Reply #120: People with an agenda?

[exploited]

2+2=4, (end of discussion) bye, bye.??? I do see your point there.

Look, my point is many of these varied "CT's" are bizarre to say the least. From my perspective, they fit into the "only in America" category. Aren't conspiracy theory's just the result of the peoples' need to find more plausible explanations for events when the official government/media spin consistently fails to address them truthfully?

I didn't claim (or intend) to 'debunk' anything with my previous post. I thought I was just broadening the context of the selected eyewitness quotes you offered - playing devil's advocate with your polarised position. Obviously something hit the Pentagon and the witnesses have varied opinions of what they saw including type, size, colour and number of aircraft in the area at the time. Of course there was an explosion in the vicinity of these people too, so 2+2=4. Hey, do eyewitnesses have 'agendas' or government building employees for that matter; or is it just limited to CTers and DU posters?

BTW, that 'FREAKING GOVERNMENT BUILDING IN DC' that you mentioned. The hub of one of the world's best funded, most technologically advanced, most paranoid war machines -- taken out by box cutters despite being forewarned. That's as bizarre as any CT out there.

P.S. Don't forget, we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know.

Bye.