You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #5: Because you have only one correct answer for your questions. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Because you have only one correct answer for your questions.
You point out that the Hutchison story is untrue. You even cite the New York Times editorial showing that Hutchison's story could not be true, because Hutchison had not even taken off before 93 crashed.

But that doesn't tell you that there was no way anyone could have stopped those planes. That tells you that it's all lies and you can feel free to believe what you wanted, that the military allowed these attacks to happen knowingly.

That's not a commitment to truth. And Sweeney's book is more than this one story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Where was the U.S. military on 9/11; who was in charge; and Texas Explorer  Jan-13-09 09:18 AM   #0 
  - I assume stand down orders. It's not an excuse, but it's a reason. nt  lulu in NC   Jan-13-09 09:40 AM   #1 
  - Wasn't it 75 minutes they had?  seemslikeadream   Jan-13-09 11:36 AM   #2 
  - First you ask questions, then you state that there's no answer you will accept.  boloboffin   Jan-13-09 12:49 PM   #3 
  - Touching History didn't answer my questions.  tetedur   Jan-13-09 02:06 PM   #4 
  - Because you have only one correct answer for your questions.  boloboffin   Jan-13-09 02:54 PM   #5 
     - Don't tell me what I believe.  tetedur   Jan-14-09 08:57 AM   #22 
  - No. You're not using your brain correctly. I asked questions for which  Texas Explorer   Jan-13-09 09:36 PM   #7 
     - then said no answer would satisfy you but "no excuse." I can read.  boloboffin   Jan-13-09 10:13 PM   #8 
        - Please, either answer the questions or move along. Thank you. n/t  Texas Explorer   Jan-13-09 10:20 PM   #9 
           - I did. You don't want to read the book and find the answers you seek.  boloboffin   Jan-13-09 10:38 PM   #10 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-13-09 10:57 PM   #11 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-14-09 08:27 AM   #19 
              - Please answer the questions in the OP. Thank you. n/t  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 08:55 AM   #20 
                 - I have provided you the place to find most of your answers.  boloboffin   Jan-14-09 10:05 AM   #24 
                    - I want YOU to give me your answer to the question. n/t  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 10:07 AM   #25 
                       - I've given you all the answer that you require. n/t  boloboffin   Jan-14-09 10:16 AM   #28 
                          - No you haven't. You've done everything you can to deflect  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 10:24 AM   #29 
                             - You asked a question. I gave you the location of your answer. You say I'm deflecting.  boloboffin   Jan-14-09 11:21 AM   #34 
                                - You gave me the location of Lynn Sweeney's (whoever that is)  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 11:29 AM   #35 
  - they was a commander in chief called george  bambino   Jan-13-09 04:27 PM   #6 
  - The hijacked flights were commercial, not military.  greyl   Jan-13-09 11:02 PM   #12 
  - You must be confused. You don't seem to have answered my OP. n/t  Texas Explorer   Jan-13-09 11:28 PM   #13 
     - Not anymore.  greyl   Jan-13-09 11:47 PM   #14 
        - No, what's clear is that you don't have any answers. n/t  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 12:01 AM   #15 
           - It's clear your "question" isn't really an honest question.  greyl   Jan-14-09 12:11 AM   #16 
              - Please answer the questions in the OP. Thank you. n/t  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 08:55 AM   #21 
                 - Click the link I provided and read it for comprehension. nt  greyl   Jan-14-09 10:13 AM   #26 
                    - Answer the questions I asked in my OP. n/t  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 10:15 AM   #27 
                       - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-14-09 10:26 AM   #30 
                          - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-14-09 10:31 AM   #31 
                          - Answer the questions I asked in my OP. n/t  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 10:50 AM   #32 
                             - Support the assertions made in your OP. nt  greyl   Jan-14-09 11:08 AM   #33 
                                - Again, in your own words, where was the U.S. military on 9/11? n/t  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 11:30 AM   #36 
                                   - You need to realize how ridiculously vague that question is.  greyl   Jan-14-09 11:47 AM   #37 
                                      - Why did the U.S. military fail to respond on September 11, 2001? n/t  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 11:51 AM   #38 
                                         - They did respond. nt  greyl   Jan-14-09 12:00 PM   #39 
                                         - It's beyond silly to claim the US Military...  SDuderstadt   Jan-14-09 12:34 PM   #40 
                                            - How ironic. It is you and your cohorts that possess an  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 12:56 PM   #41 
                                               - Here we go again....  SDuderstadt   Jan-14-09 01:10 PM   #42 
                                                  - Yep. Here we go again.  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 01:25 PM   #43 
                                                     - I see you can't remotely answer the questions I asked....  SDuderstadt   Jan-14-09 04:03 PM   #45 
  - If you have not figured it out by now  LARED   Jan-14-09 06:19 AM   #17 
  - You're not thinking straight. You seem to have failed at answering  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 08:23 AM   #18 
  - It's very funny how this post has gotten nothing but the run-around. Does  Texas Explorer   Jan-14-09 09:06 AM   #23 
  - These aren't difficult questions.  Raskolnik   Jan-14-09 03:07 PM   #44 
  - Please be aware that those rational answers  LARED   Jan-14-09 05:58 PM   #46 
  - Oh, I'm aware...I just didn't want T.E. to think that s/he had come up with some  Raskolnik   Jan-14-09 07:14 PM   #47 
     - The approach you took was a good addition to the thread.  greyl   Jan-14-09 11:04 PM   #48 
  - Operation Bojinka  Liberal_Dog   Jan-15-09 11:02 AM   #49 
     - There is a world of difference between being "aware" of something and "prepared" for something.  Raskolnik   Jan-15-09 12:26 PM   #50 
        - You Have To Be Some Kind Of Omnipotent Force...  Liberal_Dog   Jan-16-09 03:46 PM   #52 
           - Yes, you would have to be omnipotent to defend against every threat with only minutes notice.  Raskolnik   Jan-16-09 04:01 PM   #53 
  - There is no excuse for the epic falling of the WTCs either  BunnyBluetimes   Jan-15-09 02:04 PM   #51 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC