greyl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
| 48. The approach you took was a good addition to the thread. |
|
How successful it is, is harder to say. ;)
|
| -Where was the U.S. military on 9/11; who was in charge; and |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-13-09 09:18 AM |
#0 |
 -
I assume stand down orders. It's not an excuse, but it's a reason. nt |
lulu in NC |
Jan-13-09 09:40 AM |
#1 |
| -
Wasn't it 75 minutes they had? |
seemslikeadream |
Jan-13-09 11:36 AM |
#2 |
| -
First you ask questions, then you state that there's no answer you will accept. |
boloboffin |
Jan-13-09 12:49 PM |
#3 |
 -
Touching History didn't answer my questions. |
tetedur |
Jan-13-09 02:06 PM |
#4 |
 -
Because you have only one correct answer for your questions. |
boloboffin |
Jan-13-09 02:54 PM |
#5 |
| -
Don't tell me what I believe. |
tetedur |
Jan-14-09 08:57 AM |
#22 |
| -
No. You're not using your brain correctly. I asked questions for which |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-13-09 09:36 PM |
#7 |
| -
...you then said no answer would satisfy you but "no excuse." I can read. |
boloboffin |
Jan-13-09 10:13 PM |
#8 |
| -
Please, either answer the questions or move along. Thank you. n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-13-09 10:20 PM |
#9 |
| -
I did. You don't want to read the book and find the answers you seek. |
boloboffin |
Jan-13-09 10:38 PM |
#10 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-13-09 10:57 PM |
#11 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-14-09 08:27 AM |
#19 |
| -
Please answer the questions in the OP. Thank you. n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 08:55 AM |
#20 |
| -
I have provided you the place to find most of your answers. |
boloboffin |
Jan-14-09 10:05 AM |
#24 |
| -
I want YOU to give me your answer to the question. n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 10:07 AM |
#25 |
| -
I've given you all the answer that you require. n/t |
boloboffin |
Jan-14-09 10:16 AM |
#28 |
| -
No you haven't. You've done everything you can to deflect |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 10:24 AM |
#29 |
| -
You asked a question. I gave you the location of your answer. You say I'm deflecting. |
boloboffin |
Jan-14-09 11:21 AM |
#34 |
| -
You gave me the location of Lynn Sweeney's (whoever that is) |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 11:29 AM |
#35 |
| -
they was a commander in chief called george |
bambino |
Jan-13-09 04:27 PM |
#6 |
| -
The hijacked flights were commercial, not military. |
greyl |
Jan-13-09 11:02 PM |
#12 |
| -
You must be confused. You don't seem to have answered my OP. n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-13-09 11:28 PM |
#13 |
| -
Not anymore. |
greyl |
Jan-13-09 11:47 PM |
#14 |
| -
No, what's clear is that you don't have any answers. n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 12:01 AM |
#15 |
| -
It's clear your "question" isn't really an honest question. |
greyl |
Jan-14-09 12:11 AM |
#16 |
| -
Please answer the questions in the OP. Thank you. n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 08:55 AM |
#21 |
| -
Click the link I provided and read it for comprehension. nt |
greyl |
Jan-14-09 10:13 AM |
#26 |
| -
Answer the questions I asked in my OP. n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 10:15 AM |
#27 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-14-09 10:26 AM |
#30 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-14-09 10:31 AM |
#31 |
| -
Answer the questions I asked in my OP. n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 10:50 AM |
#32 |
| -
Support the assertions made in your OP. nt |
greyl |
Jan-14-09 11:08 AM |
#33 |
| -
Again, in your own words, where was the U.S. military on 9/11? n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 11:30 AM |
#36 |
| -
You need to realize how ridiculously vague that question is. |
greyl |
Jan-14-09 11:47 AM |
#37 |
| -
Why did the U.S. military fail to respond on September 11, 2001? n/t |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 11:51 AM |
#38 |
| -
They did respond. nt |
greyl |
Jan-14-09 12:00 PM |
#39 |
| -
It's beyond silly to claim the US Military... |
SDuderstadt |
Jan-14-09 12:34 PM |
#40 |
| -
How ironic. It is you and your cohorts that possess an |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 12:56 PM |
#41 |
| -
Here we go again.... |
SDuderstadt |
Jan-14-09 01:10 PM |
#42 |
| -
Yep. Here we go again. |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 01:25 PM |
#43 |
| -
I see you can't remotely answer the questions I asked.... |
SDuderstadt |
Jan-14-09 04:03 PM |
#45 |
| -
If you have not figured it out by now |
LARED |
Jan-14-09 06:19 AM |
#17 |
| -
You're not thinking straight. You seem to have failed at answering |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 08:23 AM |
#18 |
| -
It's very funny how this post has gotten nothing but the run-around. Does |
Texas Explorer |
Jan-14-09 09:06 AM |
#23 |
| -
These aren't difficult questions. |
Raskolnik |
Jan-14-09 03:07 PM |
#44 |
| -
Please be aware that those rational answers |
LARED |
Jan-14-09 05:58 PM |
#46 |
| -
Oh, I'm aware...I just didn't want T.E. to think that s/he had come up with some |
Raskolnik |
Jan-14-09 07:14 PM |
#47 |
| -
The approach you took was a good addition to the thread. |
greyl |
Jan-14-09 11:04 PM |
#48 |
| -
Operation Bojinka |
Liberal_Dog |
Jan-15-09 11:02 AM |
#49 |
| -
There is a world of difference between being "aware" of something and "prepared" for something. |
Raskolnik |
Jan-15-09 12:26 PM |
#50 |
| -
You Have To Be Some Kind Of Omnipotent Force... |
Liberal_Dog |
Jan-16-09 03:46 PM |
#52 |
| -
Yes, you would have to be omnipotent to defend against every threat with only minutes notice. |
Raskolnik |
Jan-16-09 04:01 PM |
#53 |
| -
There is no excuse for the epic falling of the WTCs either |
BunnyBluetimes |
Jan-15-09 02:04 PM |
#51 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread