 |
|
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
|
John Doe II
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-01-04 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
| 40. Precision |
 |
As I pointed out UA only confirmed the crash of UA 175 at 11:59 (without giving the location of the crash).
I'd like to precise the following: Just before 11:30 it was noted that "Every commercial flight in U.S. airspace — about a quarter of the planes still in the air — is within 40 miles of its destination." http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2002/2002-08-13-cle... I found nowhere the exact time when there was no commercial flight in the US airspace anymore but the quote very much suggested that UA headquarter waited till the very end of hope before declaring the crash of UA 175. They waited till there was no more commercial airplane in the sky. Can anybody come up with a different explanation than that UA 175 got completely lost and nobody had a clue where it was? And how is it possible as it is supposed to have hit the WTC in front of two billion eyes? In front of the FAA as well? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
 Flight 175: quite a mysterious flight ... |
John Doe II | Oct-08-04 05:29 AM | #0 |
 
UA 175 trajectory |
seatnineb | Oct-08-04 09:40 AM | #1 |
|
Burnback interview. |
seatnineb | Oct-08-04 10:36 AM | #2 |
BROOKLYN?????? |
MercutioATC | Oct-08-04 12:24 PM | #3 |
Fair point..... |
seatnineb | Oct-08-04 01:21 PM | #4 |
|
We all saw similar video (the plane appearing to go through)... |
MercutioATC | Oct-08-04 01:46 PM | #5 |
|
That you could see it from Brooklyn |
John Doe II | Oct-08-04 02:42 PM | #6 |
|
But he could see that it had "no windows" from Brooklyn? |
MercutioATC | Oct-08-04 02:47 PM | #7 |
|
Excuse me |
John Doe II | Oct-08-04 02:50 PM | #8 |
|
I think it's a good question to ask...and one that deserves an answer. |
MercutioATC | Oct-08-04 06:32 PM | #11 |
|
Good to hear |
John Doe II | Oct-09-04 10:47 AM | #12 |
|
Dulce's arguement is, I believe, unfounded. |
MercutioATC | Oct-09-04 11:22 AM | #13 |
|
No |
John Doe II | Oct-09-04 11:28 AM | #14 |
|
Again, the initial information was conflicting. |
MercutioATC | Oct-09-04 11:37 AM | #15 |
|
Ok |
John Doe II | Oct-09-04 11:45 AM | #16 |
|
Again, I agree it's a question that bears asking. |
MercutioATC | Oct-09-04 12:00 PM | #17 |
|
Ok |
John Doe II | Oct-09-04 12:12 PM | #18 |
|
I have no idea. |
MercutioATC | Oct-09-04 10:52 PM | #21 |
|
It doesn't. Your question is clear and obvious. He has no answer for it. |
stickdog | Oct-09-04 11:14 PM | #22 |
|
I'll go with a fifth option... |
MercutioATC | Oct-09-04 11:22 PM | #23 |
|
I'm still |
MrSammo1 | Nov-11-04 02:45 AM | #43 |
|
Rewriting history. |
DulceDecorum | Oct-08-04 03:26 PM | #9 |
|
Thanks! |
John Doe II | Oct-08-04 03:44 PM | #10 |
|
washington post also said 77 hit WTC |
RedSock | Oct-09-04 03:09 PM | #19 |
|
Thanks |
John Doe II | Oct-09-04 04:44 PM | #20 |
|
Further question |
John Doe II | Oct-10-04 04:32 PM | #24 |
|
Let me see if I understand your position |
LARED | Oct-11-04 09:06 AM | #25 |
|
Facts and Fiction |
John Doe II | Oct-11-04 09:16 AM | #26 |
|
Quick comments |
LARED | Oct-11-04 10:32 AM | #27 |
|
The same UA dispatcher, Ed Ballinger, worked both flights. |
stickdog | Oct-11-04 11:01 AM | #28 |
|
And slice it and dice it six ways till Sunday |
tngledwebb | Oct-11-04 11:33 AM | #29 |
|
Was Ed Ballinger the communication link to the outside? |
LARED | Oct-11-04 11:40 AM | #30 |
|
Please explain why when UA announced Flight 93 had crashed, they |
stickdog | Oct-11-04 11:50 AM | #31 |
|
Do you expect a definitive answer? |
LARED | Oct-11-04 12:14 PM | #32 |
|
Commission Report states |
John Doe II | Oct-11-04 01:38 PM | #33 |
|
Honestly |
LARED | Oct-11-04 02:03 PM | #35 |
|
Honestly |
John Doe II | Oct-11-04 02:15 PM | #36 |
|
I find nothing that screams problem |
LARED | Oct-11-04 02:30 PM | #37 |
|
Not that easy |
John Doe II | Oct-11-04 02:34 PM | #38 |
|
Commission Report states |
John Doe II | Oct-11-04 01:40 PM | #34 |
|
Anybody has an idea? |
John Doe II | Oct-19-04 02:59 PM | #39 |
|
Precision |
John Doe II | Nov-01-04 08:05 AM | #40 |
|
I change the question |
John Doe II | Nov-10-04 05:29 PM | #41 |
|
What if....... |
Old and In the Way | Nov-12-04 12:30 PM | #44 |
|
Hard to believe |
John Doe II | Nov-12-04 04:53 PM | #46 |
|
Manager of American Airlineq |
John Doe II | Nov-10-04 05:34 PM | #42 |
|
AA77 flightpath |
Old and In the Way | Nov-12-04 01:49 PM | #45 |
|
The bump |
John Doe II | Nov-12-04 04:56 PM | #47 |
|
That's where I took the pic from. |
Old and In the Way | Nov-12-04 05:12 PM | #48 |
|
I was just reading another thread about Vigilant Guardian. |
Old and In the Way | Nov-12-04 05:15 PM | #49 |
|
The funny thing about most corporations is.... |
Make7 | Nov-27-04 10:15 PM | #50 |
|
Hm |
k-robjoe | Nov-28-04 09:03 AM | #51 |
|
By United Airlines? eom. |
Make7 | Nov-29-04 03:38 AM | #52 |
|
No, American Airlines 77! |
John Doe II | Nov-29-04 03:52 AM | #53 |
|
From the first post: |
Make7 | Nov-29-04 05:29 AM | #54 |
|
Thanks a lot for your detailed questions! |
John Doe II | Dec-01-04 08:20 AM | #56 |
|
UA lost contact |
John Doe II | Dec-01-04 04:30 PM | #57 |
|
The object doesn't need to do anything |
Make7 | Dec-01-04 10:04 PM | #60 |
|
UA 175 never switched off its transponder |
John Doe II | Dec-02-04 06:20 PM | #62 |
|
I personally have none. |
Make7 | Dec-01-04 09:40 PM | #59 |
|
Don't worry |
John Doe II | Dec-02-04 06:24 PM | #63 |
|
I'd like to look at it too. |
Make7 | Dec-03-04 08:56 AM | #67 |
|
Because they knew that UAL93 crashed in PA. |
MercutioATC | Nov-29-04 11:36 PM | #55 |
|
Thanks for responding. |
Make7 | Dec-01-04 08:52 PM | #58 |
|
Transponder answer: |
MercutioATC | Dec-02-04 04:45 AM | #61 |
|
A few more questions: |
Make7 | Dec-03-04 01:05 AM | #65 |
|
Your first question |
John Doe II | Dec-03-04 03:36 AM | #66 |
|
RE: UA 175 never switched off its transponder |
Make7 | Dec-03-04 10:06 AM | #68 |
|
"This allow(s) controllers" |
John Doe II | Dec-04-04 04:45 PM | #71 |
|
Here's how our computers work: |
MercutioATC | Dec-03-04 09:03 PM | #69 |
|
That clears up my confusion. Thank you. n/t |
Make7 | Dec-04-04 07:49 AM | #70 |
|
Here I can't agree |
John Doe II | Dec-02-04 06:30 PM | #64 |
|
I wonder if the confusion UA had with flight 175 had something to do with |
spooked911 | Feb-01-05 09:52 PM | #72 |
|
The problem with that supposition: |
MercutioATC | Feb-02-05 07:28 AM | #73 |
|
It was a "real" flight that took off and could be tracked by radar but |
spooked911 | Feb-02-05 09:12 AM | #74 |
|
My point is that the flight was seen leaving the gate. |
MercutioATC | Feb-02-05 09:15 AM | #75 |
|
Then why was United so confused about their own flight? |
spooked911 | Feb-02-05 11:43 AM | #76 |
| Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC
