You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #56: Nist itself admits the towers had oxygen depleted fires.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
lovepg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #42
56. Nist itself admits the towers had oxygen depleted fires....
To quote NIST
"Nearly all indoor large fires including those of the principal combustibles in the WTC towers produce large quantities
of optically thick, dark smoke. This is because at the locations where the actual burning is taking place the oxygen is
severely depleted and the compustibles are not completely oxidized to colorless carbon dioxide and water."
The temps may have been very hot at the time of crash as the fuel burned as MIT guy says but soon settled into the oxygen depleted fire of" nearly all indoor large fires". Since Nists contention is the sustained overheated temperatures caused structural failure in addition to the damage done by the planes. I would be concerned If I were you by this admission by NIST of lower temps from the tower fires than would be needed to produce this effect. Be honest you really have not read the NIST report very well have you?
And because you think firefighters and officials were not concerned by the fires under the rubble does not make them unworthy of investigation and explaination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -To be curious is the beginning of the scientific method. Bonobo  Aug-22-09 04:05 PM   #0 
  - To refuse actual answers for no good reason shoots the scientific method execution-style.  Bolo Boffin   Aug-22-09 04:25 PM   #1 
  - All your "answers" simply amount to "it must be so because alternatives are unthinkable".  Bonobo   Aug-22-09 04:29 PM   #2 
  - Not true. Not true at all.  Bolo Boffin   Aug-22-09 04:29 PM   #3 
  - So do you support a full and independent investigation? If not, why not?  Bonobo   Aug-22-09 04:32 PM   #4 
     - What else is left to do? n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-22-09 04:47 PM   #5 
        - To satisfy those who feel it was not full, like me and many others. You did not answer the question.  Bonobo   Aug-22-09 04:51 PM   #6 
           - Your personal incredulity is no cause of concern for me.  Bolo Boffin   Aug-22-09 05:47 PM   #8 
              - Defining incredulity..  scott75   Aug-23-09 04:17 PM   #25 
  - SuperLame.  greyl   Aug-22-09 04:53 PM   #7 
  - There's the proof that your "curiosity" has nothing to do with your 9/11 opinions  William Seger   Aug-23-09 09:30 AM   #14 
     - 10 Bonus points to WS for quoting Feynman n/t  Realityhack   Aug-24-09 04:01 PM   #139 
  - WTF????? World trade fallicies!........  lovepg   Aug-23-09 01:50 PM   #17 
  - Building fires don't burn for 8 weeks  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-09 07:13 PM   #9 
  - Why not?  hack89   Aug-22-09 08:10 PM   #10 
     - ComBustables???????????  lovepg   Aug-23-09 01:55 PM   #18 
        - No  hack89   Aug-23-09 02:47 PM   #20 
           - Fireproofed steel that does not burn unless the fires are super heated..  lovepg   Aug-23-09 03:17 PM   #22 
              - Steel wasn't burning  hack89   Aug-23-09 04:02 PM   #24 
                 - Your MIT study shows a strong initial fireball blast followed by a cooling of intensity  lovepg   Aug-23-09 09:03 PM   #33 
                 - Yes - an office fire that generated a gigawatt of energy.  hack89   Aug-23-09 09:09 PM   #36 
                    - That was only during the initial fireball. the temperature declined as the jet fuel  lovepg   Aug-23-09 09:13 PM   #38 
                       - No - you really need to read the entire report. Especially the conclusion  hack89   Aug-23-09 09:34 PM   #41 
                          - Steel is an exellent conducter of heat so moments of extreme heat are dispersed.  lovepg   Aug-24-09 12:25 AM   #58 
                             - You really think you are smarter than a MIT professor? Really? nt  hack89   Aug-24-09 05:39 AM   #76 
                             - If he was so smart he would have taken into account the little problem I pointed out...  lovepg   Aug-24-09 11:12 AM   #93 
                                - "IF he was so smart"  vincent_vega_lives   Aug-24-09 11:59 AM   #112 
                                   - No I simply said since HACK clearly implied I was NOT as smart as Mr. MIT..  lovepg   Aug-24-09 12:54 PM   #116 
                                      - Interestingly most if not all of us 'OCTers'...  Realityhack   Aug-24-09 04:05 PM   #140 
                                         - Ha Ha Ha whistling past the NIST graveyard yet again? nt  lovepg   Aug-24-09 11:02 PM   #178 
                                            - Please explain what this thread has to do with NIST  Realityhack   Aug-25-09 06:44 AM   #185 
                                               - Almost every thread on this post ends up being about NIST because that is the end all be all for ..  lovepg   Aug-25-09 12:25 PM   #192 
                                               - No, it isn't.  AZCat   Aug-25-09 09:14 PM   #212 
                                               - I have. So forget that casual line of dismisal. Look in your book under insults for your next ...  lovepg   Aug-26-09 01:36 AM   #229 
                                               - Really? Well, that's quite refreshing.  AZCat   Aug-26-09 06:25 AM   #232 
                             - Steel isn't all that great a conductor of heat.  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 11:28 AM   #96 
                                - So why do my fire place tools all have wooden handles?????  lovepg   Aug-24-09 01:06 PM   #118 
                                   - Half of something really big is still really big.  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 01:09 PM   #119 
                                      - Yes half the big thing takes less time than the really big thing?  lovepg   Aug-24-09 01:31 PM   #120 
                                         - If there are other factors involved, yes.  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 01:36 PM   #122 
                                            - The lower building had THICKER STRONGER support beams..  lovepg   Aug-24-09 11:01 PM   #177 
                                               - Yes, you've proven your point.  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 11:05 PM   #179 
                                                  - Translation can't answer the point so time to ignore that which we cannot answer.  lovepg   Aug-25-09 12:26 PM   #193 
                                                  - You're right. I can't answer that point.  Bolo Boffin   Aug-25-09 12:31 PM   #194 
                                                  - Truthers 1 official story 0 nt  lovepg   Aug-25-09 12:38 PM   #195 
                                                  - This is a sad game you're playing. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-25-09 01:03 PM   #198 
                                                  - Then why does it make me so happy?????nt  lovepg   Aug-25-09 01:48 PM   #199 
                                                  - I don't know.  Bolo Boffin   Aug-25-09 02:05 PM   #202 
                                                  - Because you like playing games?  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 02:54 PM   #204 
                                                  - or like YOU! nt.  lovepg   Aug-26-09 01:23 AM   #227 
                 - Furthermore this does nothing to explain the rubble fire. nt  lovepg   Aug-23-09 09:04 PM   #34 
                    - Well, we know it can't be due to thermate  hack89   Aug-23-09 09:10 PM   #37 
                       - I don't I just want a real frigging investigation remember. You guys have the explanations!  lovepg   Aug-23-09 09:14 PM   #39 
                          - So stop claiming it couldn't be a regular fire  hack89   Aug-23-09 09:40 PM   #42 
                             - Nist itself admits the towers had oxygen depleted fires....  lovepg   Aug-23-09 11:57 PM   #56 
                                - Nice cherry picking !  hack89   Aug-24-09 05:54 AM   #77 
                                   - Its from an explanation of the report.  lovepg   Aug-24-09 11:18 AM   #94 
                                      - No, it's cherrypicking to grab one quote and twist it out of context, which is what you did. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 11:29 AM   #97 
                                      - Cherrypicking? You mean finding an inconsistency I see..........  lovepg   Aug-24-09 12:49 PM   #115 
                                         - You should be able to demonstrate that "inconsistency."  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 01:01 PM   #117 
                                            - Come on who is playing games now!  lovepg   Aug-24-09 01:32 PM   #121 
                                               - You are. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 01:37 PM   #123 
                                      - Do you also accept NIST contention that the fires were extremely hot?  hack89   Aug-24-09 02:43 PM   #128 
                                      - Quoting someone is not always quote mining.  Realityhack   Aug-24-09 04:15 PM   #144 
                                         - Look that part was quoted because NIST on purpose or inadvertantly contradicted its..  lovepg   Aug-24-09 10:49 PM   #175 
  - Does this sound like curiosity to you?  LARED   Aug-22-09 09:59 PM   #11 
  - Excellent post. So far, most of the responses are right out of ...  BuddyBoy   Aug-23-09 08:36 AM   #12 
  - Another BuddyBoy post where he only questions the motives of other posters. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-23-09 11:20 AM   #15 
     - Seems to be a trend. n/t  Realityhack   Aug-24-09 04:16 PM   #145 
  - "False equivalency"  SDuderstadt   Aug-23-09 08:40 AM   #13 
  - All these questions have been been provided perfectly  vincent_vega_lives   Aug-23-09 11:47 AM   #16 
  - Stomps foot I am correct, I am correct! nt  lovepg   Aug-23-09 01:56 PM   #19 
  - I'm sure the irony of your post is lost on you nt  LARED   Aug-23-09 02:59 PM   #21 
  - All these insults have been used in the past and have been rebutted...  lovepg   Aug-23-09 03:19 PM   #23 
     - I notice you haven't intelligently rebutted  vincent_vega_lives   Aug-23-09 07:45 PM   #27 
        - There is nothing intelligent to rebutt. nt  lovepg   Aug-23-09 09:05 PM   #35 
           - Simple troll response  vincent_vega_lives   Aug-24-09 11:48 AM   #109 
              - Arrrghh matey prepare for boarding of the good ship intellect...  lovepg   Aug-24-09 10:54 PM   #176 
  - Interesting the new crop of Truthers  vincent_vega_lives   Aug-23-09 07:44 PM   #26 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-23-09 08:16 PM   #28 
     - As if you guys are interested in discourse... Please thats rich! LOL! nt  lovepg   Aug-24-09 12:36 AM   #64 
     - 'Far lest interesting?'  Subdivisions   Aug-24-09 12:51 AM   #66 
     - And 8 years later...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 08:04 AM   #80 
     - Oh I'm sure  vincent_vega_lives   Aug-24-09 11:35 AM   #103 
     - NOT at all interested in trying to get YOUR posts deleted.  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 07:32 AM   #79 
     - Maybe you should quit trying to smear everyone who...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 08:07 AM   #82 
     - Maybe you should quit pretending.  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 08:18 AM   #84 
        - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 08:23 AM   #85 
        - dude ...  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 08:46 AM   #86 
           - yours are offensive...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 08:49 AM   #87 
              - So, I take it you're playing this game because those toasted cars  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 09:02 AM   #88 
                 - What the fuck are you yammering about now?  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 09:15 AM   #89 
                 - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-24-09 09:25 AM   #90 
                    - Dude, you've talking about a completely different thread...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 09:30 AM   #91 
                    - Another BuddyBoy post where he only questions the motives of other posters. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 11:30 AM   #101 
                    - Wrong  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 11:35 AM   #102 
                       - So, the tag team works in pairs, eh?  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 02:08 PM   #124 
                          - Looks like. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 02:10 PM   #125 
                          - !  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 02:16 PM   #126 
                          - Who?  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 02:18 PM   #127 
                             - You guys are famous.  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 02:47 PM   #129 
                                - yeah, well...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 03:04 PM   #130 
                                   - you blew it, all right? you blew it  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 03:21 PM   #131 
                                   - I see coherence isn't your strong suit either...n/t  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 03:27 PM   #132 
                                   - Dude  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 03:29 PM   #133 
                                   - So, you're not only incoherent...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 03:33 PM   #135 
                                   - You blew it, dude.  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 03:45 PM   #136 
                                   - Oh, I GET it...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 03:56 PM   #138 
                                   - Let's get out the Secret Dudecoder Ring  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 04:05 PM   #141 
                                   - BINGO!  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 04:24 PM   #148 
                                   - Maybe you two can form a club or something...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 04:27 PM   #151 
                                   - No, Dude  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 04:31 PM   #155 
                                   - Ah...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 04:32 PM   #156 
                    - Oh noesss!111  vincent_vega_lives   Aug-24-09 11:41 AM   #108 
                       - Yes, indeed. BuddyBoy is a Judy Wood promoter. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 12:08 PM   #114 
                       - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-24-09 03:32 PM   #134 
                       - Only if your health plan covers self induced severe alcohol poisoning. n/t  Realityhack   Aug-24-09 04:19 PM   #146 
                 - Another BuddyBoy post where he only questions the motives of other posters. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 11:30 AM   #100 
                    - Nope  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 11:35 AM   #104 
        - Another BuddyBoy post where he only questions the motives of other posters. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 11:30 AM   #99 
           - Still wrong  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 11:35 AM   #105 
     - Another BuddyBoy post where he only questions the motives of other posters. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 11:29 AM   #98 
     - Wrong, wrong, wrong & one for your next BS post.  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 11:37 AM   #106 
        - Another BuddyBoy post where he only questions the motives of other posters. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-24-09 12:07 PM   #113 
           - You're setting the record for being wrong & deceitful  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 03:54 PM   #137 
              - It's a broken record  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 04:06 PM   #142 
                 - You and BudduBoy make a great duo...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 04:12 PM   #143 
                    - Dude, you think you're fooling anyone?  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 04:20 PM   #147 
                       - Well, only if we count...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 04:24 PM   #149 
                       - Yes he does. That, plus it DOES take up space and time. EOM  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 04:25 PM   #150 
                          - A true  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 04:28 PM   #153 
                             - For the record....  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 04:30 PM   #154 
                                - For the broken record  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 04:32 PM   #157 
                                   - Define irony...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 04:34 PM   #158 
                                      - So this is your job?  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 04:39 PM   #159 
                                         - Yes, your mom hired me....  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 04:43 PM   #160 
                                         - If it is, he's being grossly overpaid.  BuddyBoy   Aug-24-09 04:47 PM   #162 
                                            - Free WiFi and all the $6 burgers he can get all over his face  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 04:54 PM   #165 
                                            - You're just pissed because I didn't tip you when you took my order...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 05:00 PM   #166 
                                            - Your proctologist called  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 05:02 PM   #167 
                                            - I can't imagine why my proctologist would call you....  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 05:04 PM   #168 
                                            - She called the switchboard, routed to the  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 05:10 PM   #169 
                                            - I see...you work in a cubicle?  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 05:13 PM   #170 
                                            - Tired of trying to one-up me yet?  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 05:15 PM   #171 
                                            - I finally figured out who you really are!  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 06:27 PM   #172 
                                            - you make a distinct impression  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 06:42 PM   #173 
                                            - Is that your mother?  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 06:46 PM   #174 
     - For the record  vincent_vega_lives   Aug-24-09 11:38 AM   #107 
     - ... and just as likely to think!  MrMickeysMom   Aug-25-09 12:13 AM   #182 
  - Would you mind repeating the one about the jets being (not) scrambled?  omega minimo   Aug-23-09 08:46 PM   #29 
     - Jet WERE scrambled out of Langley and Otis, dude...n/t  SDuderstadt   Aug-23-09 08:49 PM   #30 
        - Why was there no interception of any of the planes? How did they travel unchallenged through  omega minimo   Aug-23-09 08:50 PM   #31 
           - And what "highly protected" airspace are talking about, dude?  SDuderstadt   Aug-23-09 08:53 PM   #32 
           - GMAFB  omega minimo   Aug-23-09 09:26 PM   #40 
              - Dude...it's obvious you've not tried to educate yourself...  SDuderstadt   Aug-23-09 09:40 PM   #43 
                 - I stay out of here because of this sort of macho fucking bullshit  omega minimo   Aug-23-09 09:43 PM   #44 
                    - Dude...I don't know how else to answer questions from people who make all kinds of sinister...  SDuderstadt   Aug-23-09 09:46 PM   #45 
                    - "sinister insinuations"?  omega minimo   Aug-23-09 10:26 PM   #46 
                       - Oh, I see...  SDuderstadt   Aug-23-09 10:32 PM   #47 
                          - Are you here to prevent people from returning to this dungeon?  omega minimo   Aug-23-09 10:36 PM   #48 
                          - Oh, please...  SDuderstadt   Aug-23-09 11:09 PM   #49 
                             - No, they're just looking for a peckfest.  greyl   Aug-23-09 11:43 PM   #51 
                                - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-23-09 11:47 PM   #52 
                                   - I'm not pretending, and you're trying to change the subject again. nt  greyl   Aug-23-09 11:51 PM   #54 
                          - Ok SD do me a favor go rent a cessna take off from the Washington public airport then turn suddenly  lovepg   Aug-24-09 12:34 AM   #63 
                          - September 12, 1994 n/t  Realityhack   Aug-24-09 05:58 AM   #78 
                          - Are you saying any of the planes entered...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 08:06 AM   #81 
                             - The Clinton incident is one reason that airspace IS protected airspace.  lovepg   Aug-24-09 11:06 AM   #92 
                             - You might want to rephrase that.  Realityhack   Aug-24-09 04:28 PM   #152 
                                - No SD seemed confused as the where the restricted airspace was,,,  lovepg   Aug-24-09 11:08 PM   #180 
                                   - How long was 77 off course over Washington DC?  greyl   Aug-24-09 11:54 PM   #181 
                                   - How long was it off course before getting to washington DC? Thats just weak! nt  lovepg   Aug-25-09 12:19 PM   #190 
                                      - How long was its transponder off? n/t  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 12:40 PM   #196 
                                      - You know protocol calls for tracking of planes that go off the flight plan if the transponder is off  lovepg   Aug-25-09 01:54 PM   #201 
                                      - The center controlling 77 when its transponder went off wasn't aware of the other hijackings. n/t  Bolo Boffin   Aug-25-09 02:06 PM   #203 
                                      - yeah no phones were operating that day from what I heard except for the cell phones on the jets!  lovepg   Aug-26-09 01:20 AM   #225 
                                      - Dude...can you explain precisely how planes that...  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 03:08 PM   #206 
                                      - Turn on the frigging radar and the plane sending no transponder signal is tracked. nt  lovepg   Aug-26-09 01:19 AM   #224 
                                      - Not that easy, dude...n/t  SDuderstadt   Aug-26-09 01:25 AM   #228 
                                      - Your right because all the other planes keep turning their transponders on and off..  lovepg   Aug-26-09 01:38 AM   #230 
                                      - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Aug-26-09 01:45 AM   #231 
                                   - No you most certainly did not.  Realityhack   Aug-25-09 06:55 AM   #186 
                                   - I believe Mr . Cheany was informed the plane would arrive at the white house  lovepg   Aug-25-09 12:22 PM   #191 
                                      - Wrong....n/t  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 12:41 PM   #197 
                                      - Oh well then in the face of such unassailable facts.....LOL! nt  lovepg   Aug-25-09 01:51 PM   #200 
                                      - Dude...you do know that while that whole scenario was...  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 02:59 PM   #205 
                                      - Or shot down by the planes that never scrambled. that would explain the wide debris field!  lovepg   Aug-26-09 01:22 AM   #226 
                                   - I'm not at all confused about what airspace was restricted on 9/11...  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 10:07 AM   #187 
                             - .  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 11:58 AM   #111 
                          - "Have you read the 9/11 Commission Report? How about the NIST Reports/ The BPAT's?  MrMickeysMom   Aug-25-09 12:16 AM   #183 
                             - I'm willing to bet you haven't, MMM....  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 10:09 AM   #188 
                                - Well, as usual...  MrMickeysMom   Aug-25-09 06:01 PM   #207 
                                   - Simple question, MMM...  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 06:17 PM   #210 
                                      - Not all the BPATs, but all else one time or other... why?  MrMickeysMom   Aug-25-09 10:23 PM   #215 
                                         - It's perfectly germane to the subject and I don't remotely...  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 10:40 PM   #217 
                                            - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Aug-25-09 11:04 PM   #220 
                    - Personally, I think he came off like Mother Nature.  greyl   Aug-23-09 11:41 PM   #50 
                       - So you agree  omega minimo   Aug-23-09 11:49 PM   #53 
                          - Yeah, like you don't have a chip on your shoulder...  SDuderstadt   Aug-23-09 11:55 PM   #55 
                          - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-24-09 12:27 AM   #59 
                             - Because no one else would talk to you, otherwise?  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 12:29 AM   #61 
                          - Please read for comprehension.  greyl   Aug-23-09 11:58 PM   #57 
                             - When the belligerence begins  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 12:28 AM   #60 
                                - Well, then...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 12:30 AM   #62 
                                - You did the same thing in another very recent thread with the same question.  greyl   Aug-24-09 12:41 AM   #65 
                                - Yes. When the belligerence begins  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 01:28 AM   #67 
                                   - More like when you get a reply that disagrees with you, you gladly attack the poster  greyl   Aug-24-09 01:38 AM   #68 
                                      - There are plenty here who will play your games.  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 02:11 AM   #69 
                                         - ...because you're superior to those imaginary people, right.  greyl   Aug-24-09 02:22 AM   #70 
                                            - Um no  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 02:29 AM   #71 
                                               - "highly protected airspace unchallenged"  greyl   Aug-24-09 02:32 AM   #72 
                                               - .  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 02:37 AM   #73 
                                               - Thanks so much for your contribution to the discussion.  greyl   Aug-24-09 02:42 AM   #74 
                                               - Better luck next time.  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 02:56 AM   #75 
                                               - Nice racket...  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 08:12 AM   #83 
                                               - I asked a question  omega minimo   Aug-24-09 11:55 AM   #110 
                                - Man, I could have told you that way up-thread...  MrMickeysMom   Aug-25-09 12:18 AM   #184 
                                   - Typical "truther" post...  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 10:11 AM   #189 
                                      - Hilarious!  MrMickeysMom   Aug-25-09 06:03 PM   #208 
                                         - How do you know that it's not you guys creating the atmosphere?  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 06:14 PM   #209 
                                            - Your memory is bad, SDuderstadt. It comes from getting your buttocks walluped!  MrMickeysMom   Aug-25-09 10:29 PM   #216 
                                               - I'd love for you to post a single example of when you...  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 10:55 PM   #218 
                                               - I'd love for you to post a single example of when you...  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 10:55 PM   #219 
                                                  - Oh, I get it! You're TWINS!  MrMickeysMom   Aug-25-09 11:18 PM   #221 
                                                  - Could you repost the first ''challenge'' so it...  SDuderstadt   Aug-25-09 11:38 PM   #223 
           - Could you be more specific?  Realityhack   Aug-24-09 04:48 PM   #163 
              - Make sure you're not "belligerent" to Omega....  SDuderstadt   Aug-24-09 04:50 PM   #164 
  - Let's take them one at a time  Theobald   Aug-24-09 11:21 AM   #95 
  - Look at all those straw men. Now THAT is the scientific method at work... NOT  Realityhack   Aug-24-09 04:43 PM   #161 
  - Curious Is Good. Rational Also Helps  jberryhill   Aug-25-09 07:17 PM   #211 
  - I don't know, I think a little paranoia helps.  AZCat   Aug-25-09 09:16 PM   #213 
     - Bonobo was talking about science, not engineering  jberryhill   Aug-25-09 10:22 PM   #214 
        - Fair enough.  AZCat   Aug-25-09 11:25 PM   #222 
  - And now, the *rest* of the scientific method  anigbrowl   Sep-01-09 06:37 PM   #233 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC