Ghost in the Machine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Could it be because they haven't released anything from 2001 or 2002.. |
|
and only one document (so far) from 2003? Maybe because they've only released 291 documents out of 251,287?  |
| -So the Wikileaks cables: Nothing supporting 9/11 Truth yet, huh? |
Bolo Boffin |
Nov-30-10 01:25 PM |
#0 |
 -
Well |
BeFree |
Nov-30-10 02:27 PM |
#1 |
  -
I see |
BeFree |
Nov-30-10 05:21 PM |
#9 |
| -
Silly, Bolo.... |
terrafirma |
Nov-30-10 03:23 PM |
#2 |
| -
or |
zappaman |
Nov-30-10 03:24 PM |
#3 |
| -
Could it be because they haven't released anything from 2001 or 2002.. |
Ghost in the Machine |
Nov-30-10 04:14 PM |
#4 |
| -
Well, time will tell. |
Bolo Boffin |
Nov-30-10 04:52 PM |
#7 |
| -
That sounds like the most reasonable course of action to take, doesn't it? |
Ghost in the Machine |
Nov-30-10 05:05 PM |
#8 |
| -
Do some research: |
seatnineb |
Nov-30-10 04:20 PM |
#5 |
| -
Oh, so now Assange is also suppressing 9/11 Truth! |
Bolo Boffin |
Nov-30-10 04:38 PM |
#6 |
| -
of course-- wikileaks is a classic limited hangout operation |
spooked911 |
Dec-01-10 06:32 AM |
#12 |
| -
Crap... I was hoping for new info on the alien blockade of earth |
jberryhill |
Dec-01-10 03:42 PM |
#19 |
| -
don't be so sure |
zappaman |
Dec-01-10 04:42 PM |
#20 |
| -
There is more chance of that happening than you being able |
seatnineb |
Dec-05-10 12:36 PM |
#57 |
| -
sorry, but that info is |
spooked911 |
Dec-01-10 07:42 PM |
#25 |
| -
really? |
zappaman |
Dec-01-10 08:05 PM |
#27 |
| -
Logic |
spooked911 |
Dec-02-10 07:07 AM |
#31 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-02-10 07:11 AM |
#32 |
| -
"wikileaks is a classic limited hangout operation" |
zappaman |
Dec-02-10 05:49 PM |
#42 |
| -
Yeah, leakers evading Interpol don't pose for photo-ops |
mrarundale |
Dec-06-10 12:44 PM |
#67 |
| -
You obviously do not understand the importance of the |
tetedur |
Dec-01-10 08:55 AM |
#13 |
| -
On the contrary, I do understand the importance of the Wikileaks release. |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-01-10 10:11 AM |
#14 |
| -
I can't get into Wikileaks |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-01-10 11:14 AM |
#15 |
| -
Other people on Twitter have said the same today. |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-01-10 11:37 AM |
#16 |
| -
Well so did Oliver North. |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-01-10 11:52 AM |
#17 |
| -
Yes, Ahmed and Ollie have several things in common. n/t |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-01-10 12:07 PM |
#18 |
| -
Maybe one day he will host a show on fox too. |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-01-10 05:54 PM |
#23 |
| -
Why not! If he can toe the Republican right wing li(n)es, he should. |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-02-10 03:25 PM |
#38 |
| -
Republican right wing? |
immune |
Dec-02-10 03:33 PM |
#39 |
| -
Well, there are Republicans that come closer to the sanity line than others. n/t |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-02-10 03:57 PM |
#40 |
| -
Assange & 911 |
felixq78 |
Dec-22-10 11:00 AM |
#74 |
| -
Ironic that he claims to expose financial fraud |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-22-10 12:00 PM |
#75 |
| -
Why are you thanking me for something you already knew.. |
seatnineb |
Dec-05-10 12:34 PM |
#55 |
| -
I am thanking you for jumping in with both feet on a position I felt certain someone would take. |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-05-10 12:36 PM |
#56 |
| -
say hi to Julian for me...i am sure he would appreciate the |
seatnineb |
Dec-05-10 12:37 PM |
#58 |
| -
I'm sure Julian would be happy someone was trying to keep people out of a non-productive |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-05-10 12:53 PM |
#59 |
| -
Is that what he told you---LOL!!! |
seatnineb |
Dec-05-10 12:55 PM |
#60 |
| -
I've made no claims about knowing Julian Assange. n/t |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-05-10 01:16 PM |
#62 |
| -
Umm ..it was a joke. |
seatnineb |
Dec-06-10 03:29 AM |
#65 |
| -
Assange & 911 |
felixq78 |
Dec-22-10 10:56 AM |
#73 |
| -
They are coming... after the chemtrails and UFO's.... |
jberryhill |
Nov-30-10 06:51 PM |
#10 |
| -
Maybe you haven't paid attention |
noise |
Nov-30-10 10:58 PM |
#11 |
| -
I still see the skeptics are obsessed with truthers |
travis80 |
Dec-01-10 05:32 PM |
#21 |
| -
9 years of obsessing/promoting 9/11 conspiracy theories |
zappaman |
Dec-01-10 05:43 PM |
#22 |
| -
Not really-- when you think of the incredible ramifications that 9/11 being an inside job entails. |
spooked911 |
Dec-01-10 07:44 PM |
#26 |
| -
I'm a perp and I'm going to transfer data that exposes my conspiracy |
travis80 |
Dec-01-10 06:50 PM |
#24 |
| -
Wait... |
MrMickeysMom |
Dec-01-10 11:09 PM |
#28 |
| -
Won't find that in the phone book, either. |
JackRiddler |
Dec-02-10 01:04 AM |
#29 |
| -
Well, if Larry Silverstein can confess in an NPR interview |
jberryhill |
Dec-02-10 02:11 AM |
#30 |
| -
How is that an answer to the question? |
JackRiddler |
Dec-02-10 09:33 AM |
#33 |
| -
Where is this "elsewhere" of which you speak? |
jberryhill |
Dec-02-10 11:05 AM |
#34 |
| -
Elsewhere would be "outside the bounds of the question posed by the OP," i.e., distraction. |
JackRiddler |
Dec-02-10 07:18 PM |
#44 |
| -
We are often told that conspirators reveal the conspiracy in interviews and the like. |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-02-10 02:37 PM |
#35 |
| -
I think you're looking for Hollywood |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-02-10 02:46 PM |
#36 |
| -
So wanting logical consistency in the 9/11 Truth Movement's positions is "looking for Hollywood." |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-02-10 03:16 PM |
#37 |
| -
No |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-02-10 04:02 PM |
#41 |
| -
OMG! |
zappaman |
Dec-02-10 07:16 PM |
#43 |
| -
maybe |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-02-10 07:48 PM |
#46 |
| -
Are the results in? nt |
deconstruct911 |
Feb-02-11 07:13 PM |
#102 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-03-10 01:25 PM |
#47 |
| -
"I believe a bit of pillow-biting is in order, if you'll excuse me." |
Ghost in the Machine |
Dec-06-10 12:54 AM |
#64 |
| -
The Guardian gave State Dept. cables to the NY Times |
immune |
Dec-02-10 07:37 PM |
#45 |
| -
Some secrets are far too secret to get to |
Ter |
Dec-04-10 01:31 AM |
#48 |
| -
Greater than Hamas saying it could accept the 1967 borders? |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-05-10 03:01 AM |
#50 |
| -
Offtopic, but torture is illegal, immoral, and counter-productive even if you have the right person. |
eomer |
Dec-05-10 05:40 AM |
#51 |
| -
Yes, I agree with that. n/t |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-05-10 12:12 PM |
#53 |
| -
I don't see how these equate |
Ter |
Dec-05-10 11:45 AM |
#52 |
| -
Of course you don't. n/t |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-05-10 12:12 PM |
#54 |
| -
And of course you would |
Ter |
Dec-06-10 12:12 AM |
#63 |
| -
Nothing supporting ANY kind of truth |
mrarundale |
Dec-05-10 01:57 AM |
#49 |
| -
Kroll "leak" |
deconstruct911 |
Dec-05-10 01:01 PM |
#61 |
| -
uh-huh |
mrarundale |
Dec-06-10 12:39 PM |
#66 |
| -
Actually that's not true. The revelations about the ISI support OCT skeptics |
pauldp |
Dec-06-10 05:31 PM |
#68 |
| -
That's not something exclusive to 9/11 Truth. |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-06-10 07:07 PM |
#69 |
| -
You didn't say it had to be exclusive. Oh, and the CIA funding the ISI isn't 911 exclusive either. |
pauldp |
Dec-06-10 10:57 PM |
#70 |
| -
9/11 Truth being some nebulous catch-all for a lot of people isn't my problem. |
Bolo Boffin |
Dec-06-10 11:51 PM |
#71 |
| -
Only 1% of the cables have been released |
CJCRANE |
Dec-10-10 05:15 AM |
#72 |
| -
Why would there be? |
Bonobo |
Dec-23-10 12:58 AM |
#76 |
| -
Please bone up on your WikiLeaks knowledge here: |
greyl |
Dec-23-10 01:06 AM |
#77 |
| -
Wikileaks didn't reveal anything of any significance |
Swampguana |
Dec-27-10 02:41 PM |
#78 |
| -
Nonsense: it was an excellent question. And the answer is: "9-11 Truth" is a fraud. Therefore, |
apocalypsehow |
Dec-27-10 03:15 PM |
#79 |
| -
you failed to provide something significant wikileaks revealed |
Swampguana |
Dec-29-10 04:34 PM |
#80 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-30-10 03:43 AM |
#82 |
| -
Bullshit. |
Bolo Boffin |
Jan-01-11 03:57 PM |
#83 |
| -
bullshit, bullshit |
Swampguana |
Jan-07-11 09:44 AM |
#97 |
| -
re: So the Wikileaks cables: Nothing supporting 9/11 Truth yet, huh? |
rschop |
Dec-29-10 11:16 PM |
#81 |
| -
You don't have evidence that CIA deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen. |
Bolo Boffin |
Jan-01-11 03:59 PM |
#84 |
| -
Turf wars? |
noise |
Jan-01-11 05:02 PM |
#85 |
| -
That's what you've got: turf wars. "The CIA deliberately allowed 9/11" isn't what you've got. |
Bolo Boffin |
Jan-01-11 08:27 PM |
#86 |
| -
I gave you two sound reasons why a turf battle explanation doesn't ring true |
noise |
Jan-01-11 08:50 PM |
#87 |
| -
You are wishing in one hand and spitting in the other. |
Bolo Boffin |
Jan-01-11 10:18 PM |
#88 |
| -
re: You don't have evidence that CIA deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen., You have evidence of turf |
rschop |
Jan-03-11 10:43 PM |
#92 |
| -
Strange - a "criminal conspiracy" with no indictments, no arraignments, no trials, no convictions. |
apocalypsehow |
Jan-03-11 11:23 PM |
#93 |
| -
re This is a simple yes or no question, you do maintain that the reason Corsi wasn't prosecuted for |
rschop |
Jan-03-11 11:54 PM |
#94 |
| -
"Yes," huh? Interesting. I don't think you've thought that answer through. Or its implications - |
apocalypsehow |
Jan-04-11 12:15 AM |
#95 |
| -
The responses on this thread display the Dungeon's clash of the sophistries. |
JackRiddler |
Jan-02-11 08:38 PM |
#89 |
| -
" little to no information about covert operations or intelligence" As ever, Jack: bullshit. |
Bolo Boffin |
Jan-03-11 11:52 AM |
#90 |
| -
Whatever. The cables are big, the release is spectacular, but not everything can be in there. |
JackRiddler |
Jan-03-11 03:06 PM |
#91 |
| -
Someone got the feewings hewt... lol |
Bonobo |
Feb-02-11 07:14 PM |
#103 |
| -
Beautiful post. I tried to point out the same thing albeit less well. |
Bonobo |
Feb-02-11 07:13 PM |
#101 |
| -
Huffpo says that 500K text messages from government employees were released |
eridani |
Jan-06-11 10:26 PM |
#96 |
| -
WikiLeaks: FBI hunts the 9/11 gang that got away ( i.e. terrorists did 9/11) |
greyl |
Feb-01-11 11:03 PM |
#98 |
| -
Wonder if Bolo wants to enjoy a crow sandwich today? |
go west young man |
Feb-02-11 02:48 PM |
#99 |
| -
How does the Wikileaks revelation support... |
SDuderstadt |
Feb-02-11 03:59 PM |
#100 |
| -
Questioning of the official story cannot be squeezed into one catch-all phrase (aka 9/11 'truth') |
Bonobo |
Feb-02-11 07:17 PM |
#104 |
| -
Read the subject line of.... |
SDuderstadt |
Feb-02-11 07:22 PM |
#105 |
| -
Yes, the OP title is also guilty of this type of monolithic thinking. |
Bonobo |
Feb-02-11 08:42 PM |
#106 |
| -
Link? |
Larry L. Burks |
Apr-19-11 06:28 PM |
#107 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread