| 194. Bolo...stop describing yourself. n/t |
| -CGI Plane Insert? |
spooked911 |
Dec-13-08 07:34 AM |
#0 |
 -
This reminds me of a recently coined 9/11 maxim |
LARED |
Dec-13-08 08:22 AM |
#1 |
  -
QFT n/t |
Realityhack |
Dec-24-08 07:54 AM |
#211 |
| -
You are seriously suggesting that the second tower was not hit by a plane? seriously??? |
Realityhack |
Dec-13-08 02:37 PM |
#2 |
| -
Yeah....U got a problem with that. |
seatnineb |
Dec-18-08 12:08 PM |
#23 |
| -
Well then... |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-13-08 02:57 PM |
#3 |
| -
Gotta love U anonymouse internet eye-witnesses..so authentic n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-18-08 12:03 PM |
#22 |
| -
Interesting |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-19-08 12:15 PM |
#40 |
| -
If you get a typical reply it will go something like this |
LARED |
Dec-19-08 12:22 PM |
#41 |
| -
Probably |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-19-08 12:52 PM |
#42 |
| -
Answers on that vary |
jberryhill |
Dec-19-08 01:26 PM |
#44 |
| -
Indeed: |
seatnineb |
Dec-19-08 01:49 PM |
#47 |
| -
Where was your mother in relation to the WTC? n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-19-08 01:34 PM |
#46 |
| -
You have already made clear your belief I am a liar |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-19-08 02:02 PM |
#48 |
| -
If I am so debunkable......why not just tell me where was your mother on 9/11? |
seatnineb |
Dec-19-08 04:15 PM |
#50 |
| -
It's not that you're debunkable but that you are disagreeable. |
boloboffin |
Dec-19-08 04:34 PM |
#51 |
| -
Well... |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-19-08 04:57 PM |
#52 |
| -
U put me in a catch 22 situation....I will get banned if I call U a liar |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 09:54 AM |
#55 |
| -
Are you aware that |
LARED |
Dec-20-08 11:04 AM |
#56 |
| -
And are you aware that witnesses saw planes like this |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 12:45 PM |
#62 |
| -
Interestingly you have no problem |
LARED |
Dec-20-08 01:33 PM |
#67 |
| -
Ok..lets look at those who saw the plane hit... |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 02:03 PM |
#69 |
| -
I don't have to concentrate on anonymous witnesses |
LARED |
Dec-20-08 02:58 PM |
#78 |
| -
See post 24 |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 04:39 PM |
#83 |
| -
Are you even reading my posts? |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-20-08 01:27 PM |
#66 |
| -
We can go round in circles n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 02:06 PM |
#70 |
| -
Then you are not going to answer my questions? |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-20-08 02:13 PM |
#71 |
| -
I don't what to get banned. thank you n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 02:27 PM |
#74 |
| -
From my post #40 |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-20-08 02:53 PM |
#77 |
| -
Ok.. |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 04:46 PM |
#84 |
| -
ok, I'll try to post this again |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-23-08 06:41 AM |
#165 |
| -
Thanks for responding. |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 07:36 AM |
#171 |
| -
What's even more insidious |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-23-08 08:45 AM |
#172 |
| -
The whole video is a fake. n/t |
balantz |
Dec-13-08 07:46 PM |
#4 |
| -
Maybe the plane was not faked, but was vaporized |
LARED |
Dec-14-08 01:26 PM |
#5 |
| -
Not the DEW. |
boloboffin |
Dec-14-08 01:43 PM |
#6 |
| -
Perhaps this is similiar to the Lasaga Cell |
LARED |
Dec-14-08 02:14 PM |
#7 |
| -
Yes, who would have noticed bulk shipments of table salt to the Twin Towers... |
boloboffin |
Dec-14-08 02:50 PM |
#8 |
| -
fake Planes/ meteors hitting the wtc were part of the american cultural psyche |
seatnineb |
Dec-18-08 12:21 PM |
#25 |
| -
"the american cultural psyche" |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-23-08 08:54 AM |
#174 |
| -
If the islamists hated the USA so much... |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 10:59 AM |
#180 |
| -
KISS |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-23-08 11:16 AM |
#183 |
| -
You contradict yourself... |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 11:22 AM |
#184 |
| -
Pot-kettle-black |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-23-08 11:34 AM |
#188 |
| -
You are speaking gobledegook |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 12:26 PM |
#193 |
| -
To you perhaps |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-23-08 01:37 PM |
#197 |
| -
CIA and the mujahadeen were intertwined to the tune of Billions of $ |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 04:29 PM |
#200 |
| -
That page is gone. |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-24-08 06:52 AM |
#206 |
| -
Yeah...I know that story backwards |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 07:10 AM |
#207 |
| -
The Japanese (n/t) |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-24-08 07:27 AM |
#209 |
| -
True..But the japanese did not use UAV packed with explosives! n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 07:42 AM |
#210 |
| -
No they used a MAV packed with explosives. |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-24-08 12:07 PM |
#221 |
| -
Ok...thanks for info. n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 01:07 PM |
#223 |
| -
Even more insidous |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-23-08 08:49 AM |
#173 |
| -
Now that was thoughtful... |
jberryhill |
Dec-14-08 04:28 PM |
#9 |
| -
Just to remind people how much **** you have peddled down the years |
seatnineb |
Dec-18-08 12:15 PM |
#24 |
| -
Wow you dug that up again |
LARED |
Dec-20-08 08:43 PM |
#87 |
| -
Yep...it is...(a big deal)... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 01:35 AM |
#92 |
| -
Did you ever consider that in the 20 intervening months |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 06:40 AM |
#100 |
| -
And what did you check... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 10:23 AM |
#107 |
| -
Wow, that's some bad math. |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 10:32 AM |
#109 |
| -
Let's discuss LARED's math... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 10:49 AM |
#110 |
| -
You're assuming numbers meant the same thing... |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 10:56 AM |
#111 |
| -
Actually YOU are assuming that you can challenge... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 11:04 AM |
#112 |
| -
Yeah, nobody cares about your "find". |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 11:15 AM |
#114 |
| -
Your fact checking seems every bit as accurate as LARED's... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 11:25 AM |
#117 |
| -
I don't know what you're talking about. |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 11:28 AM |
#118 |
| -
Let me talk slowly here.... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 11:39 AM |
#119 |
| -
Failed to be candid? |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 11:43 AM |
#120 |
| -
No, actually he did not... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 11:50 AM |
#121 |
| -
Hmmm. Not how I read it. |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 12:07 PM |
#123 |
| -
So if LARED said his eyewitnesses... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 12:17 PM |
#125 |
| -
Four is pretty close to two. |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 12:18 PM |
#126 |
| -
And appearently.... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 12:25 PM |
#127 |
| -
Twelve? Twenty-four? |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 12:25 PM |
#128 |
| -
Yet in his first account... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 12:32 PM |
#129 |
| -
You can count to over one million using your fingers and toes... |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 12:37 PM |
#130 |
| -
Dude, please keep in mind you are a no planer/ fake plane |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 01:36 PM |
#135 |
| -
Thanks nt |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 01:37 PM |
#136 |
| -
The witnesses did not disappear. I was not there and was |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 01:16 PM |
#133 |
| -
The pressure is too much, I've cracked under the bright lights |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 01:23 PM |
#134 |
| -
It ok, they have so little actual evidence the trival takes on |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 01:12 PM |
#132 |
| -
Actually, I care |
Bjarne Riis |
Dec-23-08 10:48 AM |
#178 |
| -
Huh oh you booked marked it. |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 01:10 PM |
#131 |
| -
What a fail |
anigbrowl |
Dec-22-08 03:11 PM |
#163 |
| -
DU posters like U have a habit of changing your testimony |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 06:21 AM |
#98 |
| -
Let me repeat myself and add |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 06:37 AM |
#99 |
| -
You forgot to add that witnesses lie....9/11 is a classic example n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 06:48 AM |
#101 |
| -
So do CT'ers ...... 9/11 is a classic example |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 07:49 AM |
#102 |
| -
Simple question...did your friends see the plane approach |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 08:46 AM |
#105 |
| -
No, they were on roof top of a building on |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 12:04 PM |
#122 |
| -
Oh my god! |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 12:13 PM |
#124 |
| -
I found something even better |
LARED |
Dec-22-08 06:19 PM |
#164 |
| -
It's caused by the slow motion |
anigbrowl |
Dec-16-08 04:40 PM |
#10 |
| -
Once again, ignorance of video tech. Sort of 'stonishing! |
JackRiddler |
Dec-16-08 04:49 PM |
#11 |
| -
Yup |
jberryhill |
Dec-16-08 05:00 PM |
#12 |
| -
Wait until there's more footage from this camera |
anigbrowl |
Dec-16-08 05:10 PM |
#13 |
| -
Rational reason for missing plane parts |
dlaliberte |
Dec-16-08 10:13 PM |
#14 |
| -
How does this information affect your belief in pods? nt |
LARED |
Dec-17-08 05:45 AM |
#15 |
| -
No-plane fakery reaffirms the evidence for pods on real planes |
dlaliberte |
Dec-20-08 04:18 PM |
#80 |
| -
I'm suggesting there is no pod |
LARED |
Dec-20-08 08:46 PM |
#88 |
| -
So you are a no-pod theorist - got any evidence? |
dlaliberte |
Dec-20-08 11:17 PM |
#91 |
| -
You want evidence for no - pods??? |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 07:56 AM |
#104 |
| -
The plane parts are not really "missing" |
William Seger |
Dec-18-08 10:45 AM |
#20 |
| -
Faking planes is possible. |
seatnineb |
Dec-18-08 12:00 PM |
#21 |
| -
possible, but not necessary and not sufficient |
dlaliberte |
Dec-18-08 02:59 PM |
#28 |
| -
Thats fair enough....just keep an open mind and its cool n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-18-08 04:27 PM |
#31 |
| -
What type of plane do they show? nt |
hack89 |
Dec-20-08 12:10 PM |
#59 |
| -
Excuse me, but your pod is showing |
dlaliberte |
Dec-20-08 01:56 PM |
#68 |
| -
Thanks for the trip through memory lane |
hack89 |
Dec-20-08 02:24 PM |
#73 |
| -
The truth remains true forever |
dlaliberte |
Dec-20-08 02:36 PM |
#75 |
| -
Spend some time in the archives |
hack89 |
Dec-20-08 02:39 PM |
#76 |
| -
Spend some time updating your script |
dlaliberte |
Dec-20-08 03:55 PM |
#79 |
| -
You're a little too late |
hack89 |
Dec-20-08 10:11 PM |
#89 |
| -
20 January? Too late? What are you predicting? |
dlaliberte |
Dec-20-08 10:45 PM |
#90 |
| -
Without hatred for Bush |
hack89 |
Dec-21-08 05:24 AM |
#95 |
| -
Luc Courchesne, who made this video, is a low-level conspirator. |
spooked911 |
Dec-26-08 12:52 PM |
#229 |
| -
LMAO! Ya think? |
William Seger |
Dec-18-08 03:46 PM |
#29 |
| -
shit fuck No-planers like Fred want U 2 think they don't know what |
seatnineb |
Dec-18-08 04:24 PM |
#30 |
| -
(That's what you think) |
William Seger |
Dec-18-08 08:09 PM |
#32 |
| -
Funny thing is U take him seriously...he wants U 2 debunk him.. |
seatnineb |
Dec-19-08 01:38 AM |
#34 |
| -
For a while now, I've thought it's not a matter of "planes/no planes," but rather |
lulu in NC |
Dec-17-08 10:41 AM |
#16 |
| -
Show me plane wreckage that didn't match commercial jets. |
scrinmaster |
Dec-17-08 11:09 PM |
#17 |
| -
I misspoke--the engine parts found were not consistent with a 767, but |
lulu in NC |
Dec-18-08 04:14 AM |
#18 |
| -
"One doesn't need to be a jet engine expert ..." |
Make7 |
Dec-18-08 05:19 AM |
#19 |
| -
True-- but why can't we have an expert in these engines |
spooked911 |
Dec-19-08 05:46 AM |
#38 |
| -
How many have you contacted? |
jberryhill |
Dec-19-08 01:29 PM |
#45 |
| -
I contacted a few people at a company I found that services these engines. |
spooked911 |
Dec-20-08 04:32 PM |
#82 |
| -
Because then all you would say is that the conspirators knew enough to plant the right parts. |
boloboffin |
Dec-19-08 02:37 PM |
#49 |
| -
you're right |
spooked911 |
Dec-20-08 04:30 PM |
#81 |
| -
let me clarify-- I *am* open to new evidence |
spooked911 |
Dec-20-08 06:28 PM |
#86 |
| -
Got any data... |
catnhatnh |
Dec-21-08 01:55 AM |
#94 |
| -
Do you expect it to bounce off the side of the building?...nt |
SidDithers |
Dec-18-08 12:38 PM |
#26 |
| -
No....just enter the building more realistically |
seatnineb |
Dec-18-08 12:55 PM |
#27 |
| -
How do you know what it looked like after it entered the building? |
William Seger |
Dec-18-08 08:15 PM |
#33 |
| -
I would have expected some oscillation of the wings: |
seatnineb |
Dec-19-08 01:42 AM |
#35 |
| -
Oscillation? How much oscillation would you expect in 1/10th of a second |
William Seger |
Dec-19-08 02:57 AM |
#36 |
| -
Typical....you hide behind the speed factor and ignore the physics. |
seatnineb |
Dec-19-08 03:38 AM |
#37 |
| -
The plane went straight into the building |
William Seger |
Dec-19-08 09:41 AM |
#39 |
| -
So how could the wings enter the building within 3 frames of video |
seatnineb |
Dec-19-08 01:19 PM |
#43 |
| -
That looks like the Controlled Impact Demonstration. |
AZCat |
Dec-19-08 05:39 PM |
#53 |
| -
i take your point.....but wings are fragile |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 09:44 AM |
#54 |
| -
Well, "fragile" is a relative term. |
AZCat |
Dec-20-08 11:07 AM |
#57 |
| -
They can be shorn through and sheered off |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 12:39 PM |
#61 |
| -
That's the problem. |
AZCat |
Dec-20-08 12:48 PM |
#63 |
| -
The wings are already partially in the wall: |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 01:14 PM |
#64 |
| -
I'm not really sure where the fuel tanks are in the wings. |
AZCat |
Dec-20-08 01:25 PM |
#65 |
| -
This gif shows the entrance.. |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 02:22 PM |
#72 |
| -
Also, wings hold up those massive engines when the plane is on the ground |
boloboffin |
Dec-20-08 11:47 AM |
#58 |
| -
But wings can be perforated: |
seatnineb |
Dec-20-08 12:32 PM |
#60 |
| -
You provided no links to your pictures there. |
boloboffin |
Dec-20-08 04:47 PM |
#85 |
| -
More fuel means more chance of it igniting.... |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 06:15 AM |
#97 |
| -
More fuel meant more support for the structure of the wing |
boloboffin |
Dec-21-08 10:30 AM |
#108 |
| -
I don't think so. |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 11:12 AM |
#113 |
| -
It doesn't matter if the spark is there if the fuel isn't exposed yet. |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 11:16 AM |
#115 |
| -
But the tanks are exposed....the wings are being cut by the steel! |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 03:31 PM |
#139 |
| -
You still haven't provided links to information about those other crashes |
boloboffin |
Dec-21-08 03:34 PM |
#141 |
| -
So you are not going to ignore me then! LOL! |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 03:46 PM |
#145 |
| -
I didn't say I was going to put you on Ignore. |
boloboffin |
Dec-21-08 04:56 PM |
#154 |
| -
But will NEVER ignore you.It's my duty. n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 07:23 AM |
#169 |
| -
No, no, you've got it all wrong. |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 03:46 PM |
#144 |
| -
LOL! I never said it ignited in the tanks! |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 03:51 PM |
#146 |
| -
The one you showed earlier was before the wings made contact. |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 03:56 PM |
#147 |
| -
A plausible explanation that maybe the view of the ignition is blocked |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 04:04 PM |
#149 |
| -
You mean we SAW a burst of light (whatever it was) when the cockpit hit. |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 04:08 PM |
#150 |
| -
I respect your hypothesis and I believe it is the only explanation |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 04:22 PM |
#151 |
| -
That's cool. |
AZCat |
Dec-21-08 04:24 PM |
#152 |
| -
Well iam certain that Flight 175's did not ignite when they should have done |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 07:26 AM |
#170 |
| -
It takes more than the fuel tanks to be ruptured for an explosion |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-23-08 09:13 AM |
#175 |
| -
The circumstances were already conducive for an explosion: |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 10:53 AM |
#179 |
| -
Not quite that simple |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-23-08 11:28 AM |
#187 |
| -
Ok....a reasonable hypothesis.....but |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 12:00 PM |
#190 |
| -
Your opinion about it doesn't matter here. A liquid provides support for the container it's in. |
boloboffin |
Dec-21-08 11:19 AM |
#116 |
| -
In other words....you have no rebutal...ignorance is bliss huh? n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 03:33 PM |
#140 |
| -
Sorry, ball's in your court |
boloboffin |
Dec-21-08 03:35 PM |
#142 |
| -
You wanna spam....its all you got left...and it ain't enough to save you. |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 03:56 PM |
#148 |
| -
"Yet on 9/11...ruptured fuel tanks do not explode" |
boloboffin |
Dec-21-08 04:58 PM |
#155 |
| -
I am not talking about the plane once it is completely inside the building |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 05:09 PM |
#157 |
| -
... |
boloboffin |
Dec-21-08 05:37 PM |
#158 |
| -
Every other plane crash features an instaneouse explosion |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 06:33 PM |
#159 |
| -
Almost immediately |
boloboffin |
Dec-21-08 06:59 PM |
#160 |
| -
No that's your problem |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 07:04 AM |
#166 |
| -
You still didn't provide links to other information about your second plane. |
boloboffin |
Dec-23-08 11:02 AM |
#181 |
| -
I provided links to the videos...and I am sure U can count n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 11:24 AM |
#185 |
| -
Those aircraft were probably traveling much slower than the airliners that hit the WTC and Pentagon. |
scrinmaster |
Dec-21-08 01:37 AM |
#93 |
| -
Steel will always sheer through the wings..no matter what the speed. |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 06:07 AM |
#96 |
| -
LOL - |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 07:53 AM |
#103 |
| -
The only thing which is Dumb is the shit that U believe in.... |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 08:47 AM |
#106 |
| -
According to your logic it is impossible for water to cut steel |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 01:46 PM |
#137 |
| -
Pathetic analogy... |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 03:40 PM |
#143 |
| -
You're right it was a lousy analogy |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 04:39 PM |
#153 |
| -
How bout hitting a steel post with an an aluminium pipe LOL! |
seatnineb |
Dec-21-08 05:04 PM |
#156 |
| -
No nt |
LARED |
Dec-21-08 07:53 PM |
#161 |
| -
Then tell that to purdue. |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 07:16 AM |
#167 |
| -
A largely horizontal impact at lower speed works differently... |
Realityhack |
Dec-24-08 08:03 AM |
#212 |
| -
Make a proper comparison: |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 08:38 AM |
#213 |
| -
You persist in repeating that logical fallacy |
William Seger |
Dec-22-08 11:25 AM |
#162 |
| -
The fallacy is yours |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 07:20 AM |
#168 |
| -
You've got to be kidding |
William Seger |
Dec-23-08 10:00 AM |
#176 |
| -
Wrong |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 10:47 AM |
#177 |
| -
You have some nerve asking for links when you refuse to provide them yourself. n/t |
boloboffin |
Dec-23-08 11:03 AM |
#182 |
| -
Yawn...is this the best that DU's 9/11 debukah's have to offer. |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 11:26 AM |
#186 |
| -
No links for you until you produce the links you've been asked for previously |
boloboffin |
Dec-23-08 12:13 PM |
#191 |
| -
Bolo...stop describing yourself. n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 12:29 PM |
#194 |
| -
More evasions from seat. n/t |
boloboffin |
Dec-23-08 12:39 PM |
#195 |
| -
Just saying it does not make it true Bolo. |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 12:50 PM |
#196 |
| -
No, but the facts bear me out. |
boloboffin |
Dec-23-08 02:00 PM |
#198 |
| -
Keep waiting..whilst I bludgeon U with more doses of real plane crashes |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 04:36 PM |
#201 |
| -
"fine particulates". ROFL!!! |
vincent_vega_lives |
Dec-23-08 11:45 AM |
#189 |
| -
No wonder you believe in the plane videos...U can't see |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 12:16 PM |
#192 |
| -
Jeeeez |
William Seger |
Dec-24-08 09:24 AM |
#214 |
| -
I am not denying that there was plane debris... |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 10:05 AM |
#219 |
| -
And BTW |
William Seger |
Dec-24-08 09:45 AM |
#216 |
| -
Dont be shy Seagar...show people a larger picture. |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 09:52 AM |
#218 |
| -
You need ot look up the "rule of holes" |
William Seger |
Dec-24-08 11:12 AM |
#220 |
| -
I'm more than glad to show people what U don't want them to see. |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 12:57 PM |
#222 |
| -
This video looks fake to me |
Vroomfondel |
Dec-21-08 01:57 PM |
#138 |
| -
Time for this hideously malformed thread to die |
anigbrowl |
Dec-23-08 03:41 PM |
#199 |
| -
Probably cos your group have had an ass-kicking n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 04:42 PM |
#202 |
| -
I don't think endlessly repeating BS counts as kicking ass. |
anigbrowl |
Dec-23-08 04:47 PM |
#203 |
| -
Thats why your side has not kicked any! |
seatnineb |
Dec-23-08 05:07 PM |
#204 |
| -
Wow. I bet you came up with that all by yourself too |
anigbrowl |
Dec-23-08 07:38 PM |
#205 |
| -
But this witness did not see the plane that you claim exists. |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 07:15 AM |
#208 |
| -
Wow. "He would have seen this plane..." |
William Seger |
Dec-24-08 09:31 AM |
#215 |
| -
He was looking up..i emailed and asked him..I suggest you do the same |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 09:49 AM |
#217 |
| -
Okay....if you e-mailed him..... |
SDuderstadt |
Dec-24-08 01:12 PM |
#224 |
| -
I have posted his email address-can U read? |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 01:39 PM |
#225 |
| -
Sorry...I overlooked the e-mail address, but.... |
SDuderstadt |
Dec-24-08 01:55 PM |
#226 |
| -
You did...that was quick ! LOL! n/t |
seatnineb |
Dec-24-08 02:04 PM |
#227 |
| -
Uh, guys? Things SHEAR off airplanes upon impact, not SHEER. |
Redstone |
Dec-24-08 02:50 PM |
#228 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore