You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: Authenticiy [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
William Seger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Authenticiy
It's obviously an amateur video, and according to the Google listing it's from the Camera Planet Archive at www.911archive.net. Do you think it's fake? Well, thanks for the opportunity to point out that "truthers" claim to have "overwhelming evidence" -- but of what, they can't quite seem to agree even among themselves -- and also claim that there is "no evidence supporting the official story" -- because all the physical and documentary evidence just must have been faked and all the eyewitnesses just must be wrong or flat out lying.

> How does the so called "meteor" with molten iron and fused cement relate to your hypothesis?

The "so called 'meteor'" also has scraps of paper that are still legible. (I'll dig up the photo that's a closer view than the one Jones used, if you haven't seen it, but I suspect you have.) That's because it isn't "molter iron" -- it's just the result of several floors worth of debris being compressed together under high pressure.

> How do the eyewitness reports of secondary explosions relate to your theory?

You mean the reports of sounds that sounded like "secondary explosions" when the building collapsed? What exactly does your vivid imagination tell you that a collapsing building should sound like? Or do you mean the reports of "secondary explosions" right after (one of) the planes hit the building? Some of those might have been jet fuel exploding, and at least one of those sounds might have been the elevator that fell when its cables were severed, and some other sounds might have been other debris that was knocked into the elevator shafts by the plane impact. But if any of those those were "secondary explosions" from demolition, why did it take at least another hour before the buildings fell.

> But you have no right to expect others to agree with you. I can't understand why that is so intolerable for you.

Oh, I have no delusions that "truthers" will ever agree with me -- I compare it to being bitten by a vampire -- and I don't have any problem "tolerating" that. But then again, that's not why I post here. I post here for much the same reason that I imagine Buffy fights the vampires.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC