You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: Hey fainter, if I may ask... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Hey fainter, if I may ask...
Are you a human female between the ages of 29 and 52? Because if you are, I may be proposing marriage shortly (and this has naught to do with CD yes or no)... Otherwise, damn. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -Questions for those who argue as skeptics against 9/11 skepticism JackRiddler  Mar-13-07 03:12 PM   #0 
  - Cheney's statements  CJCRANE   Mar-13-07 03:36 PM   #1 
  - Pretty low response rate from our OCTs.  BushDespiser12   Mar-13-07 08:24 PM   #2 
  - Give them some time - it's a big post...  JackRiddler   Mar-13-07 09:03 PM   #3 
  - kick nt  petgoat   Mar-14-07 09:41 AM   #4 
  - Where are the replies? nt  HamdenRice   Mar-14-07 10:47 AM   #5 
  - The bar exam had fewer questions  jberryhill   Mar-14-07 11:21 AM   #6 
  - A person's priorities give others information about them, Jberryhill  Bryan Sacks   Mar-14-07 02:08 PM   #8 
  - Have I seen you (any of you) denouncing the "nutjob crap"?  MervinFerd   Mar-14-07 04:37 PM   #10 
  - If you haven't, it's because you don't want to look...  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 03:06 PM   #70 
     - We're looking at your own words at your sig links.  greyl   Mar-15-07 04:19 PM   #72 
        - WE?  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 04:42 PM   #76 
           - "hey, that's good stuff!"  Twist_U_Up   Mar-16-07 03:47 PM   #107 
           - You also liked  greyl   Mar-16-07 04:26 PM   #109 
           - The One Thing OCTers Can't Abide And Have No Answer For Is Honest Self Examination...  Fainter   Mar-17-07 01:10 PM   #123 
              - Funny.  greyl   Mar-17-07 01:37 PM   #126 
                 - I don't think that...  JackRiddler   Mar-17-07 02:14 PM   #127 
                 - "WE're looking at your own words at your sig links"  Fainter   Mar-17-07 03:03 PM   #129 
                    - Yeah, I own it and I've explained it.  greyl   Mar-18-07 12:06 PM   #134 
  - An F-bomb inside of the first ten words....  jberryhill   Mar-14-07 06:10 PM   #12 
  - dude...  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 08:58 PM   #85 
     - Hmmm....  jberryhill   Mar-16-07 11:18 AM   #102 
  - Uhhh, no.  AZCat   Mar-14-07 09:27 PM   #16 
  - He means structural in the anthropological /linguistic /political sense  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 06:27 AM   #20 
     - Structuralism and the "global warming hoax".  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 07:34 AM   #23 
     - All you are saying is  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 08:01 AM   #26 
        - No, I'm saying that you are misusing "structuralism".  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 08:20 AM   #28 
           - 9/11 is a political crime, not an engineering issue  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 09:29 AM   #29 
              - Does industrial activity cause global warming? YES or NO.  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 10:04 AM   #33 
              - The OP is NOT about collapse of a steel building  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 10:13 AM   #37 
              - WTF? "flatly denied that inductive science exists."  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 11:57 AM   #44 
              - Double blind studies are inductive science  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 12:23 PM   #48 
              - Yes....That's what I said.  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 12:59 PM   #56 
                 - You really don't get it! It's amazing!  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 01:11 PM   #60 
                    - You flatter yourself.  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 03:57 PM   #71 
                    - fabulist nt  greyl   Mar-15-07 04:28 PM   #75 
                    - As regards the jury...  LeftishBrit   Mar-23-07 11:40 AM   #141 
              - Please point out where the OP discusses WTC 7 nt  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 12:29 PM   #49 
              - I have two hats  jberryhill   Mar-15-07 01:00 PM   #57 
              - Simply examining 'whose interests were served' does not prove guilt  LeftishBrit   Mar-24-07 04:29 AM   #143 
              - A structuralist answer  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 10:26 AM   #40 
              - That's perfectly clear. Why do you, then, use Structural Analysis to discover..  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 11:59 AM   #46 
              - Here's yet another question MervinFerd cannot answer  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 12:22 PM   #47 
                 - You flatter yourself. OF COURSE there are questions without YES or NO..  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 02:30 PM   #68 
                 - You didn't address the question about thee FBI and KKK in post 47  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 02:37 PM   #69 
                    - You didn't address post 68, nor are you being truthful.  greyl   Mar-15-07 04:24 PM   #73 
                    - I did, too, answer that question.  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 10:05 PM   #90 
                       - Hey Mervin, interesting answer.  HamdenRice   Mar-18-07 10:25 AM   #131 
                 - An Exceptional Post!  Fainter   Mar-16-07 01:31 AM   #97 
              - Hamden, 9/11 Chafes The Epistemology...  Fainter   Mar-15-07 12:59 PM   #55 
              - Thanks! But it's not just 9/11  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 01:12 PM   #61 
              - Then why oh why are those who insist 9-11 was an inside job  vincent_vega_lives   Sep-20-07 02:52 PM   #178 
     - Actually you're wrong  salvorhardin   Mar-15-07 10:05 AM   #34 
     - Saussure  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 10:16 AM   #38 
     - Okay.  AZCat   Mar-15-07 12:32 PM   #50 
  - I don't have an issue with most of the stuff JR posted  vincent_vega_lives   Mar-15-07 07:50 AM   #24 
  - Please do  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 08:02 AM   #27 
     - After you (n/t)  vincent_vega_lives   Mar-15-07 09:34 AM   #31 
        - I'm not a debunker or OCTer  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 09:46 AM   #32 
           - "nexus of Afghanistani, Pakistani, Saudi and American .., and drug networks"  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 10:09 AM   #35 
  - "the nutters who can't be helped anyway"  jberryhill   Sep-21-07 09:00 PM   #182 
  - Your support of David Ray Griffin gives me all the information about you I need to know.  boloboffin   Sep-21-07 09:11 PM   #183 
     - more ad hominem nonsense from you  Bryan Sacks   Sep-22-07 04:40 PM   #190 
        - Oh, please. Those that dish it out should learn to take it.  boloboffin   Sep-22-07 05:46 PM   #193 
           - Apology accepted (you'll need a new one for the new lies, though)  Bryan Sacks   Sep-22-07 07:49 PM   #194 
              - Since Hillary is the current frontrunner for the Democratic nomination...  boloboffin   Sep-22-07 09:48 PM   #195 
  - Perhaps Deep Politics and Structuralism should be applied to the Titanic.  MervinFerd   Mar-16-07 10:10 AM   #101 
     - The Titanic is not beyond the reach of social analysis...  JackRiddler   Mar-16-07 02:44 PM   #103 
        - Can "social analysis" demontrate whether an iceberg sank the Titanic?  MervinFerd   Mar-17-07 08:17 AM   #121 
           - And your analysis here...  Fainter   Mar-17-07 03:57 PM   #130 
  - kick n/t  Hope2006   Mar-14-07 02:07 PM   #7 
  - Aw, c'mon OCTers! No takers? Not on even one issue?  HamdenRice   Mar-14-07 02:41 PM   #9 
  - You really miss the point  jberryhill   Mar-14-07 06:25 PM   #13 
  - the 3 patsies  CGowen   Mar-15-07 06:50 AM   #21 
  - Like Your Idea Of Jumping Into The"...breach of incomplete knowledge..." Very Much...  Fainter   Mar-15-07 09:14 PM   #86 
  - IGNORE  vincent_vega_lives   Mar-15-07 07:57 AM   #25 
  - CD Remains A Worthy Avenue If Perspective Is Kept  Fainter   Mar-14-07 06:09 PM   #11 
  - That's a great post  jberryhill   Mar-14-07 06:33 PM   #14 
  - It's an excellent post, yes  Bryan Sacks   Mar-14-07 08:32 PM   #15 
  - Do -you- have even the vaguest idea what you are talking about?  MervinFerd   Mar-14-07 09:28 PM   #17 
  - Mythic Space  LARED   Mar-14-07 09:45 PM   #18 
     - Take a piss in the Structuralist Bathroom...  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 07:23 AM   #22 
        - Ask Philip Zelikow about mythic space if you don't understand it  Bryan Sacks   Mar-15-07 09:31 AM   #30 
        - Can he design a plumbing system that will drain properly..  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 10:10 AM   #36 
           - Dude, you admitted you don't even know what structuralism is  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 10:18 AM   #39 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-15-07 01:06 PM   #58 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-15-07 01:13 PM   #62 
                 - I missed it.  vincent_vega_lives   Mar-15-07 02:19 PM   #67 
           - So far, plumbing jokes and "not my table" pleadings and sal's  petgoat   Mar-15-07 11:47 AM   #41 
              - Their inability to address these issues is telling  HamdenRice   Mar-15-07 12:35 PM   #52 
                 - It's very easy to mistake a fog of words and "deep" bullshit, for ...  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 01:09 PM   #59 
                    - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-15-07 01:14 PM   #63 
                       - What bizarre definition of name calling are you using?  greyl   Mar-15-07 04:27 PM   #74 
                          - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-18-07 10:36 AM   #132 
                             - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-18-07 11:55 AM   #133 
        - I second what Bryan said.  CJCRANE   Mar-15-07 12:36 PM   #53 
  - As an aside  jberryhill   Mar-15-07 11:49 AM   #42 
  - Hey fainter, if I may ask...  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 12:08 AM   #19 
  - LOL! Dude, No I'm Not. Perhaps We Could Double With Sibel and Indira :>)! n/t  Fainter   Mar-15-07 05:31 PM   #81 
     - That's too bad... and Sibel is married you know...  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 09:39 PM   #89 
  - And  jberryhill   Mar-15-07 11:51 AM   #43 
     - That's Very Gracious...  Fainter   Mar-15-07 12:47 PM   #54 
     - Internet arguments intensify that beast  jberryhill   Mar-15-07 02:10 PM   #66 
     - Hah! How did you know? When did you jump the snark? n/t :>)  Fainter   Mar-25-07 10:41 PM   #172 
  - Well said, JackRiddler  naboo   Mar-15-07 11:59 AM   #45 
  - Here's my take as an AIJ (Anti-Inside Jobber) you asked for it.  vincent_vega_lives   Mar-15-07 12:34 PM   #51 
  - You ought to do a lil more research  naboo   Mar-15-07 01:55 PM   #64 
  - Thanks did some. (n/t)  vincent_vega_lives   Mar-15-07 02:08 PM   #65 
  - You didn't know Zelikow and you haven't read The 9/11 Commission Report?  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 08:37 PM   #82 
     - Do these observations support any particular hypothesis?  MervinFerd   Mar-15-07 10:16 PM   #92 
     - henceforth, since you repeat yourself ad infinitum  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 10:21 PM   #93 
        - That's a grocery list, not an thesis. And your observations don't prove it.  MervinFerd   Mar-16-07 10:05 AM   #100 
        - The whole point is that the investigation of 9-11 should handle it as a crime, according to law,  LeftishBrit   Mar-26-07 04:54 AM   #173 
     - As I have said before  vincent_vega_lives   Mar-16-07 07:04 AM   #98 
        - Exactly.  JackRiddler   Mar-16-07 02:54 PM   #104 
           - I don't disagree with any of that  vincent_vega_lives   Mar-17-07 08:33 AM   #122 
  - ZERO ANSWERS  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 04:50 PM   #77 
  - Do you have Vega on Ignore, or is post #57 invisible to you?  jberryhill   Mar-15-07 04:56 PM   #78 
  - You're right, I missed Vega and will return to it. Sorry. As for Al-Fe... off-topic here. nt  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 05:01 PM   #79 
     - Aw shucks  jberryhill   Mar-15-07 05:05 PM   #80 
        - dude...  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 08:41 PM   #83 
           - Asking Questions And Demanding Answers  jberryhill   Mar-16-07 03:25 PM   #106 
              - I've understood perfectly well  JackRiddler   Mar-16-07 04:00 PM   #108 
                 - And I understand perfectly well  jberryhill   Mar-16-07 06:41 PM   #110 
                    - By all means...  JackRiddler   Mar-16-07 06:58 PM   #111 
                       - I don't know how to argue with a question  jberryhill   Mar-16-07 07:35 PM   #113 
  - Why is it so important that we respond to this?  AZCat   Mar-15-07 08:55 PM   #84 
     - who is "we"???  Hope2006   Mar-15-07 09:21 PM   #87 
     - That'd be the "we" referenced in the title of the OP...  AZCat   Mar-15-07 09:33 PM   #88 
     - So you say  Hope2006   Mar-15-07 10:07 PM   #91 
        - Ashamed? Of what?  AZCat   Mar-15-07 10:27 PM   #95 
        - I am ashamed  vincent_vega_lives   Sep-20-07 02:48 PM   #177 
     - If you haven't noticed  vincent_vega_lives   Mar-16-07 07:09 AM   #99 
     - So don't...  JackRiddler   Mar-15-07 10:22 PM   #94 
        - Your attitude is perplexing.  AZCat   Mar-15-07 10:28 PM   #96 
           - Kicking for a response from JackRiddler. n/t  AZCat   Mar-16-07 03:02 PM   #105 
              - Still waiting... n/t  AZCat   Mar-17-07 01:21 PM   #124 
  - Off the top of my head...  boloboffin   Mar-16-07 07:30 PM   #112 
  - Bolo Finally Shows Himself to Be Logically Inconsistent  jberryhill   Mar-16-07 08:14 PM   #114 
  - What. The F*ck. Ever.  boloboffin   Mar-16-07 08:28 PM   #115 
     - I think he might have been  greyl   Mar-16-07 10:05 PM   #116 
        - Yes, that's true.  boloboffin   Mar-16-07 10:18 PM   #117 
        - Better than letting someone else misinterpret you first? /nt  jberryhill   Mar-16-07 11:19 PM   #119 
        - Point for greyl  jberryhill   Mar-16-07 11:16 PM   #118 
           - Hope they're paying you guys in silver bars.  Bryan Sacks   Mar-16-07 11:39 PM   #120 
              - Thats just nutty sounding  vincent_vega_lives   Sep-21-07 12:17 PM   #179 
                 - I understand nobody pays you, Vince  Bryan Sacks   Sep-22-07 03:53 PM   #189 
  - Good.  JackRiddler   Mar-17-07 02:22 PM   #128 
  - kick for freshness...  JackRiddler   Mar-19-07 11:44 PM   #135 
  - Replies to Boloboffin's replies...  JackRiddler   Mar-21-07 01:12 PM   #136 
  - So much text. .... And still no hypothesis.  MervinFerd   Mar-21-07 01:54 PM   #137 
  - I thought this was going to be like  jberryhill   Mar-21-07 03:27 PM   #138 
     - Can't you just acknowledge excellent work instead of making dumb fun?  Bryan Sacks   Mar-23-07 12:38 PM   #142 
  - Tech problem fixed, Able Danger articles are back...  JackRiddler   Mar-21-07 04:13 PM   #139 
  - Indira Singh On EPA...  Fainter   Mar-24-07 05:28 PM   #168 
  - .  BrokenBeyondRepair   Mar-24-07 07:47 PM   #169 
  - The LIHOP show had a good run but now it's time to move on.  dailykoff   Mar-17-07 01:35 PM   #125 
  - Hypothesis: Some people are in avoidance of relevant facts and questions n/t  JackRiddler   Mar-22-07 10:25 AM   #140 
  - A few responses  LeftishBrit   Mar-24-07 04:56 AM   #144 
  - Thanks for your responses.  JackRiddler   Mar-24-07 12:15 PM   #145 
     - I am sceptical about ALL conspiracy theories, until proven  LeftishBrit   Mar-25-07 07:52 AM   #170 
        - FROM HERE IT'S THE OTHER THREAD...  JackRiddler   Mar-25-07 02:51 PM   #171 
  - Questions for Skeptics of 9/11 Skepticism  JackRiddler   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #146 
  - Of course there are questions about 9/11  mr blur   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #147 
  - Okay.  JackRiddler   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #148 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #149 
  - The answers to those questions  realisticphish   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #150 
  - Those aren't felonies.  JackRiddler   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #151 
     - doesn't skepticism require evidence  realisticphish   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #152 
        - No.  JackRiddler   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #155 
  - OK, some answers  muriel_volestrangler   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #153 
  - Thank you.  JackRiddler   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #156 
  - So, then  IAmJacksSmirkingRevenge   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #154 
  - To your question - no.  JackRiddler   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #157 
  - yOu have made no assertions. Asking questions does not support the 9/11 "Truth" movement  Caution   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #158 
  - End of discussion, I'd say.  mr blur   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #159 
  - extraordinary claims require evidence  petgoat   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #163 
  - Extraordinary claims require extraordinary investigation n/t  Ferry Fey   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #165 
  - There is already evidence  CJCRANE   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #167 
  - Dungeonized...  JackRiddler   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #160 
  - It's a DU Group, not a forum.  greyl   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #161 
     - Don't put words in my mouth.  JackRiddler   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #162 
     - It's a comedy club, a mutual admiration society, and quite juvenile. nt  petgoat   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #164 
  - kicking...  JackRiddler   Mar-24-07 04:48 PM   #166 
     - ditto, still owed...  JackRiddler   Apr-04-07 09:12 AM   #174 
  - kick  JackRiddler   Sep-20-07 11:14 AM   #175 
  - Hey Riddler  jberryhill   Sep-21-07 01:41 PM   #180 
     - If you're not going to bother with returns  JackRiddler   Sep-22-07 10:40 AM   #186 
        - You think it didn't take time and thought  jberryhill   Sep-22-07 04:46 PM   #191 
  - Here is what strongly refute from this list...  vincent_vega_lives   Sep-20-07 02:45 PM   #176 
  - Riddler doesn't even read the site he puts in his sig....  jberryhill   Sep-21-07 07:57 PM   #181 
  - Oy! I wish the Truthers would make their homework assignments smaller.  Perry Logan   Sep-22-07 06:36 AM   #184 
  - I am not a "Truther"  JackRiddler   Sep-22-07 10:37 AM   #185 
     - since you mention it  OnTheOtherHand   Sep-22-07 01:54 PM   #188 
     - "...but I do promote Steven Jones' stuff in my signature" /nt  jberryhill   Sep-22-07 04:48 PM   #192 
        - You have no shame, do you?  JackRiddler   Sep-22-07 11:07 PM   #196 
           - You're the one that links uncritically to that website.  boloboffin   Sep-22-07 11:25 PM   #197 
           - I write too much as it is...  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:05 AM   #198 
           - He won't do it...  jberryhill   Sep-23-07 10:29 AM   #212 
           - "Every statement I disagree with"  jberryhill   Sep-23-07 10:26 AM   #211 
  - those are some good questions  leftofthedial   Sep-22-07 12:12 PM   #187 
  - Why does the seismology clearly indicate no explosions on 9/11?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:01 AM   #199 
  - This is not a topic of the OP - why do you distract?  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:07 PM   #214 
  - Why have virtually none of the world's structural engineers figured this out?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:03 AM   #200 
  - This is not a topic of the OP - why do you distract?  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:08 PM   #215 
  - How did the bad guys place the charges in the towers exactly where the planes were to hit?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:03 AM   #201 
  - This is not a topic of the op - why do you distract?  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:06 PM   #213 
  - Why did the President go into brainlock on 9/11?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:04 AM   #202 
  - Why do you provide excuses for him? What about the secret service?  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:09 PM   #216 
  - If they wanted to invade Iraq, why did they frame Osama bin Laden?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:05 AM   #203 
  - Who are "they"? Who says ObL isn't one of them?  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:10 PM   #217 
  - Would international bankers really fund a plan to bring down Wall Street?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:05 AM   #204 
  - Did Wall Street come down? At any rate, not a topic of the OP - why are you distracting?  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:11 PM   #218 
  - Why haven't they staged any big domestic follow-up attacks--as most of the Truthers predicted?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:06 AM   #205 
  - I didn't. Go ask elsewhere.  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:11 PM   #219 
  - Why do Truthers fight constantly? Why can't they get agree on their story?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:08 AM   #206 
  - Why do Democrats fight constantly? Why can't they agree on a strategy?  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:12 PM   #220 
  - Why do Truthers spend half their time saying the news is rigged, & half their time quoting the news?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:09 AM   #207 
  - If you can find anyone who self-identifies as a "Truther," ask them.  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:13 PM   #221 
  - Why do Truthers ignore the manifold debunkings of everything they have ever said?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:10 AM   #208 
  - Why haven't you stopped beating your dog?  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:14 PM   #222 
  - Why do Truthers call anyone who disagrees with them an agent--always without a shred of proof?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:11 AM   #209 
  - You should ask that of someone who has actually done this - more false insinuations/associations.  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:15 PM   #223 
  - When will the Truthers realize that making false accusations of mass murder is bad for your karma?  Perry Logan   Sep-23-07 06:11 AM   #210 
  - Creating phantom categories to act as the target of prejudice and hatred can't be good for it either  JackRiddler   Sep-23-07 12:17 PM   #224 
  - next-year kick  JackRiddler   Feb-04-08 11:10 AM   #225 
  - Kick. n/t  Fainter   Feb-04-08 03:16 PM   #226 
     - Thank you.  JackRiddler   Jan-18-09 01:25 PM   #227 
  - So digging up this thread again...  JackRiddler   May-29-10 09:54 AM   #228 
  - Paul Bremer knew he had work in Iraq post 9/11  deconstruct911   May-29-10 11:55 AM   #229 
  - kick  JackRiddler   Jan-01-12 09:32 PM   #230 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC