You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #114: I think you will find that my posts are not irrelevant. Please review my past postings if you care. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Flatulo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #98
114. I think you will find that my posts are not irrelevant. Please review my past postings if you care.
I am a degreed mechanical engineer with over 30 years of experience. I am happy to provide my credentials to anyone who thinks I am a liar. I am not a PE or structural engineer, but I did take and ace every ME course that WPI had to offer through the graduate level. I analyzed thousands of trusses back in the day, even though my current line of work mostly involves sub-micron mechanical vibratiions and resonances.

In some of my early posts on DU I provided the calculations showing how much energy was transferred from the 767 impacts into the towers. If I recall correctly, it was 2.83 GJoules, which is a significant percentage of the Hiroshima bomb, and also roughly equivalent to the Murrah Federal Building truck bomb.

It is my informed opinion that the structural damage caused by the airplane impacts, coupled with fire, was the only cause of WTC1 & 2 collapsing. I am still trying to absorb the Bldg 7 report.

I will add that I believe that the information to disrupt the attacks was available, at least piecemeal, to various elements of the US intelligence apparatus, but for reasons unclear to me, the information was not used to prevent the attacks. How high up this negligence goes is not known to me.

I reject all theories of CD, nukes, energy weapons, no-planes, etc.

Reports of thermite nano-spheres may make good reading, but because something may be possible does not mean that it happened. I require a higher standard of proof - like what a court of law would require.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC