You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: Tip. Of. The. Iceberg. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Tip. Of. The. Iceberg.
Seriously, if it goes as back as Garrison suggests, why stop with Clay Shaw?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -I think I buy the Warren Report on Oswald being JFKs killer. Convince me otherwise... Taverner  Nov-19-11 05:15 PM   #0 
  - Middle of the cold war and they let him come back here after denouncing...  RagAss   Nov-19-11 05:17 PM   #1 
  - That is one of those "outliers" I was talking about  Taverner   Nov-19-11 05:22 PM   #4 
     - Kinda weird going to the USSR  jberryhill   Nov-20-11 11:40 PM   #72 
  - .........  doublethink   Nov-19-11 05:18 PM   #2 
  - Ohhh It's in paperback now !!  doublethink   Nov-19-11 05:55 PM   #14 
     - That's the most informative of the JFK books. Sums up all the most recent evidence.  Mimosa   Nov-19-11 06:31 PM   #18 
        - Ted Kennedy was a conservative, was he?  jberryhill   Nov-20-11 12:57 PM   #35 
        - Highly unlikely Ted Kennedy supported Warren Report ... despite what he might have said publickly !!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 06:54 PM   #40 
           - Maybe it was ancient aliens that did it  jberryhill   Nov-20-11 07:13 PM   #41 
              - Do you want to participate in this thread ... or discuss aliens?  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:30 PM   #50 
        - Douglass is very late to the game ... "High Treason I/II" and "Crossfire" .... and many others ....  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 06:04 PM   #38 
  - Jim Garrison was a paranoid, anti-homosexual fool.  provis99   Nov-19-11 05:21 PM   #3 
  - Yes - this is why I think the whole trial of Clay Shaw was BS  Taverner   Nov-19-11 05:22 PM   #5 
  - You haven't read Garrison's book, have you?  Mimosa   Nov-19-11 06:33 PM   #19 
  - this is the 'debate' that never ends  OnTheOtherHand   Nov-20-11 07:08 AM   #33 
  - +1 -- Jurors in Clay Trial have said if they had known Shaw was CIA, would have convicted him-!!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:17 PM   #46 
     - Tip. Of. The. Iceberg.  Taverner   Nov-20-11 08:25 PM   #48 
        - Well, if you were familiar with the research/info, you'd know no one does stop with Shaw ...!!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:31 PM   #51 
  - Clay Shaw was CIA, as confirmed after the trial -- he was also responsible for trying to  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:15 PM   #45 
     - So - there are much more meaninful leads if Garrison's account is to be believed nt  Taverner   Nov-20-11 08:25 PM   #49 
        - Right -- let's ignore Shaw being involved in international and domestic assassinations --!!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:36 PM   #52 
  - I have a tape that a friend's family wanted me to transfer to dvd  johnnie   Nov-19-11 06:30 PM   #17 
  - I remember when Oswald was shot I heard my dad say to my mom  dflprincess   Nov-20-11 07:53 PM   #42 
  - Agree -- and killing of Oswald ranks up there with NORAD being AWOL on 9/11 -- !!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:24 PM   #47 
  - That's true .... according to the RW which was exposed by his investigation -- !!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:14 PM   #44 
  - Bush Sr. was involved ........... that is all the facts you need  Angry Dragon   Nov-19-11 05:23 PM   #6 
  - He was there when Ruby died. Then again, he was a rich MFer who went wherever he pleased.  Taverner   Nov-19-11 05:51 PM   #12 
     - Are you making fun of your own thread now -- or do you have evidence of that?  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:38 PM   #53 
        - Correlation does not equal Causation  Taverner   Nov-20-11 08:41 PM   #54 
           - No one mistakes nonsense for evidence ... do you have evidence of what you posted?  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 09:22 PM   #66 
  - Why bother?  Downwinder   Nov-19-11 05:24 PM   #7 
  - Years ago at a late night diner...  PETRUS   Nov-19-11 05:25 PM   #8 
  - He didn't even want to start a revolution, he just wanted to do something of consequence  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-19-11 05:27 PM   #9 
  - Exactly. This makes me think we are barking up the wrong tree...  Taverner   Nov-19-11 05:44 PM   #10 
  - Oswald was CIA and probably also FBI -- working on high level assignments -- i.e., PATSY -- !!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:49 PM   #55 
     - Oswald was a mentally and emotionally unstable loser with a violent temper.  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-20-11 08:56 PM   #57 
        - Not according to the Tunnheim Panel/JFK Assassination Classified Records Act -- !!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 09:09 PM   #62 
           - Here's Noam Chomsky saying the same thing:  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-20-11 09:16 PM   #63 
              - Your post relates in no way to my post --- for one ....  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 09:26 PM   #67 
  - I thought at the time the whole theory stunk and still think  shraby   Nov-19-11 05:49 PM   #11 
  - It's a report from the government, what more do ya need  The Straight Story   Nov-19-11 05:51 PM   #13 
  - All the History books dealing with JFK's assassination should be moved to the fiction section  Va Lefty   Nov-19-11 06:26 PM   #15 
  - LHO admired JFK, that is a record of fact  ngant17   Nov-19-11 06:28 PM   #16 
  - there's no such thing as a scope mounted for a right-handed shooter.  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-19-11 06:35 PM   #22 
     - The rifle's scope had to be REPAIRED before it could be tested .... !!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:54 PM   #56 
        - You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-20-11 09:04 PM   #61 
           - You can't quote the Warren Report as evidence ... go to the official autopsy report ....  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 09:35 PM   #68 
              - That is the autopsy report.  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-20-11 10:44 PM   #69 
                 - If it's in the Warren Report you can't be sure ...  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 10:52 PM   #70 
                    - ...  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-20-11 11:13 PM   #71 
                       - Please explain how TWO wounds with NO OULET can connect?  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 11:40 PM   #73 
                          - There was no "wound of entry in the neck"  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-20-11 11:59 PM   #74 
                             - Official autopsy report - testimony of Finck -- and the records ....  defendandprotect   Nov-21-11 12:03 AM   #75 
                                - I linked you to the autopsy report.  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-21-11 12:18 AM   #76 
                                   - The neck would was a wound of ENTRY with NO OUTLET according to Finck -- !!  defendandprotect   Nov-21-11 12:40 AM   #77 
                                      - You're incredibly obtuse.  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-21-11 12:46 AM   #78 
                                         - There is an ENTRY wound in the back -- with NO OUTLET ---  defendandprotect   Nov-21-11 01:40 AM   #79 
                                            - All the evidence and testimony says "exit wound at in the anterior cervical region"...  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-21-11 01:44 AM   #80 
                                               - You are avoiding confirming that you know that Ford moved the back wound UP ... start there ...  defendandprotect   Nov-21-11 01:52 AM   #81 
                                                  - Ford didn't do anything  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-21-11 02:03 AM   #82 
                                                     - Ok -- Finally --  defendandprotect   Nov-21-11 02:23 AM   #83 
                                                     - My posts are about the evidence.  Spider Jerusalem   Nov-21-11 02:27 AM   #84 
  - If Oswald did do it because (pick a reason) he failed miserably  Maccagirl   Nov-19-11 06:33 PM   #20 
  - I, myself and me believe  onethatcares   Nov-19-11 06:35 PM   #21 
  - RFK and MLK I wonder about...  Taverner   Nov-19-11 09:43 PM   #26 
     - A jury found for CONSPIRACY in MLK death -- government conspiracy!!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 08:56 PM   #58 
  - Bugliosi's "Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy  Schema Thing   Nov-19-11 06:48 PM   #23 
  - That is one of the reasons I buy the Warren Report  Taverner   Nov-19-11 09:42 PM   #25 
  - ROFL  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 09:03 PM   #60 
  - Crazy B.S.  Mimosa   Nov-19-11 09:56 PM   #27 
  - What part of Bugliosi's book do you consider "crazy b.s.", specifically?  Schema Thing   Nov-19-11 10:06 PM   #28 
     - I've studied the assassination(s) for 30 years.  Mimosa   Nov-19-11 10:11 PM   #30 
        - That is not a scholarly page my friend.  Schema Thing   Nov-19-11 10:21 PM   #31 
        - Spartacus is not a 'list'. It's a huge HISTORY forum with links and discussion boards.  Mimosa   Nov-20-11 12:00 AM   #32 
           - Agree -- "Bugliosi is a tool" --  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 09:18 PM   #64 
        - + 1 that is a super page  court jester   Nov-20-11 08:01 AM   #34 
  - Bugsy has written a book based on personal attacks and little info ... it's a mess!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 09:02 PM   #59 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-19-11 07:05 PM   #24 
  - seriously, wtf does this have to do with 9/11?  Schema Thing   Nov-19-11 10:07 PM   #29 
     - This is the catch all conspiracy forum nt  hack89   Nov-20-11 08:10 PM   #43 
  - Nuts generally are not part of conspiracies.  cpwm17   Nov-20-11 03:04 PM   #36 
  - Not true -- many were discussing those involved the very night of the assassination -- !!  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 09:20 PM   #65 
  - First -- go to your library -- they'll have the report -- don't waste your money on buying it --  defendandprotect   Nov-20-11 05:49 PM   #37 
     - Great post...but a few...um...mistakes.  zappaman   Nov-20-11 06:19 PM   #39 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC