KDLarsen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-25-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
1) A google run through only bringes up one case (and even then it's anecdotal), where the military supposedly used thermite to demolish a bridge. 2) You're still ignoring the context of that quote. 3) Are you suggesting that (nano-)thermite is a powerful explosive? 4) Molten aluminium perhaps? The facades of both WTC1 and WTC2 were covered in aluminium. 5) My apologies, I was in a bit of a hurry. Turns out I mixed up Niels Harrit & Steven Jones. Harrit is into the 100 tonnes of conventional explosives, while it is Jones that suggest nano-thermite might have been used as a fuse Courtesy of Dr. Greening: http://the911forum.freeforums.org/active-thermitic-mate... So when I bounced my calculations and conclusions off Jones et al, all he could come up with was the suggestion that there were probably other explosives used in the WTC and the nanothermite chips were maybe just fuses!
|
| -Mark Loizeaux says nanothermite is a fantasy, the technology doesn't exist. Is he lying? |
rollingrock |
Oct-25-09 07:11 PM |
#0 |
-
Also of note |
rollingrock |
Oct-25-09 08:25 PM |
#1 |
 -
Oh boy.. |
KDLarsen |
Oct-25-09 08:32 PM |
#2 |
-
So you agree with Loizeaux's assertion? |
rollingrock |
Oct-25-09 08:36 PM |
#3 |
-
I agree with him |
KDLarsen |
Oct-25-09 08:49 PM |
#4 |
 -
You agree with him? |
rollingrock |
Oct-25-09 08:59 PM |
#5 |
  -
Read what I wrote, not what you think I wrote |
KDLarsen |
Oct-25-09 09:08 PM |
#6 |
 -
'Nano-thermite being used in a controlled demolition is not a real thing.' |
rollingrock |
Oct-25-09 09:56 PM |
#7 |
  -
I stand corrected |
KDLarsen |
Oct-25-09 11:26 PM |
#9 |
 -
I didn't ignore it |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 01:08 AM |
#12 |
  -
You have absolutely ZERO proof that nano-thermite or super-thermite... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 01:14 AM |
#13 |
 -
The WTC dust tested positive |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 01:24 AM |
#14 |
 -
No, it did not. n/t |
Bolo Boffin |
Oct-26-09 01:41 AM |
#18 |
  -
I'm afraid it did |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 02:00 AM |
#22 |
 -
You are incorrect. n/t |
Bolo Boffin |
Oct-26-09 03:33 AM |
#24 |
 -
No, it didn't... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 08:44 AM |
#27 |
 -
Wrong |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 01:59 PM |
#40 |
 -
Thermite |
HannibalCards |
Oct-26-09 02:29 PM |
#41 |
 -
Thermite and nanothermite are not the same |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 02:48 PM |
#42 |
 -
I thought |
HannibalCards |
Oct-26-09 03:27 PM |
#43 |
 -
You thought wrong |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 03:52 PM |
#44 |
 -
As usual, it's you squaring off against everyone else in the thread, save... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 03:57 PM |
#45 |
  -
'Everyone else?' |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 04:19 PM |
#46 |
  -
No, what intimidates you are actual facts, dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 04:23 PM |
#47 |
  -
how amusing, dude... |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-26-09 04:53 PM |
#48 |
  -
Really? |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 04:55 PM |
#49 |
  -
Now that's what I call irony |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 05:27 PM |
#50 |
  -
Dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 05:34 PM |
#51 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-26-09 05:56 PM |
#52 |
  -
Dude.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 05:58 PM |
#53 |
  -
He... doesn't.... say.... a ....word ...about.... controlled....demoltion |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 06:05 PM |
#54 |
  -
And what is the context of the conversation.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 06:08 PM |
#55 |
  -
Oh dear, looks like you caused RR to meltdown |
KDLarsen |
Oct-26-09 07:20 PM |
#56 |
  -
I know.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 07:25 PM |
#57 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-26-09 08:25 PM |
#58 |
  -
Are you melting down again, RR? |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 08:30 PM |
#60 |
  -
You've been watching one too many cartoons, dude |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 08:36 PM |
#61 |
  -
I don't watch TV, dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 08:46 PM |
#62 |
  -
Hmmm, that's odd |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 09:12 PM |
#63 |
  -
Well, you should take notice of whom I refer to as "dude".... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 09:35 PM |
#64 |
  -
Is that supposed to prove something? |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 09:53 PM |
#65 |
  -
Yeah, it proves you misrepresented Loizeaux, dude.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 10:46 PM |
#67 |
  -
Fires do not cause office buildings to collapse or pancake |
rollingrock |
Oct-27-09 07:22 AM |
#68 |
  -
Hah! |
AZCat |
Oct-27-09 08:39 AM |
#69 |
  -
Me too |
rollingrock |
Oct-27-09 09:08 AM |
#70 |
  -
Fortunately the engineering community doesn't take... |
AZCat |
Oct-27-09 10:06 AM |
#74 |
  -
'Engineering community' |
rollingrock |
Oct-27-09 05:54 PM |
#102 |
  -
Generally speaking, it does. |
AZCat |
Oct-27-09 07:30 PM |
#107 |
  -
Unless you are a mind reader |
rollingrock |
Oct-27-09 07:47 PM |
#108 |
  -
What a stupid post.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 07:53 PM |
#110 |
  -
Promoting ignorance again, rollingrock? |
AZCat |
Oct-28-09 08:26 AM |
#122 |
  -
What is the point of it that you agree with? |
eomer |
Oct-27-09 07:50 PM |
#109 |
  -
Your understanding is incorrect. |
AZCat |
Oct-28-09 08:22 AM |
#121 |
  -
My understanding is correct. |
eomer |
Oct-28-09 06:47 PM |
#132 |
  -
No, your understanding isn't correct. |
AZCat |
Oct-28-09 07:32 PM |
#133 |
  -
Yes, my understanding is correct. |
eomer |
Oct-28-09 09:05 PM |
#134 |
  -
Yes, except... |
AZCat |
Oct-28-09 09:09 PM |
#135 |
  -
Ah... in other words, you agree with me. |
eomer |
Oct-28-09 09:21 PM |
#136 |
  -
No. |
AZCat |
Oct-29-09 09:16 AM |
#137 |
  -
Those were meant as hypotheticals, not claims. |
eomer |
Oct-29-09 11:21 AM |
#139 |
  -
Dude.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 09:22 AM |
#71 |
  -
Dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 10:16 AM |
#76 |
  -
Sorry, the opinions of NIST |
rollingrock |
Oct-27-09 06:08 PM |
#103 |
  -
Dude.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 07:09 PM |
#104 |
  -
Truthers |
HannibalCards |
Oct-27-09 07:22 PM |
#106 |
  -
"Truther Logic"... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 08:25 PM |
#59 |
  -
you should watch the clip again |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-27-09 09:48 AM |
#72 |
  -
Dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 09:58 AM |
#73 |
  -
"showing that the technology is quite real and has been used for CD purposes" |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-27-09 10:14 AM |
#75 |
  -
right you are |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-27-09 10:30 AM |
#79 |
  -
You forgot to mention that leading experts in controlled demolition... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 10:39 AM |
#80 |
  -
simple question |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-27-09 10:56 AM |
#84 |
  -
Show me where I said it's impossible... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 11:09 AM |
#87 |
  -
gee, that's a graceful way to concede a mistake |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-27-09 11:03 AM |
#85 |
 -
You are moving the goalposts |
HannibalCards |
Oct-26-09 10:23 PM |
#66 |
  -
no one heard explosions? |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-27-09 10:18 AM |
#77 |
  -
"Truther Logic".. |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 10:23 AM |
#78 |
  -
"Dude Logic" |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-27-09 10:42 AM |
#81 |
  -
Dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 10:47 AM |
#82 |
  -
simple answer, dude |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-27-09 10:51 AM |
#83 |
  -
Of course, you're clipping what he actually said, dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 11:06 AM |
#86 |
  -
did you read the first responder oral histories? |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-27-09 11:21 AM |
#88 |
  -
Dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 11:39 AM |
#89 |
  -
why is everything so black and white with you? |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-27-09 12:58 PM |
#90 |
  -
Simple question: |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 01:56 PM |
#93 |
  -
That is incorrect |
HannibalCards |
Oct-27-09 02:15 PM |
#94 |
  -
the links are provided in my previous post: #81 |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-27-09 02:43 PM |
#95 |
  -
Reports of explosions immediately prior to collapse: |
eomer |
Oct-27-09 03:12 PM |
#96 |
  -
Does any of this sound like "controlled demolition"? |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 03:16 PM |
#97 |
  -
shifting goalposts: testimonial evidence is provided; whether they believe it's CD is irrelevant n/t |
reinvestigate911 |
Oct-27-09 04:18 PM |
#99 |
  -
Of explosions, dude.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 04:22 PM |
#100 |
  -
Interesting analysis suggesting seismic event prior to and during collapse. |
eomer |
Oct-27-09 04:17 PM |
#98 |
  -
also known as Pretzel logic |
rollingrock |
Oct-27-09 05:41 PM |
#101 |
  -
Oh, really, dude? |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 07:11 PM |
#105 |
 -
The I in HEI |
vincent_vega_lives |
Oct-27-09 01:06 PM |
#91 |
 -
Aluminum facades |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 01:46 PM |
#39 |
 -
No more slippery slope |
Bolo Boffin |
Oct-25-09 11:06 PM |
#8 |
  -
dupe |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 01:26 AM |
#15 |
 -
A lack of a precedent wouldn't mean it was impossible, would it? |
JackRiddler |
Oct-26-09 12:52 AM |
#11 |
 -
Lack of precedence? |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 01:29 AM |
#16 |
 -
One wonders why we even fight fires in buildings. n/t |
Bolo Boffin |
Oct-26-09 01:41 AM |
#17 |
  -
Or why they demolish buildings? Just set them ablaze and watch em fall! |
lovepg |
Oct-26-09 01:50 AM |
#19 |
   -
lol |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 01:59 AM |
#21 |
   -
Those 767's are so damn expensive! nt |
hack89 |
Oct-26-09 06:02 AM |
#26 |
   -
None of the buildings would have fallen by fire alone |
vincent_vega_lives |
Oct-29-09 10:16 AM |
#138 |
  -
To save lives, and save the contents of the building |
rollingrock |
Oct-26-09 01:51 AM |
#20 |
 -
LOL. n/t |
Bolo Boffin |
Oct-26-09 03:13 AM |
#23 |
 -
The steel portions of this building did collapse due to fire |
hack89 |
Oct-26-09 06:02 AM |
#25 |
 -
And you gloss over the fact the towers were over engineered for just such an occurance! |
lovepg |
Oct-26-09 11:51 AM |
#29 |
 -
And, of course, you have proof of that... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 11:55 AM |
#30 |
  -
WHAT THE GREAT SD does not know that the towers were engineered to take a jet crashing into it? |
lovepg |
Oct-26-09 12:00 PM |
#31 |
 -
I asked you for proof of your claim, dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 12:02 PM |
#32 |
 -
You could ask me to prove the sky is blue and it would not change the color of the sky. |
lovepg |
Oct-26-09 12:05 PM |
#33 |
 -
Why don't you just admit you can't prove it, dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 12:09 PM |
#34 |
 -
Ohhh yeah they were expecting the rubber band wind up jets with NO fuel tanks SD!! |
lovepg |
Oct-26-09 12:11 PM |
#35 |
 -
No, dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 12:14 PM |
#36 |
 -
They had been designed to withstand the impact of a landing 707 |
KDLarsen |
Oct-26-09 12:15 PM |
#37 |
 -
lovepg seems intent on embarrassing himself further, despite our attempts to.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-26-09 12:18 PM |
#38 |
 -
Prove this moronic claim. Quotes from the designeers would be acceptable. |
lovepg |
Oct-27-09 10:30 PM |
#113 |
 -
Post #38 |
KDLarsen |
Oct-27-09 11:43 PM |
#118 |
 -
Exactly but people act as if its a proven fact the engineers designed it for a slow |
lovepg |
Oct-28-09 10:34 AM |
#129 |
 -
Engineerd to withstand the force |
vincent_vega_lives |
Oct-27-09 01:15 PM |
#92 |
 -
Yeah they never expected the jet to have jet fuel on board or for it to cause a fire |
lovepg |
Oct-27-09 10:25 PM |
#111 |
 -
I already provided that... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 10:26 PM |
#112 |
  -
No you didn't you linked an article with the same claim but with no quotes from the .. |
lovepg |
Oct-27-09 10:32 PM |
#114 |
 -
Last time, dude.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 10:34 PM |
#115 |
 -
He has made many conflicting comments on this subject... |
lovepg |
Oct-27-09 11:06 PM |
#116 |
 -
Well, good, dude.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-27-09 11:18 PM |
#117 |
 -
Snark answer instead of discussing. |
lovepg |
Oct-28-09 12:45 AM |
#119 |
 -
discussing what? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-28-09 05:13 AM |
#120 |
 -
You cannot tell very well then. This person has made comments to support both sides... |
lovepg |
Oct-28-09 10:02 AM |
#125 |
 -
Dude... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-28-09 10:06 AM |
#126 |
 -
What is there to discuss, dude? |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-28-09 09:12 AM |
#123 |
 -
Snark answer |
lovepg |
Oct-28-09 09:59 AM |
#124 |
 -
You catch on quickly....n/t |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-28-09 10:07 AM |
#127 |
 -
Snark again. |
lovepg |
Oct-28-09 10:27 AM |
#128 |
 -
You obviously didn't read my post |
vincent_vega_lives |
Oct-28-09 02:29 PM |
#130 |
 -
Why would you expect lovepg to understand.... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-28-09 02:33 PM |
#131 |
 -
Things that failed on 911 according to the official story.. |
lovepg |
Oct-29-09 11:22 AM |
#140 |
 -
Thank god, you don't have all day because... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-29-09 11:52 AM |
#141 |
 -
Niels Harrit web site continues to discuss Nanothermite explosives at WTC |
cicorp |
Apr-14-10 12:58 PM |
#142 |
-
Welcome to DU cicorp. I was just going to start another thread with a |
snagglepuss |
Apr-24-10 09:42 PM |
#164 |
 -
Harrit is a joke |
KDLarsen |
Apr-24-10 09:50 PM |
#165 |
-
According to the Russia Today interview Harrit simply states that both nanothermite and conventional |
snagglepuss |
Apr-24-10 10:38 PM |
#167 |
-
Simple question: |
SDuderstadt |
Apr-24-10 10:43 PM |
#168 |
-
He addresses that question in the interview. He also states that only the military and |
snagglepuss |
Apr-24-10 11:49 PM |
#169 |
-
That's not what I asked you... |
SDuderstadt |
Apr-25-10 12:09 AM |
#170 |
-
I did reply to your question. I informed you that he addresses that question |
snagglepuss |
Apr-25-10 12:17 AM |
#171 |
-
And I ask again... |
SDuderstadt |
Apr-25-10 12:20 AM |
#172 |
-
That isn't Niels Harrits website.. |
KDLarsen |
Apr-24-10 09:53 PM |
#166 |
-
Did you notice the references are to "research"? |
jberryhill |
Oct-26-09 09:21 AM |
#28 |
-
Define irony... |
SDuderstadt |
Oct-25-09 11:51 PM |
#10 |
-
Mr. Loizeaux is a lying POS and probably an accessory after the fact |
aldo |
Apr-15-10 02:46 PM |
#143 |
 -
Moreover, you have not a shred of proof for three of your amazing assertions, and as for the last |
apocalypsehow |
Apr-15-10 03:24 PM |
#144 |
-
Of course, he is lying. |
Red Dwarf |
Apr-15-10 04:16 PM |
#145 |
 -
Did you even bother reading the thread? |
KDLarsen |
Apr-17-10 08:29 AM |
#146 |
-
mr. loizeaux couldnt find his ass with both hands.. |
Twist_U_Up |
Apr-17-10 02:28 PM |
#147 |
-
There are many things.... |
quickesst |
Apr-17-10 09:15 PM |
#148 |
-
No, he doesn't... |
SDuderstadt |
Apr-17-10 10:39 PM |
#149 |
 -
uh-um...... |
quickesst |
Apr-19-10 10:04 PM |
#154 |
-
Listen to what he's saying.... |
SDuderstadt |
Apr-19-10 10:17 PM |
#155 |
-
My apologies.... |
quickesst |
Apr-20-10 08:15 PM |
#156 |
-
How true quick. |
jschurchin |
Apr-19-10 08:01 AM |
#150 |
-
Incorrect. |
AZCat |
Apr-19-10 11:28 AM |
#151 |
-
FYI |
jschurchin |
Apr-19-10 12:15 PM |
#152 |
-
Your loss. Keep repeating mistakes, then. n/t |
AZCat |
Apr-19-10 05:26 PM |
#153 |
-
Ever notice... |
quickesst |
Apr-22-10 10:02 PM |
#157 |
-
Name one.....n/t |
SDuderstadt |
Apr-22-10 10:04 PM |
#158 |
-
"Name one....." |
quickesst |
Apr-22-10 10:42 PM |
#159 |
-
That's kinda broad, isn't it? |
SDuderstadt |
Apr-22-10 11:30 PM |
#160 |
-
Not really........ |
quickesst |
Apr-23-10 10:41 PM |
#161 |
-
How about "I'm tired of your silly games? n/t |
SDuderstadt |
Apr-23-10 10:43 PM |
#162 |
-
Jesus Nevermind Sduderstadt....... |
quickesst |
Apr-24-10 12:38 AM |
#163 |