You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #110: Maybe that could explain it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
RH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #106
110. Maybe that could explain it.

Maybe there was an eventual underground event, a collapse or a land shift, triggered by the Flight 93 impact but a few minutes later, analogous to the fracture of the Pentagon after the impact.

Is there a geologist in the house?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Flight 93: crash time cannot be true John Doe II  Sep-25-04 10:45 AM   #0 
  - I don't believe the official story  sffreeways   Sep-25-04 11:16 AM   #1 
  - Just one thing about the time differences you mention  beyurslf   Sep-25-04 11:46 AM   #2 
  - Not that easy  John Doe II   Sep-25-04 11:52 AM   #3 
  - Is Deena Burnett telling the truth?  seatnineb   Sep-25-04 12:56 PM   #4 
  - Children typically start school at 5 in the States.  MercutioATC   Sep-25-04 01:03 PM   #6 
  - "the children wanted"  RH   Sep-25-04 05:05 PM   #8 
  - Why is glick talking on the phone while the cockpit was being stormed  MercutioATC   Sep-25-04 01:01 PM   #5 
     - My impression  k-robjoe   Sep-25-04 03:27 PM   #7 
     - Putting it very mildly  k-robjoe   Sep-25-04 05:51 PM   #9 
        - Just a small addition  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 03:46 AM   #13 
           - Jeremy Glick  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 04:08 AM   #15 
              - An idea based on what?  RH   Sep-27-04 09:08 PM   #63 
     - Why don't we just synchronize all the evidence like they would in any NTSB  stickdog   Sep-25-04 11:47 PM   #11 
        - THAT I completely agree with.  MercutioATC   Sep-26-04 03:12 AM   #12 
           - Nobody is saying it's MIHOP or LIHOP  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 04:07 AM   #14 
              - What, specifically, doesn't add up?  MercutioATC   Sep-26-04 04:12 AM   #16 
                 - Excuse me, where did you answer?  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 04:16 AM   #17 
                    - Again, we're talking about a difference of two minutes.  MercutioATC   Sep-26-04 04:23 AM   #18 
                       - A lie is a lie  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 04:26 AM   #19 
                          - We ARE jumping around. Wanna just do this in the Glick thread?  MercutioATC   Sep-26-04 04:27 AM   #20 
                          - Ok  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 04:31 AM   #21 
                          - Evidence is evidence  RH   Sep-26-04 12:30 PM   #22 
                             - All you ask for is there  John Doe II   Sep-26-04 12:52 PM   #23 
                                - Why is the seismic data the "truth" when ALL of the other evidence  MercutioATC   Sep-26-04 10:37 PM   #24 
                                - Ummm, what is your explanation? Is the Earth part of a massive conspiracy?  stickdog   Sep-27-04 02:22 AM   #25 
                                - When did UAL93 crash?  MercutioATC   Sep-27-04 04:58 AM   #27 
                                - Can you please answer the question!  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 05:35 AM   #31 
                                - See the Glick thread  MercutioATC   Sep-28-04 06:16 AM   #65 
                                - You COMPLETELY avoided the question. So let's try again.  stickdog   Sep-27-04 03:50 PM   #54 
                                - See the Glick thread  MercutioATC   Sep-28-04 06:16 AM   #64 
                                - I have seen it. But I've seen no answer. (nt)  stickdog   Sep-28-04 01:39 PM   #69 
                                   - Look again  MercutioATC   Sep-28-04 09:11 PM   #76 
                                   - Looked there found nothing  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 02:50 AM   #79 
                                   - Here:  MercutioATC   Sep-29-04 05:43 AM   #89 
                                   - Here:  MercutioATC   Sep-29-04 05:43 AM   #90 
                                - Do you know what "incontrovertible" means?  RH   Sep-28-04 12:18 PM   #66 
                                - incontrovertible = impossible to deny or disprove  stickdog   Sep-28-04 01:38 PM   #68 
                                   - Presumably by demonstrating  RH   Sep-28-04 03:31 PM   #72 
                                   - How do seismologists determine the epicenter of earthquakes?  stickdog   Sep-28-04 06:12 PM   #75 
                                - The spike  The Straight Story   Oct-01-04 08:55 PM   #145 
                                   - It was detected at multiple sites.  stickdog   Oct-02-04 02:34 AM   #147 
                                      - The link is impertient  RH   Oct-02-04 07:47 AM   #153 
                                - Heya Thumb-biter...  Robb   Sep-28-04 11:16 PM   #77 
                                   - It always feels good to read intelligent stuff!  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 02:48 AM   #78 
                                   - Stone cold certain or "less certain" now?  RH   Sep-29-04 03:59 AM   #83 
                                   - I don't understand  Robb   Sep-29-04 07:37 AM   #94 
                                      - This may help.  RH   Sep-29-04 09:11 AM   #96 
                                      - I get where you're going  Robb   Sep-29-04 07:47 PM   #107 
                                      - 1) Get the data. 2) Examine the data. 3) Determine the data are  stickdog   Sep-30-04 07:51 AM   #116 
                                      - Removing my head  RH   Sep-30-04 11:25 AM   #123 
                                      - You can't be serious. Was metal debris from the Pentagon crash found  stickdog   Sep-30-04 03:12 PM   #128 
                                      - This sounds logical and convincing to me.  John Doe II   Sep-30-04 03:24 PM   #130 
                                      - The energy required  RH   Sep-30-04 04:11 PM   #132 
                                      - Good observations  Robb   Sep-30-04 04:21 PM   #134 
                                      - What does a softball do at 500 mph?  RH   Sep-30-04 05:06 PM   #135 
                                      - Excuse me  John Doe II   Oct-01-04 02:35 AM   #138 
                                      - I have no doubt  RH   Oct-01-04 05:23 AM   #139 
                                      - Your reply is IGNORANT. Read the studies. Learn something about  stickdog   Oct-02-04 02:28 AM   #146 
                                   - Thanks for the clarification, Robb :)  MercutioATC   Sep-29-04 07:29 PM   #106 
                                      - Other than the LDEO one, no  Robb   Sep-29-04 07:53 PM   #108 
                                      - Thanks! Like I said, I really know nothing about the subject.  MercutioATC   Sep-29-04 09:45 PM   #111 
                                      - Pretty sure it's here:  Robb   Sep-30-04 07:53 AM   #117 
                                      - Sure the intervening terrain can make a difference.  stickdog   Sep-30-04 10:04 AM   #118 
                                      - I wasn't saying the the terrain made a 3-minute difference, I was asking  MercutioATC   Sep-30-04 06:03 PM   #136 
                                      - There is surely no doubt  RH   Oct-01-04 05:36 AM   #140 
                                      - You're right, pure conjecture  Robb   Oct-01-04 12:51 PM   #141 
                                      - No need to be so silly.  RH   Oct-01-04 01:44 PM   #142 
                                      - Well, by that rationale  Robb   Oct-01-04 03:35 PM   #143 
                                      - I dont see it.  RH   Oct-01-04 06:21 PM   #144 
                                      - Yes. It's all an electrical disturbance. Or not.  stickdog   Oct-02-04 02:40 AM   #149 
                                      - You professed to wish to encourage everybody  RH   Oct-02-04 07:58 AM   #155 
                                      - That is an open question. Wallace says it's a plane crash in his judgment.  stickdog   Oct-02-04 02:36 AM   #148 
                                      - Maybe that could explain it.  RH   Sep-29-04 08:44 PM   #110 
                                         - Sure. There was nothing from the initial 580 mph crash.  stickdog   Oct-02-04 02:51 AM   #150 
                                         - "Nothing" is not exactly the problem.  RH   Oct-02-04 07:37 AM   #152 
                                - "incontrovertible scientific evidence"?  RH   Sep-27-04 05:24 AM   #29 
                                - What? You guys are unbelievable. If you don't like the scientific evidence  stickdog   Sep-27-04 03:55 PM   #56 
                                - incontrovertible = impossible to deny or disprove  stickdog   Sep-28-04 01:34 PM   #67 
                                - Why not a conspiracy?  RH   Sep-27-04 05:38 AM   #32 
                                   - Substantial?  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 05:51 AM   #33 
                                   - Yes. ... Substantial  RH   Sep-27-04 09:31 AM   #34 
                                      - What's new?  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 09:52 AM   #35 
                                         - Wrong versions  RH   Sep-27-04 10:12 AM   #38 
                                         - Thanks  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 10:17 AM   #39 
                                         - That's right.  RH   Sep-27-04 10:22 AM   #41 
                                         - Lucky you  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 11:40 AM   #43 
                                   - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-27-04 03:58 PM   #57 
                                - "The other evidence"  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 02:29 AM   #26 
                                - I see no reason. ....Why?  RH   Sep-27-04 05:14 AM   #28 
                                   - Can you please answer the question!  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 05:33 AM   #30 
                                      - The official timeline does not depend upon Glick.  RH   Sep-27-04 10:06 AM   #36 
                                         - Oh, my God  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 10:11 AM   #37 
                                         - Can you please answer the question!  RH   Sep-27-04 10:18 AM   #40 
                                            - Highly unlikely  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 10:32 AM   #42 
                                            - You are on the ropes!  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 12:22 PM   #45 
                                            - Yes, that's the point. Either Glick's family & the FBI are lying  stickdog   Sep-27-04 04:02 PM   #58 
                                               - Fine points Stickdog.  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 04:38 PM   #61 
                                         - Keep defending the indefensible ron  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 12:16 PM   #44 
                                            - Thanks for the source!  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 12:23 PM   #46 
                                            - No worries mate!  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 12:30 PM   #47 
                                               - A tape and a transcript  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 12:33 PM   #48 
                                               - and you have heard the tape  RH   Sep-27-04 12:55 PM   #50 
                                               - .....  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 12:58 PM   #51 
                                               - I asked why  RH   Sep-27-04 01:03 PM   #52 
                                               - Once and for all  John Doe II   Sep-27-04 01:10 PM   #53 
                                               - I was not aware of any obligation  RH   Sep-27-04 09:03 PM   #62 
                                               - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-28-04 01:43 PM   #70 
                                            - Huh.....?  RH   Sep-27-04 12:54 PM   #49 
                                               - You´re pulling our legs now  k-robjoe   Sep-27-04 03:51 PM   #55 
                                               - Yo K-Robjoe!  seatnineb   Sep-27-04 04:08 PM   #60 
                                               - When all else fails, play dumb. (nt)  stickdog   Sep-27-04 04:06 PM   #59 
  - Yeah, seismograph clocks and air traffic control clocks and the timing of  stickdog   Sep-25-04 11:38 PM   #10 
  - Summary  John Doe II   Sep-28-04 02:27 PM   #71 
  - 45 seconds or several minutes?  seatnineb   Sep-28-04 05:52 PM   #73 
  - Richard Makely  John Doe II   Sep-28-04 06:08 PM   #74 
  - Maybe  RH   Sep-29-04 04:04 AM   #84 
     - Sure  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 04:25 AM   #86 
        - A cry is not a scream.  RH   Sep-29-04 05:05 AM   #87 
           - Yes, it's all speculation  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 05:23 AM   #88 
              - Screams would probably occur  RH   Sep-29-04 05:48 AM   #91 
                 - Logic  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 06:09 AM   #92 
                    - If ABSOLUTELY nothing was heard  RH   Sep-29-04 07:34 AM   #93 
                       - Interrupted  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 07:42 AM   #95 
                          - background noise.  RH   Sep-29-04 09:22 AM   #97 
                             - GTE airfone  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 09:30 AM   #98 
                                - A silence is a connection problem.  RH   Sep-29-04 09:50 AM   #99 
                                   - Wake me up please!  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 10:07 AM   #100 
                                      - You've conceded the point then.  RH   Sep-29-04 10:12 AM   #101 
                                         - Yes, sure  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 10:20 AM   #102 
                                            - It is a not a question of explaining.  RH   Sep-29-04 11:35 AM   #103 
                                               - Everything is said  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 11:42 AM   #104 
                                               - Rolling lies.  seatnineb   Sep-29-04 04:46 PM   #105 
                                               - Great find!  John Doe II   Sep-30-04 02:47 AM   #112 
                                               - And there is is still more  John Doe II   Sep-30-04 05:46 AM   #113 
                                               - then all of a sudden all contradictions are solved?  RH   Sep-30-04 07:18 AM   #114 
                                               - Yes  John Doe II   Sep-30-04 07:36 AM   #115 
                                               - How was it possible to keep the Manhattan Project a secret?  stickdog   Sep-30-04 10:38 AM   #120 
                                               - If it was kept a secret,  RH   Sep-30-04 11:29 AM   #124 
                                               - Funny  John Doe II   Sep-30-04 11:53 AM   #126 
                                               - The same applies.  RH   Sep-30-04 02:34 PM   #127 
                                               - Well, you've convinced me!  stickdog   Oct-02-04 03:04 AM   #151 
                                               - Logically  RH   Oct-02-04 07:54 AM   #154 
                                               - If you have a clue, where oh where could it be?  stickdog   Sep-30-04 03:15 PM   #129 
                                               - Miles away from proving anybody lied? Using your judgment, nobody  stickdog   Sep-30-04 10:21 AM   #119 
                                               - I had already specified the criteria.  RH   Sep-30-04 11:23 AM   #122 
                                               - Jeremia sees all.  seatnineb   Sep-30-04 06:09 PM   #137 
  - Thanks, seatnineb  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 03:00 AM   #81 
  - How to do Hyperlinks  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 02:53 AM   #80 
  - Summary with sources  John Doe II   Sep-29-04 03:15 AM   #82 
     - Serious Question:  RH   Sep-29-04 04:10 AM   #85 
        - Good question  Robb   Sep-29-04 08:03 PM   #109 
           - I did. I was looking for anomalies. Instead I found about what you would  stickdog   Sep-30-04 10:53 AM   #121 
              - Why motivations and personalities?  RH   Sep-30-04 11:38 AM   #125 
                 - What "good effect" are you expecting from constant negative repetition?  stickdog   Sep-30-04 03:28 PM   #131 
                    - "Constant negative repetition"?  RH   Sep-30-04 04:19 PM   #133 
  - Third summary  John Doe II   Oct-05-04 06:11 AM   #156 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC