You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: Answers [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Answers
1) The section of plane in your photo had obviously been seperated from the plane's fuel source (presumably by the in-air explosion) so was not subjected to fire.

2) The section of plane that fell on Lockerbie, because of its shape, would have had a high drag coefficent. Someone with a physics degree and the mass and dimensions of the Lockerbie debris could calculate it's velocity at impact for you, but...

The evidence is before you. The fact that the Lockerbie debris survived the fall from the sky is evidence that it did not meet with the same explosive force or impact velocity as the plan that hit the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC