Reply #33: Which ones?

[SocraticTruths]

I find that the problem with insincere debunkers, I'm not saying you are one, is that whenever a new thread on chemtrails is started anywhere, the "chemmies" are asked to be investigator and judge of the topic, and to get the whole thing settled one way or the other with the one thread.

This is why it is better if insincere debunkers are ignored. There is never any flow to the discussion/ research when they are taken seriously. If one looks at the three I have decided to ignore, their writings never relate to what is being offered.

I posted tons at Gastronamus Cafe, and also at this site called Megasprayer. I even posted at Chemtrail Centrail as FUIwon'tDoWhatUTellMe. At the other two I was Socrates. If interested in where I am personally coming from you could check out my posts at those places, though I am a bit paranoid that my posts could be altered, but am not sure on that, whether it is possible. They could certainly delete my posts if they wanted to.

So yeah, if there is something specific you are curious about, just say it, please give me some time to come up with a response. Geoengineering is certainly real. There is no doubt about that.