Bryan Sacks
(732 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-28-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
But I don't like the argument that "dozens of firefighters know it's a controlled demolition, but can't say so publically". They supposedly said so to Alex Jones, who has the biggest mouth in the world. How is that consistent with national security?
I understand the reply would be, "the firefighters don't care about the silly national argument, but still don't want to run afoul of the law". I have less sympathy for that. Firefighters are getting sick and dying from the government's cover-up of the environmental damage at the WTC. They are getting stonewalled by the city and the feds when they cry for help. If there are people who know WTC 7 was in fact a controlled demolition, it will only take a few to come forward, who would become instant heroes to millions. Their lives would potentially be destroyed, of course, as well. But people are dying right now because of the government's lies. People need to come forward, or else it goes nowhere.
Or, it could be no one is 100% certain that what they know indicates CD. That seems more likely to me.
|
| -BOMBSHELL: 9/11 COVER-UP UNRAVELING |
StrictlyRockers |
Feb-28-07 03:43 AM |
#0 |
-
It's unravelling |
CJCRANE |
Feb-28-07 05:46 AM |
#1 |
-
Ales Jones reported on this on Coast To Coast AM last night. C2C has the largest |
OmmmSweetOmmm |
Feb-28-07 05:51 AM |
#2 |
-
Snort. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-28-07 05:54 AM |
#3 |
 -
"not exactly a reliably progressive individual" |
Nabia2004 |
Feb-28-07 06:09 AM |
#4 |
  -
even if true, it's irrelevant in this case because Jones is not the source |
rman |
Feb-28-07 08:37 AM |
#9 |
 -
His name is Marrs and he does alien stuff? |
StrictlyRockers |
Mar-04-07 01:23 AM |
#55 |
 -
Its amazing to see how far people rationalise for this, |
Twist_U_Up |
Feb-28-07 08:02 AM |
#5 |
-
I'm all in with 8 2 offsuit nt |
Devon77 |
Feb-28-07 08:04 AM |
#6 |
-
In other news: we have received a raise of chocolate rations, comrades |
boloboffin |
Feb-28-07 08:28 AM |
#7 |
 -
And, don't -anybody- notice that the Admin is illegally funding... |
MervinFerd |
Feb-28-07 08:35 AM |
#8 |
-
Ok, let's also look into who funded al-Qaeda on 9/11. |
CJCRANE |
Feb-28-07 09:56 AM |
#19 |
 -
Unfortunately, a thread about al Qaeda funding would wind up here. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-28-07 10:08 AM |
#21 |
-
Merv, the suggestion was a good one. |
Contrite |
Feb-28-07 04:54 PM |
#53 |
-
Really sad fallacy. |
BuyingThyme |
Feb-28-07 11:37 AM |
#23 |
-
Jones IS engaging in confirmation bias. This does not prove scripted response |
Bryan Sacks |
Feb-28-07 08:37 AM |
#10 |
 -
weird coincidence |
itsjustme |
Feb-28-07 08:50 AM |
#11 |
  -
Agree |
Bryan Sacks |
Feb-28-07 09:05 AM |
#12 |
 -
Yes and we won't get the damn sources until we get an open |
Beam Me Up |
Feb-28-07 09:08 AM |
#13 |
 -
How do you suggest we get any further information on this without |
mhatrw |
Feb-28-07 09:09 AM |
#14 |
-
making a big stink is just what should be done. |
Bryan Sacks |
Feb-28-07 09:16 AM |
#15 |
-
WTC-7 is not a honey pot. |
mhatrw |
Feb-28-07 09:24 AM |
#16 |
-
Here's ultimately where I think this has to go: |
Bryan Sacks |
Feb-28-07 09:32 AM |
#17 |
-
You haven't actually read the NIST document on WTC7, have you? |
MervinFerd |
Feb-28-07 10:15 AM |
#22 |
-
What "document" do you speak of, MervinFerd? |
BuyingThyme |
Feb-28-07 11:44 AM |
#24 |
-
Well, first they have to produce them |
Devon77 |
Feb-28-07 11:52 AM |
#25 |
-
You've found the interim report. Good work. + 5 pts. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-28-07 01:25 PM |
#41 |
-
To me it looks like they are dragging their feet |
Devon77 |
Feb-28-07 01:44 PM |
#42 |
-
No, they are being careful and responsible and professional. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-28-07 03:45 PM |
#44 |
-
here a patent but I don't know if it's the same |
Devon77 |
Feb-28-07 03:49 PM |
#46 |
 -
That patent was issued in 1967. It would hardly be a secret to anyone. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-28-07 04:28 PM |
#49 |
-
Did I say it was a secret ? you were asking me if such a thing exists. nt |
Devon77 |
Feb-28-07 04:38 PM |
#52 |
-
Yes, there is such a thing. It's "superthermite". Google it. |
Contrite |
Feb-28-07 04:24 PM |
#48 |
-
I'll take your word for it. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-28-07 04:30 PM |
#50 |
-
LOL. Yes, it is hard to imagine an urgent need for it myself. n/t |
Contrite |
Feb-28-07 04:36 PM |
#51 |
-
ROFL... |
SidDithers |
Feb-28-07 09:46 AM |
#18 |
 -
And the irrelevancy grows... |
truthpowertruth |
Feb-28-07 09:59 AM |
#20 |
-
Why does Alex Jones keep pinning this on Jane Standley? |
BuyingThyme |
Feb-28-07 12:08 PM |
#26 |
 -
Because it's about payback for the documentary, not the truth. |
boloboffin |
Feb-28-07 12:38 PM |
#27 |
  -
Well, he's got the words right, but he's attributing them to the wrong |
BuyingThyme |
Feb-28-07 12:41 PM |
#28 |
   -
The probability is that Standley gave the anchor his information. |
boloboffin |
Feb-28-07 12:57 PM |
#34 |
  -
It's pretty clear that Standly is only familiar with the "story" |
BuyingThyme |
Feb-28-07 01:04 PM |
#35 |
   -
I've seen the whole thing, thanks. n/t |
boloboffin |
Feb-28-07 01:09 PM |
#38 |
  -
Standley cannot be the origin of the story, bolo, for an obvious reason |
Bryan Sacks |
Feb-28-07 01:07 PM |
#37 |
  -
I'm saying she's a probable source for the announcer, not source of the story altogether. |
boloboffin |
Feb-28-07 01:11 PM |
#39 |
  -
She may know WTC 7 but the report is naming Salomon Brothers building |
Devon77 |
Feb-28-07 01:12 PM |
#40 |
  -
WTC 7 is the Salomon Brothers building. Same thing. |
boloboffin |
Feb-28-07 03:40 PM |
#43 |
  -
What if she heard only the name WTC 7 and didn't know its name? |
Devon77 |
Feb-28-07 03:47 PM |
#45 |
  -
I believe she calls it the Salomon Brothers building. |
boloboffin |
Feb-28-07 03:49 PM |
#47 |
  -
Good talking point. |
truthpowertruth |
Feb-28-07 12:41 PM |
#29 |
 -
The truth is always the best talking point, and that's why I've used it here. |
boloboffin |
Feb-28-07 12:50 PM |
#32 |
 -
I think the visual effect is overwhelming |
Devon77 |
Feb-28-07 12:42 PM |
#30 |
-
I think it matters in that the false (future) information seems to have |
BuyingThyme |
Feb-28-07 12:45 PM |
#31 |
-
It could have been written by Aaron Dykes |
Devon77 |
Feb-28-07 12:56 PM |
#33 |
-
As far as I remember, she does not report that at all. |
BuyingThyme |
Feb-28-07 01:06 PM |
#36 |
-
unbelievable |
Twist_U_Up |
Mar-01-07 06:58 AM |
#54 |