spooked911
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-25-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #62 |
| 65. do you honestly think the WTC was a closed system? |
|
Not that I expect an honest or straight answer from you... but I might as well keep up the little game for a bit more...
|
| -WTC2-- Squibs Far Above "Collapse" Zone During Initiation of Destruction |
spooked911 |
Jun-20-10 07:33 AM |
#0 |
 -
"the official explanation" ???? |
LARED |
Jun-20-10 07:56 AM |
#1 |
  -
Bwahahaha~!~ |
BeFree |
Jun-20-10 11:23 AM |
#2 |
| -
Can't you get anything right |
LARED |
Jun-20-10 11:32 AM |
#3 |
| -
No |
BeFree |
Jun-20-10 11:38 AM |
#4 |
| -
Why is the explanation of compressed air |
Theobald |
Jun-20-10 11:45 AM |
#5 |
| -
Still with the compressed air kick? |
BeFree |
Jun-20-10 11:54 AM |
#6 |
| -
You will have to explain your self to me |
Theobald |
Jun-20-10 12:19 PM |
#7 |
| -
And how many PSI would that be? |
BeFree |
Jun-20-10 12:31 PM |
#8 |
| -
Let's start from the beginning |
Theobald |
Jun-20-10 12:43 PM |
#9 |
| -
Collpasing container |
BeFree |
Jun-20-10 12:48 PM |
#10 |
| -
I am trying to have a serious conversation with you. |
Theobald |
Jun-20-10 09:42 PM |
#20 |
| -
sorry theobald |
zappaman |
Jun-20-10 11:12 PM |
#21 |
| -
The squibs are coming out at multiple floors, up to 15 floors above the "collapse" joint |
spooked911 |
Jun-20-10 02:08 PM |
#11 |
| -
I know one way to find out |
zappaman |
Jun-20-10 03:46 PM |
#12 |
| -
Nice to know you think this is all one big joke |
spooked911 |
Jun-20-10 07:22 PM |
#17 |
| -
I don't think 9/11 is a joke |
zappaman |
Jun-20-10 08:21 PM |
#18 |
| -
I don't mind too much if you mock the alien stuff-- |
spooked911 |
Jun-21-10 06:58 AM |
#26 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-21-10 11:55 AM |
#29 |
| -
This is yet another of your "substantive post(s) about the WTC" that shows... |
William Seger |
Jun-21-10 11:27 PM |
#32 |
| -
Spooked is merely following Lachlan's Laws |
LARED |
Jun-22-10 03:59 AM |
#33 |
| -
I love how you dance around an argument |
spooked911 |
Jun-23-10 07:02 AM |
#40 |
| -
Spooked... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-23-10 07:27 AM |
#41 |
| -
dude |
zappaman |
Jun-23-10 12:15 PM |
#42 |
| -
you're simply wrong on every level |
spooked911 |
Jun-28-10 07:42 AM |
#71 |
| -
Then why is nearly everyone here... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-28-10 08:06 AM |
#74 |
| -
you know darn well why |
spooked911 |
Jun-28-10 08:57 PM |
#82 |
| -
I AM being human, dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-28-10 09:04 PM |
#84 |
| -
I provided a CD expert when you asked for one |
spooked911 |
Jun-29-10 07:37 AM |
#90 |
| -
Dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-29-10 08:35 AM |
#91 |
| -
Nice of you to admit you are gatekeeping. |
spooked911 |
Jun-29-10 05:41 PM |
#95 |
| -
uh oh |
zappaman |
Jun-29-10 05:46 PM |
#96 |
| -
You don't need "gatekeeping", dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-29-10 09:13 PM |
#108 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-02-10 11:07 AM |
#149 |
| -
paranoia |
zappaman |
Jul-02-10 12:14 PM |
#150 |
| -
LOL, expert Staff Photographer Tom Sullivan says... |
William Seger |
Jun-28-10 12:00 PM |
#78 |
| -
"factual" and "sensible" |
zappaman |
Jun-28-10 04:38 PM |
#79 |
| -
reading comprehension problems? |
spooked911 |
Jun-28-10 08:56 PM |
#81 |
| -
Since when did an "explosive-charge placement technician" = controlled demolition expert? |
William Seger |
Jun-28-10 09:43 PM |
#85 |
| -
he said WTC7 looked like classic CD, not the "towers" |
spooked911 |
Jun-29-10 07:15 AM |
#89 |
| -
I don't see any dancing in that thread |
zappaman |
Jun-23-10 12:55 PM |
#43 |
| -
there were no explanations |
spooked911 |
Jun-23-10 07:46 PM |
#47 |
| -
yes, there were and are plenty of explanations |
zappaman |
Jun-23-10 07:51 PM |
#49 |
| -
point to one |
spooked911 |
Jun-23-10 07:57 PM |
#51 |
| -
check out William Seger's responses |
zappaman |
Jun-23-10 08:02 PM |
#53 |
| -
what about |
spooked911 |
Jun-24-10 06:43 AM |
#55 |
| -
damn those fancy-sounding words! |
zappaman |
Jun-24-10 10:17 AM |
#58 |
| -
actually, the funny thing is Seger did not even post in that particular thread |
spooked911 |
Jun-24-10 06:52 AM |
#57 |
| -
I woudn't call your response an argument |
William Seger |
Jun-25-10 09:41 AM |
#63 |
| -
your recollection is wrong |
spooked911 |
Jun-28-10 07:58 AM |
#72 |
| -
I didn't say I responded in THAT thread |
William Seger |
Jun-28-10 10:14 AM |
#77 |
| -
what was the specific answer I gave that you thought was the reasonable explanation? |
spooked911 |
Jun-28-10 08:54 PM |
#80 |
| -
I answered your question |
William Seger |
Jun-29-10 01:08 AM |
#88 |
| -
You could have answered directly instead of with your (inapt) analogy. |
spooked911 |
Jul-01-10 08:02 PM |
#141 |
| -
Your failure to understand an argument is not my fault. |
LARED |
Jun-23-10 06:19 PM |
#46 |
| -
please point me to your "argument" in that thread |
spooked911 |
Jun-23-10 07:47 PM |
#48 |
| -
That would explain why "debating" with you is such a waste of time |
William Seger |
Jun-28-10 10:02 AM |
#75 |
| -
did you watch the video in question? |
spooked911 |
Jun-23-10 06:57 AM |
#39 |
| -
Of course I did, or I wouldn't have commented on it. A better question is, did you |
William Seger |
Jun-23-10 04:56 PM |
#45 |
| -
Several points |
spooked911 |
Jun-23-10 08:49 PM |
#54 |
| -
That's funny, in a pathetic sort of way. |
William Seger |
Jun-25-10 09:21 AM |
#62 |
| -
do you honestly think the WTC was a closed system? |
spooked911 |
Jun-25-10 07:22 PM |
#65 |
| -
WTF |
William Seger |
Jun-25-10 08:06 PM |
#66 |
| -
we're talking about air pressure and you don't know what a "closed system" has to do with it? |
spooked911 |
Jun-26-10 02:19 PM |
#67 |
| -
Do you understand that the floors above the |
LARED |
Jun-26-10 05:27 PM |
#68 |
| -
I'm sure there was some smoke in the levels above the fires |
spooked911 |
Jun-27-10 08:29 AM |
#69 |
| -
We're talking about air pressure in a system that obviously wasn't closed... |
William Seger |
Jun-27-10 01:12 PM |
#70 |
| -
No-- the squibs were concomitant with the tilt |
spooked911 |
Jun-28-10 08:01 AM |
#73 |
| -
Total bullshit |
William Seger |
Jun-28-10 10:06 AM |
#76 |
| -
The initial squibs were indeed concomitant with the tilt. |
spooked911 |
Jun-28-10 09:04 PM |
#83 |
| -
Can't you ever admit that you are simply wrong? |
William Seger |
Jun-28-10 10:08 PM |
#86 |
| -
That's a pretty high bar |
LARED |
Jun-28-10 10:23 PM |
#87 |
| -
Yes, I can admit I am wrong, I have done so before, on this board a couple of times. |
spooked911 |
Jun-29-10 08:46 AM |
#92 |
| -
Jeez... Pressure changes DO propagate at the speed of sound... |
William Seger |
Jun-29-10 01:34 PM |
#93 |
| -
but but |
zappaman |
Jun-29-10 01:37 PM |
#94 |
| -
No, the pressure changes would move at the speed dictated by the force of the compressed air |
spooked911 |
Jun-29-10 06:00 PM |
#98 |
| -
"There's no way in your mind that those squibs could be the by-product of explosives going off? " |
zappaman |
Jun-29-10 06:26 PM |
#99 |
| -
goofy doesn't mean wrong. |
spooked911 |
Jun-29-10 07:57 PM |
#101 |
| -
"the problem is none of you can seem to mount proper counter-arguments to the evidence I've produced |
zappaman |
Jun-29-10 08:33 PM |
#103 |
| -
Yes-- I will repeat it: |
spooked911 |
Jun-30-10 06:37 AM |
#113 |
| -
No, you are not "waiting' for any such thing |
William Seger |
Jun-30-10 08:49 AM |
#115 |
| -
yes, it's delusional to realize that the starboard wing was traveling forwards |
spooked911 |
Jun-30-10 09:49 AM |
#117 |
| -
Good grief |
William Seger |
Jul-01-10 09:03 AM |
#130 |
| -
Really? |
spooked911 |
Jul-01-10 07:12 PM |
#137 |
| -
Your capacity for cognitive dissonance is... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-29-10 09:05 PM |
#105 |
| -
I'm not going to endlessly repeat myself just because you are |
William Seger |
Jun-30-10 12:40 AM |
#110 |
| -
Let's take #1-- |
spooked911 |
Jun-30-10 06:29 AM |
#111 |
| -
What th'....? |
William Seger |
Jun-30-10 08:33 AM |
#114 |
| -
I assume you want me to say the smoke will come out immediately after you push in the piston |
spooked911 |
Jun-30-10 09:42 AM |
#116 |
| -
"I just don't understand" |
zappaman |
Jun-30-10 11:40 AM |
#118 |
| -
Yes, you're awesome for taking my statement out of context. |
spooked911 |
Jun-30-10 03:11 PM |
#119 |
| -
ok Spooked |
zappaman |
Jun-30-10 03:23 PM |
#121 |
| -
actually, I demolished him in my last post about air pressure-- |
spooked911 |
Jul-01-10 06:21 AM |
#127 |
| -
Musta been a controlled demolition |
William Seger |
Jul-01-10 10:30 AM |
#132 |
| -
Yeah, it was. |
spooked911 |
Jul-01-10 07:21 PM |
#140 |
| -
Yup,, it was exactly like your WTC controlled demolition |
William Seger |
Jul-01-10 09:34 PM |
#143 |
| -
you "demolished" him? |
zappaman |
Jul-01-10 11:33 AM |
#133 |
| -
Spooked, have you considered that |
LARED |
Jun-30-10 05:27 PM |
#123 |
| -
Yes. |
spooked911 |
Jul-01-10 06:20 AM |
#126 |
| -
It didn't have to be. |
AZCat |
Jul-01-10 08:33 AM |
#129 |
| -
No one is saying that (except maybe you. It's hard to tell what you are |
LARED |
Jul-01-10 06:17 PM |
#134 |
| -
because |
spooked911 |
Jul-01-10 06:56 PM |
#135 |
| -
what is obvious |
zappaman |
Jul-01-10 07:06 PM |
#136 |
| -
Sorry, but you are so wrong |
spooked911 |
Jul-01-10 07:20 PM |
#139 |
| -
Once again I ponder if you are really that detached from |
LARED |
Jul-01-10 09:43 PM |
#145 |
| -
No, it's not a "closed system" |
William Seger |
Jul-01-10 09:27 AM |
#131 |
| -
It depends on the size of the holes in your newest example-- |
spooked911 |
Jul-01-10 07:18 PM |
#138 |
| -
Do you also think loud sounds travel faster than faint ones? |
William Seger |
Jul-01-10 09:33 PM |
#142 |
| -
ummmm... |
zappaman |
Jul-01-10 09:41 PM |
#144 |
| -
once again-- |
spooked911 |
Jul-02-10 08:29 AM |
#146 |
| -
And once again |
William Seger |
Jul-02-10 09:22 AM |
#147 |
| -
I admire your patiience.... |
SDuderstadt |
Jul-02-10 09:39 AM |
#148 |
| -
Once again, you seem to think calling me stupid or delusional will change my mind... |
spooked911 |
Jul-02-10 01:22 PM |
#153 |
| -
NOTHING will change your mind |
William Seger |
Jul-02-10 02:56 PM |
#155 |
| -
Except that the top of the tower completely disintegrated in mid air as it fell. |
spooked911 |
Jul-02-10 04:04 PM |
#157 |
| -
The top of the tower completely disintegrated in mid-air??? |
terrafirma |
Jul-02-10 04:15 PM |
#159 |
| -
well, most videos of the south tower destruction show this |
spooked911 |
Jul-02-10 06:29 PM |
#161 |
| -
Exactly... |
terrafirma |
Jul-02-10 08:50 PM |
#165 |
| -
the breaking apart was much more rapid and powerful than can be accounted for by gravity-- |
spooked911 |
Jul-03-10 08:18 AM |
#166 |
| -
China Syndrome reaction.??????? |
LARED |
Jul-03-10 10:00 AM |
#168 |
| -
Yes, the China Syndrome |
spooked911 |
Jul-04-10 08:23 AM |
#172 |
| -
Spooked, you are the best |
LARED |
Jul-04-10 08:33 AM |
#173 |
| -
I assume you can back up your assertion |
terrafirma |
Jul-03-10 11:27 PM |
#170 |
| -
lots of people have proven demolition |
spooked911 |
Jul-04-10 08:22 AM |
#171 |
| -
see this video, for instance |
spooked911 |
Jul-03-10 08:21 AM |
#167 |
| -
And, as I said when I first posted this, I was curious what your explanation would be |
spooked911 |
Jul-02-10 01:27 PM |
#154 |
| -
You seem to find the location |
terrafirma |
Jul-02-10 03:09 PM |
#156 |
| -
Apparently the explosives were set off assymetrically, on that one side |
spooked911 |
Jul-02-10 04:12 PM |
#158 |
| -
"Apparently", "Perhaps" and "Presumably" |
terrafirma |
Jul-02-10 04:22 PM |
#160 |
| -
you asked why they did certain things |
spooked911 |
Jul-02-10 06:31 PM |
#162 |
| -
wow |
zappaman |
Jul-02-10 07:41 PM |
#163 |
| -
No, you're not guessing. |
terrafirma |
Jul-02-10 08:45 PM |
#164 |
| -
The problem with your prediction... |
AZCat |
Jul-03-10 11:30 AM |
#169 |
| -
Let us know when you.... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-23-10 01:36 PM |
#44 |
| -
The fact that so called squibs |
LARED |
Jun-20-10 04:02 PM |
#14 |
| -
It is unremarkable if you think demolition occurred |
spooked911 |
Jun-20-10 07:21 PM |
#16 |
| -
Jeez you Ct.'ers cannot get anything right today |
LARED |
Jun-20-10 08:32 PM |
#19 |
| -
that's not what I said |
spooked911 |
Jun-21-10 06:48 AM |
#24 |
| -
I watched your video and I see what you are talking about |
Theobald |
Jun-21-10 12:52 PM |
#30 |
| -
I'm glad you watched the video and you see the squibs. |
spooked911 |
Jun-21-10 07:50 PM |
#31 |
| -
The top block was turned |
deconstruct911 |
Jun-22-10 07:48 PM |
#36 |
| -
great conclusion |
zappaman |
Jun-22-10 08:00 PM |
#37 |
| -
I think many of us have tried presenting this to people in govt |
spooked911 |
Jun-23-10 06:52 AM |
#38 |
| -
Tiny little poofs of air = Squibs |
JuniperLea |
Jun-29-10 05:49 PM |
#97 |
| -
maybe the windows WERE blown out |
spooked911 |
Jun-30-10 03:15 PM |
#120 |
| -
I'm just saying... |
JuniperLea |
Jun-30-10 03:40 PM |
#122 |
| -
I'm not sure where you're coming down on this |
spooked911 |
Jul-01-10 06:27 AM |
#128 |
| -
you think the WTC was built like an ICE? |
LARED |
Jun-20-10 04:00 PM |
#13 |
| -
Internal Combustion Engine, I'm guessing n/t |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-21-10 09:52 AM |
#27 |
| -
I think you're right, lets see if BeFree will confirm nt |
LARED |
Jun-21-10 11:05 AM |
#28 |
| -
Here's a question for you |
LARED |
Jun-20-10 04:11 PM |
#15 |
| -
spooked did you just wake up? |
zappaman |
Jun-20-10 11:19 PM |
#22 |
| -
Most of Spooked's posts... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-20-10 11:21 PM |
#23 |
| -
These squibs are different from ones typically talked about |
spooked911 |
Jun-21-10 06:51 AM |
#25 |
| -
Personally... |
terrafirma |
Jun-22-10 06:16 PM |
#34 |
| -
Well if you don't believe in mini-nukes, |
LARED |
Jun-22-10 07:24 PM |
#35 |
| -
plenty of evidence, actually |
spooked911 |
Jun-23-10 07:55 PM |
#50 |
| -
bwhahahahahahaahahaha |
zappaman |
Jun-23-10 08:01 PM |
#52 |
| -
yes, there is plenty of evidence there |
spooked911 |
Jun-24-10 06:46 AM |
#56 |
| -
Jesus, Spooked.... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-24-10 10:18 AM |
#59 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-25-10 06:10 AM |
#61 |
| -
Spooked |
zappaman |
Jun-25-10 12:54 PM |
#64 |
| -
Sorry, Spooked |
zappaman |
Jun-24-10 01:28 PM |
#60 |
| -
Taking these as evidence of explosives... |
jberryhill |
Jun-29-10 07:46 PM |
#100 |
| -
I already addressed that above when someone else asked it. |
spooked911 |
Jun-30-10 06:32 AM |
#112 |
| -
Correct me if I'm wrong... |
terrafirma |
Jun-30-10 07:08 PM |
#124 |
| -
it just gets goofier |
zappaman |
Jun-30-10 07:30 PM |
#125 |
| -
Still waiting... |
terrafirma |
Jul-02-10 12:45 PM |
#151 |
| -
don't hold your breath |
zappaman |
Jul-02-10 01:19 PM |
#152 |
| -
How do we know this isn't another example of video fakery? ( n/t ) |
Make7 |
Jun-29-10 08:11 PM |
#102 |
| -
"another example"? |
zappaman |
Jun-29-10 08:36 PM |
#104 |
| -
Make7 just forgot to include... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-29-10 09:07 PM |
#106 |
| -
ok |
zappaman |
Jun-29-10 09:13 PM |
#107 |
| -
I would actually like to know how it was determined that this video is not fake. ( n/t ) |
Make7 |
Jun-29-10 09:44 PM |
#109 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread