You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #184: Deleted message [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-04 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #182
184. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
  -"A small plane equipped with 5 missiles" crashed into Tower 1? demodewd  Jul-08-04 08:11 PM   #0 
  - Go away.  aquart   Jul-08-04 08:15 PM   #1 
  - and leave the tinfoil  wyethwire   Jul-08-04 08:18 PM   #3 
  - slo-mo  demodewd   Jul-08-04 09:00 PM   #9 
  - I strongly suggest you take your own advice.  DulceDecorum   Jul-09-04 12:24 PM   #29 
  - Take the sales reps selling "cavepeople did it" Conspiracy T. with you.  Abe Linkman   Jul-09-04 01:01 PM   #31 
  - Now HERE is an interesting photo  JackRiddler   Jul-09-04 09:20 PM   #49 
     - http://media.portland.indymedia.org/images/2003/12/275928.gif  demodewd   Jul-09-04 09:37 PM   #50 
     - for no discernible reason.  LARED   Jul-10-04 06:48 AM   #54 
  - Yeah, right  still_one   Jul-08-04 08:16 PM   #2 
  - who knows..  demodewd   Jul-08-04 09:03 PM   #10 
  - was it being flown by giant lizard people?  codegreen   Jul-08-04 08:19 PM   #4 
  - Tin Foil  Medialize   Jul-08-04 08:30 PM   #5 
  - "No, I can't prove it..."  CoonDawg   Jul-08-04 08:49 PM   #6 
  - Well, the original report was a small plane hitting the tower  soothsayer   Jul-08-04 08:51 PM   #7 
  - It looked small from far away.  MidwestTransplant   Jul-08-04 08:52 PM   #8 
  - Here's my original report  markses   Jul-16-04 10:48 PM   #181 
     - Flash  demodewd   Jul-16-04 10:53 PM   #182 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-16-04 11:11 PM   #184 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-16-04 11:19 PM   #187 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-17-04 07:48 AM   #190 
              - "Bye"  demodewd   Jul-17-04 08:53 AM   #191 
                 - Uh, wrong, boyo  markses   Jul-17-04 09:40 AM   #192 
                    - Sorry..."boyo"  demodewd   Jul-17-04 09:53 AM   #193 
                       - And I think both "reasons" you provide are ludicrous  markses   Jul-17-04 10:31 AM   #194 
                          - re: "think"  demodewd   Jul-17-04 11:01 AM   #195 
                          - If there were any proof in the pudding  markses   Jul-17-04 11:30 AM   #198 
                          - 400 mph  demodewd   Jul-17-04 11:09 AM   #196 
                             - Yes, probably one  markses   Jul-17-04 11:29 AM   #197 
                                - probably just one...eh?  demodewd   Jul-17-04 11:43 AM   #199 
                                   - It was a 767  markses   Jul-17-04 12:20 PM   #200 
                                      - don't subscribe  demodewd   Jul-17-04 12:36 PM   #201 
                                      - I don't believe the pod and I don't believe the missile  markses   Jul-17-04 12:49 PM   #202 
                                         - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-17-04 01:03 PM   #204 
                                            - Nice try  markses   Jul-17-04 01:26 PM   #205 
                                      - Thanks for your valuable contribution to discovering the truth about 9-11.  Abe Linkman   Jul-17-04 12:55 PM   #203 
                                         - So sad  markses   Jul-17-04 01:31 PM   #206 
                                            - Chill, "markses".  Abe Linkman   Jul-17-04 02:46 PM   #207 
                                               - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-17-04 04:24 PM   #208 
                                                  - You're STILL here? Whatever for?  Abe Linkman   Jul-17-04 06:46 PM   #209 
                                                  - Theory on a forum set up specifically for those of us who don't believe th  LARED   Jul-17-04 08:21 PM   #210 
                                                  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-17-04 11:54 PM   #212 
                                                  - I was going to jump in here, but you seem to be doing a fine job, markses.  MercutioATC   Jul-17-04 10:22 PM   #211 
        - Yes seen it  vincent_vega_lives   Jul-22-04 01:31 PM   #213 
  - Check this out..  demodewd   Jul-08-04 09:06 PM   #11 
  - Yes, Yes, Yes  LARED   Jul-08-04 09:14 PM   #13 
  - Here is how it all went down  demodewd   Jul-08-04 09:12 PM   #12 
  - It was giant suborbital helicopters with lasers  Robb   Jul-08-04 09:21 PM   #14 
  - Really Robb?  demodewd   Jul-08-04 09:30 PM   #18 
  - "It had the fireball of a missile"  demodewd   Jul-08-04 09:23 PM   #15 
  - Another interesting photo  demodewd   Jul-08-04 09:26 PM   #16 
  - Look familiar?  demodewd   Jul-08-04 09:28 PM   #17 
  - I love a good conspiracy theory, but ...  BattyDem   Jul-08-04 09:40 PM   #19 
  - first things first  demodewd   Jul-08-04 09:45 PM   #20 
  - I thought ...  BattyDem   Jul-08-04 09:48 PM   #21 
     - Who?  demodewd   Jul-08-04 09:59 PM   #22 
        - That's my point  BattyDem   Jul-08-04 10:00 PM   #23 
           - My point  demodewd   Jul-08-04 10:07 PM   #24 
              - Oh, ok ...  BattyDem   Jul-08-04 10:24 PM   #25 
  - Name the people  DulceDecorum   Jul-09-04 01:03 PM   #32 
  - "A small twin-engine plane had hit one tower of the World Trade Center"  woody b   Jul-09-04 06:46 AM   #26 
  - News flash! It's a matter of perceptive.  MercutioATC   Jul-09-04 12:06 PM   #28 
     - I challenge..  demodewd   Jul-09-04 12:47 PM   #30 
        - Well, possibly because the plane isn't flat across the front...  MercutioATC   Jul-09-04 01:15 PM   #33 
           - attn: junior high flunkie  demodewd   Jul-09-04 01:49 PM   #34 
           - I disagree. I see debris from a crash.  MercutioATC   Jul-09-04 01:56 PM   #35 
           - I think the puffs may be fuel clouds - as yet unburned  gbwarming   Jul-09-04 03:32 PM   #36 
              - a flash like lightning  demodewd   Jul-09-04 04:08 PM   #37 
              - Now you see it. Now you dont.  seatnineb   Jul-09-04 04:48 PM   #38 
                 - The video went out everywhere, DUers recorded it. So who has it?  gbwarming   Jul-09-04 05:47 PM   #39 
                    - gb  demodewd   Jul-09-04 05:52 PM   #40 
                    - Seen it. I think I see the nose hitting. Yes, it makes a lighter spot  gbwarming   Jul-09-04 05:57 PM   #41 
                       - enhanced flash  demodewd   Jul-09-04 06:02 PM   #42 
                          - timing of flash  demodewd   Jul-09-04 06:09 PM   #43 
                             - I looked 51 times. It happens at the same time.  gbwarming   Jul-09-04 06:09 PM   #44 
                                - Sorry..  demodewd   Jul-09-04 06:19 PM   #45 
                                   - ain't no  demodewd   Jul-09-04 06:21 PM   #46 
                    - Flash(original) = gamma press. No Flash(altered) = F.B.I  seatnineb   Jul-10-04 02:43 AM   #53 
  - More interesting photos  LARED   Jul-09-04 11:13 AM   #27 
  - A mind is a terrible thing to waste.  boloboffin   Jul-09-04 06:27 PM   #47 
  - http://media.portland.indymedia.org/images/2003/12/275928.gif  demodewd   Jul-09-04 08:03 PM   #48 
  - Uh, you did see the dimensions of the plane that hit that tower???  Zynx   Jul-09-04 11:33 PM   #51 
  - bigger?  demodewd   Jul-10-04 12:49 AM   #52 
     - ...and if you look at the shape of the plane, it's consistent with a 767.  MercutioATC   Jul-10-04 10:55 AM   #55 
     - Ok, now what "bigger" plane has hardpoints for missiles?  Zynx   Jul-10-04 11:00 AM   #56 
     - I start with...  demodewd   Jul-10-04 11:07 AM   #57 
        - Actually, you start with....  MercutioATC   Jul-10-04 11:31 AM   #58 
           - speak for yourself.  demodewd   Jul-10-04 11:43 AM   #59 
              - Again, you're not beginning with facts, but conclusions.  MercutioATC   Jul-10-04 11:52 AM   #60 
                 - re:conclusions  demodewd   Jul-10-04 12:48 PM   #61 
                 - Whatever...  MercutioATC   Jul-10-04 09:38 PM   #65 
                    - nononononononono  demodewd   Jul-10-04 10:33 PM   #67 
                       - But, you don't SEE a missile...you're CONCLUDING that it was a missile.  MercutioATC   Jul-10-04 10:48 PM   #69 
                          - It makes total sense  demodewd   Jul-11-04 01:04 PM   #76 
                             - No unpredictabilities?  objection   Jul-11-04 06:28 PM   #77 
                             - if this is so silly  reorg   Jul-11-04 06:48 PM   #78 
                             - why bother at all?  objection   Jul-11-04 07:14 PM   #82 
                                - it was seen by all sorts of people  reorg   Jul-11-04 08:10 PM   #83 
                             - re: too silly to be bothered with  demodewd   Jul-11-04 06:48 PM   #79 
                                - Which would be substantiated by what?  objection   Jul-11-04 06:56 PM   #80 
                                   - the pod  demodewd   Jul-11-04 07:06 PM   #81 
                                      - You wrote  objection   Jul-11-04 08:40 PM   #84 
                             - You seriously think a missile was necessary?  MercutioATC   Jul-11-04 09:06 PM   #85 
                                - But when?  demodewd   Jul-11-04 09:37 PM   #86 
                                   - Whaaaaaat?  MercutioATC   Jul-11-04 09:53 PM   #87 
                                   - If the fuselage was destroyed, then how was that hole in the Pent. made?  Abe Linkman   Jul-11-04 10:01 PM   #89 
                                   - We're talking about WTC2, Abe...  MercutioATC   Jul-11-04 10:05 PM   #90 
                                   - re: bowling ball  demodewd   Jul-11-04 10:14 PM   #92 
                                   - Ask Newton.  objection   Jul-12-04 06:57 AM   #100 
                                   - absolutely  demodewd   Jul-11-04 10:07 PM   #91 
                                      - That actually strengthens my statement.  MercutioATC   Jul-11-04 10:15 PM   #93 
                                      - huuummmmm  demodewd   Jul-11-04 10:17 PM   #94 
                                         - That's preposterous.  MercutioATC   Jul-11-04 10:23 PM   #95 
                                         - thems plenty hot  demodewd   Jul-11-04 10:30 PM   #96 
                                         - Then why no missile at WTC 1?  MercutioATC   Jul-11-04 10:43 PM   #97 
                                         - There was  demodewd   Jul-12-04 10:01 AM   #105 
                                         - Then why were no explosives components found at either site?  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 10:13 AM   #108 
                                         - Maybe the destroyed airplane destroyed them. n/t  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 11:32 AM   #110 
                                         - Sorry, I meant the chemical compounds of explosives weren't found.  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 11:58 AM   #113 
                                         - A completely destroyed plane created a nine foot hole in the Pentagon?  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 08:25 AM   #101 
                                         - Don't listen to ME. Here's what engineers have to say:  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 09:44 AM   #102 
                                         - That's the Official BS. Takes too long to download, anyhow. YOU tell me.  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 09:53 AM   #103 
                                         - Too much work for you? Try this link instead:  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 10:00 AM   #104 
                                         - Merc is ducking the question, because he fears being laughed at!  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 10:04 AM   #106 
                                         - Abe, I've provided you with the answer. Why won't you READ it?  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 10:08 AM   #107 
                                         - Merc: Why do you believe a destroyed plane could create a 9 ft. hole?  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 11:30 AM   #109 
                                         - Did you read the report I posted, Abe? It explains the physics  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 11:57 AM   #112 
                                         - Merc: Why won't you tell us why you believe a destroyed plane could...  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 12:23 PM   #115 
                                         - Because I don't find it "fantastical" at all. It's simple physics.  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 01:22 PM   #120 
                                         - So, a bunch of small pieces all hit the wall & created a circular hole?  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 02:58 PM   #122 
                                         - What do you know that civil engineers don't?  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 03:17 PM   #124 
                                         - I think most civil engineers would agree your claim is absurd to the max.  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 03:40 PM   #126 
                                         - You "think"? Fine, find a civil engineer that specializes in explosive or  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 03:48 PM   #129 
                                         - I am reading these posts , all of them and trying to have a open mind.  liberalnproud   Jul-12-04 07:53 PM   #142 
                                         - Actually, there were (at least in one case). Didn't you see the debris  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 08:03 PM   #143 
                                         - As a REINFORCED building, it's all the more UNlikely that a disintegrated  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 09:08 PM   #147 
                                         - Do you need a link to the report (that you refuse to read) again, Abe?  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 09:15 PM   #151 
                                         - Lib - check out this photo for exiting stuff  gbwarming   Jul-12-04 08:42 PM   #144 
                                         - exit holes  demodewd   Jul-12-04 08:44 PM   #145 
                                         - I just don't remember that?  liberalnproud   Jul-12-04 09:20 PM   #154 
                                         - That's in the report, Abe.  boloboffin   Jul-12-04 11:59 AM   #114 
                                         - bolo: Tell us why YOU believe a destroyed 757 could penetrate...  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 12:24 PM   #116 
                                         - How...  demodewd   Jul-12-04 12:28 PM   #117 
                                         - demodewd: They have a theory for that, too. It's the "magic 757 theory".  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 12:37 PM   #119 
                                         - Takes too long to download? One second is too long?  boloboffin   Jul-12-04 11:56 AM   #111 
                                         - Watch out for flying airplane parts! Look--- there's one. Bolo: Tell us  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 12:33 PM   #118 
                                         - Abe, you DO understand that it didn't have to be a single piece that  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 01:28 PM   #121 
                                         - Were they itty bitty pieces? Like BB size?  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 03:06 PM   #123 
                                         - From the report, I gather that much of the destruction was caused by  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 03:33 PM   #125 
                                         - Are you trying to crawdad away from that nine foot circular hole story?  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 03:45 PM   #127 
                                         - It's not MY story. It's a report by specialists who actually examined  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 03:52 PM   #131 
                                         - You say you don't "fully understand the physics". Which part?  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 04:39 PM   #135 
                                         - Abe, are your views really that simplistic?  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 04:54 PM   #136 
                                         - "merc" -- It's understandable that you want to change the subject  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 05:32 PM   #137 
                                         - I'm not changing the subject. Frankly, I'm happy to let this one run.  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 05:57 PM   #139 
                                         - THIS is what their very own atc says he believes happened at the Pentagon  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 06:52 PM   #140 
                                         - You haven't even read the report? Read it and get back to me.  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 07:03 PM   #141 
                                         - All I know is what YOU reported, and that was horse pucky.  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 09:02 PM   #146 
                                         - Abe, for the record  LARED   Jul-12-04 09:10 PM   #148 
                                         - You mean YOU also believe that crappola?  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 09:14 PM   #150 
                                         - Abe, being ignorant regarding the physical sciences  LARED   Jul-12-04 09:20 PM   #155 
                                         - "lared" -- So you believe that "crappola" too, about disintegrated planes?  Abe Linkman   Jul-13-04 07:21 AM   #163 
                                         - No, Abe. I can take it. Live up to your promise...  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 09:13 PM   #149 
                                         - I'm not interested in your propaganda report. YOU said YOU believe that  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 09:19 PM   #152 
                                         - So,you're refusing to even look at expert opinion of what REALLY happened?  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 09:30 PM   #157 
                                         - re: Civil Engineering Magazine  demodewd   Jul-12-04 09:19 PM   #153 
                                         - "Huge heat"  demodewd   Jul-12-04 09:29 PM   #156 
                                         - Nevertheless, these people were there. You weren't.  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 09:38 PM   #158 
                                         - the glaring fallacy  demodewd   Jul-12-04 09:58 PM   #159 
                                         - The DNA evidence has nothing to do with this report.  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 10:18 PM   #160 
                                         - assumption  demodewd   Jul-12-04 11:20 PM   #161 
                                         - The damage is still consistent with a 757, not an F-16.  MercutioATC   Jul-13-04 04:02 AM   #162 
                                         - The damage is consistent with a small plane, definitely not a 757.  Abe Linkman   Jul-13-04 07:28 AM   #164 
                                         - Have you read the report yet, Abe?  MercutioATC   Jul-13-04 12:35 PM   #166 
                                         - Use your eyes, silly goose. Do YOU see a hole big enough for a 757?  Abe Linkman   Jul-13-04 12:44 PM   #168 
                                         - Use YOUR eyes, Abe. Read the report.  MercutioATC   Jul-13-04 02:09 PM   #172 
                                         - Thanks for the Propaganda offer. I read an excerpt. That's enough.  Abe Linkman   Jul-13-04 02:54 PM   #176 
                                         - You read an EXCERPT? What, did your eyes expire before you could read  MercutioATC   Jul-13-04 03:06 PM   #178 
                                         - Some advice, Mercutio...  carlvs   Jul-13-04 12:43 PM   #167 
                                         - ANOTHER voice of moderation.  Abe Linkman   Jul-13-04 12:51 PM   #169 
                                         - Yes, he's free to leave...or stay and contribute.  MercutioATC   Jul-13-04 02:20 PM   #174 
                                         - See the pod?  demodewd   Jul-13-04 01:45 PM   #170 
                                         - dd, Is that the crappiest, jpeggiest photo available?  gbwarming   Jul-13-04 02:11 PM   #173 
                                         - re: compressed  demodewd   Jul-13-04 03:55 PM   #180 
                                         - Thanks for the link, carlvs :)  MercutioATC   Jul-13-04 02:04 PM   #171 
                                         - Your silly stories about a disintegrated 757 ARE fact-free  Abe Linkman   Jul-13-04 02:59 PM   #177 
                                         - "Fact-free"? How do you know, Abe? You refuse to read the report.  MercutioATC   Jul-13-04 03:09 PM   #179 
                                         - Did it change your mind about the absurd notion of a disintegtrated plane  Abe Linkman   Jul-13-04 08:35 AM   #165 
                                         - Geez...so just post a report that supports YOUR scenario, Abe.  MercutioATC   Jul-13-04 02:23 PM   #175 
                                         - Abe, you are lying, we explained that very often:  Bob Stanford   Jul-12-04 04:19 PM   #132 
                                         - I understand that you don't completely understand  demodewd   Jul-12-04 03:47 PM   #128 
                                         - And you do? At least the experts and I have the same position.  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 03:50 PM   #130 
                                         - You believe that a destroyed, disintegrated plane had one more trick.  Abe Linkman   Jul-12-04 04:28 PM   #133 
                                         - No, I believe that these experts know what they're talking about.  MercutioATC   Jul-12-04 04:32 PM   #134 
                                         - Why  objection   Jul-12-04 06:48 AM   #98 
                                      - Leave nothing to chance?  objection   Jul-12-04 06:52 AM   #99 
                                   - You have GOT to be kidding  gbwarming   Jul-11-04 09:56 PM   #88 
                 - YOU have a conclusion, but no facts. And that's a fact.  Abe Linkman   Jul-10-04 01:16 PM   #62 
                    - No, YOU have a conclusion, but no facts!  Robb   Jul-10-04 02:45 PM   #63 
                    - No wonder most people ignore your posts  Abe Linkman   Jul-10-04 04:13 PM   #64 
                       - Keep pluggin', Abe.  Robb   Jul-10-04 10:34 PM   #68 
                    - Why do you persist with this "second personality" stuff?  MercutioATC   Jul-10-04 09:44 PM   #66 
                       - YOU are claiming to know what happened, so YOU nust prove YOUR case.  Abe Linkman   Jul-10-04 11:09 PM   #70 
                          - I claim no such thing.  MercutioATC   Jul-10-04 11:17 PM   #71 
                             - So, you're back to taking the MIHOP leap?  Abe Linkman   Jul-10-04 11:41 PM   #72 
                                - ??? You're making less and less sense, Abe.  MercutioATC   Jul-10-04 11:51 PM   #73 
                                   - Maybe so, but YOU aren't making ANY sense.  Abe Linkman   Jul-11-04 08:27 AM   #74 
                                      - O.K., tell me if THIS makes sense:  MercutioATC   Jul-11-04 08:35 AM   #75 
     - Tell me how it is that I saw a 767  markses   Jul-16-04 11:06 PM   #183 
        - Flash  demodewd   Jul-16-04 11:12 PM   #185 
           - You got a ridiculous video analysis  markses   Jul-16-04 11:13 PM   #186 
              - special eyes  demodewd   Jul-16-04 11:25 PM   #188 
                 - My eyes are not special  markses   Jul-17-04 07:43 AM   #189 
  - It was a single jet entering throught the star gate  LARED   Jul-12-04 05:44 PM   #138 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC