hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-11 01:07 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Shame on you!! How can you live with yourself?? |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-15-11 01:15 AM by hang a left
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWorDrTC0Qg Side by side analysis: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwFAnP7_RtY Scientific explanation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVCDpL4Ax7I At the end of this video John Gross actually admits that NIST is NOW investigating controlled demolition in the cause of the collapse of World Trade Center 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcqf5tL887o Here is Scott Grainger, Fire Protection Engineer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nvWh2aTdCs& Here is Kathy McGrade Metallurgical Engineer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6ziLE23Soo& Here is Ron Brookman a Structural Engineer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TM_l_4sJ-sY& Here is Tom Sullivan he is a Explosives Technician/Loader http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg And just for lulz: Here is a newscast from the BBC that reports the collapse of World Trade Center 7, 20 minutes before it was imploded http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc
|
| -Building 7 Explained - Sep 6, 2011 |
greyl |
Sep-14-11 11:34 PM |
#0 |
 -
Well that settles it |
whatchamacallit |
Sep-15-11 12:17 AM |
#1 |
| -
Shame on you!! How can you live with yourself?? |
hang a left |
Sep-15-11 01:07 AM |
#2 |
 -
Why don't you address the issues in the video? |
cpwm17 |
Sep-15-11 09:30 AM |
#3 |
 -
Watch the video in the OP and see for yourself |
zappaman |
Sep-15-11 09:38 AM |
#4 |
| -
And while you're at it, watch another one of his videos here: |
Nostradammit |
Sep-20-11 04:54 AM |
#32 |
| -
Years ago debunkers would be screaming about a gash, southwest corner damage and images NIST would |
jakeXT |
Sep-15-11 11:55 AM |
#5 |
| -
some did, and then they learned something |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-15-11 12:43 PM |
#6 |
| -
That's kind of why I suspect that Gage is a charlatan. He seems |
Flatulo |
Sep-15-11 11:53 PM |
#15 |
| -
yes, Bolo is probably taking a break from the interminable repetition |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-16-11 06:52 AM |
#17 |
| -
I'm insufficiently self-disciplined to not be guilty of the behavior you describe. |
Flatulo |
Sep-16-11 10:15 AM |
#25 |
| -
yeah, I think that's sort of how it goes |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-16-11 10:59 AM |
#26 |
| -
Well said. I wish I were a better generalist, given my age, but |
Flatulo |
Sep-16-11 11:15 AM |
#27 |
| -
This is the damage that supposedly caused WTC 7 to collapse into it's own footprint |
Cheap_Trick |
Sep-15-11 01:50 PM |
#7 |
| -
as I said in the other thread: incorrect (straw man) |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-15-11 02:20 PM |
#8 |
| -
You realize you just posted three buildings with reinforced concrete supports |
AtheistCrusader |
Sep-15-11 07:52 PM |
#9 |
| -
Because in Truther Land |
terrafirma |
Sep-15-11 08:24 PM |
#10 |
| -
You obviously did not puruse the NIST report on Bldg 7. |
Flatulo |
Sep-15-11 09:19 PM |
#11 |
| -
They also concluded the fuel tanks weren't contributors. |
AtheistCrusader |
Sep-15-11 09:47 PM |
#12 |
| -
Which really goes to show you, you just can't trust |
Flatulo |
Sep-15-11 09:53 PM |
#13 |
| -
I often use a hypothetical to help illustrate the collapse. |
AtheistCrusader |
Sep-15-11 10:10 PM |
#14 |
| -
Good point |
William Seger |
Sep-16-11 07:59 AM |
#21 |
| -
Unless you're Spooked. Then the cause is externally |
Flatulo |
Sep-16-11 09:32 AM |
#24 |
| -
Excellent post -- and they certainly haven't stopped building steel frame buildings .... |
defendandprotect |
Sep-16-11 03:31 AM |
#16 |
| -
The steel portions of the Madrid building did collapse |
hack89 |
Sep-16-11 07:08 AM |
#18 |
| -
yo, hack, this is a WTC 7 thread |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-16-11 07:28 AM |
#19 |
| -
Ok - my point about massive structural damage is still valid. |
hack89 |
Sep-16-11 07:48 AM |
#20 |
| -
except that for WTC 7, the structural damage probably wasn't crucial |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-16-11 08:13 AM |
#22 |
| -
Well, that same structural damage cause |
AtheistCrusader |
Sep-16-11 08:36 AM |
#23 |
| -
how long did it take.... |
wildbilln864 |
Sep-20-11 09:30 PM |
#41 |
| -
I looked it up for you. |
zappaman |
Sep-20-11 09:43 PM |
#42 |
| -
sorry to confuse you but..... |
wildbilln864 |
Sep-20-11 09:52 PM |
#44 |
| -
my bad. |
zappaman |
Sep-20-11 10:13 PM |
#47 |
| -
Where can I read about the new building codes as a result of this research? |
Ezlivin |
Sep-16-11 01:32 PM |
#28 |
| -
a good start is NIST's FAQ |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-16-11 02:17 PM |
#29 |
| -
Buildings present some special design challenges |
Flatulo |
Sep-16-11 04:44 PM |
#30 |
| -
"How the Loss of One Column May Have Led to the Collapse of WTC " |
MrMickeysMom |
Sep-20-11 01:11 AM |
#31 |
| -
What serious science links are you referring to? |
cpwm17 |
Sep-20-11 05:14 AM |
#33 |
| -
"Anyone who believes that is "foolish"... |
MrMickeysMom |
Sep-20-11 04:04 PM |
#36 |
| -
You posted three comments |
cpwm17 |
Sep-20-11 05:33 PM |
#38 |
| -
Well... if you say so, buddy |
MrMickeysMom |
Sep-20-11 06:37 PM |
#39 |
| -
make that 4. |
zappaman |
Sep-20-11 07:19 PM |
#40 |
| -
Here's something constructive |
LARED |
Sep-20-11 05:15 AM |
#34 |
| -
Let's have a nice golf clap for that astute observation! |
MrMickeysMom |
Sep-20-11 04:05 PM |
#37 |
| -
Willful ignorance: Last bastion of willful delusion |
William Seger |
Sep-20-11 06:03 AM |
#35 |
| -
nice projecting! nt |
wildbilln864 |
Sep-20-11 09:55 PM |
#45 |
| -
"I do not think it means what you think it means" |
William Seger |
Sep-21-11 03:26 AM |
#50 |
| -
(Delete, misplaced) |
William Seger |
Sep-21-11 03:13 AM |
#48 |
| -
at least he named his blog correctly.... |
wildbilln864 |
Sep-20-11 09:44 PM |
#43 |
| -
no. |
wildbilln864 |
Sep-20-11 10:11 PM |
#46 |
| -
The OP subject is WTC7 |
William Seger |
Sep-21-11 03:17 AM |
#49 |
| -
One interesting thing about wtc7 |
mrarundale |
Oct-03-11 01:06 AM |
#51 |
| -
It's almost like... |
deconstruct911 |
Oct-03-11 02:13 AM |
#52 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread