Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Reply #7: Well, let's give you the ABC version to help you out . . . [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep-19-09 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well, let's give you the ABC version to help you out . . .
Edited on Sat Sep-19-09 03:47 AM by defendandprotect
First, every nation on the planet has been reporting for months to the US government
that you're coming -- you should expect that the airports are on HIGH ALERT and that
the US government is ready for you -- except . . . again, it's your lucky year!

Bush has been practicing "Operation Ignore" even when the United Nations Security Council
came to alert him in August just before 9/11 of the threats --
They also visited our intelligence agencies to ensure that they knew.
Operation Ignore continued, however --
Presume the hijackers knew they could count on that? :think:

IF you want to use a plane . . . you have to hijack it --
do you really believe our airports are so incapable that there could be four simultaneous
hijackings? :think:

Then, you'd have to worry about NORAD which runs down planes which go off course
or which are unidentified -- except on 9/11. :think:

Now after you've picked the planes, you need to get actual hijackers in there --
and by the way, something like 10 or more of the alleged hijackers have been found alive --
and they have to be capable of hijacking the planes and flying the planes.
How do they get metal box cutters through screening?
Maybe someone plants them on the plane for them?

And -- these people have to be able to fly planes.
Not to mention being willing to kill themselves doing it! :think:

Meanwhile, their best pilot couldn't even manage flying a small plane which he was trying to
rent. They are required for insurance reasons to make sure he could fly -- he couldn't! :think:

Also -- definitely count on having picked a day when you really get LUCKY and the
Pentagon/military are running FOUR SIMULTANEOUS training programs which coincidentally have
to do with hijacked planes! :think:

Also pick a day when our government has sent a good part of our defense fighter jets off to
Alaska and Canada . . . to fight an imaginary war with the Russians! :think:

And when a whole other bunch of our fighter jets are sent to North Carolina on training mission!
That left 14 fighter jets to protect the entire US! :think:

OK . . . so now you have the plane and the passengers. Now what -- ?
Do you kill them all? Do you gas them all? How do you contain them? What are the
possibilities of the hijacking not being successful? :think:

Meanwhile, besides NORAD threat there is also the threat that the planes can be taken over
by remote control.

Every expectation -- except on 9/11 -- is that the US is the most heavily defended nation ever.
Guess we were wrong!!

However, that rumor is the major reason presumably that we could feel confident that the
"The Russians aren't coming! The Russians aren't coming!" :think:

Had they told you that the Russians had done 9/11 you'd still be ROFL --

:think: :think: :think:

and then :think: some more --

You're Muslims . . . what do you expect to benefit by this except having 1.3 or more MUSLIMS
KILLED and your country invaded as has happened? In fact, generally most of the ME invaded
by us -- and "Muslims" now being a dirty word?

:think: :think: :think:

Who really benefited from all of that . . . ?? :think:


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  The video had to be phony because.... defendandprotect  Sep-18-09 01:53 AM   #0 
   "Interesting" is not quite the word I would use  LARED   Sep-18-09 06:40 AM   #1 
   lol  Realityhack   Sep-18-09 07:08 AM   #2 
   A cartoon cut out of a "Bugs Bunny" hole in the WTC is believable --???  defendandprotect   Sep-18-09 02:25 PM   #3 
   This is my favorite! Absolutely Nuts!  Theobald   Sep-18-09 02:57 PM   #4 
   Yeah the KISS argument for fake crashes takes the cake n/t  Realityhack   Sep-18-09 03:26 PM   #5 
   Well, let's give you the ABC version to help you out . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-19-09 03:34 AM   #7 
      What on earth are you talking about?  KDLarsen   Sep-19-09 06:17 AM   #8 
      there was an exercise going on that day  Rosa Luxemburg   Sep-20-09 12:06 AM   #18 
      Something that was quickly cleared up by the question "real world or exercise"  Bolo Boffin   Sep-20-09 12:47 AM   #19 
      Except that the tapes show something else . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 03:30 AM   #23 
      yes there was a lot of confusion that day  Rosa Luxemburg   Sep-20-09 03:35 PM   #28 
      but not about real-world or exercise. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Sep-20-09 05:16 PM   #33 
      Excuse me? That's from the tapes . . . !!!  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 09:16 PM   #36 
         Yep - asked, answered, done.  Bolo Boffin   Sep-20-09 09:54 PM   #38 
            When NORAD is AWOL, it becomes fairly clear what's going on . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 11:27 PM   #43 
               NORAD was not AWOL.  Bolo Boffin   Sep-21-09 12:02 AM   #49 
                  Wake up and fess up . . . NORAD was AWOL and Sen. Dayton was chasing them down . . .!!!  defendandprotect   Sep-22-09 12:19 AM   #64 
                     And I'm done chasing down your whack-a-mole game. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Sep-22-09 02:12 AM   #66 
                        Right . . . Sen. Mark Dayton was "whack-a-mole" . . . !!! And you want to be taken seriously?  defendandprotect   Sep-22-09 02:27 AM   #67 
                        I don't care if a plane denier doesn't take me seriously, defend. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Sep-22-09 02:48 AM   #71 
                           Sen. Mark Dayton is making clear things that you need to ignore . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-22-09 04:00 PM   #78 
                        you lose again. taking your ball and going home?  Twist_U_Up   Sep-22-09 05:06 AM   #73 
      Glad you remembered . . . !!!  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 09:16 PM   #35 
      The 14 fighters on alert status was a permanent thing  KDLarsen   Sep-20-09 03:51 PM   #30 
         Vigilant Guardian moved planes into Canada and Alaska for an imaginary exercise re Russians . ..  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 09:17 PM   #37 
         YOU look it up...  SDuderstadt   Sep-20-09 10:08 PM   #39 
         It didn't have zilch to do with the number of alert status planes  KDLarsen   Sep-21-09 05:11 AM   #53 
            Except it did . . . Here's the info on Vigilant Guardian - . . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-22-09 12:35 AM   #65 
               Let me try that once more..  KDLarsen   Sep-22-09 05:44 AM   #74 
         yes combat ready but there was a screen  Rosa Luxemburg   Sep-20-09 11:35 PM   #44 
            Do you even know what the term "combat ready" means?  SDuderstadt   Sep-20-09 11:37 PM   #45 
               in 'normal circumstances'  Rosa Luxemburg   Sep-20-09 11:40 PM   #47 
                  WTF?  SDuderstadt   Sep-20-09 11:48 PM   #48 
      there was a delay though  Rosa Luxemburg   Sep-20-09 03:36 PM   #29 
      There were FOUR simultaneous exercises scheduled for that day . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 03:25 AM   #21 
      No . . . UNITED NATIONS warned Bush and intelligence agencies in AUGUST . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 03:21 AM   #20 
         D&P, as usual...  SDuderstadt   Sep-20-09 03:30 AM   #22 
         14 interceptors was the grand total of strip alert fighters for all of America  hack89   Sep-20-09 06:19 PM   #34 
            what happened to the 14?  Rosa Luxemburg   Sep-20-09 11:38 PM   #46 
            Congratulations  KDLarsen   Sep-21-09 05:14 AM   #54 
            the people who were in control should have been reprimanded  Rosa Luxemburg   Sep-21-09 09:24 AM   #56 
               They did what they could, with what little info they had  KDLarsen   Sep-21-09 09:56 AM   #57 
                  the people at the top failed  Rosa Luxemburg   Sep-21-09 04:32 PM   #59 
                     What should the people at the top have done?  KDLarsen   Sep-21-09 04:54 PM   #60 
                        I'm talking about the Commander in cheif and Defense secretary and his VP  Rosa Luxemburg   Sep-21-09 05:47 PM   #61 
                           What medals and pats on the back did *they* recieve?  KDLarsen   Sep-21-09 05:55 PM   #62 
                              They didn't have their act together  Rosa Luxemburg   Sep-21-09 07:27 PM   #63 
            Bingo - you finally get it. nt  hack89   Sep-21-09 06:34 AM   #55 
            Here's what happened . .. planes were sent EAST in another "coincidence" . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-22-09 02:38 AM   #70 
               Their initial heading was to the Northeast  hack89   Sep-22-09 06:20 AM   #75 
                  NORAD 150 miles from DC when "plane" hit Pentagon -- father than they were before take off--!  defendandprotect   Sep-22-09 03:55 PM   #76 
            Here's the info . . . NORAD was out-of-town . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-22-09 02:31 AM   #68 
               your first 2 links aren't working for me  maddezmomDU Moderator   Sep-22-09 02:38 AM   #69 
                  Thanks --  defendandprotect   Sep-22-09 03:57 PM   #77 
      You don't even have a basic grasp of history  Theobald   Sep-19-09 03:14 PM   #9 
         Yeah, the Soviet Union...  Subdivisions   Sep-19-09 10:22 PM   #14 
         Does anyone have any idea...  SDuderstadt   Sep-19-09 10:28 PM   #15 
         Theo was explaining that the Soviet Union is more heavily defended than the U.S. So,  Subdivisions   Sep-19-09 10:31 PM   #16 
            Well, thanks for sharing that...  SDuderstadt   Sep-19-09 10:34 PM   #17 
            Stay away from Georgia . . . we might be running another "false flag" there .. ?????  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 03:33 AM   #25 
         Uh Dude, the Soviet Union doesn't exist anymore. n/t  Theobald   Sep-20-09 10:15 PM   #40 
            Duh! Your words:  Subdivisions   Sep-21-09 12:34 AM   #51 
               I believe Theobald was holding up the Soviet Union as an example of a heavily defended country.  Bolo Boffin   Sep-21-09 12:42 AM   #52 
               Words have meaning.  Theobald   Sep-21-09 11:49 AM   #58 
               Duh! I'm still waiting for a real response.  Theobald   Sep-22-09 04:41 PM   #79 
                  Tap your foot while you're waiting. And when  Subdivisions   Sep-22-09 04:47 PM   #80 
                     Come on Subby Wubby!  Theobald   Sep-22-09 05:05 PM   #81 
         Well, that's the rumor that $900 billion a year buys security -- !!!  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 03:32 AM   #24 
            Dumb, da dumb, da dumb  Theobald   Sep-20-09 10:19 PM   #41 
   That reminds me, has anyone gotten their Illuminati stipend yet this month?  Flatulo   Sep-18-09 10:23 PM   #6 
   Don't spread this around, but...  SDuderstadt   Sep-19-09 05:36 PM   #10 
   This reminds me of junior high school  aronbehar   Sep-19-09 05:39 PM   #11 
   Plane fakery is something you buy into, aron? n/t  Bolo Boffin   Sep-19-09 05:53 PM   #12 
   Aluminum planes don't crash thru steel buildings like BUTTER -- !!!  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 03:37 AM   #27 
   Did you actually read the link?  Flatulo   Sep-19-09 09:31 PM   #13 
   I think the illuminati is nonsense  aronbehar   Sep-20-09 10:23 PM   #42 
      Uh-huh, I'm almost believing you  William Seger   Sep-21-09 12:05 AM   #50 
   You didn't get that smart hanging around the dungeon . . . !!!  defendandprotect   Sep-20-09 03:34 AM   #26 
   "The plane shaped hole is really ridiculous" ??  William Seger   Sep-20-09 04:52 PM   #31 
      Unplug teh internet?  AZCat   Sep-20-09 04:53 PM   #32 
   just stupid  sspeilbergfan90   Sep-22-09 03:29 AM   #72 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC