Abe Linkman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 18. Sounds like what the perps did at the Pentagon - using extra planes to... |
|
distract attention & set up a false, but plausible scenario. In the case of FL "93" - it may well have NOT been shot down (was there even such a thing as a real FL 93?). The debris field is as suspicious as the debris field on the pristine Pentalawn.
|
| -... and kiss the official UA 93 theory good-bye! |
John Doe II |
Jan-08-05 10:52 AM |
#0 |
 -
Great job! Doesn't this fit with the idea that flight 93 was shot down? |
spooked911 |
Jan-08-05 11:03 AM |
#1 |
 -
Thanks! |
John Doe II |
Jan-09-05 03:00 PM |
#20 |
 -
This evidence appears to imply a plane from the east was shot down |
philb |
Nov-17-05 10:55 PM |
#80 |
| -
I haven't read the whole thing yet, but two points |
IanDB1 |
Jan-08-05 11:20 AM |
#2 |
| -
Your most important point is the best I've ever heard it put |
boloboffin |
Jan-08-05 04:29 PM |
#7 |
| -
Your points |
John Doe II |
Jan-09-05 01:17 PM |
#15 |
| -
Sounds like what the perps did at the Pentagon - using extra planes to... |
Abe Linkman |
Jan-09-05 01:53 PM |
#18 |
| -
The government had no desire |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jul-04-05 08:37 AM |
#62 |
| -
It is not that clear at all what would be in this Govt's interest. |
tngledwebb |
Jan-11-05 11:28 AM |
#25 |
| -
Lawsuit |
Kevin Fenton |
Jul-05-05 07:33 AM |
#69 |
| -
Very pertinent point in this discussion. |
Old and In the Way |
Jan-28-06 12:58 PM |
#101 |
| -
Where in the world did you find this information, very eye opening |
GetTheRightVote |
Jan-08-05 11:32 AM |
#3 |
| -
It took some time ...! |
John Doe II |
Jan-09-05 01:34 PM |
#16 |
| -
Loud bang and then plane plunged; was the bang a missile hitting? |
philb |
Nov-18-05 06:27 PM |
#86 |
| -
If Shepley & Purbaugh are believed; the plane from NW hit the crash site |
philb |
Nov-18-05 06:33 PM |
#87 |
| -
WOW - this is long, but WOW! |
skylarmae |
Jan-08-05 11:34 AM |
#4 |
| -
if flight93 was shot down, it would destroy their carefully crafted |
spooked911 |
Jan-08-05 02:11 PM |
#6 |
| -
As for why not claim the shooting down of UA93 |
NV Whino |
Jan-08-05 01:10 PM |
#5 |
| -
Superb work - a couple of questions |
mikelewis |
Jan-08-05 05:27 PM |
#8 |
| -
Good questions-- and this is what most 9/11 researchers have been trying |
spooked911 |
Jan-08-05 09:24 PM |
#11 |
| -
You seem to know me |
John Doe II |
Jan-09-05 01:40 PM |
#17 |
| -
Were 93, 175,11, and 77 involved in those exercises? |
Old and In the Way |
Jan-28-06 01:13 PM |
#102 |
| -
We do know. They weren't. |
MercutioATC |
Jan-28-06 02:28 PM |
#103 |
| -
I'll try some answers |
John Doe II |
Jan-09-05 02:18 PM |
#19 |
| -
What do you think about the plane from the East & debris at Indian Lake & |
philb |
Nov-20-05 08:49 PM |
#96 |
| -
This is a very good question |
Andre II |
Aug-24-06 03:16 AM |
#105 |
| -
edit: I regret contributing to the bump - self delete. nt |
greyl |
Aug-24-06 04:07 AM |
#106 |
| -
The New Baltimore story was just an erroneuse report. |
planeman |
Aug-24-06 08:37 AM |
#107 |
| -
Why do you think |
Andre II |
Aug-26-06 09:15 AM |
#108 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-08-05 05:30 PM |
#9 |
| -
That's a good piece-- thanks! |
spooked911 |
Jan-08-05 09:19 PM |
#10 |
| -
Not all conspiracies are true, and not all conspiracies are false |
IanDB1 |
Jan-09-05 09:47 AM |
#12 |
| -
After you read the article, you'll be better able to know which is which. |
Abe Linkman |
Jan-09-05 10:25 AM |
#13 |
| -
No conspiracy theories? |
Make7 |
Jan-09-05 12:29 PM |
#14 |
| -
Good job, Make7! |
Ifonly |
Jan-10-05 10:41 PM |
#24 |
| -
Absolutely brillliant - as usual! nT |
woody b |
Jan-09-05 04:42 PM |
#21 |
| -
Great |
John Doe II |
Jan-10-05 11:55 AM |
#22 |
| -
Is it possible that the plane coming from the east... |
mikelewis |
Jan-10-05 05:12 PM |
#23 |
| -
yes-- makes sense to me. |
spooked911 |
Jan-13-05 09:17 AM |
#29 |
| -
I've heard about the switch plane theory but then what happened to |
meppie-meppie not |
Jan-17-05 03:32 PM |
#33 |
| -
That's the catch, isn't it? |
spooked911 |
Jan-17-05 03:59 PM |
#35 |
| -
One thing that we DO know. |
Abe Linkman |
Jan-17-05 04:35 PM |
#37 |
| -
when you people refer to the OCT are you referring to the one |
meppie-meppie not |
Jan-17-05 05:18 PM |
#40 |
| -
I'm about 1/2 way through "The Puzzle Palace" (the NSA) and I'm |
meppie-meppie not |
Jan-17-05 05:15 PM |
#39 |
| -
Would you feel more comfortable just believing what unca gdub tells you? |
Abe Linkman |
Jan-17-05 05:45 PM |
#41 |
| -
until I get ALL the answers that satisfy me, until there is a real |
meppie-meppie not |
Jan-17-05 06:10 PM |
#42 |
| -
Dear OTCler! |
John Doe II |
Jan-11-05 12:43 PM |
#26 |
| -
forgive me for a stupid question... |
meppie-meppie not |
Jan-17-05 03:34 PM |
#34 |
| -
Official Conspiracy Theorist (I think) |
spooked911 |
Jan-17-05 04:00 PM |
#36 |
| -
thanks spooked! I'll get the lingo eventually :-) n/t |
meppie-meppie not |
Jan-17-05 05:02 PM |
#38 |
| -
Re part 1. The commission report agrees with the eyewitness reports. |
gbwarming |
Jan-11-05 11:02 PM |
#27 |
| -
Thanks very much |
John Doe II |
Jan-13-05 08:48 AM |
#28 |
| -
You're very polite, Thank you. |
gbwarming |
Jan-14-05 12:27 AM |
#30 |
| -
Do you have any questions at all about the official story? |
tngledwebb |
Jan-14-05 05:18 AM |
#31 |
| -
Some answers |
John Doe II |
Jan-14-05 02:31 PM |
#32 |
| -
Doubting the wind ... |
John Doe II |
Jan-18-05 03:56 PM |
#43 |
| -
Enjoy the silence! |
John Doe II |
Jan-23-05 03:08 PM |
#44 |
| -
Donald Rumsfeld told us |
Last Lemming |
Jan-23-05 03:44 PM |
#45 |
| -
Second part out |
John Doe II |
Jan-30-05 12:10 PM |
#46 |
| -
The two distinct white jets theme is interesting. |
exploited |
Jan-31-05 02:34 PM |
#47 |
| -
FWIW, the 911 report contradicts the FBI Falcon 20 claim |
exploited |
Feb-01-05 10:34 AM |
#48 |
| -
Thanks a lot for all your info! |
John Doe II |
Feb-01-05 03:07 PM |
#49 |
| -
Maybe the waving of wings was for another reason. |
exploited |
Feb-02-05 09:17 AM |
#53 |
| -
One more thing |
exploited |
Feb-02-05 04:57 AM |
#50 |
| -
Have you EVER heard of an A-10 being used as an air to air weapon? |
MercutioATC |
Feb-02-05 06:23 AM |
#51 |
| -
I agree |
exploited |
Feb-02-05 09:01 AM |
#52 |
| -
I have issues with an A-10 being used. |
MercutioATC |
Feb-02-05 09:20 AM |
#54 |
| -
You could be right |
exploited |
Feb-02-05 11:15 AM |
#55 |
| -
Speed |
John Doe II |
Feb-03-05 02:18 AM |
#57 |
| -
Seems I'm not the only one to suggest the A-10 |
exploited |
Feb-02-05 08:20 PM |
#56 |
| -
Airports |
John Doe II |
Feb-03-05 02:21 AM |
#58 |
| -
They have a bunch of A-10s at Willow Grove, PA. Just set an |
stickdog |
Jan-28-06 05:25 AM |
#99 |
| -
One thing you have to admit... |
jschurchin |
Jan-28-06 08:47 AM |
#100 |
| -
Not only that, the A-10 is SLOW. |
MercutioATC |
Jan-28-06 02:29 PM |
#104 |
| -
Some of the witnesses shown pictures of options chose Swedish SAAB |
philb |
Jul-04-05 07:05 PM |
#67 |
| -
I thought that the witnesses confirmed jet was a swedish fighter |
philb |
Nov-17-05 11:07 PM |
#81 |
| -
White plane |
John Doe II |
Feb-27-05 11:55 AM |
#59 |
| -
One thought I had was the white plane clearly wasn't |
spooked911 |
Feb-27-05 05:34 PM |
#60 |
| -
The C130 was an electronic warfare plane that had ability to bring down |
philb |
Nov-17-05 11:11 PM |
#82 |
| -
Nonsense |
hack89 |
Nov-19-05 10:58 AM |
#92 |
| -
I posted what I've seen said about the C130 |
philb |
Nov-19-05 04:26 PM |
#94 |
| -
There is no ability to jam aircraft flight controls |
hack89 |
Nov-19-05 06:21 PM |
#95 |
| -
White plane theory |
rs3787 |
Jul-04-05 04:51 AM |
#61 |
| -
welcome to DU!!! And good post! |
spooked911 |
Jul-04-05 09:05 AM |
#63 |
| -
Shot down |
Zaphod 36 |
Jul-04-05 01:51 PM |
#64 |
| -
One missile |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jul-04-05 05:26 PM |
#66 |
| -
Could the 'white plane' |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jul-04-05 05:24 PM |
#65 |
| -
Response to questions: |
rs3787 |
Jul-05-05 05:46 AM |
#68 |
| -
Thanks a lot |
John Doe II |
Jul-05-05 09:11 AM |
#70 |
| -
Crater and flight path |
rs3787 |
Jul-06-05 10:55 AM |
#74 |
| -
Good explanition, but |
Zaphod 36 |
Jul-08-05 06:26 AM |
#77 |
| -
Indian Lake |
John Doe II |
Jul-05-05 12:34 PM |
#71 |
| -
Indian Lake info |
rs3787 |
Jul-06-05 09:16 AM |
#73 |
| -
Thanks for the info! |
John Doe II |
Jul-06-05 11:41 AM |
#75 |
| -
Second debris field at Indian Lake 4-8 miles away & jet sounds overhead |
philb |
Nov-18-05 08:32 PM |
#88 |
| -
Actually at least 3 separate debris fields in different areas/directions |
philb |
Nov-18-05 08:52 PM |
#89 |
| -
More questions |
Zaphod 36 |
Jul-05-05 01:22 PM |
#72 |
| -
Re more qustions |
rs3787 |
Jul-07-05 07:14 AM |
#76 |
| -
This statement is very confusing to me? |
philb |
Nov-18-05 06:05 PM |
#85 |
| -
I think you mean a remote controlled plane rigged with a bomb |
philb |
Nov-17-05 11:32 PM |
#83 |
| -
UK radio broadcast |
extrak |
Nov-17-05 08:43 PM |
#78 |
| -
Probably because it was a commercial airliner |
Tab |
Nov-17-05 09:26 PM |
#79 |
| -
Questions about 93 |
petgoat |
Nov-18-05 01:28 AM |
#84 |
| -
This was the FIFTH PLANE... |
woody b |
Nov-19-05 03:51 PM |
#93 |
| -
Wind direction facts on 9/11 document official story was bogus |
philb |
Nov-19-05 08:40 AM |
#90 |
| -
A one plane scenario consistent with the debris fields |
philb |
Nov-19-05 10:02 AM |
#91 |
| -
Problem is |
Andre II |
Apr-08-07 05:24 PM |
#109 |
| -
The Neocon Flying Circus! |
MrSammo1 |
Nov-21-05 03:37 AM |
#97 |
| -
Is there URL for a site that summerizes your information posted here? |
philb |
Dec-04-05 10:12 AM |
#98 |
| -
Locking |
Lithos |
Apr-08-07 05:27 PM |
#110 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread