You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #134: he wouldnt show. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #131
134. he wouldnt show.
ive met his type before.
Big and bad behind the puter but when it comes time to pony up. They are nowhere to be found.
I call them keyboard warriors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -But there is surely a point after which incompetence becomes an insufficient explanation for failure seemslikeadream  Jun-30-08 04:14 PM   #0 
  - Keep up the great work seemslikeadream. I know I appreciate the posts.  Twist_U_Up   Jun-30-08 06:49 PM   #1 
  - Some good info here, SLaD.  Hope2006   Jun-30-08 06:58 PM   #2 
  - Does anyone want to challenge the idea that the anthrax attacks were probably an inside job?  Diane_nyc   Jul-01-08 09:27 AM   #3 
  - Does anyone want to challenge the idea that the anthrax attacks came from outer space?  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 09:36 AM   #4 
     - You don't regard the fact that the anthrax came from Fort Detrick as evidence? nt  petgoat   Jul-01-08 05:45 PM   #15 
     - It came from the Ames strain, which is more available than the Bush Administration  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 05:53 PM   #18 
     - Do you REALLY think the anthrax is as likely to have come from outer space as ...  Diane_nyc   Jul-02-08 01:43 PM   #72 
        - There is just as much evidence of that as anything else.  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 03:31 PM   #77 
           - Disinfo technique #13: Alice in Wonderland Logic  petgoat   Jul-02-08 03:48 PM   #80 
           - Do you really think the FBI's original hypothesis was no more likely than a space alien doing it???  Diane_nyc   Jul-02-08 08:18 PM   #97 
              - boloboffin also wrote "absurd example"  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 04:24 AM   #107 
                 - modified  Hope2006   Jul-03-08 05:18 AM   #109 
                 - Yes, they can, Hope. Back under your rock. n/t  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 06:10 AM   #110 
                 - And your point? To suggest that the FBI's original hypothesis is so utterly UNLIKELY?  Diane_nyc   Jul-03-08 06:43 AM   #111 
                    - Yes, investigators wouldn't start with a list that included...  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 07:02 AM   #112 
                    - Until you drop the pretense that your first statement was "the FBI's original hypothesis"  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 07:47 AM   #113 
                       - So no aliens then? nt  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 11:12 AM   #117 
                       - Yes, the FBI's original hypothesis does qualify as an "inside job"  Diane_nyc   Jul-03-08 11:47 AM   #118 
                          - So the "OCT" was an inside job. The hijackers did abuse a position of trust.  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 12:12 PM   #119 
                             - Obviously, the definition must be referring to trust beyond everyday "trust" ....  Diane_nyc   Jul-03-08 12:25 PM   #120 
  - Anthrax 2001: data dump  JackRiddler   Jul-01-08 10:01 AM   #5 
  - Brilliant JackRiddler.  Bassman66   Jul-01-08 10:46 AM   #6 
  - My goodness.  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 11:46 AM   #8 
  - There are none so blind as those...  Bassman66   Jul-01-08 02:58 PM   #9 
  - Don't be so tough on JR. nt  hack89   Jul-01-08 04:30 PM   #12 
  - "It's such a specific drug. Are you fucking kidding me?"  Bassman66   Jul-01-08 03:21 PM   #10 
  - So continuity of government plans  hack89   Jul-01-08 04:29 PM   #11 
     - So let THEM say that, then. Why didn't they respond to the request?  JackRiddler   Jul-01-08 05:53 PM   #19 
        - I think they did say "continuity of government" was the reason.  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 06:10 PM   #22 
        - I've learned not to rely on your memory. Cite.  JackRiddler   Jul-01-08 07:07 PM   #36 
        - Just presenting a possible explanation  hack89   Jul-01-08 06:54 PM   #30 
           - Leave it if it's all the same to you.  Bassman66   Jul-02-08 01:11 AM   #61 
              - And if they did you wouldn't believe them anyway  hack89   Jul-02-08 06:18 AM   #62 
                 - How do you know that?  Bassman66   Jul-02-08 06:31 AM   #64 
  - You're not really this bad? I seem to remember better...  JackRiddler   Jul-01-08 05:52 PM   #17 
     - That's the second time you've cited Judicial Watch approvingly, Jack!  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 05:54 PM   #20 
        - Hey, Bolo! I like that!  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 06:30 PM   #25 
        - Oh, yes. I didn't come up with it. I forget who did.  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 06:37 PM   #26 
           - Just so you know...  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 06:40 PM   #28 
        - bedunker Strategy # 33: When you are pwn3d, distract with name-calling n/t  Bryan Sacks   Jul-01-08 06:59 PM   #32 
        - Please point out where Bolo called anyone a name...n/t  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 07:02 PM   #33 
        - bedunker strategy #111: focus on semantics for the sheer hell of it  Bryan Sacks   Jul-01-08 07:07 PM   #35 
           - Oh. I see....  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 07:18 PM   #37 
              - by clear implication he did, and YOU got the implication loud and clear  Bryan Sacks   Jul-01-08 07:39 PM   #41 
                 - Oh, I see....  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 08:07 PM   #44 
                 - Why don't you come and call me "Doody" to my face?  SDuderstadt   Jul-02-08 12:20 AM   #60 
                    - Ohhhh... you get me all hot & sweaty when you talk tough like that!!  Ghost in the Machine   Jul-03-08 07:10 PM   #122 
                       - tempting isnt it  Twist_U_Up   Jul-03-08 08:25 PM   #125 
                          - C'mon out...  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 08:27 PM   #126 
                          - I take it self defense isnt your strong point.  Twist_U_Up   Jul-03-08 08:46 PM   #129 
                             - No, I meant what I said....  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 09:29 PM   #130 
                                - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-04-08 04:07 AM   #132 
                                   - Nothing rallies the "truth community"...  SDuderstadt   Jul-04-08 11:30 AM   #135 
                          - He'd piss his pants as he ran away screaming...  Ghost in the Machine   Jul-03-08 11:14 PM   #131 
                             - he wouldnt show.  Twist_U_Up   Jul-04-08 08:08 AM   #134 
                                - This is unintentional irony, right?  SDuderstadt   Jul-04-08 11:31 AM   #136 
        - :eyes:  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 08:59 PM   #48 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-03-08 08:28 PM   #127 
        - Please don't insult the intelligence of the moderators...  JackRiddler   Jul-01-08 07:39 PM   #40 
           - You are correct, Jack.  Hope2006   Jul-02-08 06:11 PM   #93 
              - Thanks for that...  JackRiddler   Jul-02-08 06:22 PM   #94 
              - "Bolo was inviting the forum to go to the Judicial Watch website:"  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 08:10 PM   #95 
                 - Awww...poor bolo.  Hope2006   Jul-02-08 08:23 PM   #98 
                 - Spare me your crocodile tears, lady.  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 04:22 AM   #106 
                 - "Pot calling kettle"...n/t  Hope2006   Jul-03-08 05:08 AM   #108 
                 - lol yep transparancy is his problem now  Twist_U_Up   Jul-03-08 08:31 PM   #128 
                 - You got owned.. again... just quit whining about it, ok?  Ghost in the Machine   Jul-03-08 06:55 PM   #121 
  - Part Two  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 04:45 PM   #13 
  - On what NEW EVIDENCE was the FBI's initial assessment of the anthrax reversed?  Bryan Sacks   Jul-01-08 05:16 PM   #14 
  - Silly Bryan. It was a LACK of actual signs that would have been present.  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 05:51 PM   #16 
     - right! They jumped to conclusions originally! Of Course!  Bryan Sacks   Jul-01-08 06:55 PM   #31 
     - Love it... thanks for a laugh.  JackRiddler   Jul-01-08 08:00 PM   #43 
     - bedunker strategy #105: focus on semantics to avoid addressing question  Bryan Sacks   Jul-01-08 07:04 PM   #34 
        - "truther" strategy 1-200  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 07:19 PM   #38 
           - are you implying I can't answer an argument here? Say what it is, then.  Bryan Sacks   Jul-01-08 07:43 PM   #42 
              - "Liars and obfuscators"  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 08:08 PM   #45 
                 - you must have my side confused with what you call the 'truther' side  Bryan Sacks   Jul-01-08 08:47 PM   #47 
                    - Seems like a "distinction without a difference" to me....  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 09:11 PM   #50 
                       - 'truther' vs skeptic  Bryan Sacks   Jul-01-08 09:48 PM   #52 
                          - No offense, Bryan...  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 09:59 PM   #54 
                          - sorry, have to let you do the work. If you have specific questions, I'll answer.  Bryan Sacks   Jul-01-08 10:07 PM   #55 
                             - How can I "do the work"....  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 10:17 PM   #56 
                          - True Scotsman  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 06:24 AM   #63 
                          - On the (at least) two meanings of "9/11 Truth" (and "Truther")  Diane_nyc   Jul-02-08 02:08 PM   #73 
  - If you can't remember the anthrax panic of September aught-ONE (not -two)  JackRiddler   Jul-01-08 06:45 PM   #29 
     - Good points, Jack.  Hope2006   Jul-01-08 07:24 PM   #39 
     - Sis, Boom, Bah! n/t  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 07:28 AM   #66 
     - "Thanks for the exercise." Tap-dancing like that could be considered exercise, I'd have to agree.  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 07:28 AM   #65 
  - Part Three  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 06:09 PM   #21 
  - Part Four  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 07:51 AM   #67 
     - The FBI has a more efficient way of saying nothing.  JackRiddler   Jul-02-08 09:19 AM   #68 
        - And there's only one explanation for such an act, right?  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 09:31 AM   #69 
           - No, but there is a likeliest explanation  JackRiddler   Jul-02-08 09:49 AM   #70 
           - Likeliest is a function of your confirmation bias, Jack.  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 12:13 PM   #71 
           - Condescension is neither a sign nor a substitute for intelligence.  JackRiddler   Jul-02-08 02:38 PM   #75 
              - Perhaps you should put the "condescension" tactic down, Jack.  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 03:27 PM   #76 
                 - Yeah, but Jack's is justified; yours isn't. nt  petgoat   Jul-02-08 04:04 PM   #82 
                    - Petgoat, who the fuck made you judge of anything?  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 08:11 PM   #96 
                       - Sherlock Holmes was a junkie. But you knew that, right? nt  petgoat   Jul-03-08 12:07 AM   #99 
                          - Sherlock Holmes was a fictional character, petgoat.  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 04:21 AM   #105 
                             - As usual you miss the point.  petgoat   Jul-03-08 10:16 AM   #114 
                                - If conversations with you didn't make me so sad, I'd die of laughter.  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 10:27 AM   #115 
                                   - Thanks for making clear yet once again that you don't know what you're talking about. nt  petgoat   Jul-03-08 10:54 AM   #116 
           - Quite! nt.  Bassman66   Jul-02-08 03:53 PM   #81 
           - Disinfo technique #19. Demand impossible proofs.  petgoat   Jul-02-08 02:27 PM   #74 
              - I've demanded an "impossible proof"???  boloboffin   Jul-02-08 03:32 PM   #78 
                 - conclusive evidence of black ops is hard to come by  petgoat   Jul-02-08 03:41 PM   #79 
  - excellent post as usual SLaD! Thank you. nt  wildbilln864   Jul-01-08 11:31 AM   #7 
  - Gonzo Speculation on Anthrax  petgoat   Jul-01-08 06:17 PM   #23 
  - *pat pat pat pat pat*  boloboffin   Jul-01-08 06:20 PM   #24 
  - You know, you've got me thinking here...  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 06:38 PM   #27 
  - Just for emphasis  seemslikeadream   Jul-01-08 08:39 PM   #46 
  - As much as I despise Bush....  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 09:10 PM   #49 
  - Just to be very clear about what I am saying, so there are no misunderstandings  seemslikeadream   Jul-01-08 09:39 PM   #51 
  - Bush is a jerk and a criminal....  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 09:52 PM   #53 
     - Of course you do. We expect nothing less from you  Twist_U_Up   Jul-03-08 12:24 AM   #100 
        - "I hate Bush, but..."  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 01:47 AM   #104 
  - Ya know I just might have to apologize for my inadequacies  seemslikeadream   Jul-01-08 10:40 PM   #57 
  - Here's a HUGE difference between Hitler and Bush...  SDuderstadt   Jul-01-08 11:01 PM   #58 
  - Oh Really?  Liberal_Dog   Jul-02-08 04:10 PM   #83 
     - The Bush family has a history linked with facism. nt.  Bassman66   Jul-02-08 04:18 PM   #84 
     - What, exactly, is a "facist"?  SDuderstadt   Jul-02-08 04:30 PM   #86 
     - Thanks.  Bassman66   Jul-02-08 04:47 PM   #87 
        - If you're going to prattle on about fascism...  SDuderstadt   Jul-02-08 04:57 PM   #90 
           - Yes you're right.  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 01:36 AM   #102 
     - Bush Fulfills His Grandfather's Dream  seemslikeadream   Jul-02-08 04:50 PM   #89 
        - Looks like the OP you quoted in this post  Hope2006   Jul-04-08 03:13 PM   #137 
           - Yes thanks for posting that  seemslikeadream   Jul-04-08 03:16 PM   #138 
              - Glad to hear you got then straightened out, SLaD.  Hope2006   Jul-04-08 06:17 PM   #140 
     - You're kidding, right?  SDuderstadt   Jul-02-08 04:29 PM   #85 
        - Many the fascists have learned subtly over the years.  Bassman66   Jul-02-08 04:48 PM   #88 
           - And, you know a lot about fascist regimes, right?  SDuderstadt   Jul-02-08 05:00 PM   #91 
           - I'm disappointed sir.  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 01:41 AM   #103 
           - Hey Bassman66 ever read IBM and the Holocaust by Edwin Black?  seemslikeadream   Jul-02-08 05:49 PM   #92 
  - Rove's "Third Reich of Republican majority in this country-That was absolutely his plan"  seemslikeadream   Jul-01-08 11:08 PM   #59 
     - Bushs the First Family when it comes to Treason  Twist_U_Up   Jul-03-08 12:28 AM   #101 
  - I gotta tell ya....  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 07:11 PM   #123 
  - But since you were wrong...  Ghost in the Machine   Jul-03-08 07:23 PM   #124 
  - Thanks SLAD!  maryf   Jul-04-08 04:11 AM   #133 
     - HI!! maryf  seemslikeadream   Jul-04-08 03:17 PM   #139 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC