You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #45: Number 1, NHT.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Number 1, NHT....
offer some documentation of your goofy claims or it's just more of your typical bullshit. Even if, as you claim, both Connally and his wife maintain he was hit by a dofferent bullet, that isn't proof of anything and certainly isn't consistent with the physical evidence. Secondly, the autopsists didn't conclude that the bullet that hit JFK in the back only pentrated an inch. One of the doctors tried to probe the wound with his finger and then a soft probe, but was unable to penetrate it more than an inch, which proves basically that he was unable to penetrate it more than an inch, not that was the total depth of the wound. In fact, the Forensic Pathology Panel of the House Select Committee on Assassinations addressed the issue and here's what they had to say about it:

(430) The panel believes that the difficulty which Drs. Humes, Finck, and Boswell experienced in trying to place a soft probe through the bullet pathway in President Kennedys neck probably resulted from their failure or inability to manipulate this portion of the body into the same position it was in when the missile penetrated. Rigor mortis may have hindered this manipulation. Such placement would have enabled reconstruction of the relationships of the neck and shoulder when the missile struck. It is customary, however, to dissect missile tracks to determine damage and pathway. Probing a track blindly may produce false tracks and misinformation.



Hmmm, choices. Should I believe the Forensic Pathology Panel or some guy named "NowHearThis" whose biggest claim to fame is posting goofy theories on a discussion board? I think I'll go with the forensic pathologists.

Your claim that Connally could not have been wounded by the same bullet as JFK and still be seen holding on to his stetson is easily disproven by other accounts of wounds even more severe in which case the person wounded was, nonetheless, able to grasp things despite the severity of their wounds as demonstrated below:

At last I was close enough to pull the pin on my last grenade. And as I drew my arm back, all in a flash of light and dark I saw him, that faceless German, like a strip of motion picture film running through a projector that's gone berserk. One instant he was standing waist-high in the bunker, and the next he was aiming a rifle grenade at my face from a range of ten yards. And even as I cocked my arm to throw, he fired and his rifle grenade smashed into my right elbow and exploded and all but tore my arm off. I looked at it, stunned and unbelieving. It dangled there by a few bloody shreds of tissue, my grenade still clenched in a fist that suddenly didn't belong to me anymore . . ."
Daniel K. Inouye with Lawrence Elliott, Journey to Washington, Prentice-Hall 1967, pp. 151-152.


More importantly (and something you either were too lazy to research properly or were deceitful enough to omit) is that Mrs. Connally stated that her husband held his stetson all the way to Parkland:

Nellie: John Connally was trying to see him. He looked to
his right and he couldn't see the president. He knew it was a
gun shot. I just heard a loud noise. And John was afraid they
were shooting at the president and he turned to see if he
could see him on this other side and he couldn't see him
there and in the process of turning back John was shot.
Second shot.

TM: Second shot. You've never wavered from this, by the
way?

Nellie: I never will. I pulled him down in my lap because I
didn't want him to hurt him anymore. I didn't want him to
shoot at him anymore. And while I had him in my lap there
was another shot. And my reaction to that was matter all
over the car, blew up, we were in front of the Kennedys, it
blew up all over us. Third shot.

TM: And you're covering your husband at this time.

Nellie: And he also, he has... he has... his hat in his hand.
He always had that hat somewhere. He had the hat in his
hand when I pulled him over and crouched him down and
he was holding that hat up against him. He closed up that
wound that would've killed him before we got to the hospital.

http://web.archive.org/web/20001013092436/http://www.te...



If you look closely enough, you'll also see that Mrs. Connally states that her husband was hit by the SECOND shot, which thoroughly undermines your claim that both she and Gov. Connally thought he was hit by a different bullet. We know that because Connally stated that, after the first bullet missed, he turned to his right in his seat and looked over his shoulder because that's where he heard the shot come from. Since Connally thought that the first bullet missed (which it did) and he knows that the third shot was the fatal headshot to JFK, he would've have to conclude that both he and JFK were hit by the same shot. More importantly, perhaps you could tell us if they were hit by two different bullets and, given the relative positions of JFK and Connally, how could any shot have hit Connally where it did and NOT gone through JFK first?

As I have stated previously, some classes in critical thinking could pre-empt most of your goofy claims. I am sure your local community college offers them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -Oswald and paraffin tests --- defendandprotect  Oct-27-07 10:45 PM   #0 
  - "I am a patsy!"  deen   Oct-29-07 07:37 PM   #1 
  - Jack Ruby was actually a rather brave man in trying to warn us ---  defendandprotect   Oct-29-07 11:47 PM   #7 
  - A few corrections.  TheWraith   Nov-01-07 02:45 AM   #8 
  - Untrue -- Ruby made a long list of calls to Mafia figures within a day or so of JFK coup ---  defendandprotect   Nov-05-07 10:06 PM   #9 
     - Dorothy Kilgallen  MinM   Jan-18-08 12:07 AM   #16 
        - Margaret Smith  nebula   Jan-18-08 12:39 PM   #20 
           - Gerry Patrick Hemming  MinM   Feb-01-08 10:33 AM   #21 
  - Ruby tried desperately to avoid what he had been ordered to do  NowHearThis   May-16-09 03:10 PM   #25 
     - you don't have a shred of proof of any of this, dude...  SDuderstadt   May-16-09 03:21 PM   #26 
        - You might enjoy this article on the CIA, Oswald, and JFK assassination  NowHearThis   May-16-09 06:55 PM   #27 
        - If you're trying to claim or imply that Oswald was CIA...  SDuderstadt   May-16-09 09:45 PM   #30 
           - I know what it says. I read it and decided you might profit from it.  NowHearThis   May-16-09 09:57 PM   #31 
              - "Most researchers "  SDuderstadt   May-16-09 09:59 PM   # 
        - An introduction to the origin of the SBT (single bullet theory)  NowHearThis   May-16-09 07:34 PM   #28 
        - Chew on this article about Jack Ruby  NowHearThis   May-16-09 08:43 PM   #29 
  - "I am not resisting arrest" - that's what Oswald said when arrested at the Texas Theater  dflprincess   May-16-09 10:34 PM   #33 
  - He also drew his revolver and tried to kill the officer who got to him first...  SDuderstadt   May-16-09 10:38 PM   #34 
     - He made the statement after being handcuffed  dflprincess   May-16-09 11:56 PM   #35 
        - If he was innocent, why did he try to kill the arresting officer??  SDuderstadt   May-17-09 12:07 AM   #36 
           - I never said he was innocent,  dflprincess   May-17-09 12:18 AM   #37 
              - All the shots trace back to the sniper's nest...  SDuderstadt   May-17-09 12:20 AM   #38 
                 - Where the shots came from depend on which witnesses you believe  dflprincess   May-17-09 12:25 AM   #39 
                    - No, they depend on trajectory analysis...  SDuderstadt   May-17-09 12:34 AM   #40 
                       - Again, it depends on whose recreation you choose to believe  dflprincess   May-17-09 12:45 AM   #41 
                          - The evidence needed is in the Zapruder film...  SDuderstadt   May-17-09 12:56 AM   #42 
                             - Connally was NOT hit by the same bullet. Z film proves it.  NowHearThis   May-17-09 08:47 AM   #44 
                                - Number 1, NHT....  SDuderstadt   May-17-09 10:55 AM   #45 
                                   - Do you actually believe what you wrote?  NowHearThis   May-17-09 10:58 AM   #46 
                                      - Yeah, NHT....  SDuderstadt   May-17-09 11:08 AM   #47 
  - An honest question to those who believe Oswald was a lone nut...  Mortimer Ichabod   Nov-03-10 12:33 PM   #53 
     - Not really...  SDuderstadt   Nov-03-10 04:38 PM   #54 
        - Ruby, etc  Mortimer Ichabod   Nov-04-10 08:08 AM   #55 
           - The physical evidence...n/t  SDuderstadt   Nov-04-10 08:55 AM   #56 
              - physical evidence  Mortimer Ichabod   Nov-04-10 09:20 AM   #57 
                 - I'm not interested in getting into a long...  SDuderstadt   Nov-04-10 09:39 AM   #58 
                    - none taken  Mortimer Ichabod   Nov-04-10 10:00 AM   #59 
                    - Italian Army tests  k-robjoe   Nov-04-10 10:36 AM   #60 
                       - Wow. Great video k-robjoe  Jessenio   Nov-05-10 06:51 PM   #78 
                          - Look at the video again and ask yourself...  SDuderstadt   Nov-05-10 06:59 PM   #79 
                             - "the impact of the backstop"  k-robjoe   Nov-06-10 08:54 AM   #84 
                                - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Nov-06-10 10:31 AM   #85 
                                   - "Its a bullet-proof vest"  k-robjoe   Nov-06-10 12:23 PM   #86 
                                      - "it would also mean that these guys from the italian army are complete fools"  SDuderstadt   Nov-06-10 01:03 PM   #87 
                                         - Most damage  k-robjoe   Nov-06-10 05:06 PM   #88 
                                            - Jesus, this is hopeless...  SDuderstadt   Nov-06-10 05:34 PM   #89 
                                               - "High velocity"  k-robjoe   Nov-06-10 05:54 PM   #90 
                                                  - Dude...  SDuderstadt   Nov-06-10 06:37 PM   #91 
                                                  - Looks like youre right  k-robjoe   Nov-06-10 06:50 PM   #92 
                    - Reading a previous thread on the evidence I found this quote:  Mortimer Ichabod   Nov-04-10 10:43 AM   #61 
                       - No...  SDuderstadt   Nov-04-10 10:47 AM   #62 
                       - you must be mistaken..  Mortimer Ichabod   Nov-04-10 11:00 AM   #63 
                          - I'm hardly mistaken...  SDuderstadt   Nov-04-10 11:04 AM   #64 
                             - i really have no idea who you think i am..  Mortimer Ichabod   Nov-04-10 11:10 AM   #65 
                                - "your apparent paranoia"  SDuderstadt   Nov-04-10 11:16 AM   #66 
                       - Could you please link me to where...  SDuderstadt   Nov-04-10 12:00 PM   #67 
                          - I stand corrected  Mortimer Ichabod   Nov-04-10 12:37 PM   #68 
                             - Inasmuch as...  SDuderstadt   Nov-04-10 12:49 PM   #69 
                             - cover what tracks?  Mortimer Ichabod   Nov-04-10 12:54 PM   #70 
                                - And, I stand by what I said about...  SDuderstadt   Nov-04-10 01:01 PM   #71 
                             - touche!  IScreamSundays   Nov-04-10 08:17 PM   #72 
                                - We'll add the word "touche"...  SDuderstadt   Nov-04-10 08:21 PM   #73 
                                   - I just found it humorous that you are accusing our  IScreamSundays   Nov-05-10 03:31 PM   #76 
                                      - I never, ever accused him of being...  SDuderstadt   Nov-05-10 03:40 PM   #77 
                                         - touche  IScreamSundays   Nov-05-10 07:37 PM   #80 
                                            - How is having to admit an egregious error...  SDuderstadt   Nov-05-10 07:43 PM   #81 
                                               - Touche  zappaman   Nov-05-10 08:07 PM   #82 
                                                  - Conspiracists are such a hoot...  SDuderstadt   Nov-06-10 12:13 AM   #83 
  - I remember not long after the assassination, Oswald's mother claimed he was a government agent  dflprincess   Oct-29-07 08:24 PM   #2 
  - You should look into Oswald's mother.  boloboffin   Oct-29-07 08:24 PM   #3 
     - Why , was she a MILF?  dbonds   Oct-29-07 10:37 PM   #4 
        - You are thinking of Zemeckis' version  boloboffin   Oct-29-07 10:41 PM   #5 
        - What is an MILF? EOM  able1   May-18-09 02:44 PM   #50 
           - "mother I'd like to fuck" is what it stands for - a good looking woman who's also a mother  Bolo Boffin   May-18-09 04:23 PM   #51 
              - Okey dokey. Now I know. Thank you. EOM  able1   May-18-09 06:18 PM   #52 
  - Great JFK conpiracy video: JFK II  deen   Oct-29-07 11:34 PM   #6 
  - Thanks --- good to have. Being pretty familiar with this info . . ..  defendandprotect   Nov-05-07 10:34 PM   #10 
     - peter jennings  sabbat hunter   Nov-06-07 06:59 AM   #11 
     - Yes . . . smokers do get cancer . . ..  defendandprotect   Nov-06-07 04:07 PM   #12 
     - have you provided  sabbat hunter   Nov-06-07 04:13 PM   #13 
        - What are you talking about . . .???  defendandprotect   Nov-06-07 04:50 PM   #14 
           - in other words  sabbat hunter   Nov-06-07 06:04 PM   #15 
     - And . . .geez . . . we haven't seen "cancer" used by the CIA to kill people . . . !!!  defendandprotect   Feb-03-08 12:19 AM   #22 
     - How in the world is Peter Jennings' death even remotely suspicious,...  SDuderstadt   Jan-18-08 12:45 AM   #17 
     - The program in question is inane ---  defendandprotect   Feb-03-08 12:24 AM   #23 
     - "Another questionable death connected to this coup on JFK"  SDuderstadt   Nov-05-10 01:10 PM   #75 
  - Paraffin Tests  jberryhill   Jan-18-08 12:48 AM   #18 
  - Oswald's Paraffin Tests  MinM   Jan-18-08 05:57 AM   #19 
  - Warren Commion Report: "Paraffin test on Oswald was completely unreliable" ----  defendandprotect   Feb-03-08 12:28 AM   #24 
  - Why is the paraffin test no longer used?  jberryhill   May-17-09 01:20 AM   #43 
  - "Truther logic"...  SDuderstadt   May-18-09 12:39 PM   #49 
  - ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##  DU GrovelBot   May-16-09 09:59 PM   #32 
  - When firing bolt action rifle  vincent_vega_lives   May-18-09 12:33 PM   #48 
     - Please provide sources to your "tests"  Bignerd   Nov-05-10 09:56 AM   #74 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC