You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: You're right, semantics are NOT important. So I suggest we use this form: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. You're right, semantics are NOT important. So I suggest we use this form:
Edited on Sun Jan-14-07 07:52 PM by file83
Hello, my name is xxx. I am interested in 9/11 conspiracy recipes and I am skeptical of the "official version of ingredients".

I learned about the "official recipe" by _____________________ (insert details as appropriate, such as "reading the Joy Of Cooking/Rachel Ray's Easy Meals/Jamie Oliver's The Naked Chef; reading epicurious.com; watching "The Iron Chef"; etc etc").

The ingredients that I have seen do not seem to add up to the meal that says that 19 hijackers brought the world's most powerful country to its knees.

I am testing the recipe that ______________________.

The strongest ingredients towards this recipe, in my opinion, is:

A) ___________________________ (Source: ______________)
B) ___________________________ (Source: ______________)
C) ___________________________ (Source: ______________)
etc.
(fill in the blanks with your choice of spices!)

I wish to find out the tastiest meal, and if these ingredients can be proved to be yummy or repulsive, I will understand that I have been mistaken in thinking my recipe and/or sources were cooked correctly.

Sincerely,
xxx.

That should work. Afterall, it's just semantics, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -A Suggested Form for Serious Consideration of Conspiracy Theories boloboffin  Jan-13-07 10:30 PM   #0 
  - What would be...  wildbilln864   Jan-13-07 10:53 PM   #1 
  - Do you have any problems with answering any of those questions, wildbilln864? n/t  boloboffin   Jan-13-07 11:04 PM   #2 
  - Anyway, here ya go...  wildbilln864   Jan-13-07 11:04 PM   #3 
     - next...  wildbilln864   Jan-13-07 11:06 PM   #4 
     - OK.  boloboffin   Jan-13-07 11:30 PM   #8 
        - Let's see an example of how an expert such as yourself would use this tool,  John Q. Citizen   Jan-13-07 11:34 PM   #9 
        - As I replied below,  boloboffin   Jan-13-07 11:40 PM   #11 
        - also...  wildbilln864   Jan-13-07 11:56 PM   #12 
        - But enough people know about PNAC that precludes the Bush/PNAC crowd from being a "cabal".  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 01:54 PM   #31 
        - The problem here is you are  LARED   Jan-14-07 06:53 AM   #24 
  - One does not "test" a theory. One might test a hypothesis.  file83   Jan-13-07 11:18 PM   #5 
  - an excellent assessment, file83...  wildbilln864   Jan-13-07 11:25 PM   #7 
  - That's just semantics, file83.  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 01:51 PM   #30 
     - You're right, semantics are NOT important. So I suggest we use this form:  file83   Jan-14-07 07:51 PM   #44 
        - Get serious. n/t  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 07:58 PM   #45 
  - It seems reasonable except it would need to be very long and detailed  John Q. Citizen   Jan-13-07 11:24 PM   #6 
  - You don't have to stop at C...  boloboffin   Jan-13-07 11:38 PM   #10 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-14-07 12:01 AM   #13 
     - Your reasons for not submitting to the same process is weak, Bolo.  John Q. Citizen   Jan-14-07 12:08 AM   #14 
        - JQC, you don't know my life.  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 12:36 AM   #17 
  - It's OCTs who should have to jump through extra hoops,  dailykoff   Jan-14-07 12:21 AM   #15 
  - Not at all.  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 12:37 AM   #18 
  - In fact, this is what I'll submit a form on.  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 01:53 AM   #20 
  - I think all participants who "buy in" to the form should be held equally  John Q. Citizen   Jan-14-07 06:24 AM   #23 
  - I'm a little sick of that nonsense  LARED   Jan-14-07 07:10 AM   #25 
  - No - it is you that is providing cover for the Bush administration.  hack89   Jan-14-07 09:28 AM   #26 
     - Only in the self-serving pretzel logic of OCTs. (n/t)  dailykoff   Jan-14-07 03:11 PM   #34 
  - p.s. "JREF" is a site run by a magician, not a journal. (n/t)  dailykoff   Jan-14-07 12:25 AM   #16 
  - A magician and a noted skeptic.  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 12:38 AM   #19 
  - You should join the conspiracy theory forum there dailykoff  G Hawes   Jan-14-07 03:41 AM   #21 
  - I'm not so easily impressed. Or so technically inclined. My interests lie more  John Q. Citizen   Jan-14-07 06:07 AM   #22 
  - That's one of the more intellectually dishonest OR ignorant statements I've seen here.  Kingshakabobo   Jan-14-07 10:55 AM   #27 
     - Is he a magician? Yes. Is JREF a journal? No.  dailykoff   Jan-14-07 03:09 PM   #33 
        - Look, you. Point out any post of mine that claims JREF is a journal.  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 03:29 PM   #35 
           - Try again, you. I said "trade on," not "claim." (n/t)  dailykoff   Jan-14-07 03:43 PM   #36 
              - p.s. I'm out of this nutty thread which will be my first ever to ignore.  dailykoff   Jan-14-07 03:47 PM   #37 
              - Can't hack being asked for actual evidence?  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 04:06 PM   #40 
              - That is utter crap.  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 04:06 PM   #39 
  - Again I'll ask Bolo...  wildbilln864   Jan-14-07 10:58 AM   #28 
  - I've told you: I believe the same things about 9/11 that Dennis Kucinich does. n/t  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 01:44 PM   #29 
     - Does Dennis believe in the ' lone cadre theory?'  John Q. Citizen   Jan-14-07 03:56 PM   #38 
        - Why don't you ask him? n/t  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 04:07 PM   #41 
           - I'm asking you because you said you and Dennis are of one mind. So what  John Q. Citizen   Jan-14-07 04:11 PM   #42 
  - On a recently deleted thread, Bryan Sacks posted a link to a Vince Foster murder CT page.  boloboffin   Jan-14-07 02:58 PM   #32 
  - out and out endorsement is strong. Good presentation of evidence, better  Bryan Sacks   Jan-14-07 04:32 PM   #43 
  - Locking  Lithos   Jan-14-07 08:00 PM   #46 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC