You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #116: There's a thing called a "LINK" in the OP.. try clicking on it, it gives the full German version.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #86
116. There's a thing called a "LINK" in the OP.. try clicking on it, it gives the full German version..
Here it is again, in case you missed it:

http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/9-11/artikel45057

ZRICH 2973 Menschen starben bei den Anschlgen von 9/11. Bin Laden und Al Kaida, schrie der Bush-Clan. Die Welt glaubte ihm. Inzwischen zweifeln selbst Wissenschaftler an der Bush-Version. Auch die Schweizer Uni-Dozenten Albert A. Stahel (63) und Daniele Ganser (34) stellen jetzt heisse Fragen.

Etwas stimmt nicht, sagt Strategieexperte Stahel in der Weltwoche und verweist auf den lckenhaften offiziellen 9/11-Report der US-Regierung von 2004.

Gegenber BLICK besttigt der Uni-Professor die Kritik:

Osama Bin Laden kann nicht der grosse Pate hinter den Anschlgen sein. Er habe nicht genug Kommunikationsmittel gehabt.

Stahel bezweifelt, dass ein Passagierflugzeug ins Pentagon krachte: Fr Flug-Anfnger ist es eigentlich unmglich, das Gebude so genau zu treffen.

Sieben Stunden nach den Twin Towers strzte daneben das World Trade Center 7 ein. Die offizielle Version: Es brannte lange. Stahel: Gar nichts ist klar.

Noch weiter als Stahel geht Historiker Daniele Ganser, sein Kollege an der Uni Zrich. Auch die offizielle US-Version nennt er eine Verschwrungstheorie: Es gibt 3 Theorien, die wir gleichberechtigt behandeln sollten:



berraschungs-Theorie Bin Laden und Al Kaida fhrten die Anschlge aus.


Lass es absichtlich passieren Teile der US-Regierung kannten die Al-Kaida-Plne. Sie reagierten nicht, um eine Serie von Kriegen zu legitimieren.


Fhre es absichtlich selbst aus Die Anschlge wurden vom Pentagon und/oder Geheimdiensten ausgefhrt. Die Bin-Laden-Videos sind geflscht. 3000 Menschen wurden fr strategische Interessen geopfert.

Ganser: Je mehr wir forschen, desto mehr zweifeln wir an Bushs Version. Fr ihn ist denkbar, dass die Bush-Regierung verantwortlich war. Bush hat schon so viel gelogen! Und bereits 1962 gab es im Pentagon einen Plan, unschuldige US-Brger fr eigene Interessen zu opfern. So weit wie Ganser geht Stahel nicht: Ich stelle nur Fragen.

Lesen Sie weiter in der gedruckten Ausgabe
http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/9-11/artikel45057


There's also this thing called "Google". It's a pretty popular search engine. You can use it to search a term such as "German to English translation free" and find a link, like this: http://ets.freetranslation.com /

That link didn't translate as well as the OP, but it's the first link I tried.. there's many more translators to choose from. Here's what this one gave me:

ZURICH 2973 persons died in the attacks of 9/11. "am store" and "al Kaida", screamed the Bush clan. The world believed it. In the mean time even scientists doubt the Bush version. Also the Swiss universities instructors Albert A. Stahel (63) and Daniele gander (34) ask now hot questions.

"Something agrees", strategy expert Stahel in the "world does not say week" and refers to the "lckenhaften" of official 9/11-Report of the US government of 2004.

The university professor confirms opposite VIEW the criticism:

Osama bin Laden the large godfather" cannot be "behind the attacks. It had not had enough communication means.

Stahel doubts that a passenger airplane crashed into the Pentagon: "For flight beginner is it actually impossible, the building so exactly to encounter."

Seven hours after the Twin tower collapsed beside it that World Trade Centers 7. The official version: It burned long. Stahel: "Nothing at all is clear."

Yet further as Stahel, historian goes Daniele gander, its colleague at the university Zurich. It names also the official US version "a conspiracy theory" : "There are equally treat should" 3 theories, that we:



Store and al Kaida am carried out "surprises theory" the attacks.

"Let intentionally happen" it part the US government knew the al-Kaida-plans. They did not react in order to legitimize a series of getting.

It intentionally itself "went were carried out out of" the attacks of the Pentagon and/or secret services. That am are falsified-stores-videos. 3000 persons were sacrificed for strategic interests.

Gander: "The more we search, the more doubt we Bushs version." For it is conceivable that the Bush government was responsible. "Bush already so much put! There were and already 1962 in the Pentagon a plan to sacrifice innocent US citizens for own interests." So far like gander, Stahel does not go: "I ask only questions."

Read further in the printed edition


Hell, if she would have posted all that, you'd just complain that her posts were too long...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC