You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: Active catalytic materials are different materials than [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Active catalytic materials are different materials than
thermatic materials. But you must know that so why change the subject to Catalytic material? Let me guess. You have no defense of the active thermatic materials meme.

I don't need to defend my position, you do. So why not call old Niels up and invite him to explain what how a Thermatic Material becomes "Active".

I have no down side as you say, you do. So the balls in your court. I will get the usual CTer tail between the legs retreat or the more standard response that is reinforcing your confirmation bias.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -DNA is to rape as Active Thermitic Material is to _______?________. Stanchetalarooni  Sep-14-10 09:21 AM   #0 
  - Another try to sneak a 9/11 CT post into the Science Forum?  MineralMan   Sep-14-10 09:31 AM   #1 
  - It all depends  deconstruct911   Sep-14-10 09:48 AM   #2 
  - Really?  William Seger   Sep-14-10 10:10 AM   #3 
     - Over 1000 architects and engineers are asking questions that weren't asked or considered in the past  Stanchetalarooni   Sep-14-10 10:44 AM   #4 
     - That is a patently false claim  SDuderstadt   Sep-14-10 10:50 AM   #5 
     - 1297 verified Architectural and Engineering professionals  Stanchetalarooni   Sep-14-10 11:00 AM   #6 
        - key word being "professionals"  KDLarsen   Sep-14-10 11:02 AM   #7 
        - Which is not the same thing as...  SDuderstadt   Sep-14-10 11:06 AM   #8 
     - Richard Gage isn't "asking questions"  William Seger   Sep-15-10 09:05 AM   #11 
     - A testable prediction or theory.  Stanchetalarooni   Sep-14-10 11:16 AM   #9 
        - You are overlooking a third possibility. ( n/t )  Make7   Sep-14-10 11:50 AM   #10 
        - to amplify Make7, you're assuming evidence of "thermate"  OnTheOtherHand   Sep-15-10 09:50 AM   #13 
           - A lot like paint but distinguished from paint by the elemental aluminum.  eomer   Sep-19-10 09:27 AM   #25 
              - Harrit & Co. didn't do the necessary tests to determine that there was elemental aluminum  William Seger   Sep-19-10 12:01 PM   #26 
              - Can you point to a specific paper or post that demostrates what you say about aluminum? n/t  eomer   Sep-19-10 12:32 PM   #27 
                 - Since I'm sure you would doubt what any JREF'ers say...  William Seger   Sep-19-10 01:04 PM   #28 
                    - Manieri's critique on the elemental aluminum topic looks pretty weak.  eomer   Sep-19-10 04:32 PM   #29 
                       - You're allowing Jones to misrepresent Manieri's point  William Seger   Sep-19-10 10:47 PM   #30 
                          - The XEDS maps show that silicon is concentrated in the same areas as aluminum in the red layer.  eomer   Sep-20-10 07:37 AM   #32 
                             - So they claim, but fail to prove  William Seger   Sep-20-10 10:56 PM   #37 
                                - That's interesting.  eomer   Sep-21-10 03:58 AM   #38 
              - for what it's worth  OnTheOtherHand   Sep-20-10 06:41 AM   #31 
                 - Yes, I'm outside my expertise too (as you know).  eomer   Sep-20-10 01:54 PM   #34 
                    - no worries, no snark taken  OnTheOtherHand   Sep-20-10 04:04 PM   #35 
  - woo? n/t  OnTheOtherHand   Sep-15-10 09:30 AM   #12 
  - So far the most correct answer. nt  LARED   Sep-18-10 06:27 AM   #18 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-17-10 09:17 PM   #14 
  - This is a hard question  LARED   Sep-17-10 10:06 PM   #15 
     - So why don't you contact the authors of the paper and ask them?  tetedur   Sep-18-10 12:17 AM   #16 
     - I don't need to contact them because I already  LARED   Sep-18-10 04:57 AM   #17 
        - So when Kevin Maloney states that QuantumSphere produces  tetedur   Sep-18-10 08:16 AM   #19 
           - Active catalytic materials are different materials than  LARED   Sep-18-10 09:44 AM   #20 
              - No, I don't think I'll be contacting Niels Harrit for you  tetedur   Sep-18-10 05:44 PM   #21 
                 - Translation -  LARED   Sep-18-10 06:57 PM   #22 
     - I do.  eomer   Sep-19-10 06:52 AM   #23 
        - Not sure I buy that explanation  LARED   Sep-19-10 07:24 AM   #24 
           - What then is nanotechnology and is it new?  Stanchetalarooni   Sep-20-10 01:38 PM   #33 
              - If Jones et al established that Nanotechnolgy was used  LARED   Sep-20-10 06:49 PM   #36 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC