You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #85: I'm just asking for opinions from people who understand the issues. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #82
85. I'm just asking for opinions from people who understand the issues.
People with training and experience.

I haven't seen ANY that agree with any of the various conspiracy theories. You'd think that a few would disagree if the theories had any merit, wouldn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Analysts studying 9/11 claims evidence supports small plane at Pentagon berniew1  Jan-02-05 10:29 PM   #0 
  - But those working on election fraud shouldn't get distracted right now  berniew1   Jan-02-05 10:31 PM   #1 
  - a good video  sportndandy   Jan-02-05 10:32 PM   #2 
  - is everything a conspiracy?  Machiavelli05   Jan-02-05 10:34 PM   #3 
  - No kidding. If an AA plane didn't hit the pentagon then where did the AA  MidwestTransplant   Jan-02-05 10:35 PM   #5 
  - So then were was the AA plan IN the pentagon? None of the pictures show  merwin   Jan-02-05 11:31 PM   #53 
  - There ARE pictures of plane debris...look here:  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:52 PM   #71 
  - So, we've got a wheel well, a tiny bit of part of an engine, and one scrap  merwin   Jan-03-05 12:12 AM   #88 
     - Read the ASCE report. It explains it.  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:15 AM   #90 
  - You mean: no photos of credible 757 debris, right?  Abe Linkman   Jan-03-05 09:18 AM   #110 
  - Wherdy go?  DulceDecorum   Jan-03-05 12:44 PM   #125 
  - If an AA plane DID hit the Pentagon, then where did the AA plane go? (nt)  stickdog   Jan-04-05 02:36 AM   #147 
  - Amen to that. nt  smartvoter   Jan-02-05 10:46 PM   #9 
  - no shit..  frylock   Jan-02-05 10:49 PM   #13 
  - you forgot, 'go shopping'  bunny planet   Jan-02-05 10:56 PM   #24 
  - ITS NOT SHROUDED IN MYSTERY  Machiavelli05   Jan-02-05 11:04 PM   #35 
     - not the same thing  demodewd   Jan-03-05 09:30 AM   #114 
     - There were eyewitness there that said it was a smaller craft. Here is  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 10:37 AM   #117 
     - They saw a 757 fly into the Pentagon and then completely disappear?  stickdog   Jan-04-05 02:48 AM   #148 
  - well in fact, almost everything is indeed a conspiracy!  spooked911   Jan-02-05 11:09 PM   #39 
  - Post 20 below n/t  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:19 PM   #45 
  - Sooooo..... if it was really an A3 that hit the Pentagon,  ocelot   Jan-02-05 10:35 PM   #4 
  - So because no one can answer your question, the evidence in these  buddysmellgood   Jan-02-05 10:48 PM   #12 
  - Ever heard of PhotoShop?  ocelot   Jan-02-05 10:54 PM   #21 
     - Again, no one is disputing the disappearance of the 757. But where is the  buddysmellgood   Jan-02-05 10:58 PM   #30 
     - Here's a good link:  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:03 PM   #33 
        - Flight 77 could have been shot down in a remote area.  spooked911   Jan-02-05 11:12 PM   #41 
        - I disagree.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:13 PM   #44 
           - translate  demodewd   Jan-03-05 09:42 AM   #115 
              - Translation (for those who have trouble with English)...  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 02:36 PM   #132 
                 - the "hole"  demodewd   Jan-04-05 12:53 AM   #146 
        - That report is MORE consistent with a small jet attack; not a 757.  Abe Linkman   Jan-03-05 09:21 AM   #111 
     - Ever hear of the Atlantic Ocean? Photoshop? See post #7.  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 10:41 AM   #120 
  - Let me take a wild guess. The hijackers flew the plane to south  wlubin   Jan-02-05 11:06 PM   #36 
  - Is it so hard to crash a plane somewhere else? say, ocean?  merwin   Jan-02-05 11:33 PM   #55 
  - Why would the hijackers be willing to kill themselves?  wlubin   Jan-02-05 11:41 PM   #59 
  - That would work as well... n/t  merwin   Jan-02-05 11:44 PM   #63 
  - Undetected by radar? Yes, it is.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:49 PM   #68 
     - They are if they turn their transponders off. In fact, I have it on good  stickdog   Jan-04-05 03:32 AM   #149 
        - A 757 is stealthy? And what's this about Texas?  MercutioATC   Jan-04-05 09:13 PM   #155 
  - It could have easily been dumped in the Atlantic. It amazes me  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-02-05 11:47 PM   #65 
  - Rense?  Annus Horribilis   Jan-02-05 10:38 PM   #6 
  - This is relevant. The same players. Here's another good video  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-02-05 10:39 PM   #7 
  - Would this explain Rummy's behavior?  WhoWantsToBeOccupied   Jan-02-05 10:43 PM   #8 
  - I repeat my previous question:  ocelot   Jan-02-05 10:47 PM   #10 
  - Well... take your pick  Machiavelli05   Jan-02-05 10:50 PM   #14 
  - how difficult would it have been to vector 77 to an undisclosed location..  frylock   Jan-02-05 10:51 PM   #16 
  - Impossible.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 10:53 PM   #19 
     - it would seem that there was some confusion that day..  frylock   Jan-02-05 10:55 PM   #23 
     - All of it's recorded.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 10:58 PM   #27 
        - But where are the radar "tapes"? n/t  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:22 PM   #49 
           - I don't know whether the FAA or the FBI have them now.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:30 PM   #51 
              - Got it. Thanks. But in he link here:  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:39 PM   #56 
              - I agree that protocol wasn't followed in the tape-snipping incident, but  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:42 PM   #60 
                 - Then why not follow protocol?  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:46 PM   #64 
                 - I don't know.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:48 PM   #67 
                    - The research community wants it. It'll help shut 'em up to see the record.  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:50 PM   #69 
                       - Hey, I agree with you.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:54 PM   #73 
                          - O.K. I leave that open as a possibility. Again, 101 logic, dictates.  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:57 PM   #76 
                 - OK, here is the smoking gun. Find the video of a 757 crashing  wlubin   Jan-02-05 11:47 PM   #66 
                    - I don't have a video of my parents having sex...  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:50 PM   #70 
                    - Well, no offense, but I hope you're sure of that!  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:54 PM   #74 
                    - Actually, it's more involved than that...  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:01 AM   #80 
                       - A 757 would cause a hole of X size.  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:11 AM   #86 
                       - One by one  Wilms   Jan-03-05 12:12 AM   #87 
                       - "F" for logic. "B" for intentional or negligent hogwash.  Abe Linkman   Jan-03-05 09:25 AM   #112 
                       - Care to give us an example of YOUR logic?  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 02:38 PM   #133 
                       - "Lightpoles along the alleged flight path of the 757 were knocked over."  stickdog   Jan-04-05 04:14 AM   #153 
                          - Again, he hit the Pentagon.  MercutioATC   Jan-04-05 09:16 PM   #156 
                    - ooops ouch. Sorry I didn't think I would have to explain this  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:02 AM   #81 
                       - I'm sure they COULD. They haven't, though.  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:13 AM   #89 
                          - they did release a video and it was doctored to be made fuzzy  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:17 AM   #92 
                             - I have seen it. Who do you think doctored it?  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:21 AM   #96 
                                - What kind of question is that? Who do you think doctored it?  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:23 AM   # 
                                   - You think the government doctored it? Why??  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:24 AM   #99 
                                      - Yes I think the gov doctored it.. And they doctored it so that we  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:29 AM   #102 
                                      - Why release it at all, then?  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 02:31 PM   #130 
                                      - Because they were hounded for 2 years to give a video of it.  wlubin   Jan-03-05 03:24 PM   #134 
                                      - Yes, that "hounding" thing seems to work really well, doesn't it?  MercutioATC   Jan-04-05 09:18 PM   #157 
                    - There were security tapes that were immediately confiscated that  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 10:39 AM   #119 
                       - Bingo, smoking gun.  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:35 PM   #124 
                          - I agree. n/t  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 01:21 PM   #127 
                          - Speaking of videos. This will make all of you think. Please Read!  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 01:35 PM   #128 
              - Just like every vote is recorded.  stickdog   Jan-04-05 04:00 AM   #152 
                 - Well, that's a bizarre statement.  MercutioATC   Jan-04-05 09:19 PM   #158 
     - Thank you!  ocelot   Jan-02-05 10:56 PM   #25 
     - just like  demodewd   Jan-03-05 10:38 AM   #118 
     - Except from Dallas to DC. That's a "radar invisible" zone. Right, Merc?  stickdog   Jan-04-05 03:53 AM   #151 
        - What are you babbling about? AAL77 was nowhere near Texas.  MercutioATC   Jan-04-05 10:10 PM   #161 
  - Explain the wings. Explain the size of the engine part relative to the leg  buddysmellgood   Jan-02-05 10:52 PM   #17 
  - Nobody SAW it????? Completely untrue.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 10:56 PM   #26 
     - Look at the quotes you posted.  buddysmellgood   Jan-02-05 11:08 PM   #38 
        - I have looked at them.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:10 PM   #40 
           - Right. 20 feet off the ground. The problem is that the evidence does not  buddysmellgood   Jan-02-05 11:22 PM   #48 
              - Did you READ the text on that site?  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:29 PM   #50 
                 - I don't want to believe this. But there is too much that does not add up.  buddysmellgood   Jan-03-05 12:03 AM   #82 
                    - I'm just asking for opinions from people who understand the issues.  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:10 AM   #85 
                       - I haven't seen any reasonable explanation of the pentagon's conspiracy  buddysmellgood   Jan-03-05 12:19 AM   #94 
                          - Bingo. Let's see it. Smoking gun.  wlubin   Jan-04-05 12:04 AM   #145 
  - Try this...  Wilms   Jan-02-05 10:53 PM   #20 
  - I think I saw you once..  Machiavelli05   Jan-02-05 11:22 PM   #47 
     - Cut me some slack. Did you look at that? n/t  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:32 PM   #54 
  - Yes, please find the AA 757  dlaliberte   Jan-02-05 10:58 PM   #28 
  - They found AAL77 passenger DNA and the black boxes...  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:00 PM   #31 
     - OK, they say the DNA was there.  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:13 PM   #43 
        - Is there any evidence that it WASN'T there?  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:21 PM   #46 
        - The gov't. has been hiding throughout. Too many questions refused.  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:31 PM   #52 
        - Agreed, but that's not evidence of wrongdoing.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:40 PM   #58 
           - And many experts have weighed in. The official story is a lie. n/t  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:59 PM   #78 
              - Show me ONE expert that has "weighed in".  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:08 AM   #84 
              - Apology requested. That was a wtc reference.  Wilms   Jan-03-05 12:16 AM   #91 
                 - What was a WTC reference?  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:19 AM   #95 
              - Wilms -The News on the day - re: Pentagon  TrustingDog   Jan-03-05 12:29 AM   #101 
              - I am curious about these experts  AZCat   Jan-03-05 12:47 AM   #106 
        - So they say they have the DNA and Black Box, but no plane parts?  merwin   Jan-02-05 11:39 PM   #57 
        - They have a landing gear strut, fuselage parts, engine parts, etc.  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:44 PM   #62 
           - You are trying to mislead people into thinking there is evidence of a 757  Abe Linkman   Jan-03-05 07:33 PM   #137 
           - I'm not trying to mislead anybody, Abe.  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 09:44 PM   #140 
              - Those video images are powerful, aren't they?  Abe Linkman   Jan-03-05 10:25 PM   #141 
           - pretty flimsy?  demodewd   Jan-03-05 08:02 PM   #138 
              - Yes, flimsy. PIECES of the 757 did the damage, not an intact plane.  MercutioATC   Jan-04-05 09:20 PM   #159 
        - Really? Then how come there is no 757 debris on the lawn in front  wlubin   Jan-02-05 11:53 PM   #72 
        - Like this?  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:54 PM   #75 
           - That little piece? that was the only piece found and that  wlubin   Jan-02-05 11:59 PM   #79 
              - What do you think happens to planes that hit reinforced concrete buildings  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:04 AM   #83 
                 - easy, drive up middle of the night before in a van, drop it off.  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:18 AM   #93 
                    - The night before??? And nobody saw it just sitting there?  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:22 AM   #97 
                       - What is more silly is to think that a HUGE, and I mean HUGE  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:32 AM   #103 
                          - Why is it "silly"? A 757 is a relatively fragile thing.  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 02:33 PM   #131 
                             - A 757 gets sucked into a black hole void and leaves one little  wlubin   Jan-03-05 03:33 PM   #135 
                                - You obviously don't understand the mechanics. Let me help.  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 09:05 PM   #139 
                                   - The ASCE report explains damage that is consistent with a small jet.  Abe Linkman   Jan-03-05 10:32 PM   #142 
                                   - And if you look at that video doesn't look as if whatever it is that  wlubin   Jan-03-05 11:23 PM   #143 
                                   - No I am sorry. Not enough wreckage for me to believe it was a 757.  wlubin   Jan-04-05 12:03 AM   #144 
        - We are not DISBELIEVING every statement. On the other hand.  stickdog   Jan-04-05 04:46 AM   #154 
        - Meanwhile the same people said there was no black boxes found  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 10:46 AM   #123 
  - I have the same question. Was a passenger list released with the names  bunny planet   Jan-02-05 11:00 PM   #32 
  - She didn't get the memo? Divorce by default? Who knows?  Wilms   Jan-02-05 11:44 PM   #61 
  - Wow, that's scary. Like the terrorism expert on Al Queda (sp.?) that  bunny planet   Jan-03-05 08:55 AM   #109 
  - Let me tell you, I noticed that Ted Olsen did not really appear to  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:44 AM   #105 
  - A passenger list was released as was with all the planes. The odd  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 10:42 AM   #121 
  - Where was it when it "disappeared" from radar between Texas and DC?  stickdog   Jan-04-05 03:36 AM   #150 
     - When was it ever anywhere near Texas?  MercutioATC   Jan-04-05 09:20 PM   #160 
  - That's actually a good point I hadn't heard before  spooked911   Jan-02-05 11:07 PM   #37 
  - Rumsfeld also said that a missile hit the Pentagon. He slips up  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-02-05 11:12 PM   #42 
  - And I also heard that the part of the pentagon that was hit  wlubin   Jan-03-05 01:01 AM   #107 
     - Yes-- definitely. That is actually the most suspicious part of the  spooked911   Jan-03-05 08:10 AM   #108 
     - You're Correct  impe   Jan-03-05 09:26 AM   #113 
     - That's true, and Rumsfeld's office was on the opposite side  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 10:43 AM   #122 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-02-05 10:47 PM   #11 
  - PLEASE look at the rebuttals on the 9/11 Forum here before you  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 10:51 PM   #15 
  - link?  buddysmellgood   Jan-02-05 10:53 PM   #18 
  - Here:  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 10:54 PM   #22 
  - Please look at the questions left unanswered...  Wilms   Jan-03-05 12:40 AM   #104 
  - This is in the "2004 Election Results and Discussion" forum?  Kazak   Jan-02-05 10:58 PM   #29 
  - It should be moved shortly...  MercutioATC   Jan-02-05 11:03 PM   #34 
  - for you disbelievers please spend time pursuing this link  hangloose   Jan-02-05 11:59 PM   #77 
  - Or this one:  MercutioATC   Jan-03-05 12:23 AM   #98 
  - The Neo Cons said they needed a "New Pearl Harbor" to go into  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:28 AM   #100 
  - Yes, it is right there at Project for a New Century, in Rebuilding  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 10:32 AM   #116 
     - That publication is tantamount to telling everyone that you are going  wlubin   Jan-03-05 12:45 PM   #126 
        - We need someone with the guts to prosecute. Elliot Spitzer, the  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 01:41 PM   #129 
  - Kick!  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jan-03-05 03:59 PM   #136 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC