defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Sep-14-09 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 26. They put surface-to-air missiles on the roof of Bush's Florida Hotel on 9/10/01 . . . |
 |
Edited on Mon Sep-14-09 01:26 AM by defendandprotect
The Colony Beach and Tennis Resort, where Bush stayed the night before 9/11.
On the night of September 10th, Bush stayed at the Colony Beach Resort—“an upscale and relatively pristine tropical island enclave located directly on the Gulf of Mexico, a spindly coral island… off Sarasota, Florida.” Zainlabdeen Omer, a Sudanese native living in Sarasota, told the local police that night that someone he knew who had made violent threats against Bush was in town and Omer was worried about Bush’s safety. The man was identified only as “Ghandi.” A police report states the Secret Service was informed immediately.
After a private dinner with various Florida politicians (including his brother Jeb) and Republican donors, Bush went to bed around 10:00 p.m. Surface-to-air missiles were placed on the roof of the resort , and an Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) plane circled high overhead. It’s not clear if this type of protection was standard for the president or whether security was increased because of possible threats.But, supposedly, the Pentagon runs on "Don't worry, be happy!" http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayan...
|
Can't believe the general public doesn't notice no jet parts in |
schmuls |
Sep-11-09 04:01 PM |
#0 |

Well, that's because there were jet parts at Penn and the Pentagon. |
Bolo Boffin |
Sep-11-09 04:11 PM |
#1 |
 
I must have read misinformation. I thought the Pennsylvania jet |
schmuls |
Sep-11-09 04:27 PM |
#2 |
  
Virtually except for the EVIDENCE they meant us to find. nt |
lovepg |
Sep-11-09 04:29 PM |
#3 |
   
Yes, and Satan buried fossils in the earth to make us believe in evolution |
anigbrowl |
Sep-11-09 04:50 PM |
#5 |
  
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-11-09 11:04 PM |
#7 |
  
I would'nt know I will have to take your word for it, Your the expert on satans comings and goings.. |
lovepg |
Sep-12-09 01:33 AM |
#8 |
  
Good grief...are you still in high school or something? |
anigbrowl |
Sep-12-09 06:08 PM |
#9 |
  
You honestly, seriously do not understand the comparison? |
Realityhack |
Sep-13-09 10:16 PM |
#23 |
  
There were pieces all over, but plenty was recognizable. |
Bolo Boffin |
Sep-11-09 04:49 PM |
#4 |
   
Always good to have this little reminder . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-16-09 12:47 AM |
#65 |
   
Bolo a few questions about your plane debris photo... |
lovepg |
Sep-26-09 03:14 AM |
#75 |
  
Yes. . . it "vaporized" but then it reappeared somewhere far off in the woods and . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-12-09 10:16 PM |
#11 |
 
Stop lying. |
Realityhack |
Sep-13-09 12:44 AM |
#13 |
  
Unfortunately, it is sadly true . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-13-09 02:03 AM |
#16 |
 
Strangely surreal |
KDLarsen |
Sep-13-09 04:45 AM |
#17 |
  
"Surreal" indeed . . . that is the very nature of all the OCT re 9/11 . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-13-09 11:15 AM |
#18 |
 
Do you always end every post with an exlamation point! |
snooper2 |
Sep-14-09 01:21 PM |
#34 |
 
... because you'd like to reduce info about 9/11 to "exclamation marks" by any chance..?? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 03:15 PM |
#43 |
 
Do you have any of this sitting on your table by chance? |
snooper2 |
Sep-15-09 10:46 AM |
#60 |
 
You have yet to point to one place@ |
Realityhack |
Sep-13-09 11:27 AM |
#19 |
 
Are you on this planet -- ??? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 03:17 PM |
#44 |
 
Personal attacks do not constitute evidence. |
Realityhack |
Sep-14-09 05:07 PM |
#53 |
 
All sorts of miraculously convenient vaporizing planes that day. |
Echo In Light |
Sep-14-09 09:54 AM |
#30 |
 
There was "no evidence" of a plane according to the jet pilot reporting to Gen. Arnold--!! |
defendandprotect |
Sep-12-09 10:18 PM |
#12 |

Yawn |
pfloydguy7750 |
Sep-11-09 07:19 PM |
#6 |
 
You know, that's exactly the attitude we should all have about fascism . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 03:18 PM |
#45 |

DP he is yawning at the same recycled BS. n/t |
Realityhack |
Sep-14-09 05:37 PM |
#57 |

Right . . . do they ignore of necessity, or do they ignore out of lalalalalal....? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-12-09 10:12 PM |
#10 |
 
Stop making things up. |
Realityhack |
Sep-13-09 12:50 AM |
#14 |

Pentagon is heavily protected, in a heavily restricted area -- except on 9/11 . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-13-09 01:59 AM |
#15 |

Did they? |
Neily |
Sep-13-09 04:48 PM |
#20 |
 
No they did not. |
Realityhack |
Sep-13-09 10:15 PM |
#22 |
 
Doubt they'd be letting the world know exactly what they had . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 01:10 AM |
#25 |
 
They put surface-to-air missiles on the roof of Bush's Florida Hotel on 9/10/01 . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 01:24 AM |
#26 |

So much evidence... how will I read through all of it. Oh, wait... |
Realityhack |
Sep-13-09 10:12 PM |
#21 |
 
You can read . .. ??? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 01:27 AM |
#27 |

I can only assume your posts lack of factual evidence indicates.... |
Realityhack |
Sep-14-09 01:39 PM |
#35 |

When you behave as though you .... |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 02:41 PM |
#37 |

Either you can back up your statement or you can not. |
Realityhack |
Sep-15-09 08:05 AM |
#58 |

Reagan International Airport is < 1 mile from the Pentagon. |
Flatulo |
Sep-14-09 12:54 PM |
#31 |

Well said Flatulo. |
Realityhack |
Sep-14-09 01:17 PM |
#33 |
 
Thanks, but this may be a short stay... |
Flatulo |
Sep-14-09 02:01 PM |
#36 |
  
Very understandable. |
Realityhack |
Sep-14-09 03:01 PM |
#41 |
   
And what did you learn here, "Realityhack" . . . could it be that the Pentagon needed defense . . .? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 03:33 PM |
#46 |
  
And it's apparently not evident to D&P that... |
SDuderstadt |
Sep-14-09 03:38 PM |
#47 |
  
Given your posts... |
Realityhack |
Sep-14-09 05:11 PM |
#55 |
  
Well, let's have a great mind like yours make it clear -- Did Pentagon need a defense system???? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-15-09 10:57 PM |
#62 |
  
Let's stay on topic, shall we? What I think matters not one whit. |
Flatulo |
Sep-16-09 11:00 AM |
#66 |
  
Maybe you need a translator . . . Would the Pentagon publish facts of their defense????? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-16-09 09:16 PM |
#67 |
  
So, if they do not publish details of their defenses, how do you know what they are? |
Flatulo |
Sep-16-09 11:35 PM |
#68 |
  
Let's agree . . . the Pentagon had no defense . . . and they're idiots . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-17-09 02:35 PM |
#69 |
  
Thanks - I shall try to struggle along without your incoherent babble. |
Flatulo |
Sep-17-09 06:05 PM |
#70 |
   
Do you think it makes sense for the pentagon to have defenses?? |
lovepg |
Sep-26-09 02:55 AM |
#74 |
  
It is actually just an office building in time of war. |
hack89 |
Sep-26-09 07:00 AM |
#76 |
  
If you ignore everyone who disagrees with you.... |
Realityhack |
Sep-18-09 07:21 AM |
#71 |
  
Yes flatulence is always welcome talk about the stench? |
lovepg |
Sep-26-09 02:48 AM |
#73 |
 
If you're buying his argument, I think you understand the need for Pentagon defense . . .???? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 02:49 PM |
#39 |

Do you realize that you created more than two options here? |
Flatulo |
Sep-15-09 09:09 AM |
#59 |

"Either the Pentagon needs defense and has it -- or they're idiots . . " . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-15-09 11:05 PM |
#63 |

Iran Contra Airport is presumably flying legally authorized flights? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 02:46 PM |
#38 |

May I present this incoherent babbling as Exhibit A ... |
Flatulo |
Sep-14-09 04:09 PM |
#48 |

I'll accept your post as "incoherent babbling/Exhibit A" . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 04:15 PM |
#50 |
 
Sorry, but you are unwilling or unable to understand the words that are being spoken to you. |
Flatulo |
Sep-14-09 04:54 PM |
#52 |

And, you're saying, that the Pentagon would make that info public??? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-15-09 10:29 PM |
#61 |

Later. Enjoy reality I hear it is nice... |
Realityhack |
Sep-14-09 05:08 PM |
#54 |

Agree . . . reality is good -- |
defendandprotect |
Sep-16-09 12:45 AM |
#64 |

Who needs "jet parts" with all the eye witness accounts of people seeing the jets crash? |
cbdo2007 |
Sep-13-09 11:56 PM |
#24 |
 
Right . . . the OCT is ready to go without jet parts . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 01:32 AM |
#28 |

So you agree that witnesses saw the plane crash? How many witnesses saw a missile? |
cbdo2007 |
Sep-14-09 09:45 AM |
#29 |

No . . . quite to the contrary . . . |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 12:57 PM |
#32 |

First report on FoxNews on 9/11 was that people saw a plane crash on I-395 in Washington. |
cbdo2007 |
Sep-14-09 02:53 PM |
#40 |

Fox News . . . ???? That's propably better than a jet pilot sent by Brig. Gen. Arnold--!!! |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 03:08 PM |
#42 |

What you're saying isn't even making sense. Next you're going to tell me the Pentagon |
cbdo2007 |
Sep-14-09 04:14 PM |
#49 |

If you think Fox News makes sense, how can I possibly help you . . .??? |
defendandprotect |
Sep-14-09 04:19 PM |
#51 |

In light of post 4 do you retract the OP? n/t |
Realityhack |
Sep-14-09 05:27 PM |
#56 |

k i c k |
defendandprotect |
Sep-26-09 02:20 AM |
#72 |