You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: Got it on. Thanks! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Got it on. Thanks!
Seems more like a history, to me, but they're sure to cover 9/11. And we'll see how "fair and balanced" they are. I saw "Loose Change" a couple of weeks ago. I was expecting a total conspiracy theory bias, but what they mostly did was raise important questions that have still never been answered... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -9/11 Forensic evidence to be reviewed on the History Channel, right now. nt patrice  Dec-14-08 02:03 PM   #0 
  - you mean the revisionist history channel....  nebenaube   Dec-14-08 02:10 PM   #1 
  - You mean the right-wing propaganda channel...  Hissyspit   Dec-14-08 04:02 PM   #7 
  - Got it on. Thanks!  Rhiannon12866   Dec-14-08 02:28 PM   #2 
  - Don't give "Loose Change" too much credit. Most of what they present is false.  TheWraith   Dec-14-08 02:58 PM   #5 
     - Well, the guy who made the film was there and I was pretty impressed with him.  Rhiannon12866   Dec-14-08 03:05 PM   #6 
        - Here's a good site for covering the various fictions of Loose Change.  TheWraith   Dec-14-08 04:46 PM   #9 
  - If you want to go deeper down that rabbit hole, check this link out:  balantz   Dec-14-08 02:37 PM   #3 
  - Hard to believe that there are some here who buy the Bush fairy tale about 9/11  Cheap_Trick   Dec-14-08 02:53 PM   #4 
  - Most have sold out  dlaliberte   Dec-16-08 07:47 PM   #13 
  - No one has to discredit the work done on no plane theories  LARED   Dec-14-08 04:27 PM   #8 
  - Yes... that's why a CNN reporter throws his career away reporting "No Plane" ...  defendandprotect   Dec-14-08 11:01 PM   #12 
  - Not much is self-evident - wrong planes, not no planes  dlaliberte   Dec-16-08 08:40 PM   #14 
     - OMG! A honest-to-God Pod Advocate!  boloboffin   Dec-16-08 08:47 PM   #15 
        - OMG! An honest-to-God Obfuscator  dlaliberte   Dec-16-08 09:04 PM   #16 
        - "firemen reached the impact site and reported there was not much fire left to put out"  boloboffin   Dec-16-08 10:38 PM   #17 
           - not much fire regardless  dlaliberte   Dec-18-08 12:25 AM   #24 
              - basic physics  dlaliberte   Dec-18-08 08:51 AM   #26 
                 - The falling mass of the upper section would have imparted SEVEN times the normal load capacity  boloboffin   Dec-18-08 01:17 PM   #28 
                 - Bazant completely blows it  dlaliberte   Dec-19-08 12:23 AM   #31 
                    - You are not quoting Ace Baker.  boloboffin   Dec-19-08 12:31 AM   #32 
                       - I'll quote Hitler when he makes sense  dlaliberte   Dec-19-08 09:46 AM   #34 
                          - Stupid strawman argument  SDuderstadt   Dec-19-08 10:18 AM   #35 
                          - Don't believe me or anyone else - find out for yourself  dlaliberte   Dec-19-08 12:14 PM   #36 
                          - A doctorate in the relevant subject matter vs. a high school diploma is NOT "based on reputation"  boloboffin   Dec-19-08 12:25 PM   #37 
                          - But it is a STUPID quote.  Realityhack   Jan-05-09 10:17 AM   #52 
                             - STUPID indeed  dlaliberte   Jan-10-09 02:14 PM   #94 
                 - Simple "basic physics" question  William Seger   Jan-03-09 08:59 PM   #43 
                 - No answer to my question?  William Seger   Jan-04-09 02:14 PM   #49 
                 - Still no answer? Need a hint?  William Seger   Jan-05-09 09:44 PM   #55 
        - It's been, what, two or three years since we had a pod person  jberryhill   Dec-16-08 10:47 PM   #18 
        - Very interesting  LARED   Dec-17-08 05:42 AM   #19 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-17-08 07:09 PM   #20 
           - ad hominem attacks will get you nowhere  dlaliberte   Dec-17-08 08:03 PM   #21 
              - I'll try and be nice  LARED   Dec-17-08 08:58 PM   #22 
              - Show me some evidence that the evidence is false  dlaliberte   Dec-17-08 09:33 PM   #23 
                 - I found evidence - pods are questionable  dlaliberte   Jan-03-09 01:21 PM   #38 
                    - "I particularly dislike the irrational attacks by debunkers,"  boloboffin   Jan-03-09 01:46 PM   #39 
                       - "But we WANT you to preach pod nonsense here"  dlaliberte   Jan-03-09 02:37 PM   #40 
                          - "the more it exposes that you are trying to obscure the truth."  boloboffin   Jan-03-09 05:33 PM   #41 
                          - "Bazant, whose arguments are fundamentally flawed,.."  William Seger   Jan-03-09 08:22 PM   #42 
                             - Bazant is bizarre  dlaliberte   Jan-04-09 04:52 AM   #45 
                                - JEM is bordering on journalistic and scientific fraud  dlaliberte   Jan-04-09 12:36 PM   #46 
                                - How is the thread on the physics of 9/11 going?  AZCat   Jan-04-09 12:56 PM   #47 
                                - LMAO!  William Seger   Jan-04-09 02:20 PM   #50 
                                   - Yeah. I imagine they ONLY published that so Bazanat could make fun of it.  Realityhack   Jan-05-09 10:22 AM   #53 
                                      - Not exactly "make fun of it", perhaps  William Seger   Jan-05-09 12:16 PM   #54 
                                - Once again, you're late to the party...  William Seger   Jan-04-09 02:08 PM   #48 
                                   - An interesting sidenote...  AZCat   Jan-04-09 11:19 PM   #51 
                                   - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-05-09 11:57 PM   #60 
                                   - "once the tilting started, after about 2 seconds, the controller noticed and quickly demolished..."  boloboffin   Jan-06-09 12:11 AM   #61 
                                      - Maybe the controller was automated  dlaliberte   Jan-06-09 06:21 AM   #62 
                                         - Prove you wrong?  AZCat   Jan-06-09 09:27 AM   #63 
                                            - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-06-09 09:58 AM   #64 
                                            - "We" meaning me and boloboffin.  AZCat   Jan-06-09 10:14 AM   #65 
                                            - You spent several hours writing a post  William Seger   Jan-06-09 10:38 AM   #66 
                                            - You spent no time thinking about the problem for yourself  dlaliberte   Jan-06-09 10:55 AM   #67 
                                            - On the contrary, Mr. dlaliberte  William Seger   Jan-06-09 02:32 PM   #69 
                                            - You are exhibiting exactly what I am talking about  dlaliberte   Jan-06-09 04:15 PM   #70 
                                            - But that's not the sort of answer he's seeking.  AZCat   Jan-06-09 11:28 AM   #68 
                                   - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-07-09 12:32 AM   #72 
                                      - Clarification regarding more massive lower floors  dlaliberte   Jan-07-09 09:07 AM   #73 
                                      - What?!  AZCat   Jan-07-09 05:44 PM   #77 
                                         - Was your missreading deliberate?  dlaliberte   Jan-08-09 01:45 AM   #79 
                                            - You seem to think WE are responsible for the deletion of your messages.  AZCat   Jan-08-09 08:55 AM   #81 
                                            - Does the moderator go looking for things to delete, or wait for reports of 'abuse'?  dlaliberte   Jan-08-09 10:20 AM   #84 
                                            - I don't know - why don't you ask them?  AZCat   Jan-08-09 12:04 PM   #86 
                                      - Jeez, first....  William Seger   Jan-07-09 10:46 AM   #75 
                                         - please take your time  dlaliberte   Jan-07-09 11:17 AM   #76 
                                            - Do you quote G W Bush when he makes sense? nt  greyl   Jan-07-09 07:14 PM   #78 
                                            - "You cannot lead if you send mexed missages"  dlaliberte   Jan-08-09 04:55 AM   #80 
                                            - So, no you don't, eh? Just Hitler?  greyl   Jan-08-09 09:15 AM   #82 
                                            - Update before replying  dlaliberte   Jan-08-09 10:07 AM   #83 
                                            - Deleted again?  William Seger   Jan-08-09 11:01 AM   #85 
                                               - Delayed deletion. Does anyone really think my message was offensive?  dlaliberte   Jan-08-09 01:45 PM   #87 
                                               - "It vanished into thin error (we agree this did not happen)"  dlaliberte   Jan-08-09 03:08 PM   #88 
                                               - Think about it some more  William Seger   Jan-08-09 07:49 PM   #89 
                                               - Heavy thoughts, massive coverup  dlaliberte   Jan-09-09 01:35 AM   #90 
                                               - WTC debris distribution  dlaliberte   Jan-10-09 08:55 AM   #91 
                                               - We're not getting anywhere  William Seger   Jan-10-09 09:56 AM   #92 
                                               - a lot of the debris spreading happened after it hit the ground??  dlaliberte   Jan-10-09 11:31 AM   #93 
                                               - The game of "answer the basic physics question"  dlaliberte   Jan-10-09 02:31 PM   #95 
                                               - I can hardly wait  William Seger   Jan-10-09 03:27 PM   #96 
                                               - "path of maximum resistance" ??  dlaliberte   Jan-10-09 03:40 PM   #97 
                                               - Isn't that what you claimed in one of the deleted messages?  William Seger   Jan-10-09 04:01 PM   #99 
                                               - Path of greatest resistance to rational thinking  dlaliberte   Jan-10-09 08:41 PM   #100 
                                               - What are you asking?  William Seger   Jan-10-09 10:38 PM   #101 
              - Attacking an idea is not ad hominem at all.  greyl   Dec-18-08 12:57 AM   #25 
                 - "your pod is showing"  dlaliberte   Dec-18-08 09:13 AM   #27 
                    - "holding up a mirror so people can hopefully see what they are doing."  boloboffin   Dec-18-08 01:18 PM   #29 
                       - Did you get the watering can I sent for Christmas?  MrMickeysMom   Jan-05-09 10:55 PM   #57 
                          - Please stop these silly games. n/t  boloboffin   Jan-05-09 11:20 PM   #58 
                          - We mostly xeriscape around here.  AZCat   Jan-05-09 11:52 PM   #59 
                             - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-06-09 07:50 PM   #71 
  - Thank you ...!!  defendandprotect   Dec-14-08 10:57 PM   #11 
  - Now owned by Clear Channel -- and all truth telling destroyed ---  defendandprotect   Dec-14-08 10:52 PM   #10 
  - Accessory after the fact to mass murder!  aldo   Dec-18-08 02:35 PM   #30 
  - What in hades is going on here?  boloboffin   Dec-19-08 12:36 AM   #33 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-03-09 10:38 PM   #44 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-05-09 10:54 PM   #56 
  - The fucking History channel had...  wildbilln864   Jan-07-09 09:54 AM   #74 
     - This may be the first time I agree with you.  Realityhack   Jan-10-09 03:50 PM   #98 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC