John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-05-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #77 |
| 79. You flatter yourself, greyl. Always. It begs the question of what you are attempting to |
|
compensate for?
Your self glorification, your personal vanity has nothing to do with the topic of this forum or any other forum.
Perhaps DU needs an "I think I'm smarter than everyone else" forum where you could post your self tributes to.
|
| -Testing for explosives at WTC |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 07:58 AM |
#0 |
-
Actually, someone from the truth movement did do testing and found thermite residue. |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 09:33 AM |
#1 |
 -
Let me be the first to call bullshit |
LARED |
Feb-03-07 11:30 AM |
#7 |
  -
The only one who found it is the only one who looked. Apparently Dr. Greening |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:08 PM |
#10 |
 -
If I understand you correctly you made it up that someone has |
LARED |
Feb-03-07 02:25 PM |
#24 |
 -
What is thermite residue? |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 11:59 AM |
#8 |
 -
NIST test for explosives would be equally invalid |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 12:06 PM |
#9 |
  -
NIST presumably would have taken over their part of the investigation from the FBI. |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:21 PM |
#12 |
 -
Why do you assume that the FBI did not test for explosives? nt |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 02:00 PM |
#21 |
 -
Jones didn't find "thermite residue" |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 01:22 PM |
#13 |
-
I think you replied to the wrong post, William. But no matter. Greening at least attempts to |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:30 PM |
#16 |
-
No, I just replied to two of your posts at once |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 01:37 PM |
#18 |
-
if we use Occam's Razor, we see that |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:50 PM |
#20 |
-
Guess you didn't quite understand it |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 02:25 PM |
#23 |
-
Any rational person knows there were no explosives. n/t |
planeman |
Feb-03-07 09:36 AM |
#2 |
-
How would one know that? How do you know that the accused hijackers didn't |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 09:59 AM |
#3 |
-
Spellcheck time!! |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 10:00 AM |
#4 |
-
BeFree... |
wildbilln864 |
Feb-03-07 11:01 AM |
#5 |
-
Of course |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 11:21 AM |
#6 |
-
Too bad you don't have a logic checker |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 01:17 PM |
#11 |
-
I'm sure you don't have any evidence either, William. that's the point and the problem. |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:24 PM |
#14 |
 -
Yes, I do |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 01:29 PM |
#15 |
-
Please don't give them any ideas. |
Kingshakabobo |
Feb-03-07 01:35 PM |
#17 |
-
Can you document the authenticity of your video? How does the |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:37 PM |
#19 |
-
Authenticiy |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 02:04 PM |
#22 |
-
You and Buffy. Why is that so believeable....and funny. Well good luck with vampires! |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 03:33 PM |
#28 |
-
Yes |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 04:07 PM |
#30 |
 -
I'm just sorry that I was too late to save you |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 04:08 PM |
#32 |
-
Is this a personal attack? |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 04:32 PM |
#36 |
-
Of course not |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 04:44 PM |
#37 |
-
You are showing your particular |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 05:06 PM |
#42 |
-
Speaking of victims, Seger |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 06:51 PM |
#53 |
-
Speaking of bushco |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 07:22 PM |
#55 |
-
Yes it does |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 08:58 PM |
#59 |
-
A good example of this ability to buy whatever is offered is the pancake theory. |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 09:54 PM |
#63 |
-
Read the tea leaves tho |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 10:03 PM |
#64 |
-
What I think |
Hope2006 |
Feb-04-07 03:40 AM |
#67 |
-
What I think |
William Seger |
Feb-04-07 11:23 AM |
#70 |
-
Pancake theory? Oh, Jeez, you're turning into petgoat |
William Seger |
Feb-04-07 11:12 AM |
#69 |
-
Thanks! |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 04:19 PM |
#33 |
-
Yes. |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 03:12 PM |
#25 |
-
The fundamental flaw with your argument |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 03:21 PM |
#26 |
 -
Which proves the point |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 03:29 PM |
#27 |
-
Of course explosives were possible. |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 03:55 PM |
#29 |
-
No, we don't |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 04:08 PM |
#31 |
 -
I am not sure exactly what you mean ... |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 04:26 PM |
#34 |
-
No |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 05:29 PM |
#47 |
-
Again you are missing the point ... |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 08:33 PM |
#56 |
-
You don't need an investigation? |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 09:03 PM |
#60 |
-
I agree with you here (but, with reservation) |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 04:29 PM |
#35 |
 -
It is not a strawman |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 04:48 PM |
#38 |
 -
Those totally wacked-out theories were advanced... |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 04:59 PM |
#39 |
-
What I don't see is |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 05:03 PM |
#40 |
-
I think it comes down to what is more plausible.. |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 05:14 PM |
#43 |
-
Actually working |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 05:33 PM |
#48 |
-
Thanks for proving my point |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 06:05 PM |
#50 |
-
There are no answers. |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 06:10 PM |
#51 |
-
So every scientist in the world is scared? |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 08:41 PM |
#58 |
-
There have been scientists |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 09:09 PM |
#61 |
-
Just who has been fired? nt |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 10:12 PM |
#65 |
-
Uhhh, the scientists weren't the ones having difficulty... |
AZCat |
Feb-04-07 11:33 AM |
#71 |
-
Um... |
JackRiddler |
Feb-03-07 05:06 PM |
#41 |
-
I do agree with you |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 05:16 PM |
#44 |
-
But that is not what is getting across ... |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 05:25 PM |
#46 |
-
Tell you what... |
JackRiddler |
Feb-03-07 06:29 PM |
#52 |
-
How do you know what I do beyond this forum? |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 08:39 PM |
#57 |
-
Why don't you stop distancing the most valuable resources you have here? |
greyl |
Feb-05-07 10:30 AM |
#77 |
-
You flatter yourself, greyl. Always. It begs the question of what you are attempting to |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-05-07 10:47 AM |
#79 |
-
Huh? |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 05:21 PM |
#45 |
-
OK |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 05:52 PM |
#49 |
-
Not so |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 07:12 PM |
#54 |
-
Frankly |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 09:20 PM |
#62 |
-
Do you care what you believe? nt |
greyl |
Feb-04-07 02:10 AM |
#66 |
-
WTF? |
BeFree |
Feb-04-07 09:05 AM |
#68 |
-
Confused? |
greyl |
Feb-04-07 10:30 PM |
#72 |
-
That's better |
BeFree |
Feb-05-07 02:30 AM |
#73 |
-
One wouldn't know it by your posts here. |
greyl |
Feb-05-07 05:52 AM |
#74 |
-
You wince? |
BeFree |
Feb-05-07 10:16 AM |
#75 |
-
That's some weak ass argument you've got. |
greyl |
Feb-05-07 10:25 AM |
#76 |
-
Ooooh, getting nasty, eh? |
BeFree |
Feb-05-07 10:47 AM |
#78 |