angstlessk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-10-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 20. You are correct .. the official story is not a 'theory'..it is an outright lie! |
|
btw... I have never iggiyd anyone ever...
|
| -How will the new "Ignore" function affect the 9/11 Forum? |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 01:01 PM |
#0 |
-
I predict |
Hope2006 |
Jan-10-07 01:19 PM |
#1 |
 -
In Skinner's thread on the fuction ... |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 01:28 PM |
#2 |
-
Only in response to being placed on that "non-OCTer's" block list, Hope. |
boloboffin |
Jan-10-07 01:44 PM |
#3 |
 -
Do you identify with OCTabots? |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 01:55 PM |
#4 |
-
I'm not even an OCTer. |
boloboffin |
Jan-10-07 02:01 PM |
#5 |
-
You are correct .. the official story is not a 'theory'..it is an outright lie! |
angstlessk |
Jan-10-07 04:49 PM |
#20 |
-
OMGWTFBBQ! |
boloboffin |
Jan-10-07 04:59 PM |
#22 |
-
I agree, "official theory" makes it sound too legitimate.eom |
mirandapriestly |
Jan-10-07 10:10 PM |
#42 |
-
Could happen |
Hope2006 |
Jan-10-07 02:18 PM |
#7 |
-
For once, perhaps, discussion will be able to "build up" |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 03:10 PM |
#9 |
-
Maybe you should take note of the moderator sticky at the top of this forum. |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-10-07 04:03 PM |
#10 |
 -
It's the way certain people disagree |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 04:06 PM |
#12 |
-
How can you tell what is a sincere and what is an insincere disagreement? |
salvorhardin |
Jan-10-07 08:45 PM |
#30 |
-
Your model is off |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 09:35 PM |
#37 |
-
You didn't answer the question |
salvorhardin |
Jan-10-07 09:40 PM |
#38 |
-
Rhetorical strategy |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 09:45 PM |
#39 |
-
What a crock |
William Seger |
Jan-11-07 08:41 AM |
#47 |
-
"what a crock" is not a rational argument |
HamdenRice |
Jan-11-07 09:55 AM |
#49 |
-
Not a rational argument |
Hope2006 |
Jan-11-07 03:23 PM |
#53 |
-
I hadn't heard the term "OCTabot" until I read this thread |
Hope2006 |
Jan-10-07 04:06 PM |
#11 |
-
Yes, I noticed who is most upset about the function |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 04:08 PM |
#13 |
-
I look forward to a dynamic change. n/t |
Hope2006 |
Jan-10-07 04:13 PM |
#18 |
-
Very, very upset, it seems |
Hope2006 |
Jan-11-07 02:04 PM |
#50 |
-
The vitriol is amazing |
HamdenRice |
Jan-11-07 02:17 PM |
#51 |
-
I agree that the change may well be permanent |
Hope2006 |
Jan-11-07 03:07 PM |
#52 |
-
The name-calling goes both ways ....'OCTabots' indeed. |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-10-07 02:02 PM |
#6 |
-
The Ignore function is lame |
vincent_vega_lives |
Jan-10-07 03:04 PM |
#8 |
-
Who are "OCTabots?" |
Anarcho-Socialist |
Jan-10-07 04:09 PM |
#14 |
 -
To name names could be considered a personal attack |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 04:10 PM |
#15 |
-
Gosh, would it now? |
Anarcho-Socialist |
Jan-10-07 04:11 PM |
#16 |
-
But not naming names slanders anyone you disagree with. |
boloboffin |
Jan-10-07 04:13 PM |
#17 |
 -
Did you read the definition in post 4? |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 04:15 PM |
#19 |
-
Outright hypocrisy, sir. |
boloboffin |
Jan-10-07 04:57 PM |
#21 |
-
You can engage in "name calling" all you want |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 05:31 PM |
#23 |
-
I'm sorry. Do you identify with "outright hypocrisy"? n/t |
boloboffin |
Jan-10-07 06:47 PM |
#26 |
-
What are the characteristics of an OCTabot? |
salvorhardin |
Jan-10-07 08:47 PM |
#32 |
-
see post 4 nt |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 09:00 PM |
#34 |
-
I think Skinner is trying to finally kill the 911 forum. nt |
hack89 |
Jan-10-07 05:51 PM |
#24 |
 -
If that's the case I doubt it will work |
LARED |
Jan-10-07 06:00 PM |
#25 |
-
You have this habit of broad brushing people - |
LARED |
Jan-10-07 07:36 PM |
#27 |
 -
Your misguided opinion |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 08:31 PM |
#29 |
  -
You are course are entitled to your opinion |
LARED |
Jan-10-07 08:45 PM |
#31 |
 -
I demonstrated a fact, not an opinion |
HamdenRice |
Jan-10-07 08:59 PM |
#33 |
 -
I disagree. |
AZCat |
Jan-10-07 09:24 PM |
#35 |
  -
Hey! What am I? Chopped liver? n/t |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-10-07 10:01 PM |
#40 |
 -
You didn't post in that particular thread. |
AZCat |
Jan-10-07 10:06 PM |
#41 |
 -
Got it. I thought you mean this thread... |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-10-07 10:16 PM |
#43 |
 -
Jerry liked Terrence McKenna, Kingshakabobo |
Bryan Sacks |
Jan-11-07 07:51 PM |
#66 |
 -
Don't you blaspheme, don't you blaspheme! |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-11-07 09:09 PM |
#67 |
 -
R-E-S-P-E-C-T |
Bryan Sacks |
Jan-11-07 10:55 PM |
#69 |
 -
. |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-11-07 10:57 PM |
#70 |
 -
Demonstrated a fact? Hardly. (n/t) |
LARED |
Jan-10-07 09:31 PM |
#36 |
 -
re: boring echo chambers |
tenseconds |
Jan-11-07 05:50 PM |
#57 |
-
The funny thing is... |
AZCat |
Jan-10-07 07:50 PM |
#28 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-11-07 01:48 AM |
#44 |
  -
Not that Skinner would ever do it... |
AZCat |
Jan-11-07 08:33 AM |
#46 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-11-07 09:27 AM |
#48 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-11-07 06:22 PM |
#59 |
  -
This is quite true...look at all the deleted posts in this thread. n/t |
Hope2006 |
Jan-11-07 09:22 PM |
#68 |
 -
For the record... |
AZCat |
Jan-11-07 07:09 PM |
#64 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-11-07 10:58 PM |
#71 |
-
They (and Skinner & the boys) are the final word on what's acceptable. |
AZCat |
Jan-11-07 11:08 PM |
#72 |
 -
Delete |
Hope2006 |
Jan-11-07 11:38 PM |
#75 |
-
Yup!! |
Hope2006 |
Jan-11-07 11:35 PM |
#74 |
-
I think it may encourage more people to participate in the forum. |
Progs Rock |
Jan-11-07 02:52 AM |
#45 |
 -
I agree |
leftstreet |
Jan-11-07 03:53 PM |
#55 |
  -
It is true |
Hope2006 |
Jan-11-07 06:23 PM |
#60 |
 -
Interesting point |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-11-07 06:16 PM |
#58 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-11-07 06:27 PM |
#61 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-11-07 06:41 PM |
#62 |
-
Thank you for sharing your experiences |
Hope2006 |
Jan-11-07 06:49 PM |
#63 |
-
Testing |
Hope2006 |
Jan-11-07 11:33 PM |
#73 |
-
I think that it will turn this forum ... |
SidDithers |
Jan-11-07 03:30 PM |
#54 |
-
Conspiracy theorists |
Marie26 |
Jan-11-07 04:34 PM |
#56 |
 -
There are plenty of other places on the Internet |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-11-07 07:39 PM |
#65 |
-
Of course there are |
G Hawes |
Jan-12-07 02:06 AM |
#78 |
-
As long as they can debate in a civil manner |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-12-07 11:48 AM |
#84 |
-
The effect is already apparent |
canetoad |
Jan-12-07 12:36 AM |
#76 |
 -
Those aren't comprehensive lists. |
AZCat |
Jan-12-07 02:01 AM |
#77 |
  -
The sarcasm smilie is redundant, don't you think? |
canetoad |
Jan-12-07 02:15 AM |
#80 |
 -
I was sincere. |
AZCat |
Jan-12-07 02:18 AM |
#81 |
 -
Yeah, it is apparent, who would want to |
mirandapriestly |
Jan-14-07 04:02 PM |
#91 |
-
If this were a bar |
canetoad |
Jan-14-07 05:07 PM |
#94 |
-
I love the new ignore function. |
sagesnow |
Jan-12-07 02:08 AM |
#79 |
-
Hear no evil, see no evil |
Ferry Fey |
Jan-12-07 05:25 AM |
#82 |
-
Common sense will become |
jschurchin |
Jan-12-07 08:03 AM |
#83 |
-
One thing I hadn't counted on |
Hope2006 |
Jan-13-07 06:19 PM |
#85 |
-
I think the new strategy is to hijack the whole forum. |
dailykoff |
Jan-14-07 01:05 AM |
#86 |
 -
Yes they are |
Hope2006 |
Jan-14-07 07:02 AM |
#87 |
 -
At the time of this posting... |
SidDithers |
Jan-14-07 09:50 AM |
#88 |
 -
The quality of new OCT threads: potatoes and cigarettes brought down towers |
HamdenRice |
Jan-14-07 10:44 AM |
#89 |
  -
Many of the OCT threads |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-14-07 04:18 PM |
#92 |
 -
Kicking threads is one thing |
Hope2006 |
Jan-14-07 04:50 PM |
#93 |
 -
You might want to check out the king of Old Thread kickers... |
SidDithers |
Jan-14-07 12:47 PM |
#90 |
-
It appears that the flamebait threads |
Hope2006 |
Jan-14-07 05:20 PM |
#95 |
 -
It's the cyber-stamping |
canetoad |
Jan-14-07 06:48 PM |
#96 |
-
LOL and 1/2!! |
Hope2006 |
Jan-14-07 07:05 PM |
#97 |
-
Locking |
Lithos |
Jan-14-07 08:01 PM |
#98 |