Reply #141: Yeah, but you're ignoring what other doctors saw...

[SDuderstadt]

that's why you should rely on "convergence of evidence". I bet you could take nearly any criminal case in which there is literally an open and shut case and find plenty of conflicting accounts. That's why we have detectives, evidence labs and trials.

Seriously, you are mystifying this case. Read Bugliosi's book and I'd be willing to bet you'd come away convinced of Oswald's guilt. About the only remaining question would be whether anyone else (non-shooter) might possibly have been involved, but the evidence shows that to be highly unlikely.