You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #89: No normal mainifests, No video [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #76
89. No normal mainifests, No video
Edited on Mon Jun-01-09 10:00 PM by Kalun D
your claims would be ultimately irrelevant to 9/11 "inside job" conspiracism even if they were correct
If there is no hard proof the 19 actually boarded the planes anybody could have been the perps. Even if it was proven the 19 boarded, and it hasn't been, it would then have to be proven they were piloting the planes, and there's even less proof of that.


There was some confusion on some of the names in the first few days after the attack, but that seems to be pretty much sorted out now.
The names have never changed, they were questionable even by the FBI at some point, no proof has ever been subsequently presented as to their authenticity. And the biased unknown source 9llmyth website even admits this, "Of course we can’t prove that Mueller really believed that...(the ID's were positive)".

And there was never any hard evidence these people, even if correctly ID'd, actually boarded the planes. Even though there positively should be video evidence. The mere withholding of that video evidence is highly suspicious in itself.

And the question has NEVER been answered, and it never will, where is the video?


most of the hijackers were indeed identified as particular people connected with radical Islamist terrorism, and those people seem to have disappeared for some reason.
Regardless of their ID, it was never proven they boarded the planes, even though there should be proof.


the manifests, the passenger calls, the communications with the ATCs, the last will videos (and presumably much more, such as the bin Laden "confession" video)
There has never been ANY manifests from the airlines contrary to the usual SOP. How come it was different just this time? Shouldn't it have been even more straight and narrow if we really wanted to know the truth?

transcripts of passenger calls or all audio released to the public in a court of law? Last will videos from unknown sources? An unknown source Bin Laden "confession" video that doesn't even look like Bin Laden?

NONE of this "evidence" positively establishes the 19 boarding the planes or in the cockpits.


Tell me what you do believe and why you believe it
We don't know who was really on the planes, or who flew them into the buildings. The lack of what would be positive evidence is damning all by itself. Like lack of video and manifests released by the airlines as is SOP. "The FBI says so" is not good enough, show us the video.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC