You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: The famous picture that Christophera loved so much?... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #32
67. The famous picture that Christophera loved so much?...
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 08:39 AM by SidDithers
the one he thought it was evidence of a concrete core?



Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Video: South Tower Coming Down... wildbilln864  Sep-27-09 02:15 PM   #0 
  - OCT detachment from reality begins in 3... 2... 1...  whatchamacallit   Sep-27-09 08:19 PM   #1 
  - So you really think they put explosives on every floor?  hack89   Sep-27-09 08:54 PM   #2 
     - Since you have no conclusive evidence they weren't put into place  whatchamacallit   Sep-27-09 09:07 PM   #3 
        - And you can't, in good faith, rule out the possibility  hack89   Sep-27-09 09:19 PM   #4 
        - Hack you can see the intact corner of the building above the floors where the  lovepg   Sep-27-09 10:19 PM   #5 
        - You misunderstand the NIST report  hack89   Sep-28-09 08:13 AM   #8 
           - So the corner columns were strong enough to initially resist collapse..  lovepg   Sep-28-09 11:50 AM   #9 
              - But the core columns did resist  hack89   Sep-28-09 08:24 PM   #32 
                 - That spire was the bottom of the core that survived the collapse it was so strong.  lovepg   Sep-28-09 11:29 PM   #49 
                 - I believe the spire was as high as Floor 60, maybe just 50  Bolo Boffin   Sep-29-09 12:31 AM   #64 
                 - The famous picture that Christophera loved so much?...  SidDithers   Sep-29-09 08:38 AM   #67 
        - Here's what I know  whatchamacallit   Sep-27-09 10:20 PM   #6 
           - Why are you so unwilling to admit that the WTC were a unique event?  hack89   Sep-28-09 05:19 AM   #7 
              - Let me break it down for you  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 01:47 PM   #10 
                 - "For the top section of the tower (the hammer) to not be intact at the bottom...  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 01:51 PM   #11 
                 - Alright Mr. Ad Hominem  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 02:02 PM   #13 
                    - Point to the ad hominem....  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 02:05 PM   #14 
                       - How would you know?  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 02:11 PM   #17 
                          - Please point to ANY post in which...  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 02:14 PM   #18 
                 - through the remaining 3/4 structural mass - there's one of your problems  Bolo Boffin   Sep-28-09 01:53 PM   #12 
                 - Ah, well that ends that  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 02:06 PM   #15 
                    - Bolo's explanation makes perfect sense...  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 02:07 PM   #16 
                    - I don't believe you, Winston. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Sep-28-09 04:00 PM   #23 
                 - a few things  OnTheOtherHand   Sep-28-09 02:33 PM   #19 
                 - Sure man  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 03:17 PM   #20 
                    - ah, now I remember why I usually don't try this  OnTheOtherHand   Sep-28-09 03:42 PM   #21 
                       - There's nothing meaningful enough in this post to even respond to  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 03:54 PM   #22 
                 - You do realize that the "pile driver" gains mass with every floor?  hack89   Sep-28-09 06:40 PM   #24 
                    - Bullshit  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 07:41 PM   #25 
                    - Do you really not understand Hack's post?  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 07:45 PM   #26 
                       - I understand that it's bullshit  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 07:48 PM   #27 
                          - How in the fuck do you figure that Hack is wrong???  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 07:56 PM   #28 
                             - If you believe that the top floors acted as a "pile driver"  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 08:14 PM   #29 
                                - It only had to cream one floor at a time  hack89   Sep-28-09 08:20 PM   #30 
                                - So says the magical 2 day old paper anyway  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 08:47 PM   #33 
                                   - What is an engineered force?  hack89   Sep-28-09 08:55 PM   #36 
                                      - I'm referring to man-made forces  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 08:59 PM   #37 
                                      - People like you  hack89   Sep-28-09 09:08 PM   #38 
                                         - People like you  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 09:10 PM   #39 
                                         - If you believe that why do you spend all your time in here????  lovepg   Sep-28-09 11:44 PM   #52 
                                            - Entertainment  hack89   Sep-29-09 05:46 AM   #65 
                                               - Well if the government PAYS people to hang out on Forums like this...  lovepg   Sep-29-09 12:34 PM   #69 
                                               - Why do you think the government would waste time on you?  hack89   Sep-29-09 12:47 PM   #70 
                                               - Hey they send FBI informants to church anti war rallys full of little old ladies..  lovepg   Sep-29-09 01:07 PM   #72 
                                               - Yes, to infiltrate and lead astray into illegal actions or goofy theories.  Bolo Boffin   Sep-29-09 01:12 PM   #73 
                                               - Hey the official story is pretty damn goofy!  lovepg   Sep-29-09 02:26 PM   #74 
                                               - The real world as in politics, news, culture, entertainment, songs, etc  hack89   Sep-29-09 05:26 PM   #75 
                                               - Thats for YOU to find out LOL!  lovepg   Sep-29-09 05:56 PM   #76 
                                               - Like I said - no one. nt  hack89   Sep-29-09 06:05 PM   #77 
                                - You can't argue from a position of "know-nothingness" and claim to seek truth. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Sep-28-09 08:21 PM   #31 
                                - Funny  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 08:49 PM   #34 
                                - I don't argue from a position of "know-all-edness", WTF that is  Bolo Boffin   Sep-28-09 08:53 PM   #35 
                                - We're very receptive to your presentation of math that would...  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 09:24 PM   #41 
                                   - So if I don't auto-gobble the OCT like you  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 09:37 PM   #42 
                                      - Dude...if you claim that the consensus...  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 10:34 PM   #45 
                                         - There is no fucking consensus  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 11:09 PM   #47 
                                            - If we're so "ignorant"...  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 11:39 PM   #51 
                                            - *You* have no math  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 11:50 PM   #53 
                                            - Dude....  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 11:59 PM   #54 
                                            - No I do not have a two day old paper I can coast on.  whatchamacallit   Sep-29-09 12:00 AM   #55 
                                            - Dude....I'm not referring to the Bazant paper.  SDuderstadt   Sep-29-09 12:04 AM   #56 
                                            - Let's start here; what exactly is "my claim"?  whatchamacallit   Sep-29-09 12:08 AM   #57 
                                            - You claimed the piledriver would NOT gain mass with every floor...  SDuderstadt   Sep-29-09 12:11 AM   #58 
                                            - No, if read to the next post  whatchamacallit   Sep-29-09 12:14 AM   #59 
                                            - No, dude...  SDuderstadt   Sep-29-09 12:17 AM   #61 
                                            - Remember this?  SDuderstadt   Sep-29-09 12:15 AM   #60 
                                            - My point was that the big hunk that supposedly started it off at the top wasn't there at the bottom.  whatchamacallit   Sep-29-09 12:21 AM   #62 
                                            - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Sep-29-09 12:22 AM   #63 
                                            - Bazant also published in 2008...  SidDithers   Sep-29-09 08:47 AM   #68 
                                            - Questions about Pissants paper.....  lovepg   Sep-29-09 01:03 PM   #71 
                                - you refute your own statement. nt  wildbilln864   Sep-30-09 05:47 PM   #84 
                                - Dude....you can't refute the math that shows there was or...  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 09:22 PM   #40 
                                   - So you claim  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 09:44 PM   #43 
                                      - Since the truth community has provided no alternative  hack89   Sep-28-09 10:04 PM   #44 
                                      - Well, it must be insofar as you're concerned, otherwise...  SDuderstadt   Sep-28-09 10:39 PM   #46 
                                         - Get a  whatchamacallit   Sep-28-09 11:11 PM   #48 
                    - You just argued it was gaining mass as it desended while ripping apart on the way down.  lovepg   Sep-28-09 11:37 PM   #50 
                       - Ripping apart does not make mass disappear  hack89   Sep-29-09 08:18 AM   #66 
                          - I am saying quite obviously mass is being spewed out the sides in a spectacular manner.  lovepg   Sep-29-09 06:47 PM   #78 
                             - The heavy pieces went straight down  hack89   Sep-29-09 08:40 PM   #79 
                                - Heres question you may have not considered....  lovepg   Sep-30-09 01:36 AM   #80 
                                   - But that's my point - you don't need large charges at all  hack89   Sep-30-09 05:16 AM   #81 
                                      - Hey I do not KNOW how they did it or even who THEY is thats why I want a new investigation..  lovepg   Sep-30-09 10:27 AM   #82 
        - do you have any evidence  sabbat hunter   Sep-30-09 12:49 PM   #83 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC