The Lone Groover
(654 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-27-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 26. Then we move to the next step. |
|
Which is find out why.
Simple really.
A bit like lots of questions about the OCT. You know like all those ones the Government ignored or didn't want to answer during the 9/11 Commission.
You remember?
|
| -BBC responds |
truthpowertruth |
Feb-27-07 01:59 PM |
#0 |
 -
My favorite parts: |
truthpowertruth |
Feb-27-07 02:00 PM |
#1 |
  -
Exactly. |
StrictlyRockers |
Feb-27-07 06:15 PM |
#52 |
| -
BBC is teh evil111 |
Anarcho-Socialist |
Feb-27-07 02:12 PM |
#2 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-27-07 02:18 PM |
#3 |
| -
The DU September 11th forum is 95% belly laughs |
Anarcho-Socialist |
Feb-27-07 02:23 PM |
#4 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-27-07 02:33 PM |
#6 |
| -
This one ranks with White Plastic Chairs for bewildering stupidity. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-27-07 02:44 PM |
#8 |
| -
Actually |
salvorhardin |
Feb-27-07 02:49 PM |
#9 |
| -
"When you walk through a storm... |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 02:52 PM |
#10 |
| -
... |
Anarcho-Socialist |
Feb-27-07 03:05 PM |
#11 |
| -
"If you are being run out of town... |
Sweet Pea |
Feb-27-07 03:59 PM |
# |
| -
"If half the things ever said turned out to be a lie, |
greyl |
Feb-28-07 02:36 AM |
#67 |
| -
Yeah, but making fun of "dustification" was losing its sporting appeal. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-27-07 03:15 PM |
#12 |
| -
But, you are amusing, nonetheless. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-27-07 03:17 PM |
#13 |
| -
I know! This response is a riot! I'm still waiting for the third try. Hilarious stuff so far!! |
StrictlyRockers |
Mar-04-07 01:25 AM |
#87 |
| -
Who said anything about that stuff? |
StrictlyRockers |
Feb-27-07 11:50 PM |
#59 |
| -
You do realise... |
Anarcho-Socialist |
Feb-28-07 01:59 AM |
#65 |
| -
I do realise (sic) that. |
StrictlyRockers |
Feb-28-07 03:14 AM |
#70 |
| -
That's an ignorant American-centric attitude |
Anarcho-Socialist |
Feb-28-07 03:19 AM |
#71 |
| -
HERE COMES..................... |
Twist_U_Up |
Feb-27-07 02:24 PM |
#5 |
| -
What an absolutely GLORIOUS response!!!! |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 02:35 PM |
#7 |
| -
If it's not an error, what is it?... |
SidDithers |
Feb-27-07 03:22 PM |
#14 |
| -
Come on, Sid. It's not an error. It is a FALSE REPORT. |
Bryan Sacks |
Feb-27-07 03:34 PM |
#15 |
| -
I can buy that.. |
SidDithers |
Feb-27-07 03:46 PM |
#17 |
| -
"intentional" is the only issue here. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-27-07 03:51 PM |
#21 |
| -
Preach on, brutha... |
SidDithers |
Feb-27-07 03:52 PM |
#23 |
| -
Nope... |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 03:59 PM |
#31 |
| -
The Beeb got it wrong... |
SidDithers |
Feb-27-07 04:02 PM |
#34 |
| -
I don't believe it was intentional, but as you said, |
Bryan Sacks |
Feb-27-07 04:12 PM |
#39 |
| -
Under even the most ridiculous CT, what possible reason would there be.. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-28-07 08:54 AM |
#77 |
| -
Bryan: And the implication of this ---IS---? |
MervinFerd |
Feb-27-07 03:49 PM |
#20 |
| -
No script. Not an intentionally false report. |
Bryan Sacks |
Feb-27-07 04:25 PM |
#42 |
| -
Thanks for a falsifiable statement. Now, why are you aiding Alex Jones? |
MervinFerd |
Feb-28-07 08:50 AM |
#76 |
| -
My theory is that it needs investigating alongside... |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 03:44 PM |
#16 |
| -
Woot! |
boloboffin |
Feb-27-07 03:48 PM |
#18 |
| -
Eh? nt |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 03:52 PM |
#22 |
| -
English: not your strong suit. Eh? n/t |
boloboffin |
Feb-27-07 03:57 PM |
#29 |
| -
I'm not a spelling facist if that's what you mean. nt |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 04:27 PM |
#44 |
| -
And so it's investigated, and found that the BBC... |
SidDithers |
Feb-27-07 03:49 PM |
#19 |
| -
The Stock Market is down 500 points!! They -know- the jig is up! |
MervinFerd |
Feb-27-07 03:54 PM |
#25 |
| -
That's not true. |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 03:56 PM |
#28 |
| -
Bin Laden is long gone. |
CJCRANE |
Feb-27-07 04:00 PM |
#32 |
| -
Then we move to the next step. |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 03:55 PM |
#26 |
| -
The "why" is staring you right in the face... |
SidDithers |
Feb-27-07 03:57 PM |
#30 |
| -
Report what? |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 04:02 PM |
#33 |
| -
Report that building 7 had collapsed... |
SidDithers |
Feb-27-07 04:07 PM |
#37 |
| -
"conflicting information or rumors floating " |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 04:15 PM |
#40 |
| -
A rumour that there was an explosion at the Capitol Building?... |
SidDithers |
Feb-27-07 04:26 PM |
#43 |
| -
What have false rumors got to do with this? |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 04:32 PM |
#45 |
| -
Rumours sometimes get reported as fact... |
SidDithers |
Feb-27-07 04:34 PM |
#46 |
| -
Hence they could have used words such as "unconfirmed" |
CJCRANE |
Feb-27-07 05:02 PM |
#48 |
| -
They could have, and should have... |
SidDithers |
Feb-28-07 09:49 AM |
#79 |
| -
Either/or. |
CJCRANE |
Feb-28-07 09:42 PM |
#82 |
| -
Did a reporter actually report the Capitol had been bombed? |
Contrite |
Feb-27-07 11:14 PM |
#57 |
| -
So the head of BBC World News is guilty of criminal conspiracy to commit mass murder? |
vincent_vega_lives |
Feb-27-07 06:13 PM |
#51 |
| -
I think you are putting words in the poster's mouth. |
Contrite |
Feb-27-07 11:36 PM |
#58 |
| -
The internet crowd only pointed the BBC |
michael_1166 |
Feb-27-07 03:53 PM |
#24 |
| -
The issue is the implication. And you know it. |
MervinFerd |
Feb-27-07 03:55 PM |
#27 |
| -
Yes they're scared of the implication, that's |
michael_1166 |
Feb-27-07 04:06 PM |
#36 |
| -
What is it that you gain by backing the MSM, or the official theory? |
BushDespiser12 |
Feb-27-07 06:28 PM |
#53 |
| -
The BBC are liars!!!! |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 04:05 PM |
#35 |
| -
This is another thing that makes no sense. |
SocraticTruths |
Feb-27-07 04:09 PM |
#38 |
| -
A most pertinent question... |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-27-07 04:17 PM |
#41 |
| -
Astroturfing |
SocraticTruths |
Feb-27-07 05:00 PM |
#47 |
| -
Pretty darn revealing, I'd say. |
StrictlyRockers |
Feb-27-07 05:42 PM |
#50 |
| -
Damn. Wished I had read this prior to writing this... |
BushDespiser12 |
Feb-27-07 06:32 PM |
#54 |
| -
mhatrw: Second thread on the BBC's response |
boloboffin |
Feb-27-07 05:17 PM |
#49 |
| -
Well...that means it isn't a hoax... |
mmmlink |
Feb-27-07 06:44 PM |
#55 |
| -
For some more "through the looking glass" news reporting |
JohnyCanuck |
Feb-27-07 07:02 PM |
#56 |
| -
OK ... so lets see ... |
Tim Howells |
Feb-28-07 12:41 AM |
#60 |
| -
Continue looking. |
greyl |
Feb-28-07 01:19 AM |
#61 |
| -
We are talking about... |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-28-07 01:34 AM |
#63 |
| -
Imagine a celebrity gets shot in the head backstage at the Oscars. |
greyl |
Feb-28-07 02:06 AM |
#66 |
| -
You are correct, Tim. It is a load of BS, a total disgrace indeed. |
StrictlyRockers |
Feb-28-07 01:30 AM |
#62 |
| -
BBC truthfulness is proved false. |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-28-07 01:39 AM |
#64 |
| -
I haven't heard that story - have a link? nt |
greyl |
Feb-28-07 02:42 AM |
#68 |
| -
Are there any TRUE stories that you HAVE heard of: |
StrictlyRockers |
Feb-28-07 03:00 AM |
#69 |
| -
Link |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-28-07 07:23 AM |
#72 |
| -
My goodness |
Anarcho-Socialist |
Feb-28-07 07:30 AM |
#73 |
| -
Ah... the mockery ploy. That works. |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-28-07 07:36 AM |
#74 |
| -
Suckers! |
salvorhardin |
Feb-28-07 07:43 AM |
#75 |
| -
Oh yes they are. |
The Lone Groover |
Feb-28-07 09:10 AM |
#78 |
| -
Is google video charging now money? nt |
Devon77 |
Feb-28-07 10:07 AM |
#80 |
| -
I don't know about Google... |
The Lone Groover |
Mar-01-07 01:23 AM |
#86 |
| -
coincidence theorists in full effect with the ad homs.. |
frylock |
Feb-28-07 10:22 AM |
#81 |
| -
Coincidence "theorists"? |
JackRiddler |
Feb-28-07 10:17 PM |
#84 |
| -
New introduction to the whole BBC shebang... |
JackRiddler |
Feb-28-07 10:16 PM |
#83 |
| -
Thanks JR - It just gets better and better... |
The Lone Groover |
Mar-01-07 01:22 AM |
#85 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread