Reply #394: at least you found the FAQ, but your "fix" is broken

[OnTheOtherHand]

If you've paid any attention to the literature -- or just thought a bit about the underlying problem -- it should have crossed your mind that video studies wouldn't be able to distinguish "no" support from "very little" support. Thus, NIST's "negligible" is supported by the evidence, and your "NO" is not.

But let's back up.

so there were over two seconds of complete free-fall. What do they say about this?

"indicating negligible support from the structure below"

Wow, how enlightening, not to mention a vast understatement.

I could not make this shit up.

Yo, dude. Spooked. Yo. Try reading the next sentence.

If you think you can meaningfully rebut that explanation, by all means do your damnedest. Right now, you just look kind of silly.