Reply #23: All you ask for is there

[John Doe II]

"To say that somebody lied you need to show that they knew well enough that something else was true as a matter of fact."


The Commission Report states:

"United 93 crashed in Pennswlvania at 10:03:11, 125 miles from Washington D.C. The precise crash time has been the subject of some dispute. The 10:03:11 impact times is supported by previous National Transportation Safety Board analysis and by evidene from the Commission staff's analysis of radar, the flight data recorder, the cockpit voice recorder, infrared satellite data, and air traffic control transmissions" (Commission Report, p. 30).

The conclusion is obviously a very conscious one but as we've seen the impact time simply can't be correct! The seismic recording of 10:06:05 seems very much more plausible. So, yes, certainly the Commission must have known that their conclusion isn't true. So it's a lie, a cover up.
The suspect: The Commission who wrote and signed it but also most likely the government that from the beginning claimed 10:03 was correct although the seismic data said 10:06. The government always refused to dexplain this discrepancy.
The motive: Certainly something to cover up. What that might have been is not of interst in this thread.

But I take you agree that the offical timeline can't be correct, don't you?