You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #111: Let's take #1-- [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #110
111. Let's take #1--
say there are two floors that we can move together at variable speeds experimentally, in a closed chamber, and then we can measure the speed of the air exiting from between the compressed floors-- say through a hole in the chamber that is midway between the two floors. Are you saying that the exit speed of the air will be the same, regardless of whether the floors move together at 1 foot per second, and 100 feet per second?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -WTC2-- Squibs Far Above "Collapse" Zone During Initiation of Destruction spooked911  Jun-20-10 07:33 AM   #0 
  - "the official explanation" ????  LARED   Jun-20-10 07:56 AM   #1 
  - Bwahahaha~!~  BeFree   Jun-20-10 11:23 AM   #2 
     - Can't you get anything right  LARED   Jun-20-10 11:32 AM   #3 
        - No  BeFree   Jun-20-10 11:38 AM   #4 
           - Why is the explanation of compressed air  Theobald   Jun-20-10 11:45 AM   #5 
              - Still with the compressed air kick?  BeFree   Jun-20-10 11:54 AM   #6 
                 - You will have to explain your self to me  Theobald   Jun-20-10 12:19 PM   #7 
                 - And how many PSI would that be?  BeFree   Jun-20-10 12:31 PM   #8 
                    - Let's start from the beginning  Theobald   Jun-20-10 12:43 PM   #9 
                       - Collpasing container  BeFree   Jun-20-10 12:48 PM   #10 
                       - I am trying to have a serious conversation with you.  Theobald   Jun-20-10 09:42 PM   #20 
                          - sorry theobald  zappaman   Jun-20-10 11:12 PM   #21 
                       - The squibs are coming out at multiple floors, up to 15 floors above the "collapse" joint  spooked911   Jun-20-10 02:08 PM   #11 
                       - I know one way to find out  zappaman   Jun-20-10 03:46 PM   #12 
                       - Nice to know you think this is all one big joke  spooked911   Jun-20-10 07:22 PM   #17 
                          - I don't think 9/11 is a joke  zappaman   Jun-20-10 08:21 PM   #18 
                             - I don't mind too much if you mock the alien stuff--  spooked911   Jun-21-10 06:58 AM   #26 
                                - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-21-10 11:55 AM   #29 
                                - This is yet another of your "substantive post(s) about the WTC" that shows...  William Seger   Jun-21-10 11:27 PM   #32 
                                - Spooked is merely following Lachlan's Laws  LARED   Jun-22-10 03:59 AM   #33 
                                - I love how you dance around an argument  spooked911   Jun-23-10 07:02 AM   #40 
                                   - Spooked...  SDuderstadt   Jun-23-10 07:27 AM   #41 
                                   - dude  zappaman   Jun-23-10 12:15 PM   #42 
                                   - you're simply wrong on every level  spooked911   Jun-28-10 07:42 AM   #71 
                                   - Then why is nearly everyone here...  SDuderstadt   Jun-28-10 08:06 AM   #74 
                                   - you know darn well why  spooked911   Jun-28-10 08:57 PM   #82 
                                   - I AM being human, dude...  SDuderstadt   Jun-28-10 09:04 PM   #84 
                                   - I provided a CD expert when you asked for one  spooked911   Jun-29-10 07:37 AM   #90 
                                   - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Jun-29-10 08:35 AM   #91 
                                   - Nice of you to admit you are gatekeeping.  spooked911   Jun-29-10 05:41 PM   #95 
                                   - uh oh  zappaman   Jun-29-10 05:46 PM   #96 
                                   - You don't need "gatekeeping", dude...  SDuderstadt   Jun-29-10 09:13 PM   #108 
                                   - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-02-10 11:07 AM   #149 
                                   - paranoia  zappaman   Jul-02-10 12:14 PM   #150 
                                   - LOL, expert Staff Photographer Tom Sullivan says...  William Seger   Jun-28-10 12:00 PM   #78 
                                   - "factual" and "sensible"  zappaman   Jun-28-10 04:38 PM   #79 
                                   - reading comprehension problems?  spooked911   Jun-28-10 08:56 PM   #81 
                                   - Since when did an "explosive-charge placement technician" = controlled demolition expert?  William Seger   Jun-28-10 09:43 PM   #85 
                                   - he said WTC7 looked like classic CD, not the "towers"  spooked911   Jun-29-10 07:15 AM   #89 
                                   - I don't see any dancing in that thread  zappaman   Jun-23-10 12:55 PM   #43 
                                   - there were no explanations  spooked911   Jun-23-10 07:46 PM   #47 
                                   - yes, there were and are plenty of explanations  zappaman   Jun-23-10 07:51 PM   #49 
                                   - point to one  spooked911   Jun-23-10 07:57 PM   #51 
                                   - check out William Seger's responses  zappaman   Jun-23-10 08:02 PM   #53 
                                   - what about  spooked911   Jun-24-10 06:43 AM   #55 
                                   - damn those fancy-sounding words!  zappaman   Jun-24-10 10:17 AM   #58 
                                   - actually, the funny thing is Seger did not even post in that particular thread  spooked911   Jun-24-10 06:52 AM   #57 
                                   - I woudn't call your response an argument  William Seger   Jun-25-10 09:41 AM   #63 
                                   - your recollection is wrong  spooked911   Jun-28-10 07:58 AM   #72 
                                   - I didn't say I responded in THAT thread  William Seger   Jun-28-10 10:14 AM   #77 
                                   - what was the specific answer I gave that you thought was the reasonable explanation?  spooked911   Jun-28-10 08:54 PM   #80 
                                   - I answered your question  William Seger   Jun-29-10 01:08 AM   #88 
                                   - You could have answered directly instead of with your (inapt) analogy.  spooked911   Jul-01-10 08:02 PM   #141 
                                   - Your failure to understand an argument is not my fault.  LARED   Jun-23-10 06:19 PM   #46 
                                      - please point me to your "argument" in that thread  spooked911   Jun-23-10 07:47 PM   #48 
                                      - That would explain why "debating" with you is such a waste of time  William Seger   Jun-28-10 10:02 AM   #75 
                                - did you watch the video in question?  spooked911   Jun-23-10 06:57 AM   #39 
                                   - Of course I did, or I wouldn't have commented on it. A better question is, did you  William Seger   Jun-23-10 04:56 PM   #45 
                                      - Several points  spooked911   Jun-23-10 08:49 PM   #54 
                                         - That's funny, in a pathetic sort of way.  William Seger   Jun-25-10 09:21 AM   #62 
                                         - do you honestly think the WTC was a closed system?  spooked911   Jun-25-10 07:22 PM   #65 
                                         - WTF  William Seger   Jun-25-10 08:06 PM   #66 
                                         - we're talking about air pressure and you don't know what a "closed system" has to do with it?  spooked911   Jun-26-10 02:19 PM   #67 
                                         - Do you understand that the floors above the  LARED   Jun-26-10 05:27 PM   #68 
                                         - I'm sure there was some smoke in the levels above the fires  spooked911   Jun-27-10 08:29 AM   #69 
                                         - We're talking about air pressure in a system that obviously wasn't closed...  William Seger   Jun-27-10 01:12 PM   #70 
                                         - No-- the squibs were concomitant with the tilt  spooked911   Jun-28-10 08:01 AM   #73 
                                         - Total bullshit  William Seger   Jun-28-10 10:06 AM   #76 
                                         - The initial squibs were indeed concomitant with the tilt.  spooked911   Jun-28-10 09:04 PM   #83 
                                         - Can't you ever admit that you are simply wrong?  William Seger   Jun-28-10 10:08 PM   #86 
                                         - That's a pretty high bar  LARED   Jun-28-10 10:23 PM   #87 
                                         - Yes, I can admit I am wrong, I have done so before, on this board a couple of times.  spooked911   Jun-29-10 08:46 AM   #92 
                                         - Jeez... Pressure changes DO propagate at the speed of sound...  William Seger   Jun-29-10 01:34 PM   #93 
                                         - but but  zappaman   Jun-29-10 01:37 PM   #94 
                                         - No, the pressure changes would move at the speed dictated by the force of the compressed air  spooked911   Jun-29-10 06:00 PM   #98 
                                         - "There's no way in your mind that those squibs could be the by-product of explosives going off? "  zappaman   Jun-29-10 06:26 PM   #99 
                                         - goofy doesn't mean wrong.  spooked911   Jun-29-10 07:57 PM   #101 
                                         - "the problem is none of you can seem to mount proper counter-arguments to the evidence I've produced  zappaman   Jun-29-10 08:33 PM   #103 
                                         - Yes-- I will repeat it:  spooked911   Jun-30-10 06:37 AM   #113 
                                         - No, you are not "waiting' for any such thing  William Seger   Jun-30-10 08:49 AM   #115 
                                         - yes, it's delusional to realize that the starboard wing was traveling forwards  spooked911   Jun-30-10 09:49 AM   #117 
                                         - Good grief  William Seger   Jul-01-10 09:03 AM   #130 
                                         - Really?  spooked911   Jul-01-10 07:12 PM   #137 
                                         - Your capacity for cognitive dissonance is...  SDuderstadt   Jun-29-10 09:05 PM   #105 
                                         - I'm not going to endlessly repeat myself just because you are  William Seger   Jun-30-10 12:40 AM   #110 
                                         - Let's take #1--  spooked911   Jun-30-10 06:29 AM   #111 
                                         - What th'....?  William Seger   Jun-30-10 08:33 AM   #114 
                                         - I assume you want me to say the smoke will come out immediately after you push in the piston  spooked911   Jun-30-10 09:42 AM   #116 
                                         - "I just don't understand"  zappaman   Jun-30-10 11:40 AM   #118 
                                         - Yes, you're awesome for taking my statement out of context.  spooked911   Jun-30-10 03:11 PM   #119 
                                         - ok Spooked  zappaman   Jun-30-10 03:23 PM   #121 
                                         - actually, I demolished him in my last post about air pressure--  spooked911   Jul-01-10 06:21 AM   #127 
                                         - Musta been a controlled demolition  William Seger   Jul-01-10 10:30 AM   #132 
                                         - Yeah, it was.  spooked911   Jul-01-10 07:21 PM   #140 
                                         - Yup,, it was exactly like your WTC controlled demolition  William Seger   Jul-01-10 09:34 PM   #143 
                                         - you "demolished" him?  zappaman   Jul-01-10 11:33 AM   #133 
                                         - Spooked, have you considered that  LARED   Jun-30-10 05:27 PM   #123 
                                         - Yes.  spooked911   Jul-01-10 06:20 AM   #126 
                                         - It didn't have to be.  AZCat   Jul-01-10 08:33 AM   #129 
                                         - No one is saying that (except maybe you. It's hard to tell what you are  LARED   Jul-01-10 06:17 PM   #134 
                                         - because  spooked911   Jul-01-10 06:56 PM   #135 
                                         - what is obvious  zappaman   Jul-01-10 07:06 PM   #136 
                                         - Sorry, but you are so wrong  spooked911   Jul-01-10 07:20 PM   #139 
                                         - Once again I ponder if you are really that detached from  LARED   Jul-01-10 09:43 PM   #145 
                                         - No, it's not a "closed system"  William Seger   Jul-01-10 09:27 AM   #131 
                                         - It depends on the size of the holes in your newest example--  spooked911   Jul-01-10 07:18 PM   #138 
                                         - Do you also think loud sounds travel faster than faint ones?  William Seger   Jul-01-10 09:33 PM   #142 
                                         - ummmm...  zappaman   Jul-01-10 09:41 PM   #144 
                                         - once again--  spooked911   Jul-02-10 08:29 AM   #146 
                                         - And once again  William Seger   Jul-02-10 09:22 AM   #147 
                                         - I admire your patiience....  SDuderstadt   Jul-02-10 09:39 AM   #148 
                                         - Once again, you seem to think calling me stupid or delusional will change my mind...  spooked911   Jul-02-10 01:22 PM   #153 
                                         - NOTHING will change your mind  William Seger   Jul-02-10 02:56 PM   #155 
                                         - Except that the top of the tower completely disintegrated in mid air as it fell.  spooked911   Jul-02-10 04:04 PM   #157 
                                         - The top of the tower completely disintegrated in mid-air???  terrafirma   Jul-02-10 04:15 PM   #159 
                                         - well, most videos of the south tower destruction show this  spooked911   Jul-02-10 06:29 PM   #161 
                                         - Exactly...  terrafirma   Jul-02-10 08:50 PM   #165 
                                         - the breaking apart was much more rapid and powerful than can be accounted for by gravity--  spooked911   Jul-03-10 08:18 AM   #166 
                                         - China Syndrome reaction.???????  LARED   Jul-03-10 10:00 AM   #168 
                                         - Yes, the China Syndrome  spooked911   Jul-04-10 08:23 AM   #172 
                                         - Spooked, you are the best  LARED   Jul-04-10 08:33 AM   #173 
                                         - I assume you can back up your assertion  terrafirma   Jul-03-10 11:27 PM   #170 
                                         - lots of people have proven demolition  spooked911   Jul-04-10 08:22 AM   #171 
                                         - see this video, for instance  spooked911   Jul-03-10 08:21 AM   #167 
                                         - And, as I said when I first posted this, I was curious what your explanation would be  spooked911   Jul-02-10 01:27 PM   #154 
                                         - You seem to find the location  terrafirma   Jul-02-10 03:09 PM   #156 
                                         - Apparently the explosives were set off assymetrically, on that one side  spooked911   Jul-02-10 04:12 PM   #158 
                                         - "Apparently", "Perhaps" and "Presumably"  terrafirma   Jul-02-10 04:22 PM   #160 
                                         - you asked why they did certain things  spooked911   Jul-02-10 06:31 PM   #162 
                                         - wow  zappaman   Jul-02-10 07:41 PM   #163 
                                         - No, you're not guessing.  terrafirma   Jul-02-10 08:45 PM   #164 
                                         - The problem with your prediction...  AZCat   Jul-03-10 11:30 AM   #169 
                                - Let us know when you....  SDuderstadt   Jun-23-10 01:36 PM   #44 
                       - The fact that so called squibs  LARED   Jun-20-10 04:02 PM   #14 
                       - It is unremarkable if you think demolition occurred  spooked911   Jun-20-10 07:21 PM   #16 
                          - Jeez you Ct.'ers cannot get anything right today  LARED   Jun-20-10 08:32 PM   #19 
                             - that's not what I said  spooked911   Jun-21-10 06:48 AM   #24 
                       - I watched your video and I see what you are talking about  Theobald   Jun-21-10 12:52 PM   #30 
                          - I'm glad you watched the video and you see the squibs.  spooked911   Jun-21-10 07:50 PM   #31 
                             - The top block was turned  deconstruct911   Jun-22-10 07:48 PM   #36 
                                - great conclusion  zappaman   Jun-22-10 08:00 PM   #37 
                                   - I think many of us have tried presenting this to people in govt  spooked911   Jun-23-10 06:52 AM   #38 
                       - Tiny little poofs of air = Squibs  JuniperLea   Jun-29-10 05:49 PM   #97 
                          - maybe the windows WERE blown out  spooked911   Jun-30-10 03:15 PM   #120 
                             - I'm just saying...  JuniperLea   Jun-30-10 03:40 PM   #122 
                                - I'm not sure where you're coming down on this  spooked911   Jul-01-10 06:27 AM   #128 
                 - you think the WTC was built like an ICE?  LARED   Jun-20-10 04:00 PM   #13 
                 - Internal Combustion Engine, I'm guessing n/t  OnTheOtherHand   Jun-21-10 09:52 AM   #27 
                    - I think you're right, lets see if BeFree will confirm nt  LARED   Jun-21-10 11:05 AM   #28 
                 - Here's a question for you  LARED   Jun-20-10 04:11 PM   #15 
  - spooked did you just wake up?  zappaman   Jun-20-10 11:19 PM   #22 
  - Most of Spooked's posts...  SDuderstadt   Jun-20-10 11:21 PM   #23 
  - These squibs are different from ones typically talked about  spooked911   Jun-21-10 06:51 AM   #25 
     - Personally...  terrafirma   Jun-22-10 06:16 PM   #34 
        - Well if you don't believe in mini-nukes,  LARED   Jun-22-10 07:24 PM   #35 
           - plenty of evidence, actually  spooked911   Jun-23-10 07:55 PM   #50 
              - bwhahahahahahaahahaha  zappaman   Jun-23-10 08:01 PM   #52 
                 - yes, there is plenty of evidence there  spooked911   Jun-24-10 06:46 AM   #56 
                    - Jesus, Spooked....  SDuderstadt   Jun-24-10 10:18 AM   #59 
                    - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-25-10 06:10 AM   #61 
                       - Spooked  zappaman   Jun-25-10 12:54 PM   #64 
                    - Sorry, Spooked  zappaman   Jun-24-10 01:28 PM   #60 
  - Taking these as evidence of explosives...  jberryhill   Jun-29-10 07:46 PM   #100 
  - I already addressed that above when someone else asked it.  spooked911   Jun-30-10 06:32 AM   #112 
     - Correct me if I'm wrong...  terrafirma   Jun-30-10 07:08 PM   #124 
     - it just gets goofier  zappaman   Jun-30-10 07:30 PM   #125 
     - Still waiting...  terrafirma   Jul-02-10 12:45 PM   #151 
        - don't hold your breath  zappaman   Jul-02-10 01:19 PM   #152 
  - How do we know this isn't another example of video fakery? ( n/t )  Make7   Jun-29-10 08:11 PM   #102 
     - "another example"?  zappaman   Jun-29-10 08:36 PM   #104 
        - Make7 just forgot to include...  SDuderstadt   Jun-29-10 09:07 PM   #106 
           - ok  zappaman   Jun-29-10 09:13 PM   #107 
           - I would actually like to know how it was determined that this video is not fake. ( n/t )  Make7   Jun-29-10 09:44 PM   #109 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC