LARED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-03-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 7. Let me be the first to call bullshit |
|
No one found thermite residue.
|
| -Testing for explosives at WTC |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 07:58 AM |
#0 |
 -
Actually, someone from the truth movement did do testing and found thermite residue. |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 09:33 AM |
#1 |
 -
Let me be the first to call bullshit |
LARED |
Feb-03-07 11:30 AM |
#7 |
 -
The only one who found it is the only one who looked. Apparently Dr. Greening |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:08 PM |
#10 |
| -
If I understand you correctly you made it up that someone has |
LARED |
Feb-03-07 02:25 PM |
#24 |
| -
What is thermite residue? |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 11:59 AM |
#8 |
| -
NIST test for explosives would be equally invalid |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 12:06 PM |
#9 |
| -
NIST presumably would have taken over their part of the investigation from the FBI. |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:21 PM |
#12 |
| -
Why do you assume that the FBI did not test for explosives? nt |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 02:00 PM |
#21 |
| -
Jones didn't find "thermite residue" |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 01:22 PM |
#13 |
| -
I think you replied to the wrong post, William. But no matter. Greening at least attempts to |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:30 PM |
#16 |
| -
No, I just replied to two of your posts at once |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 01:37 PM |
#18 |
| -
if we use Occam's Razor, we see that |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:50 PM |
#20 |
| -
Guess you didn't quite understand it |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 02:25 PM |
#23 |
| -
Any rational person knows there were no explosives. n/t |
planeman |
Feb-03-07 09:36 AM |
#2 |
| -
How would one know that? How do you know that the accused hijackers didn't |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 09:59 AM |
#3 |
| -
Spellcheck time!! |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 10:00 AM |
#4 |
| -
BeFree... |
wildbilln864 |
Feb-03-07 11:01 AM |
#5 |
| -
Of course |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 11:21 AM |
#6 |
| -
Too bad you don't have a logic checker |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 01:17 PM |
#11 |
| -
I'm sure you don't have any evidence either, William. that's the point and the problem. |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:24 PM |
#14 |
| -
Yes, I do |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 01:29 PM |
#15 |
| -
Please don't give them any ideas. |
Kingshakabobo |
Feb-03-07 01:35 PM |
#17 |
| -
Can you document the authenticity of your video? How does the |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 01:37 PM |
#19 |
| -
Authenticiy |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 02:04 PM |
#22 |
| -
You and Buffy. Why is that so believeable....and funny. Well good luck with vampires! |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 03:33 PM |
#28 |
| -
Yes |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 04:07 PM |
#30 |
| -
I'm just sorry that I was too late to save you |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 04:08 PM |
#32 |
| -
Is this a personal attack? |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 04:32 PM |
#36 |
| -
Of course not |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 04:44 PM |
#37 |
| -
You are showing your particular |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 05:06 PM |
#42 |
| -
Speaking of victims, Seger |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 06:51 PM |
#53 |
| -
Speaking of bushco |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 07:22 PM |
#55 |
| -
Yes it does |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 08:58 PM |
#59 |
| -
A good example of this ability to buy whatever is offered is the pancake theory. |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-03-07 09:54 PM |
#63 |
| -
Read the tea leaves tho |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 10:03 PM |
#64 |
| -
What I think |
Hope2006 |
Feb-04-07 03:40 AM |
#67 |
| -
What I think |
William Seger |
Feb-04-07 11:23 AM |
#70 |
| -
Pancake theory? Oh, Jeez, you're turning into petgoat |
William Seger |
Feb-04-07 11:12 AM |
#69 |
| -
Thanks! |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 04:19 PM |
#33 |
| -
Yes. |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 03:12 PM |
#25 |
| -
The fundamental flaw with your argument |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 03:21 PM |
#26 |
| -
Which proves the point |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 03:29 PM |
#27 |
| -
Of course explosives were possible. |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 03:55 PM |
#29 |
| -
No, we don't |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 04:08 PM |
#31 |
| -
I am not sure exactly what you mean ... |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 04:26 PM |
#34 |
| -
No |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 05:29 PM |
#47 |
| -
Again you are missing the point ... |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 08:33 PM |
#56 |
| -
You don't need an investigation? |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 09:03 PM |
#60 |
| -
I agree with you here (but, with reservation) |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 04:29 PM |
#35 |
| -
It is not a strawman |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 04:48 PM |
#38 |
| -
Those totally wacked-out theories were advanced... |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 04:59 PM |
#39 |
| -
What I don't see is |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 05:03 PM |
#40 |
| -
I think it comes down to what is more plausible.. |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 05:14 PM |
#43 |
| -
Actually working |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 05:33 PM |
#48 |
| -
Thanks for proving my point |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 06:05 PM |
#50 |
| -
There are no answers. |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 06:10 PM |
#51 |
| -
So every scientist in the world is scared? |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 08:41 PM |
#58 |
| -
There have been scientists |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 09:09 PM |
#61 |
| -
Just who has been fired? nt |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 10:12 PM |
#65 |
| -
Uhhh, the scientists weren't the ones having difficulty... |
AZCat |
Feb-04-07 11:33 AM |
#71 |
| -
Um... |
JackRiddler |
Feb-03-07 05:06 PM |
#41 |
| -
I do agree with you |
Hope2006 |
Feb-03-07 05:16 PM |
#44 |
| -
But that is not what is getting across ... |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 05:25 PM |
#46 |
| -
Tell you what... |
JackRiddler |
Feb-03-07 06:29 PM |
#52 |
| -
How do you know what I do beyond this forum? |
hack89 |
Feb-03-07 08:39 PM |
#57 |
| -
Why don't you stop distancing the most valuable resources you have here? |
greyl |
Feb-05-07 10:30 AM |
#77 |
| -
You flatter yourself, greyl. Always. It begs the question of what you are attempting to |
John Q. Citizen |
Feb-05-07 10:47 AM |
#79 |
| -
Huh? |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 05:21 PM |
#45 |
| -
OK |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 05:52 PM |
#49 |
| -
Not so |
William Seger |
Feb-03-07 07:12 PM |
#54 |
| -
Frankly |
BeFree |
Feb-03-07 09:20 PM |
#62 |
| -
Do you care what you believe? nt |
greyl |
Feb-04-07 02:10 AM |
#66 |
| -
WTF? |
BeFree |
Feb-04-07 09:05 AM |
#68 |
| -
Confused? |
greyl |
Feb-04-07 10:30 PM |
#72 |
| -
That's better |
BeFree |
Feb-05-07 02:30 AM |
#73 |
| -
One wouldn't know it by your posts here. |
greyl |
Feb-05-07 05:52 AM |
#74 |
| -
You wince? |
BeFree |
Feb-05-07 10:16 AM |
#75 |
| -
That's some weak ass argument you've got. |
greyl |
Feb-05-07 10:25 AM |
#76 |
| -
Ooooh, getting nasty, eh? |
BeFree |
Feb-05-07 10:47 AM |
#78 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread