You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #55: Abbreviations mean nothing without context. nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. Abbreviations mean nothing without context. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -Van Jones doesn't believe the 9/11 Commission Report, Do you? Junkdrawer  Sep-05-09 08:19 AM   #0 
  - "Steaming Pile" is a lot nicer than I would have said.  rurallib   Sep-05-09 08:22 AM   #1 
  - I think the 'steaming pile' is the shit the Truthers put out.  robcon   Sep-05-09 08:23 AM   #2 
  - I love Bush  G_j   Sep-05-09 08:23 AM   #3 
  - me too  Aragorn   Sep-05-09 08:41 AM   #7 
  - 9/11 was an inside job n/t  RoccoR5955   Sep-05-09 08:27 AM   #4 
  - The Govt cant coverup a blow job  Retired AF Dem   Sep-05-09 09:02 AM   #17 
     - Why? Reasons? nt  valerief   Sep-05-09 09:09 AM   #19 
     - Here are two reasons  RoccoR5955   Sep-05-09 11:42 AM   #56 
        - Building 7. Enron records.  chimpymustgo   Sep-05-09 11:55 AM   #58 
        - Sure, because everyone at Enron went free  KDLarsen   Sep-05-09 12:48 PM   #65 
        - Wouldn't it have been much easier to buy a paper shredder? nt  Flatulo   Sep-05-09 09:41 PM   #74 
           - Then you'd have to explain where all the documents went  CrawlingChaos   Sep-06-09 02:08 AM   #83 
              - Coupla things...  Flatulo   Sep-07-09 05:26 PM   #88 
              - Oh hogwash  CrawlingChaos   Sep-08-09 06:57 PM   #112 
              - So let me see if I understand this...  Flatulo   Sep-08-09 08:57 PM   #114 
              - Yeah but no one from El Paso Energy, Dynegy, Reliant went to jail  szatmar666   Sep-11-09 11:27 PM   #119 
              - how about a simple break-in and fire..  snooper2   Sep-08-09 01:04 PM   #105 
                 - In one of the most secure buildings on the planet?  CrawlingChaos   Sep-08-09 07:03 PM   #113 
                    - 7 world trade. Lucky number 7 indeed!  deconstruct911   May-24-10 07:43 PM   #132 
        - And those PNACers became W's cabinet. nt  wildbilln864   Sep-05-09 12:13 PM   #59 
        - There's a worthy dot connection there...  MrMickeysMom   Sep-06-09 09:17 AM   #85 
           - 9/11 mission accomplished  deconstruct911   Jun-24-10 12:43 PM   #135 
        - Silver-who?  KDLarsen   Sep-05-09 12:45 PM   #64 
        - for the best explanation....  wildbilln864   Sep-05-09 01:48 PM   #68 
           - I agree  KDLarsen   Sep-05-09 02:05 PM   #69 
              - I think they wanted to get their war on.....  wildbilln864   Sep-05-09 02:16 PM   #70 
        - one problem with that theory  sabbat hunter   Sep-05-09 10:32 PM   #75 
        - Not true . . . they were NOT going to be allowed to use demolition . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:50 AM   #100 
        - I'd just add to that Bush was talking about the need to invade Iraq a year before taking office!!  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:30 AM   #92 
        - Bullshit: Point number one is a total fabrication.  Theobald   Sep-15-09 10:02 AM   #131 
     - I agree. That's why I've always thought of it as a massive, PRIVATE...  Junkdrawer   Sep-05-09 09:13 AM   #22 
     - ding! n/t  Wilms   Sep-05-09 09:21 AM   #24 
     - Our Pentagon with all its reported defenses . . . evidently turned OFF . . .!!!  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:33 AM   #93 
     - Yes, just like it failed to do with the Manhattan Project, the Stealth Bomber  Ezlivin   Sep-05-09 11:10 AM   #53 
     - Not quite the same..  KDLarsen   Sep-05-09 12:51 PM   #66 
     - Especially when $90 million was spent by the GOP Devils with the Blue Dress on . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:29 AM   #91 
  - Why should we be expected to believe a commission that was "setup to fail"?  JohnyCanuck   Sep-05-09 08:30 AM   #5 
  - I don't. Most people here don't. And yet Van Jones is attacked as being a "Troofer"...  Junkdrawer   Sep-05-09 08:33 AM   #6 
  - And of course they aren't mentioning Philip Zelikow working behind the scenes on the committee.  OmmmSweetOmmm   Sep-05-09 08:45 AM   #9 
  - Remember, Bush's first choice was Kissinger--!!  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:39 AM   #94 
  - And yet they signed their namesto this POS 9/11 Commission Report..  Old and In the Way   Sep-12-09 12:05 AM   #120 
  - Of course not  JonLP24   Sep-05-09 08:42 AM   #8 
  - I believe there was a lot wrong with the commission itself  blogslut   Sep-05-09 08:50 AM   #10 
  - In Before Move To September 11 Forum  slackmaster   Sep-05-09 08:54 AM   #11 
  - Yep. Polls like this make the job of discrediting "Troofers" difficult.  Junkdrawer   Sep-05-09 08:56 AM   #13 
     - Not sure why not believing or totally accepting the 9/11 Commission report  JonLP24   Sep-05-09 08:59 AM   #14 
     - On the subject of 9/11, 9/11 conspiracy theory advocates discredit themselves  Bolo Boffin   Sep-05-09 12:31 PM   #62 
     - If that were true, Bolo, you wouldn't be here ...  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:41 AM   #96 
        - There's a really quick way to stop me - present evidence that supports your theory  Bolo Boffin   Sep-08-09 01:08 AM   #104 
        - How about you try doing that re your "theory" . . . ???  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 01:41 PM   #107 
        - What do you do for a living again?  snooper2   Sep-08-09 01:06 PM   #106 
           - What do you do for a living again?  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 01:43 PM   #108 
              - Telecomunications VoIP Engineer  snooper2   Sep-08-09 03:14 PM   #110 
                 - Same here --  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 04:12 PM   #111 
                    - Sure you do...  snooper2   Sep-09-09 09:19 AM   #116 
                       - you're off topic! nt  wildbilln864   Sep-12-09 01:32 AM   #125 
     - Ah . . . it was in general, originally ... 143 votes ... was wondering how that happened!!  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:40 AM   #95 
  - "Everyone should totally believe it. Smirk." - xCommander AWOL (R)  SpiralHawk   Sep-05-09 08:55 AM   #12 
  - thank you  G_j   Sep-05-09 09:01 AM   #15 
  - The chairmen of the 9/11 commission no longer believe the report  HamdenRice   Sep-05-09 09:02 AM   #16 
  - And Neil Armstrong now agrees that the Moon missions were all a hoax  slackmaster   Sep-05-09 09:08 AM   #18 
  - Why post something from The Onion? nt  valerief   Sep-05-09 09:11 AM   #20 
  - Why not?  slackmaster   Sep-05-09 09:12 AM   #21 
     - Why not answer the question?  valerief   Sep-05-09 09:28 AM   #25 
     - What question?  slackmaster   Sep-05-09 09:44 AM   #34 
     - So you think you know more about the 9/11 Commission process than Kean & Hamilton?  HamdenRice   Sep-05-09 09:40 AM   #30 
        - Is one steaming pile somehow better than another steaming pile?  slackmaster   Sep-05-09 09:46 AM   #36 
           - So you don't believe the 9/11 Commission Report either? That's the OP question, isn't it?  HamdenRice   Sep-05-09 09:49 AM   #38 
              - I certainly don't agree with Van Jones' LIHOP position on 9/11  slackmaster   Sep-05-09 10:46 AM   #50 
                 - Jet fuel can't burn hot enough to bring the buildings down  divideandconquer   Sep-05-09 11:51 AM   #57 
                 - Save it for the September 11 forum  slackmaster   Sep-05-09 01:24 PM   #67 
                 - correct! thank you and welcome to the DUngeon! nt  wildbilln864   Sep-05-09 02:24 PM   #71 
                 - Where does Jones state a position? Please provide a link nt  HamdenRice   Sep-05-09 12:22 PM   #60 
                 - The point of the poll is whatever information everyone has .... including their  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:44 AM   #98 
  - Kean & Hamilton, "Stonewalled by the C.I.A. "  HamdenRice   Sep-05-09 09:38 AM   #28 
  - Excellent point . . . and thanks for that reminder!!  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:43 AM   #97 
  - Uh-oh! The attack on your character, your intelligence and your manhood will begin in....  Raster   Sep-12-09 12:17 AM   #121 
  - The book Kean and Hamilton wrote about the commission  Bluenorthwest   Sep-05-09 09:15 AM   #23 
  - Personally . . . IMO, it's a cover up of the cover up . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:46 AM   #99 
  - Troofers make Birfers look sane. n/t  WeDidIt   Sep-05-09 09:28 AM   #26 
  - So..if you don't believe the 9/11 Commission Report, you're a "Troofer"...  Junkdrawer   Sep-05-09 09:33 AM   #27 
  - Yup. And there's an amazing amount of crossover...  SidDithers   Sep-05-09 09:43 AM   #32 
     - Phil Berg is the father of both the Troofers and the Birfers  WeDidIt   Sep-05-09 10:14 AM   #40 
        - Yep. If it weren't for Phil Berg, no one would question 9/11...One thing....  Junkdrawer   Sep-05-09 10:25 AM   #42 
           - father of the .....  wildbilln864   Sep-05-09 10:34 AM   #43 
              - I'm pretty sure they aren't related. I remember seeing people question the connection at the time  maddezmom   Sep-05-09 10:46 AM   #49 
  - The 9/11 commission has gaping holes in it  lunatica   Sep-05-09 09:40 AM   #29 
  - Thank you Junkdrawer  Pharaoh   Sep-05-09 09:43 AM   #31 
  - 'welcome n/t  Junkdrawer   Sep-05-09 10:10 AM   #39 
  - .  beac   Sep-05-09 09:44 AM   #33 
  - k&r! nt  wildbilln864   Sep-05-09 09:45 AM   #35 
  - Well, Bush told the truth about everything else important. Why lie about a little thing like this?  Bonobo   Sep-05-09 09:46 AM   #37 
  - kicking for a bigger sample. nt  wildbilln864   Sep-05-09 10:24 AM   #41 
  - The poll results are disgusting. The 9/11 comm. report is flawed but we should accept basic points.  LLStarks   Sep-05-09 10:39 AM   #44 
  - thanks for the laugh...  wildbilln864   Sep-05-09 10:41 AM   #45 
  - 17 DUers actually think the 9/11 Commission report is mostly right?  Junkdrawer   Sep-05-09 10:41 AM   #46 
     - 17 people in denial or seriously uninformed.  Individualist   Sep-05-09 10:43 AM   #47 
     - 80 percent of respondents....  wildbilln864   Sep-05-09 10:44 AM   #48 
        - Dirty little secret...  Junkdrawer   Sep-05-09 10:49 AM   #51 
           - Abbreviations mean nothing without context. nt  LLStarks   Sep-05-09 11:12 AM   #55 
           - dirty little secret: opt-in polls don't give generalizable results  OnTheOtherHand   Sep-05-09 12:45 PM   #63 
           - you're a twenty percenter so ....  wildbilln864   Sep-12-09 01:39 AM   #126 
           - That supports my observations...  MrMickeysMom   Sep-06-09 09:20 AM   #86 
           - Correct...they really don't want discussion on the subjexct.  Old and In the Way   Sep-12-09 12:18 AM   #122 
  - Anyone who wants to read an accurate report  Individualist   Sep-05-09 10:57 AM   #52 
  - Thank you . . don't have time now but saved it --  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:56 AM   #101 
  - Bush and Cheney should have TESTIFIED UNDER OATH...  Octafish   Sep-05-09 11:11 AM   #54 
  - Gee, no apologists disputing your point....  Old and In the Way   Sep-12-09 12:22 AM   #123 
  - 9/11 and those who doubt the official commission findings  victoryparty   Sep-05-09 12:23 PM   #61 
  - You've spread one of the classic hoaxes of the Truthers, victoryparty.  robcon   Sep-05-09 08:35 PM   #72 
     - They all three collapsed due to weakened steel and two airplanes? Why that's  Subdivisions   Sep-05-09 09:34 PM   #73 
     - It's called science.  Bolo Boffin   Sep-05-09 10:34 PM   #76 
        - I aced physics in high school and took physics in college. But thanks for the tip. n/t  Subdivisions   Sep-05-09 11:44 PM   #78 
        - Time to refresh. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Sep-06-09 12:04 AM   #79 
        - It appears your education was insufficient. n/t  AZCat   Sep-07-09 09:02 PM   #89 
        - Science and physics do not confirm the OCT . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 01:04 AM   #103 
     - yeah right! nothing melted and....  wildbilln864   Sep-05-09 11:20 PM   #77 
     - Melted steel did not contribute to the fall of the towers. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Sep-06-09 12:05 AM   #80 
        - again, your opinion!  wildbilln864   Sep-06-09 12:23 AM   #81 
           - Nope. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Sep-06-09 12:26 AM   #82 
     - There is no "licorice" steel event . . . especially above and below the fire ....  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 01:00 AM   #102 
  - snicker..... 28 - 103..... Your wasting your time octers. everybody knows.....  Twist_U_Up   Sep-06-09 05:57 AM   #84 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Sep-07-09 06:39 AM   #87 
  - There are 143 people reading this . . . in the dungeon . .. ???? Wow~!  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 12:25 AM   #90 
  - Obviously, this article was posted in "General" for a short time and picked up 143 votes!  defendandprotect   Sep-08-09 02:22 PM   #109 
     - 80 % of respondents don't believe in the OTC.  Kaleko   Sep-09-09 12:12 AM   #115 
        - If you' re an apologist for the Bush administration for the past 8 years....  Old and In the Way   Sep-12-09 12:49 AM   #124 
           - Please point to anyone who is...  SDuderstadt   Sep-12-09 05:18 PM   #128 
  - k&r for the new visitors to this DUngeon. nt  wildbilln864   Sep-11-09 04:07 PM   #117 
  - Neither  pfloydguy7750   Sep-11-09 05:43 PM   #118 
  - the more years that pass  Torn_Scorned_Ignored   Sep-12-09 12:42 PM   #127 
  - I guess I'm part of the minority  p4poetic   Sep-13-09 02:25 PM   #129 
  - I remember watching some of the testimony and yelling at the TV. They spent more time  yurbud   Sep-13-09 08:23 PM   #130 
  - Small detail  shure   Jun-22-10 12:16 PM   #133 
     - They weren't tasked with investigating WTC7  KDLarsen   Jun-23-10 11:45 AM   #134 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC