Reply #7: 'Nano-thermite being used in a controlled demolition is not a real thing.'

[rollingrock]

1) Can you back up that statement?

2) Loizeaux states that nanothermite doesn't exist, period. So he is either a) lying or b) has been living in a cave, so is completely ignorant and unaware of more recent technological developments. The likelihood of b) is very unlikely.

3) any powerful explosive has more than multiple applications. RDX for example has multiple applications and was originally designed for military and industrial uses. years later, RDX became commonly used in controlled demolitions. the point is, any powerful explosive has the potential to be used for controlled demolitions to bring down buildings. the recent technology of nano-explosives, for example, are far more powerful than RDX, can be precisely controlled and formed into shaped-charges, so would be ideally suited for controlled demolition.

4) the absence of RDX doesn't explain the pools of molten material that burned for months and the presence of nano-sized, highly-engineered thermitic substances found in the WTC dust. blow torches cannot do that.

5) do you have a quote from that article? it's usually common courtesy to highlight or provide a quote from a lengthy article, instead of expecting people to read the whole thing.

I did a search for the word 'fuse' and 'fuses' from the article you posted.
Nothing comes up. So I have to wonder where you get this idea about the fuses.
How come the word 'fuse' or 'fuses' doesn't even appear in the article? Are you making it up?