You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #98: "Oddly enough almost every one of my conclusions were the exact same conclusions reached by... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #95
98. "Oddly enough almost every one of my conclusions were the exact same conclusions reached by...
by the DOJ IG".

Dude...do you realize you just sank your own argument again? How can you simultaneously claim that the various entities worked to cover-up the truth, then turn around and say the DOJ IG reached the same conclusions you did? Too funny.

BTW, I hope you've convinced enough people to actually read the DOJ IG's report so they can see how you quote-mined and cherry-picked the information, omitting all the evidence that contradictos your claims and theories. Why did you do that, dude?

I also believe you owe all of us a real explanation of why you sat on your "research" and said nothing to the FBI until AFTER 3000 people were killed You also owe us an apology for initially claiming you had affidavits from your employees confirming you warned them of the attacks in advance then, when challenged for evidence of that, you then claimed you had given your only copies to the FBI. What kind of researcher would do something so stupid?

Too funny, dude. You may commence spluttering
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -Behrooz Sarshar k-robjoe  Feb-01-11 06:52 PM   #0 
  - So much for the "it would have leaked" theorists  noise   Feb-01-11 09:31 PM   #1 
  - It is a bad case of justice denied  BeFree   Feb-01-11 10:40 PM   #2 
  - You mean so much for the "controlled demolition & no planes" theorists. nt  greyl   Feb-01-11 10:45 PM   #3 
  - Heh  BeFree   Feb-01-11 11:51 PM   #4 
     - LOL  zappaman   Feb-02-11 12:47 AM   #5 
        - What are you babbling about?  BeFree   Feb-02-11 08:02 AM   #10 
           - be the change you want to see in the world?  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-02-11 08:46 AM   #15 
           - What's it to you?  BeFree   Feb-02-11 08:50 AM   #16 
              - I don't see anyone harassing you whatsoever  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-02-11 04:50 PM   #19 
                 - Heh  BeFree   Feb-02-11 06:08 PM   #25 
           - ROFLMAO  zappaman   Feb-02-11 04:56 PM   #20 
  - this piece quotes a Chicago Tribune article from July 2004  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-02-11 07:16 AM   #8 
  - Let's look at what he said versus what actually happened  KDLarsen   Feb-02-11 03:34 AM   #6 
  - What he actually said  BeFree   Feb-02-11 05:55 AM   #7 
  - What would be the point?  KDLarsen   Feb-02-11 08:30 AM   #12 
     - You aren't intersted?  BeFree   Feb-02-11 08:34 AM   #13 
  - FWIW, it is on the Trib website  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-02-11 07:22 AM   #9 
  - Thanks  KDLarsen   Feb-02-11 08:27 AM   #11 
     - that would tend to distract, yes  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-02-11 08:39 AM   #14 
        - "They Tried to Warn Us: Foreign Intelligence Warnings Before 9/11"  k-robjoe   Feb-02-11 09:04 AM   #17 
        - meh  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-02-11 05:08 PM   #21 
           - "All right, you've covered your ass now"  k-robjoe   Feb-02-11 05:32 PM   #24 
              - grunt  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-02-11 07:34 PM   #27 
              - "intelligence failures do tend to look unbelievably stupid in retrospect"  k-robjoe   Feb-03-11 04:41 AM   #32 
                 - get away with?  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-03-11 06:32 AM   #36 
                    - Get away with  k-robjoe   Feb-03-11 08:07 AM   #37 
                    - it's interesting  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-03-11 09:14 AM   #38 
                       - LIHOP  k-robjoe   Feb-03-11 09:54 AM   #39 
                          - OK, at least now I sort of get your point... sort of  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-03-11 05:53 PM   #55 
                             - Youre not convinced that I find it persuasive?  k-robjoe   Feb-04-11 03:31 AM   #66 
                    - The simple question  noise   Feb-03-11 02:53 PM   #40 
                       - that's an interesting construction  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-03-11 03:36 PM   #41 
                          - I'm not trying to win anything  noise   Feb-03-11 03:50 PM   #42 
                             - How do you know he...  SDuderstadt   Feb-03-11 03:56 PM   #43 
                             - If it is so shoddy then it should be easy  noise   Feb-03-11 04:08 PM   #44 
                                - "When does Dina Corsi appear on the Piers Morgan show?"  zappaman   Feb-03-11 04:14 PM   #45 
                                - Why should citizens  noise   Feb-03-11 04:19 PM   #46 
                                   - What bullshit...  SDuderstadt   Feb-03-11 04:37 PM   #48 
                                      - Do you ask anything of power?  noise   Feb-03-11 05:32 PM   #50 
                                      - Yeah, I ask lots of things of power, dude...  SDuderstadt   Feb-03-11 05:44 PM   #53 
                                - I don't think a single government official...  SDuderstadt   Feb-03-11 04:35 PM   #47 
                                   - You have it backwards  noise   Feb-03-11 05:29 PM   #49 
                                      - No, dude...  SDuderstadt   Feb-03-11 05:34 PM   #51 
                                         - His analysis isn't definitive as he is working with publicly available information  noise   Feb-03-11 05:44 PM   #52 
                                         - "The reason for the lack of complete answers is the secrecy"  SDuderstadt   Feb-03-11 05:49 PM   #54 
                                         - You know what I'd like to see?  Ghost in the Machine   Feb-04-11 06:05 AM   #68 
                                         - I have asked them repeatedly, Ghost...  SDuderstadt   Feb-04-11 06:30 AM   #70 
                                         - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-07-11 12:04 PM   #72 
                                         - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Feb-07-11 12:15 PM   #73 
                                         - re: do you see how your "answer" to question # 1 does not remotely answer the question?  rschop   Feb-07-11 12:39 PM   #74 
                                         - Now you claim your "answer" to question # 1...  SDuderstadt   Feb-07-11 12:42 PM   #75 
                                         - e: Now you claim your "answer" to question # 1...was sarcasm??  rschop   Feb-07-11 05:01 PM   #86 
                                         - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Feb-07-11 05:22 PM   #87 
                                         - re; you just hate it that you're asked logical questions and the logical flaws in your "argument" ar  rschop   Feb-08-11 12:01 AM   #94 
                                         - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Feb-08-11 12:19 AM   #96 
                                         - re: you admitted that you did not know Dina Corsi's state of mind  rschop   Feb-08-11 12:53 AM   #100 
                                         - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Feb-08-11 01:06 AM   #101 
                                         - I left the thread  k-robjoe   Feb-08-11 04:03 AM   #102 
                                         - Book  k-robjoe   Feb-07-11 01:37 PM   #76 
                                         - re: Whats the title of your book?  rschop   Feb-07-11 04:37 PM   #84 
                                         - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-07-11 04:42 PM   #85 
                                         - Quote  k-robjoe   Feb-07-11 05:26 PM   #88 
                                         - RE: "Why do you think they are here, do you think they are going to FUCKING Disney Land?" "  rschop   Feb-07-11 06:16 PM   #89 
                                         - Another deplorable rhetorical trick...  SDuderstadt   Feb-07-11 06:44 PM   #92 
                                         - In your "answer" to question #1...  SDuderstadt   Feb-07-11 01:43 PM   #77 
                                         - "Donna" = FBI Agent Dina Corsi  eomer   Feb-07-11 02:30 PM   #78 
                                         - Because I read it a while ago...  SDuderstadt   Feb-07-11 02:40 PM   #79 
                                         - re: Because I read it a while ago...didn't feel like plowing through it again, rather than simply  rschop   Feb-07-11 06:25 PM   #90 
                                         - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Feb-07-11 06:54 PM   #93 
                                         - Two replies  k-robjoe   Feb-07-11 03:37 PM   #80 
                                         - I would suggest everyone read...  SDuderstadt   Feb-07-11 03:41 PM   #81 
                                         - RE: Who is "Donna"  rschop   Feb-07-11 04:15 PM   #82 
                                         - More of your bullshit...  SDuderstadt   Feb-07-11 04:25 PM   #83 
                                         - re: More of your bullshit....  rschop   Feb-08-11 12:22 AM   #97 
                                         - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Feb-08-11 12:49 AM   #99 
                                         - KICK!  rschop   Feb-07-11 06:27 PM   #91 
                                         - re: I have asked them repeatedly, Ghost...  rschop   Feb-08-11 12:11 AM   #95 
                                         - "Oddly enough almost every one of my conclusions were the exact same conclusions reached by...  SDuderstadt   Feb-08-11 12:40 AM   #98 
                             - "All I'm doing is..."  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-03-11 05:56 PM   #56 
                                - "Inventing the other side"  k-robjoe   Feb-03-11 06:10 PM   #57 
                                   - "you have no right to demand transparency"  SDuderstadt   Feb-03-11 06:13 PM   #58 
                                   - The wording  k-robjoe   Feb-03-11 06:17 PM   #59 
                                      - Point to anyone who has said...  SDuderstadt   Feb-03-11 06:19 PM   #60 
                                         - I will make my point clearer  k-robjoe   Feb-03-11 06:27 PM   #61 
                                         - Perhaps OnTheOtherHand was responding to the following part of that post:  Make7   Feb-03-11 06:49 PM   #62 
                                         - The key issue is that we cannot get basic answers almost 10 years later  noise   Feb-03-11 07:06 PM   #63 
                                         - I KNEW you'd work the word...  SDuderstadt   Feb-03-11 07:10 PM   #64 
                                         - "authoritarian"  zappaman   Feb-03-11 07:17 PM   #65 
                                         - Seen from Europe  k-robjoe   Feb-04-11 03:46 AM   #67 
                                   - wow, you have a lot of pluck... no, spunk... no...  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-04-11 06:27 AM   #69 
                                      - I changed the wording  k-robjoe   Feb-04-11 08:13 AM   #71 
              - No difference  BeFree   Feb-02-11 08:07 PM   #28 
              - Grey's Law.  greyl   Feb-02-11 11:12 PM   #31 
        - re: I assume there must be better criticisms of the 9/11 Commission than this one.  rschop   Feb-02-11 05:26 PM   #22 
           - And, while you're at it...  SDuderstadt   Feb-02-11 05:29 PM   #23 
              - ;)  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-02-11 07:15 PM   #26 
                 - Just read the snips here  BeFree   Feb-02-11 08:10 PM   #29 
                    - I have done  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-03-11 06:14 AM   #35 
  - "...does not recall any mention of a hijacking to Afghanistan."  CJCRANE   Feb-03-11 04:54 AM   #33 
  - not so much  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-03-11 05:46 AM   #34 
  - As it turns out, the Chicago Tribune was lying.  eomer   Feb-20-11 09:29 AM   #103 
  - re: additional information obtained by the 9/11 Commission  rschop   Feb-02-11 03:43 PM   #18 
  - Link to Frields 9/11 Commission MFR  noise   Feb-02-11 10:58 PM   #30 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC