You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #86: Bolo said the chances of hitting one of the wedges was 20%... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-03-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. Bolo said the chances of hitting one of the wedges was 20%...
Edited on Thu Jul-03-08 05:35 PM by SDuderstadt
show me where he was talking about specifically hitting the recently reinforced wall. You're inserting a distinction that Bolo never made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -The Attack of the Straw Man Perry Logan  May-26-08 07:10 AM   #0 
  - Your first mistake in this is thinking that "LIHOP" doesn't equal "inside job"  Ghost in the Machine   May-26-08 12:43 PM   #1 
  - Since no two LIHOPpers agree with one another, it's impossible to say.  Perry Logan   May-27-08 10:07 PM   #9 
     - Well, I thought the rest really didn't merit comment, as they're really just minor differences of  Ghost in the Machine   May-27-08 10:18 PM   #13 
        - When you say "first," it implies there are more...  Perry Logan   May-27-08 10:23 PM   #14 
           - Do *you* suffer from comprehension problems, too?  Ghost in the Machine   May-27-08 11:08 PM   #16 
              - Apparently so.  Perry Logan   May-28-08 01:17 PM   #24 
                 - "If you don't mention the matter, how can you agree to disagree about it?"  Ghost in the Machine   May-28-08 02:31 PM   #33 
  - You sense concordance in your 9/11 theory because it is not your own  elias7   May-26-08 09:49 PM   #2 
  - The irony is fabulous  LARED   May-26-08 10:08 PM   #3 
     - But 9/11 'Truthers' are not 9/11 skeptics  Bryan Sacks   May-27-08 09:00 AM   #6 
     - Your comment is a perfect example of what I was talking abouot in my post.  Perry Logan   May-27-08 10:17 PM   #12 
     - Uh, hardly. And you misunderstand basic terminology  Bryan Sacks   May-28-08 07:44 AM   #20 
     - Good points.  CJCRANE   May-28-08 01:41 PM   #27 
     - So where do you draw the line?  LARED   May-28-08 10:08 PM   #38 
     - The term "9/11 Truth" has become ambiguous  Diane_nyc   Jul-02-08 02:06 PM   #62 
     - Yeah, I'd agree, Diane.  Bryan Sacks   Jul-02-08 04:54 PM   #64 
     - The 9/11 Truth movement - surrendering semantic turf?  Diane_nyc   Jul-02-08 07:10 PM   #65 
     - The irony is that you fail to see the fanaticism of the OCT'ers  elias7   May-27-08 03:43 PM   #7 
        - They, like I, are deeply offended by false charges of mass murder.  Perry Logan   May-27-08 10:13 PM   #11 
        - I think it's more a case of viewing the world through cast-iron glasses. n/t  boloboffin   May-27-08 10:31 PM   #15 
        - My point was that the OCT'ers have fanatic tendencies as well  elias7   May-28-08 07:36 AM   #19 
        - You exhibit some of the same traits you detest, Perry. No way around it. n/t  Bryan Sacks   May-28-08 07:45 AM   #21 
           - It's called satire.  Perry Logan   May-28-08 02:20 PM   #30 
              - You don't get it. n/t  Bryan Sacks   May-28-08 02:33 PM   #34 
        - That was said very well. n/t  balantz   May-28-08 01:25 PM   #26 
        - Sorry you find me insulting  LARED   May-28-08 10:27 PM   #39 
        - When did bin Laden take responsibilty?  Ghost in the Machine   May-28-08 11:03 PM   #40 
        - And when did the US govt present solid EVIDENCE of their claim?  Echo In Light   May-29-08 07:26 AM   #42 
           - They haven't, and can't. That's why he isn't wanted for the 9-11 attacks  Ghost in the Machine   May-29-08 11:50 AM   #49 
        - If I Am Not Mistaken, Bin Laden Initially Denied Any Involvement In 9-11  Liberal_Dog   May-29-08 11:08 AM   #46 
           - A masterful non-denial denial it was, too. n/t  boloboffin   May-29-08 11:10 AM   #47 
              - *This* is a "non-denial denial"??  Ghost in the Machine   May-29-08 11:44 AM   #48 
                 - Yep, sure is.  boloboffin   May-29-08 12:02 PM   #50 
                 - You Believe Everything Osama Says?  Sweet Pea   May-29-08 12:19 PM   #51 
                    - Ummm... *why* would he do it, then deny it? The worst attack on American soil ever  Ghost in the Machine   May-29-08 12:29 PM   #52 
                    - Its obvious  Sweet Pea   May-29-08 01:21 PM   #53 
                       - Deleted message  Name removed   May-29-08 01:51 PM   #54 
                          - bin Laden's dead?  Sweet Pea   May-29-08 03:06 PM   #56 
                             - Deleted message  Name removed   May-29-08 03:28 PM   #57 
                                - Nice job there, Sport  Sweet Pea   May-29-08 06:41 PM   #58 
                                   - More proof of your lack of comprehension and ability to put 2 & 2 together..  Ghost in the Machine   May-29-08 07:38 PM   #59 
                                      - Whatever  Sweet Pea   May-30-08 05:38 AM   #60 
                                         - Nice impersonation of my 14 year old!  Ghost in the Machine   May-30-08 09:38 AM   #61 
                    - If you don't believe Osama, it means you believe George Bush, right?  Ghost in the Machine   May-29-08 01:58 PM   #55 
        - I've observed this for some time now: many OCTers seem to be fueled by a want of ridiculing others..  Echo In Light   May-29-08 07:57 AM   #43 
           - Twist, it's real simple...  SDuderstadt   May-29-08 10:28 AM   #45 
  - Conspiracy skeptic?  Mr_Jefferson_24   May-26-08 10:26 PM   #4 
  - Yup. It's far less absurd than any version of the inside job theory.  Perry Logan   May-27-08 10:05 PM   #8 
  - Congratulations!  HamdenRice   May-27-08 06:23 AM   #5 
  - Good collection of non sequiturs.  Perry Logan   May-27-08 10:10 PM   #10 
     - Never, ever criticize anyone for non sequiturs  HamdenRice   May-28-08 06:55 AM   #18 
        - But I'm using non sequiturs deliberately, whereas you have no idea what you're doing.  Perry Logan   May-28-08 01:14 PM   #23 
           - Or maybe you're not capable of understanding subtle, socratic irony ...  HamdenRice   May-28-08 01:17 PM   #25 
  - huh?  mrgerbik   May-28-08 01:58 AM   #17 
  - The biggest straw man used by Truthers is "the official story."  Perry Logan   May-28-08 01:12 PM   #22 
  - The "offficial story" isn't  CJCRANE   May-28-08 01:43 PM   #28 
     - Exactly. The "official story" is a mythical beast!  Perry Logan   May-28-08 02:19 PM   #29 
        - Why do you support it then?  CJCRANE   May-28-08 02:30 PM   #32 
           - Such as it is, it still makes more sense than any Truther scenario I've heard.  Perry Logan   May-28-08 04:19 PM   #36 
  - government and media said two things around the same time  T Monk   May-28-08 02:30 PM   #31 
  - Show me your sources or I'm not buying it.  Perry Logan   May-28-08 04:18 PM   #35 
     - government released confessional tape of 12-13-01 a 9-17-01 UPI report quoted  T Monk   May-28-08 05:28 PM   #37 
        - Anything about Osama masterminding 9/11 from that cave?  Perry Logan   May-29-08 06:27 AM   #41 
           - the concept was put out there whether on the run or in a cave through a cooperative effort between  T Monk   May-29-08 09:46 AM   #44 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-02-08 02:25 PM   #63 
  - I am a 9/11 conspiracy skeptic. You are a 9/11 conspiracy true believer.  mhatrw   Jul-03-08 04:57 AM   #66 
     - Yes, that is a straw man.  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 06:15 AM   #67 
        - 20%.  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 07:06 AM   #68 
        - Five wedges. Plane had to hit one of them. 20%.  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 07:41 AM   #69 
           - 100%  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 07:56 AM   #70 
           - What were the chances of hitting a corner and impacting two sides?  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 07:58 AM   #71 
              - Interesting. However, the plane didn't hit a corner. n/t  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 08:13 AM   #72 
                 - But it could have.  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 08:29 AM   #74 
                    - OK. n/t  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 08:32 AM   #76 
                       - My stats are only for guidance, there is a 82.33% chance they are wrong. nt  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 08:36 AM   #79 
        - oh really?  Bryan Sacks   Jul-03-08 08:24 AM   #73 
           - Damn! I forgot to factor that into my calculations.  Bassman66   Jul-03-08 08:30 AM   #75 
           - You misspelled "bullshit distractions". n/t  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 08:35 AM   #78 
           - Really.  boloboffin   Jul-03-08 08:34 AM   #77 
           - So you believe that Osama, KSM and 19 successfully brought down the  mhatrw   Jul-03-08 01:57 PM   #81 
           - Umm, what difference would it make to Bolo's argument if the plane hit the roof instead?  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 11:08 AM   #80 
              - Only the exterior walls were reinforced.  mhatrw   Jul-03-08 02:01 PM   #82 
              - I'm responding to Bryan's distinction that hitting the roof is...  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 04:27 PM   #83 
                 - bedunker strategy# 171: misstate your opponent's position (Strawman) n/t  Bryan Sacks   Jul-03-08 05:29 PM   #85 
              - You don't understand, so you demean  Bryan Sacks   Jul-03-08 05:26 PM   #84 
                 - Bolo said the chances of hitting one of the wedges was 20%...  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 05:31 PM   #86 
                    - you're sad n/t  Bryan Sacks   Jul-03-08 05:40 PM   #87 
                       - And you're wrong, as usual....  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 05:43 PM   #88 
                          - listen, genius  Bryan Sacks   Jul-03-08 05:52 PM   #89 
                             - Ummm, Bryan...  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 05:56 PM   #90 
                                - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-03-08 06:15 PM   #91 
                                   - Are you now claiming that a wing is not referring to a wedge?  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 06:21 PM   #92 
                                   - Yes. n/t  Hope2006   Jul-03-08 06:25 PM   #93 
                                   - This is getting funny (but it usually is trying to reason with "truthers")  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 06:29 PM   #94 
                                      - Whatever.  Hope2006   Jul-03-08 06:50 PM   #95 
                                   - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-03-08 10:31 PM   #96 
                                   - Only you guys would even try to claim that a roof....  SDuderstadt   Jul-03-08 10:35 PM   #97 
                                   - Giving this post a kick. n/t  Hope2006   Jul-03-08 10:39 PM   #98 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC