Liberal_Dog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-29-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 46. If I Am Not Mistaken, Bin Laden Initially Denied Any Involvement In 9-11 |
|
But even if he did claim responsibility, so what?
Anybody can claim anything they want to, but that doesn't necessarily make the claim true.
|
| -The Attack of the Straw Man |
Perry Logan |
May-26-08 07:10 AM |
#0 |
 -
Your first mistake in this is thinking that "LIHOP" doesn't equal "inside job" |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-26-08 12:43 PM |
#1 |
  -
Since no two LIHOPpers agree with one another, it's impossible to say. |
Perry Logan |
May-27-08 10:07 PM |
#9 |
| -
Well, I thought the rest really didn't merit comment, as they're really just minor differences of |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-27-08 10:18 PM |
#13 |
| -
When you say "first," it implies there are more... |
Perry Logan |
May-27-08 10:23 PM |
#14 |
| -
Do *you* suffer from comprehension problems, too? |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-27-08 11:08 PM |
#16 |
| -
Apparently so. |
Perry Logan |
May-28-08 01:17 PM |
#24 |
| -
"If you don't mention the matter, how can you agree to disagree about it?" |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-28-08 02:31 PM |
#33 |
| -
You sense concordance in your 9/11 theory because it is not your own |
elias7 |
May-26-08 09:49 PM |
#2 |
| -
The irony is fabulous |
LARED |
May-26-08 10:08 PM |
#3 |
| -
But 9/11 'Truthers' are not 9/11 skeptics |
Bryan Sacks |
May-27-08 09:00 AM |
#6 |
| -
Your comment is a perfect example of what I was talking abouot in my post. |
Perry Logan |
May-27-08 10:17 PM |
#12 |
| -
Uh, hardly. And you misunderstand basic terminology |
Bryan Sacks |
May-28-08 07:44 AM |
#20 |
| -
Good points. |
CJCRANE |
May-28-08 01:41 PM |
#27 |
| -
So where do you draw the line? |
LARED |
May-28-08 10:08 PM |
#38 |
| -
The term "9/11 Truth" has become ambiguous |
Diane_nyc |
Jul-02-08 02:06 PM |
#62 |
| -
Yeah, I'd agree, Diane. |
Bryan Sacks |
Jul-02-08 04:54 PM |
#64 |
| -
The 9/11 Truth movement - surrendering semantic turf? |
Diane_nyc |
Jul-02-08 07:10 PM |
#65 |
| -
The irony is that you fail to see the fanaticism of the OCT'ers |
elias7 |
May-27-08 03:43 PM |
#7 |
| -
They, like I, are deeply offended by false charges of mass murder. |
Perry Logan |
May-27-08 10:13 PM |
#11 |
| -
I think it's more a case of viewing the world through cast-iron glasses. n/t |
boloboffin |
May-27-08 10:31 PM |
#15 |
| -
My point was that the OCT'ers have fanatic tendencies as well |
elias7 |
May-28-08 07:36 AM |
#19 |
| -
You exhibit some of the same traits you detest, Perry. No way around it. n/t |
Bryan Sacks |
May-28-08 07:45 AM |
#21 |
| -
It's called satire. |
Perry Logan |
May-28-08 02:20 PM |
#30 |
| -
You don't get it. n/t |
Bryan Sacks |
May-28-08 02:33 PM |
#34 |
| -
That was said very well. n/t |
balantz |
May-28-08 01:25 PM |
#26 |
| -
Sorry you find me insulting |
LARED |
May-28-08 10:27 PM |
#39 |
| -
When did bin Laden take responsibilty? |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-28-08 11:03 PM |
#40 |
| -
And when did the US govt present solid EVIDENCE of their claim? |
Echo In Light |
May-29-08 07:26 AM |
#42 |
| -
They haven't, and can't. That's why he isn't wanted for the 9-11 attacks |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-29-08 11:50 AM |
#49 |
| -
If I Am Not Mistaken, Bin Laden Initially Denied Any Involvement In 9-11 |
Liberal_Dog |
May-29-08 11:08 AM |
#46 |
| -
A masterful non-denial denial it was, too. n/t |
boloboffin |
May-29-08 11:10 AM |
#47 |
| -
*This* is a "non-denial denial"?? |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-29-08 11:44 AM |
#48 |
| -
Yep, sure is. |
boloboffin |
May-29-08 12:02 PM |
#50 |
| -
You Believe Everything Osama Says? |
Sweet Pea |
May-29-08 12:19 PM |
#51 |
| -
Ummm... *why* would he do it, then deny it? The worst attack on American soil ever |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-29-08 12:29 PM |
#52 |
| -
Its obvious |
Sweet Pea |
May-29-08 01:21 PM |
#53 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-29-08 01:51 PM |
#54 |
| -
bin Laden's dead? |
Sweet Pea |
May-29-08 03:06 PM |
#56 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-29-08 03:28 PM |
#57 |
| -
Nice job there, Sport |
Sweet Pea |
May-29-08 06:41 PM |
#58 |
| -
More proof of your lack of comprehension and ability to put 2 & 2 together.. |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-29-08 07:38 PM |
#59 |
| -
Whatever |
Sweet Pea |
May-30-08 05:38 AM |
#60 |
| -
Nice impersonation of my 14 year old! |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-30-08 09:38 AM |
#61 |
| -
If you don't believe Osama, it means you believe George Bush, right? |
Ghost in the Machine |
May-29-08 01:58 PM |
#55 |
| -
I've observed this for some time now: many OCTers seem to be fueled by a want of ridiculing others.. |
Echo In Light |
May-29-08 07:57 AM |
#43 |
| -
Twist, it's real simple... |
SDuderstadt |
May-29-08 10:28 AM |
#45 |
| -
Conspiracy skeptic? |
Mr_Jefferson_24 |
May-26-08 10:26 PM |
#4 |
| -
Yup. It's far less absurd than any version of the inside job theory. |
Perry Logan |
May-27-08 10:05 PM |
#8 |
| -
Congratulations! |
HamdenRice |
May-27-08 06:23 AM |
#5 |
| -
Good collection of non sequiturs. |
Perry Logan |
May-27-08 10:10 PM |
#10 |
| -
Never, ever criticize anyone for non sequiturs |
HamdenRice |
May-28-08 06:55 AM |
#18 |
| -
But I'm using non sequiturs deliberately, whereas you have no idea what you're doing. |
Perry Logan |
May-28-08 01:14 PM |
#23 |
| -
Or maybe you're not capable of understanding subtle, socratic irony ... |
HamdenRice |
May-28-08 01:17 PM |
#25 |
| -
huh? |
mrgerbik |
May-28-08 01:58 AM |
#17 |
| -
The biggest straw man used by Truthers is "the official story." |
Perry Logan |
May-28-08 01:12 PM |
#22 |
| -
The "offficial story" isn't |
CJCRANE |
May-28-08 01:43 PM |
#28 |
| -
Exactly. The "official story" is a mythical beast! |
Perry Logan |
May-28-08 02:19 PM |
#29 |
| -
Why do you support it then? |
CJCRANE |
May-28-08 02:30 PM |
#32 |
| -
Such as it is, it still makes more sense than any Truther scenario I've heard. |
Perry Logan |
May-28-08 04:19 PM |
#36 |
| -
government and media said two things around the same time |
T Monk |
May-28-08 02:30 PM |
#31 |
| -
Show me your sources or I'm not buying it. |
Perry Logan |
May-28-08 04:18 PM |
#35 |
| -
government released confessional tape of 12-13-01 a 9-17-01 UPI report quoted |
T Monk |
May-28-08 05:28 PM |
#37 |
| -
Anything about Osama masterminding 9/11 from that cave? |
Perry Logan |
May-29-08 06:27 AM |
#41 |
| -
the concept was put out there whether on the run or in a cave through a cooperative effort between |
T Monk |
May-29-08 09:46 AM |
#44 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-02-08 02:25 PM |
#63 |
| -
I am a 9/11 conspiracy skeptic. You are a 9/11 conspiracy true believer. |
mhatrw |
Jul-03-08 04:57 AM |
#66 |
| -
Yes, that is a straw man. |
boloboffin |
Jul-03-08 06:15 AM |
#67 |
| -
20%. |
Bassman66 |
Jul-03-08 07:06 AM |
#68 |
| -
Five wedges. Plane had to hit one of them. 20%. |
boloboffin |
Jul-03-08 07:41 AM |
#69 |
| -
100% |
Bassman66 |
Jul-03-08 07:56 AM |
#70 |
| -
What were the chances of hitting a corner and impacting two sides? |
Bassman66 |
Jul-03-08 07:58 AM |
#71 |
| -
Interesting. However, the plane didn't hit a corner. n/t |
boloboffin |
Jul-03-08 08:13 AM |
#72 |
| -
But it could have. |
Bassman66 |
Jul-03-08 08:29 AM |
#74 |
| -
OK. n/t |
boloboffin |
Jul-03-08 08:32 AM |
#76 |
| -
My stats are only for guidance, there is a 82.33% chance they are wrong. nt |
Bassman66 |
Jul-03-08 08:36 AM |
#79 |
| -
oh really? |
Bryan Sacks |
Jul-03-08 08:24 AM |
#73 |
| -
Damn! I forgot to factor that into my calculations. |
Bassman66 |
Jul-03-08 08:30 AM |
#75 |
| -
You misspelled "bullshit distractions". n/t |
boloboffin |
Jul-03-08 08:35 AM |
#78 |
| -
Really. |
boloboffin |
Jul-03-08 08:34 AM |
#77 |
| -
So you believe that Osama, KSM and 19 successfully brought down the |
mhatrw |
Jul-03-08 01:57 PM |
#81 |
| -
Umm, what difference would it make to Bolo's argument if the plane hit the roof instead? |
SDuderstadt |
Jul-03-08 11:08 AM |
#80 |
| -
Only the exterior walls were reinforced. |
mhatrw |
Jul-03-08 02:01 PM |
#82 |
| -
I'm responding to Bryan's distinction that hitting the roof is... |
SDuderstadt |
Jul-03-08 04:27 PM |
#83 |
| -
bedunker strategy# 171: misstate your opponent's position (Strawman) n/t |
Bryan Sacks |
Jul-03-08 05:29 PM |
#85 |
| -
You don't understand, so you demean |
Bryan Sacks |
Jul-03-08 05:26 PM |
#84 |
| -
Bolo said the chances of hitting one of the wedges was 20%... |
SDuderstadt |
Jul-03-08 05:31 PM |
#86 |
| -
you're sad n/t |
Bryan Sacks |
Jul-03-08 05:40 PM |
#87 |
| -
And you're wrong, as usual.... |
SDuderstadt |
Jul-03-08 05:43 PM |
#88 |
| -
listen, genius |
Bryan Sacks |
Jul-03-08 05:52 PM |
#89 |
| -
Ummm, Bryan... |
SDuderstadt |
Jul-03-08 05:56 PM |
#90 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-03-08 06:15 PM |
#91 |
| -
Are you now claiming that a wing is not referring to a wedge? |
SDuderstadt |
Jul-03-08 06:21 PM |
#92 |
| -
Yes. n/t |
Hope2006 |
Jul-03-08 06:25 PM |
#93 |
| -
This is getting funny (but it usually is trying to reason with "truthers") |
SDuderstadt |
Jul-03-08 06:29 PM |
#94 |
| -
Whatever. |
Hope2006 |
Jul-03-08 06:50 PM |
#95 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-03-08 10:31 PM |
#96 |
| -
Only you guys would even try to claim that a roof.... |
SDuderstadt |
Jul-03-08 10:35 PM |
#97 |
| -
Giving this post a kick. n/t |
Hope2006 |
Jul-03-08 10:39 PM |
#98 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread