Reply #314: I have a "word argument", I'm sorry I don't have the time to put it into a "mathematical argument"

[spooked911]

If you can't see there is a problem saying the top block initially fell at nearly free-fall speed for one whole story, when it really tilted over in a more controlled fall (one side anchored, significant resistance during the initial part of the tilting)-- if you can't see that the Bazant/NIST assumption is inaccurate and heavily biased toward the official theory-- I'm not sure there's much point continuing.