ma2007
(221 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-24-07 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
But do not forget: those in exercise are just ADDITIONALLY.
They do NEVER replace those which are in QRA status. Airpolicing is NATO standard. No NATO state is allowed to use the jets in QRA (so applied to the security of the NATO air space) for exercises or any other use.
|
| -Andrews AFB seen by Google Earth |
ma2007 |
Jan-23-07 09:27 AM |
#0 |
 -
A date of when the photo was taken would help |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-23-07 10:14 AM |
#1 |
  -
How good to have experts around ... |
ma2007 |
Jan-23-07 11:10 AM |
#2 |
| -
At 9:26 AM |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-23-07 04:46 PM |
#13 |
| -
113th Wing |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-26-07 11:43 AM |
#53 |
| -
More info |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-23-07 11:49 AM |
#3 |
| -
hmmmm! |
wildbilln864 |
Jan-23-07 11:55 AM |
#4 |
| -
Not willing to be too intense, but ... |
ma2007 |
Jan-23-07 12:18 PM |
#5 |
| -
"Important is: they did not scramble" |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-23-07 12:48 PM |
#6 |
| -
Get nervous, huh ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-23-07 03:15 PM |
#7 |
| -
"The Andrews interceptor jets did not scramble in a due time." |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-23-07 04:05 PM |
#8 |
| -
Wrong question |
ma2007 |
Jan-23-07 04:36 PM |
#10 |
| -
The jets may not be scrambled, but your logic certainly is. |
MervinFerd |
Jan-23-07 04:45 PM |
#12 |
| -
Don`t you notice |
ma2007 |
Jan-24-07 04:06 AM |
#18 |
| -
See |
Big Pappa |
Jan-24-07 04:24 AM |
#19 |
| -
Can you show a single instance of an interception over US soil |
hack89 |
Jan-23-07 04:56 PM |
#15 |
| -
QRA besides Payne Stewart case |
ma2007 |
Jan-24-07 03:57 AM |
#17 |
| -
None of those were over land. |
hack89 |
Jan-24-07 06:23 AM |
#26 |
| -
NATO irrelevant ... |
ma2007 |
Jan-24-07 08:26 AM |
#29 |
| -
You don't understand |
hack89 |
Jan-24-07 04:14 PM |
#33 |
| -
As my local fire chief said... |
Ferry Fey |
Jan-31-07 08:40 AM |
#92 |
| -
This is ----SO----- 2002. |
MervinFerd |
Jan-23-07 04:11 PM |
#9 |
| -
No - you simply don't understand how the Air Force |
hack89 |
Jan-23-07 04:41 PM |
#11 |
| -
Have you seen ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-24-07 04:34 AM |
#20 |
| -
This is not a NATO issue |
hack89 |
Jan-24-07 06:20 AM |
#25 |
| -
NATO irrelevant ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-24-07 08:09 AM |
#28 |
| -
To add a very official link |
ma2007 |
Jan-24-07 12:45 PM |
#32 |
| -
I like your sense of humor ... |
hack89 |
Jan-24-07 04:16 PM |
#34 |
| -
I like your sense of humor too |
ma2007 |
Jan-25-07 03:37 AM |
#37 |
| -
I repeat |
ma2007 |
Jan-26-07 01:37 AM |
#41 |
| -
Nato my two cents |
raebrek |
Feb-06-07 06:59 AM |
#96 |
| -
OK, this one is too funny to ignore. |
achtung_circus |
Jan-24-07 07:34 PM |
#36 |
| -
WHAT IS YOUR ACCUSATION? WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO PROVE? |
MervinFerd |
Jan-23-07 04:48 PM |
#14 |
| -
Do YOU ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-24-07 04:44 AM |
#22 |
| -
Before 9-11 |
Big Pappa |
Jan-24-07 03:31 AM |
#16 |
| -
Andrews had two fighter jets up in the air that morning |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-24-07 04:43 AM |
#21 |
| -
yes, I forgot |
ma2007 |
Jan-24-07 04:50 AM |
#23 |
| -
In addition, a C130 took off from Andrews at 9:30 AM |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-24-07 05:19 AM |
#24 |
| -
Are you sure ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-24-07 07:56 AM |
#27 |
| -
Absolutely, no doubt |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-24-07 10:03 AM |
#30 |
| -
Again: are you sure ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-24-07 11:28 AM |
#31 |
| -
I agree |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-24-07 05:09 PM |
#35 |
| -
Finally found the video of O'Brien |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-25-07 09:46 PM |
#40 |
| -
Thank you |
ma2007 |
Jan-26-07 02:12 AM |
#43 |
| -
Who's a Liar? O'Brien? |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-26-07 11:51 AM |
#56 |
| -
Incorrect and misleading |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-26-07 11:49 AM |
#55 |
| -
Practice flights |
Big Pappa |
Jan-25-07 03:40 AM |
#38 |
| -
Yes. So what ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-25-07 04:09 AM |
#39 |
| -
So what? |
Big Pappa |
Jan-26-07 02:04 AM |
#42 |
| -
What to do ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-26-07 02:36 AM |
#44 |
| -
New York |
Big Pappa |
Jan-26-07 04:01 AM |
#45 |
| -
Wrong |
ma2007 |
Jan-26-07 04:19 AM |
#47 |
| -
Even F-15s run out of fuel. |
boloboffin |
Jan-26-07 11:05 AM |
#49 |
| -
Good example of the confusion of the day |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-26-07 11:25 AM |
#51 |
| -
All rubbish |
ma2007 |
Jan-26-07 12:34 PM |
#58 |
| -
After bothering to read all this |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-29-07 10:49 AM |
#76 |
| -
Are |
Big Pappa |
Jan-29-07 08:56 PM |
#79 |
| -
No. I am not saying that. |
ma2007 |
Jan-30-07 03:38 AM |
#83 |
| -
Having spent |
Big Pappa |
Jan-30-07 03:58 AM |
#84 |
| -
Like I said |
Big Pappa |
Jan-28-07 08:27 PM |
#72 |
| -
By the way, |
Big Pappa |
Jan-26-07 04:16 AM |
#46 |
| -
Good - so you are a witness |
ma2007 |
Jan-26-07 04:25 AM |
#48 |
| -
Without a source that doesn't tell us much |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-26-07 11:16 AM |
#50 |
| -
What are you refering to ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-26-07 11:35 AM |
#52 |
| -
Food? Beer. n/t |
ma2007 |
Jan-27-07 02:21 AM |
#61 |
| -
yet the air force managed to intercept planes on |
rman |
Jan-30-07 06:29 AM |
#86 |
| -
Check |
Big Pappa |
Feb-05-07 11:04 PM |
#95 |
| -
Wrong again |
ma2007 |
Feb-06-07 12:46 PM |
#97 |
| -
Your |
Big Pappa |
Feb-06-07 09:34 PM |
#99 |
| -
So poor |
ma2007 |
Feb-07-07 11:01 AM |
#100 |
| -
There is no need to end a thread at post #100 |
ma2007 |
Feb-13-07 11:29 AM |
#101 |
| -
Andrews was NOT an alert site |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-26-07 11:45 AM |
#54 |
| -
Plus, this picture was taken in the last 4 years. |
boloboffin |
Jan-26-07 12:10 PM |
#57 |
| -
Bolo, are you seriously telling us |
ma2007 |
Jan-26-07 12:42 PM |
#59 |
| -
You are using a post-9/11 picture to talk about pre-9/11 conditions. |
boloboffin |
Jan-27-07 04:42 PM |
#65 |
| -
Sense and miracle |
ma2007 |
Jan-28-07 03:20 AM |
#66 |
| -
Present your research. n/t |
boloboffin |
Jan-28-07 03:50 AM |
#67 |
| -
No. It is you who makes the allegation |
ma2007 |
Jan-28-07 04:24 AM |
#68 |
| -
You need to get over yourself in a real hurry. |
boloboffin |
Jan-28-07 11:56 AM |
#69 |
| -
Bolo - even a child |
ma2007 |
Jan-28-07 12:44 PM |
#70 |
| -
Yes. You did research. You presented an OP based on that research. Present it. n/t |
boloboffin |
Jan-28-07 12:46 PM |
#71 |
| -
Tell us something new. |
ma2007 |
Jan-26-07 12:51 PM |
# |
| -
If you admit it why do you keep mentioning |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-27-07 07:02 AM |
#62 |
| -
Do I understand correctly ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-27-07 07:37 AM |
#63 |
| -
More or less |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-29-07 10:43 AM |
#75 |
| -
Oh. Geography. |
ma2007 |
Jan-29-07 04:07 PM |
#77 |
| -
Otis was an alert base on 9-11!!! |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-29-07 05:32 PM |
#78 |
| -
Shall I laugh ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-30-07 03:14 AM |
#81 |
| -
You sir are a Troll. |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-31-07 08:14 AM |
#91 |
| -
Oh. Basics. Peaches are not apples. Otis is not Andrews. |
ma2007 |
Feb-05-07 03:35 PM |
#94 |
| -
Oui |
vincent_vega_lives |
Feb-06-07 05:30 PM |
#98 |
| -
Tell us something new. |
ma2007 |
Jan-26-07 12:51 PM |
#60 |
| -
Why not the official website ? |
ma2007 |
Jan-27-07 03:41 PM |
#64 |
| -
NORAD lied |
Contrite |
Jan-29-07 12:16 AM |
#73 |
| -
"This did not happen." |
ma2007 |
Jan-29-07 02:37 AM |
#74 |
| -
Trying |
Big Pappa |
Jan-29-07 09:00 PM |
#80 |
| -
No. Nothing to prove. |
ma2007 |
Jan-30-07 03:25 AM |
#82 |
| -
I'm not so sure that CTers are equally eager as OCTers |
rman |
Jan-30-07 06:25 AM |
#85 |
| -
"anyone who does not buy the official story" |
ma2007 |
Jan-30-07 09:10 AM |
#87 |
| -
I think that does not explain how it is that |
rman |
Jan-30-07 10:46 AM |
#88 |
| -
Very well |
ma2007 |
Jan-30-07 11:27 AM |
#89 |
| -
Fair enough |
rman |
Jan-30-07 01:14 PM |
#90 |
| -
If I do not disagree you are not embarressed too much ? |
ma2007 |
Feb-05-07 03:13 PM |
#93 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread