Reply #98: It's not a "theory"

[William Seger]

You seem to have a lot of difficulty with the definition of common words. It's an extremely well documented and accepted FACT that UA175 hit WTC2, and that one engine part was found at Church and Murray. You insult the board with your empty claim that "most DUers know that the engine part was planted." Thankfully, only a tiny handful of DUers seem to be that delusional, and they don't "know" any such thing -- they simply assume it, for no good reason. Spooky claims he can prove that it couldn't have happened, which would mean all that evidence must have been faked, which would mean it should not be accepted as fact. Unfortunately, his proof fails. Miserably. And I see that as usual, you have absolutely nothing to contribute to the "debate" but naked assertions and denial, along with insinuations that anyone who doesn't buy this idiotic bullshit must be an accomplice after the fact. Very impressive.