Reply #212: And see, that's the thing - I don't think you really believe or care whether there was a conspiracy

[apocalypsehow]

to kill JFK or not.

Going by your posts and that one OP you posted where your "facts" were thoroughly reduced to pitiful shreds and yet you continued to argue, I don't really perceive that you give much of a fig whether Oswald acted alone, or whether there was a genuine conspiracy involved.

I think you simply enjoy arguing, have found an issue over which people do a good bit of it, and have simply picked a side, facts be damned.

That's why I take the content of absolutely nothing you post seriously anymore.

Of course, that doesn't mean you get a pass on posting historical inaccuracies or phony "facts" - better clarify that now or I'm sure down the road, when your OP's/replies get taken to the cleaners on the facts (again), I'll start hearing about how I shouldn't reply to you because I don't take you seriously (and I don't) in lieu of a substantive rebuttal. Just to be clear.

But every time you see a post of mine replying to yours, johnnie, I want you to imagine a man at a keyboard rolling his eyes as he typed that reply. The visual will be accurate.