#56 |
| -
btw, it's funny-- you clearly are interested in conspiracies, |
spooked911 |
Dec-06-11 12:32 PM |
#46 |
| -
? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Dec-06-11 01:22 PM |
#48 |
| -
please explain how you think I used this fallacy |
spooked911 |
Nov-28-11 12:06 PM |
#11 |
| -
I'll be you $1000 dollars I can do it. in a simulator |
ryan_cats |
Nov-28-11 04:46 PM |
#12 |
| -
"1) Throttles, 2) Yolk, 3) rudder" |
jberryhill |
Nov-28-11 05:45 PM |
#14 |
| -
I like my yolks, sunny side up |
ryan_cats |
Nov-29-11 03:59 PM |
#22 |
| -
I don't think you'd need 4 hours to do it..... |
Old and In the Way |
Nov-29-11 09:13 PM |
#23 |
| -
doing it at 540 mph is impossible |
spooked911 |
Dec-02-11 09:34 AM |
#26 |
| -
Plane breaks up |
ryan_cats |
Dec-02-11 10:55 AM |
#29 |
| -
did you hit it going 540 mph? |
spooked911 |
Dec-04-11 08:56 AM |
#37 |
| -
I have tried -- using Flight Sim |
spooked911 |
Dec-02-11 09:34 AM |
#25 |
| -
I know you have a high opinion of yourself... |
ryan_cats |
Dec-04-11 07:22 PM |
#42 |
| -
A few points of discussion |
sgsmith |
Nov-28-11 05:27 PM |
#13 |
| -
Thanks-- a few points in response |
spooked911 |
Dec-02-11 09:42 AM |
#27 |
| -
Response |
sgsmith |
Dec-04-11 01:58 PM |
#39 |
| -
I don't get the planned maneuver part |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-02-11 11:15 AM |
#30 |
| -
But flight 11 did bank. |
sgsmith |
Dec-02-11 01:33 PM |
#32 |
| -
Spooked, you are right on time |
LARED |
Nov-28-11 06:01 PM |
#15 |
| -
good info, thnx (nt) |
T S Justly |
Nov-29-11 01:52 AM |
#18 |
| -
cuz they saw it on teevee |
mrarundale |
Nov-29-11 02:18 PM |
#21 |
| -
The idea that there was mass panicking following Well's WotW broadcast is a myth |
salvorhardin |
Dec-03-11 07:51 PM |
#35 |
| -
How do you know? |
mrarundale |
Dec-04-11 04:40 PM |
#40 |
| -
That is an excellent question... |
terrafirma |
Nov-29-11 10:21 PM |
#24 |
| -
Many don't believe it |
mrarundale |
Dec-04-11 04:43 PM |
#41 |
| -
The Vne of a 767 is .86 mach = 560 knots at 1000 feet. |
hack89 |
Dec-07-11 04:11 PM |
#50 |
| -
This has been posted before |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-11-11 03:41 PM |
#59 |
| -
It's ALL been posted before D911 |
mrarundale |
Dec-12-11 06:23 PM |
#60 |
| -
You got me |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-12-11 07:31 PM |
#61 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread